Hyper-Elites Are Desperate For a Recession Because They Want to Buy Your Assets for Cheap - Recessions are part of the business plan for the great reset to serfdom


A giant recession is coming.

Can you feel it?

Corporatist governments are now predicting it will be the worst recession since the Great Depression.

Central banksters are practically gleeful in their interest-rate-raising announcements, framing themselves as the saviors of the economy in the fight against the very inflation they caused in the first place.

For those keeping score…
  1. First, the Feds printed $16 trillion (that’s $16,000,000,000,000) in two short years, over $6 trillion of which ended up in the pockets of the rich.
  2. Price inflation started to soar as corporations raised their prices, leaving corporations and the rich with trillions in hard cash that they desperately want to spend.
  3. Now that the increased cost of living is destroying the working class, everyday working people are demanding higher wages, and corporations absolutely hate paying people to produce 100% of their profits.
The elites believe you have too much wealth and power to say no right now — so it’s time to squeeze it out of you and put you back in your place:

  • That’s why their media outlets are currently blaming labor for inflation.
  • That’s why their politicians are currently putting forward anti-freedom laws, like Ontario’s new law that will fine people $4000 for every day they go on strike.
  • That’s why their politicians are attacking public budgets with austerity, stripping old people and children and working people of the shared services that they are paying for.
And above all, rather than doing the moral and mathematically-sound thing — taxing back the money from the elites who benefited most from the handout — corporate politicians are now blitzkrieging the people’s economy with interest rate hikes and crippling budget cuts.

Interest rate hikes in particular have all sorts of wonderful benefits for the parasite class:
  • It means we have to pay private banksters more money to service the national debt which was largely created by corporatist politicians.
  • It ensures banksters enjoy record profits from all that extra unearned interest they take off of us.
  • It ensures we can afford to buy less, which decreases purchasing demand, which counterintuitive is a good thing for corporations when they can’t deliver in times of supply chain upheaval — never mind our health, safety, and well-being.
  • It ensures that millions of people will lose their jobs as the economy contracts and small businesses shutter. This is great news for mega-corporations, who would otherwise see their stock price suffer due to paying real living wages. But with millions of people freshly out of work, laborers who are desperate for work will compete against each other, thus keeping wages lower than the cost of living.
  • Best of all, interest rate hikes ensure millions of people no longer qualify for loans and mortgages, because there’s no way they could pay back the elevated interest payments.
All of this will have the great and glorious cumulative effect of plunging the nation into a brutal and prolonged recession.

The elite-owned-and-controlled Fed is trying to create a recession.

(The British Cons have already succeeded in ramming Britons into recession and millions of them are now choosing between heating and eating.)

When the American RecessionTM hits, asset prices will fall — particularly the price of houses as millions of families are kicked to the curb.

But there will be no working-class people who can afford to buy those houses thanks to the elevated monthly payment costs.

Cue the B-word: Bailouts.

Once the billionaires and banksters and monopolies feel that the recession has gone on long enough and can go no lower without sparking a murderous purge of those in power, they’ll once again change their tune and decide it’s time for an economic recovery.

The Fed will — on your behalf, of course — create trillions by buying securities from their bankster buddies and depositing the funds with their bankster buddies. Those banks will then do two things with all that money:
  1. They might buy up cheap assets, including your former home (typically in the form of mortgage-backed securities.)
  2. They will definitely loan money to their corporate buddies, who will use it to buy up cheap assets, including your former home.
The corporate-controlled media will then kick into overdrive, excitedly announcing that “the economy” is in recovery… because stock prices are rising and house prices are rising.

But you and I will know the truth.

Just like 2008, 2023 will have been yet another round won by the parasite anti-economy at the cost of the real economy.
  • Millions will lose their life savings and declare bankruptcy.
  • Tens of thousands of businesses will close their doors, giving monopolies more power over suppliers, employees, and consumers.
  • Millions will lose their homes and become rent-trapped for life — paying so much to parasite land-lorders that they’ll never be able to save up enough of a down payment to ever own again.
And what will become of those poor, dear, sweet billionaires and their mega-corporations who engineered this whole “crisis” from the start?

Armed with trillions in tax-payer money, they will hoover up trillions of dollars of dirt-cheap assets — our houses and land and natural resources — and then watch the value of their portfolios soar as asset prices recover.

This pump will continue until the elites feel we’re again at a point where a recession is needed to free up more assets for the eating.

Remember, friends, you and your children are just fodder. You exist to apply time and energy and effort and creativity to natural resources in order to create wealth for the richest people in human history.

Your hopes, dreams, aspirations, wellbeing, and freedom do not matter.

You do not matter.

You never did.
 
This calls for violence and not the gay burn down mom and pops store type. I mean some solidarity riot type of shit. In Minecraft at the very least.

This what they fear. Occupy Wall Street scared them because they could see that in a matter of months the Black Panthers and the KKK would have been marching arm in arm to drag them out of their mansions and into the streets.
If that didn’t happen before 2016, I’m not sure it’ll ever happen in the US. Even with the feeling that the media and the state and various other places are working in collusion with each other, I feel American Troubles would be wishful thinking.

Never underestimate paranoia over traps and honeypots, or what people will put up with when they have something to lose.

Tyranny is doing what they can to make this world (more of) a hell.

For the "little people" it seems they want to turn into "serfs", that is.
I’d say leftists are more willing to put up with a lot. The truckers was just the first time we saw someone reveal their breaking point. And even then, there wasn’t calls for people to hang from streetlights and lampposts before you loot their house.
 
If that didn’t happen before 2016, I’m not sure it’ll ever happen in the US. Even with the feeling that the media and the state and various other places are working in collusion with each other, I feel American Troubles would be wishful thinking.

Never underestimate paranoia over traps and honeypots, or what people will put up with when they have something to lose.
Boomergeddon was cringe and anyone willing to put their life or freedom on the line for well documented grifter le orange man is a complete retard, but it was nice to see the cockroaches on Capitol Hill terrified for once. They should always be scared of what the electorate will do if they sell them out, sadly they will never allow this.
 
I laugh when cops get killed by feral joggers
F*** them they would murder your kids for the sake of their pensions
So I don't give to schitt's about The Grieving feelings of police officers wives and their kids
If you're a police officer you are not a good person in the current system
Always had sympathy for the police but the lockdowns kinda changed that. One should change his job if you have to arrest priests for holding church services. Or some joggers in the park for exercising.
 
Boomergeddon was cringe and anyone willing to put their life or freedom on the line for well documented grifter le orange man is a complete retard, but it was nice to see the cockroaches on Capitol Hill terrified for once. They should always be scared of what the electorate will do if they sell them out, sadly they will never allow this.
I thought all it took for a storming to be seen as good was that Democrats would do it toward a GOP majority. And even then, I think some on the right would be cool with it because “We hate them. At the very least they’ll learn that it’s not 2003 anymore”. At least before the positive media coverage.
 
Yeah, like the others here I saw it coming but luckily I already own a home and can continue to buy stock in the megacorps. So I can at least save my own ass from the new feudalism that's coming.

Nha you'd just be a better class of serf, I'm not being funny when I that but there genuinely was classes of Serfs and some where allowed to own property that there lord didn't own as well and had differing obligations.

https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/23/business/23nocera.html I'm on mobile, don't have the extension to get around the paywall but this article should sum it up.

What's the name of that plugin?

As someone who was around in 2008 in the left-wing Anarchist scene Occupy Wall Street was always a bunch of complete incompetent upper-middle-class douchebags one actually affected by the 2008 financial crash
These people literally believed in open borders f***
I regret ever being around those people they were a bunch of pissy upper-middle-class fagg's who didn't give two fuck about Working Class People whatsoever
And they became the Vanguard of the woke left most of the people who were part of that who actually had principles like myself either left or became part of the far right
And furthermore globalism is a form of f****** communism has nothing to do with feudalism feudal Lords would defend their rights on Horseback covered in heavy plate

The international banking class should be hunted for sport for the good of humanity f*** every single one of these people the underhanded Satanist scumbags going to hell and people should do the duty and send them directly to the judgement seat of Christ

Yea I can recall that and just how fucking monied most of those protesters where for the most part especially in London the iPhone 1 got released a little late here so it was THE new phone and nearly everyone of the protestors that the BBC could find had one or the trademark white ear buds who when standing around doing nothing between camera crews showing up spent the majority of there time in Starbucks and Harvey Nicks coffee shops (seriously).

There was this one fucker who looked like Tim Pools Etonian educated cousin with a voice so plummy he must have had one shoved up his arse at birth, fashionably ripped jeans, shabby chique hoody that is tailored to fit and a white - shirt made by Prada and sold for £60 a pop complaining about how he had to enter the job market with no support for the working class - he was tracked down by someone online and as predicted was from a Old Money Financial class family, He'd been educated at Eaton studdied in Finance and fine art, had a job waiting for him if he wanted it but had a personal net worth of 6 million gifted to him along with a house in Surrey with 24/7 monitored security, but he was taking some time off to in his own words "Consider his options".

It was nearly all posers at those protests with very little reported on by genuine working class people.
 
Your daily reminder that it is morally correct to steal from corporations and the government.
 
Nha you'd just be a better class of serf, I'm not being funny when I that but there genuinely was classes of Serfs and some where allowed to own property that there lord didn't own as well and had differing obligations

Yeomen, a particularly complicated social status because of how they changed over the centuries.

Lots of conflicting narratives, like not being allowed to bear arms and yet very clearly owning weapons in reliable historical sources.
 
Lots of conflicting narratives, like not being allowed to bear arms and yet very clearly owning weapons in reliable historical sources.

That was very regional and also kinda difficult to judge, your average household and trade often had tools available that made your average sword look tame, the damage you can do with a Stevedor hook, Bill Hook, and felling Axe made the point moot for the most part, the most they could do is say you can't have a sword but your average person wouldn't want one anyway he had a hatchett and a bill hook that he was quite happy with.

The only restriction I am aware of off the top of my head was around Bow's and later Cross Bows but part of that was class based, they didn't like the idea that anybody could learn to use one in a few days and be able to take on a night at reasonable range but a bow took more skill to use and often worked better as a volley weapon but a Cross Bow was easer to aim directly and could penetrate armour at close range, but the idea was worked around with things like Stone Bows any way and at that time warfair was changing anyway with the invention of Cannon and Gun's becoming a thing shortly after so the important people started leading from the rear.
 
That was very regional and also kinda difficult to judge, your average household and trade often had tools available that made your average sword look tame, the damage you can do with a Stevedor hook, Bill Hook, and felling Axe made the point moot for the most part, the most they could do is say you can't have a sword but your average person wouldn't want one anyway he had a hatchett and a bill hook that he was quite happy with.

The only restriction I am aware of off the top of my head was around Bow's and later Cross Bows but part of that was class based, they didn't like the idea that anybody could learn to use one in a few days and be able to take on a night at reasonable range but a bow took more skill to use and often worked better as a volley weapon but a Cross Bow was easer to aim directly and could penetrate armour at close range, but the idea was worked around with things like Stone Bows any way and at that time warfair was changing anyway with the invention of Cannon and Gun's becoming a thing shortly after so the important people started leading from the rear.
Yeomen were really only particular to England, anyways. The kings needed warm bodies for the unending war against France, so requiring the commoners with the means to own and train with a bow was the easiest way of accomplishing that. They were also, by the standards of the medieval period, poor as fuck as far as landowners went with an annual rent income of a mere 40 shillings. A peasant foot archer who survived 6 months of campaigning at three pence a day's wage would make more in his "year" of service than that.

No, really it may seem hard to believe but feudal England was a shockingly egalitarian place compared to the bulk of Western Europe. There's a reason people got so guillotine happy during the French revolution and it wasn't because that one day for no reason at all they decided the nobility had to go.
 
Unless a complete societal collapse occurs (which just might), the plan is to offer the people a deal: all debts expunged and bad credit vanished. The catch?
The first possibility means this world becomes far more a hell than it is now, but at least people could have more freedom then. The other possibility may lead to the end of free will as we know it if brain-computer-interfaces are part of that catch. Hopefully things somehow change for the better though. But I'm not holding my breath now.

Meanwhile, leaving behind the madhouse of modern urban "society" and all those soyboys who "love the hustle and bustle of the big city" could work - if it stays possible.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Tsukasa Kadoya
The first possibility means this world becomes far more a hell than it is now, but at least people could have more freedom then. The other possibility may lead to the end of free will as we know it if brain-computer-interfaces are part of that catch. Hopefully things somehow change for the better though. But I'm not holding my breath now.

Meanwhile, leaving behind the madhouse of modern urban "society" and all those soyboys who "love the hustle and bustle of the big city" could work - if it stays possible.
Honestly, I don't believe the technocratic world is capable of ending free will because the people they are promoting are too dumb STEM-wise to maintain such high tech infrastructure. Combined with importing impoverished people from the 3rd world and the IQ of future generations goes down. I'm well aware they have to monkey around with score values to maintain its normal distribution, but people getting dumber because dumb people are the ones breeding means a lack of a quality workforce.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: ToroidalBoat
Honestly, I don't believe the technocratic world is capable of ending free will because the people they are promoting are too dumb STEM-wise to maintain such high tech infrastructure. Combined with importing impoverished people from the 3rd world and the IQ of future generations goes down. I'm well aware they have to monkey around with score values to maintain its normal distribution, but people getting dumber because dumb people are the ones breeding means a lack of a quality workforce.
Doesn't mean they won't try.
 
Yeomen, a particularly complicated social status because of how they changed over the centuries.

Lots of conflicting narratives, like not being allowed to bear arms and yet very clearly owning weapons in reliable historical sources.
Yeah, the "no arms" thing is strange. My guess is that it was they couldn't own the weapons of a knight, and the assumption that people just understood class distinctions and the were only ever vaguely codified because it was just known. Pretty much all longbowmen were yeomen.
 
Back