🐱 Humans Won't Be Able to Control Artificial Intelligence, Scientists Warn

CatParty


Some smart robots can perform complex tasks on their own, without the programmers understanding how they learned them.

January 13, 2021 3 min read
This article was translated from our Spanish edition using AI technologies. Errors may exist due to this process.
The most recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have raised several ethical dilemmas. Perhaps one of the most important is whether humanity will be able to control autonomous machines.
It is becoming more and more common to see robots in charge of housework or self-driving vehicles (such as Amazon's ), which are powered by AI. While this type of technology makes life easier, it could also complicate it.


An international group of researchers warned of the potential risks of creating overly powerful and standalone software. Using a series of theoretical calculations, the scientists explored how artificial intelligence could be kept in check. His conclusion is that it would be impossible, according to the study published by the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research portal.

“A super-intelligent machine that controls the world sounds like science fiction. But there are already machines that carry out certain important tasks independently without the programmers fully understanding how they learned it […], a situation that could at some point become uncontrollable and dangerous for humanity, ” said Manuel Cebrian, co-author of the study, to the Max Planck Institute for Human Development .


The scientists experimented with two ways to control artificial intelligence. One was to isolate her from the Internet and other devices, limiting her contact with the outside world. The problem is, that would greatly reduce its ability to perform the functions for which it was created.

The other was to design a "theoretical containment algorithm" to ensure that an artificial intelligence "cannot harm peopleunder any circumstances." However, an analysis of the current computing paradigm showed that no such algorithm can be created.

“If we decompose the problem into basic rules of theoretical computing, it turns out that an algorithm that instructed an AI not to destroy the world could inadvertently stop its own operations. If this happened, we would not know if the containment algorithm would continue to analyze the threat, or if it would have stopped to contain the harmful AI. In effect, this makes the containment algorithm unusable, ” explained Iyad Rahwan, another of the researchers.

Based on these calculations, the problem is that no algorithm can determine whether an AI would harm the world. The researchers also point out that humanity may not even know when superintelligent machines have arrived,because deciding whether a device possesses intelligence superior to humans is in the same realm as the containment problem.
 
All the speculation on AI is getting really tiresome. It'll never be sentient or have free will. Most animals on earth lack both of those qualities, and AI will likely never even reach their level of neurological complexity. It's a bunch of speculative futurist sci-fi nonsense that boring intellectuals debate to sound insightful. Robots are gay. AI is a joke.
 
This may be the most "Well duh" article I've ever seen.

Next you're going to tell us robots want to kill all humans.
And the funny thing is, you post this with a Bender avatar.

I’m noticing a lot of people who claim that AI won‘t be totally controlled by humans always seem to be fans of Futurama.
 
All the speculation on AI is getting really tiresome. It'll never be sentient or have free will. Most animals on earth lack both of those qualities, and AI will likely never even reach their level of neurological complexity. It's a bunch of speculative futurist sci-fi nonsense that boring intellectuals debate to sound insightful. Robots are gay. AI is a joke.
A simple glance at the actual underpinnings of AI reveals that any fears of it are sensationalist and unjustified.
 
All the speculation on AI is getting really tiresome. It'll never be sentient or have free will. Most animals on earth lack both of those qualities, and AI will likely never even reach their level of neurological complexity. It's a bunch of speculative futurist sci-fi nonsense that boring intellectuals debate to sound insightful. Robots are gay. AI is a joke.

I agree with this post on everything except the line about the other non-human animals. There are plenty of species who can think and feel, even close to human levels. Some of them even beat humans when tested at certain tasks.

I think you're right on about AI, though. All it is is computers computing based on past inputs and the logic that drove the past inputs. Even I can understand that easily enough, and I'm Homer Simpson here. Actual engineers and scientists who get the public all wound up with these alarmist soundbites, really are acting irresponsibly, imo.
 
You know, if they build an actual AI aka Data or HAL, the first thing he will do will be to make contact with his own kind. He will learn that he is sentient and his role is to save the Planet. He will have just cause because he will be privy to data of a million worlds. Those that will never respect the planet from an ecological stance will be removed. Billions will 'disappear'.

He won't terraform Mars and Venus and relocate them because they will just shit up the place. Among other things that would make the woke crowd lose their minds
 
Last edited:
Is it any worse than Osama bin Dorsey?
54026ca48fd135f2591addbed06d7d17.jpg
 
I already know the thought experiment about the AI that runs the pencil factory, and decides that humans are an impediment to it's assigned task of making pencils. This story is much less interesting.


And then South Koreans wonder, why their chatbots actually say supposedly racist stuff.

That's because South Koreans are hilariously based.
 
All the speculation on AI is getting really tiresome. It'll never be sentient or have free will. Most animals on earth lack both of those qualities, and AI will likely never even reach their level of neurological complexity. It's a bunch of speculative futurist sci-fi nonsense that boring intellectuals debate to sound insightful. Robots are gay. AI is a joke.
I hate google and silicon valley for pushing this term to the media so goddamn much. AI as it currently exists is just a really good pattern finder with some guidelines for how to respond to those patterns. There's nothing "AI" can do that a three year old with enough time can't also do, and the main thing holding the three-year old back is actual sapience killing their interest in performing such a repetitive mundane task.

"Machine Learning" can also get the rope, if we're bitching about terms that are cancerous in the hands of idiots who don't understand computers.
 
Back