I adopt pit bulls on Craigslist and put them down - and you should too! - I also do the same with black orphans!


Be honest: chances are that you cross the street when you see a pit bull walking toward you on the same sidewalk. Pit bulls have a well deserved reputation all over the world for being dangerous, aggressive dogs that suddenly snap for no apparent reason. I’m here to tell you the truth is even worse than previously thought.

You see, these murder machines have a well oiled social media disinfo apparatus known as “pit mommies.” The “pit mommy” movement adopts and breeds pit bulls while posting photos of them dressed up in pink tutus and baby clothes. These “adorabull” posts are almost always accompanied by absurd fallacies and false claims about the breed being harmless.

With more and more people now getting their news and ideas from social media, the pit mommy movement has managed to deceptively shift public perception on pits to somewhere in the apathetic middle.

But pit bulls have been selectively bred for bloodsport for centuries. They are genetically hardwired to kill, and to not be deterred by any amount of pain to get the kill. No amount of love and training will undo the pit bull instinct to kill. Someone thinking she’s a good owner with such a lovable muscled doggo will not prevent it from taking its blood prize the moment it sees a window of opportunity.

If you get a pit bull, you are setting the creature and the potential victims around you up for failure by denying history and genetics.

Unfortunately, elected representatives in America are failing to do anything about pit bulls as they continue to mass murder our children and doggoes. I propose and will demonstrate in this article that the pit crisis has now reached a point where We The People are called upon to take matters into our own hands. The continued murder of innocents calls for radical action.

That’s why for three years now I have adopted over a hundred pit bulls on Craigslist — and then put them down.

Because of my efforts, fewer humans (and good doggoes) will have to suffer from pit bull attacks. I like to think that my accumulated effort has over the long term saved at least one child from the lockjaws of death. But, I realize, this form of activism will need hundreds of practitioners across our beautiful country to even begin to get a grip on the pit crisis.

Pit maulings by the numbers​

Even the cuddliest and most well behaved pit bull can and eventually will turn on its humans for no or little reason — like an unexpected sound, or a bout of boredom. They’ve even been known to eat their own owners for a snack, like when Virginian police discovered two pit bulls in the forest casually eating their dead owner’s rib cage (after killing her).

But let’s look at the statistics. Despite making up around 6.2% of the dog population, pit bulls are responsible for over 70% of all fatal dog bites, according to a 2018 scientific study from dog attack authority DogsBite.org. When you include pit mixes, the number goes even higher:

Pit bulls, additional bull breeds and mastiff-type guard dogs and war dogs — the types used to create “baiting” bull breeds and fighting breeds — accounted for a jaw-dropping 87% (40) of all dog bite-related deaths in 2020.

Dog Stats.png


Are you paying attention yet?

To top it all off, pits target children disproportionally more than any other breed. While dogs of all breeds can snap when feeling threatened or in a bad mood, pit bull selection of victim is based on what it thinks it can readily turn into blood soup.

If you’re a pet owner, you’re probably aware that humans aren’t the only victims of pit bulls. Pit bulls often attack and kill dogs, cats, and other pets. I know from first hand experience because two of them tried to kill my lab in a completely unprovoked (redundant) attack in 2018.

A perfect example of this phenomenon is the 2018 incident at the Chiang Mai, Thailand pet show. Keep in mind that pet show dogs are often trained to be highly disciplined. But even with hundreds of hours of training and discipline, a pit bull in this pet show couldn’t help itself from attacking a beautiful Siberian Husky. This completely demolishes the lie that only pit bulls with bad owners attack others.

In 2019, pit bulls accounted for 91% of fatal dog-on-dog attacks, as well as 76% of fatal attacks on cats.

If you’re still not convinced about the devastating impact of pit bulls, if you still can’t feel for the mass murdered victims of the pit bulls, you need to grow some empathy in your soul. You may be a psychopath.

Listen to pit bull survivors — and believe them​

In January 2021, 35-year-old Candis Danielson was attacked by her neighbor’s two pit bulls. According to local news, the vicious pit bulls had “dragged Danielson under the trailer and inflicted extensive damage to her legs and feet.” The woman had to get one of her feet amputated as a result of the pit bull attack.

In yet another attack that happened last year, a Kentucky man was left “pretty chewed up” after being surrounded and attacked by three pit bull. The man was hospitalized with injuries to the face, back and lower torso. The story would have been much different if it was a gang of three Chihuahuas or Shih Tzus. “You can see [injuries] on my face, on the side of my face, on my back, you know, on my bottom. Some pretty good gashes on my leg and, you know, I’ve even got some scratches on my private parts. So, I was pretty chewed up,” the victim reported.

The most heart-wrenching stories are those that involve children. Pit bulls appear to have a special affinity for stalking the smallest and most innocent of children before ambushing and tearing their necks up.

In March 2013, 14-month-old Daxton Borchardt was allowed to stay with his babysitter despite her pitbulls, because his parents believed it’s all about training. The pitbulls promptly murdered little Daxton.

Daxton’s father Jeff said that he could no longer remain silent after hearing about a toddler mauled by a pit bull in Caledonia. Before his son’s death, Jeff said that he used to believe that a dog’s behavior was determined by the way it was raised. He no longer believes this myth — an evil lie peddled by pit mommies online. “Believing the myth, ‘It’s not the breed, it’s all how you raise them,’ is what left us without a son,” Jeff said. He said he cannot forget how his son looked after the prolonged attack.

Another attack that occurred this year resulted in the death of a 6-year-old child. “I was an advocate for pit bulls and what happened today happened so fast that there was nothing that anyone could do,” the mother said as she cried.

For children who manage to survive the pit bull attacks, the trauma never stops. A three-year-old girl who suffered serious injuries and lost her eye after surviving a pit bull attack was booted out of a KFC after an employee told her grandmother that the child’s scars were “disturbing” other customers.

Bite Survivor.jpg


My proposal for common sense pit bull control​

Most of us agree at this point that it’s time to come up with a permanent solution to the pit bull question. At the same time, I recognize that not everyone wants to spend their time trekking around their state looking for adoptable pit bulls to put down.

America must implement common-sense pit bull control to rid ourselves of these dogs, and I have a series of suggestions.

1.) Like we do with so many important issues, let’s look to the laws and policies of our progressive allies. Currently, there are pit bull bans in several progressive countries, such as Canada, Denmark, France, Finland, Norway, Switzerland, and several more. If those countries are smart enough to recognize the need for common sense pit bull control, then America should follow suit.

2.) We should also regulate animal shelters who are cynically using loopholes to trick people into bringing assault-style dogs into their homes.

Currently, animal shelters are overrun with pit bulls, which is understandable considering their extremely violent nature. However, shelters don’t properly inform potential adopters that these dogs are pit bulls. Instead, animal shelters will advertise a pit bull as a “lab mix” or another “mix” breed in an attempt to deceive those looking for a friendly family dog.

Not Pits.jpg


Everyone should be able to agree that animal shelters that do this should be shut down and held accountable for the blood on their hands.

3.) Lastly, we need to tell Big Tech to remove pit mommy content as speedily and heavy-handedly as they deal with other kinds of misinformation identified by the White House as a health risk. Think vaccine misinfo, etc. We must also demand a highly visible pit bull warning attached to posts associated with persons identified as pit mommies or pit mommy adjacent.

How many more children must die? The time to act is yesterday.

Crack Pitmom.jpg
 
I mean you can read the breed standards like the one I linked if you'd like. Nowhere does it say they're supposed to be human-aggressive murder dogs, at least not if you're breeding to the actual standard and not some methhead who refuses to get their fucked up mutt fixed.

The AKC standard? Only a tiny fraction of pit bull-type dogs are AKC-registered American Staffordshire Terriers bred to any sort of standard. Most pit bulls are bred by people with no standards at all.
 
Pie bulls are literally made to ruin someone’s day. Just use them as guard dogs for your restricted areas as one should and move on. They recognize who feeds them, that is all you can count on.
 
The AKC standard? Only a tiny fraction of pit bull-type dogs are AKC-registered American Staffordshire Terriers bred to any sort of standard. Most pit bulls are bred by people with no standards at all.
And those dogs probably aren't even full pits either. Like I've been saying, most of the fucked up dogs that attack people are probably more or less square-headed mutts. Really inbred, fucked up mutts.
 
Its Thunderdome, no need to use random dog breeds as a proxy for black people if you want to be racist against them.

Parroting retarded Karen moral panics to own the libs.

Plus horses and humans kill way more people in the US than dogs anyway.

While I think a lot of the dogs that are attacking people being labeled as pits are more mutts than anything else, I wouldn't doubt a good chunk are inbred as fuck from generations of trailer trash refusing to get their damn dogs fixed and/or puppy mills and backyard breeders giving zero fucks.

Purebreds have their issues, but bully breeds aren't supposed to be human aggressive and no dog that shows human aggression (unless against threatening strangers) should be bred. Unfortunately for people who just want to churn out as many puppies as quickly as possible or just keep a mean-looked dog chained in the backyard 24/7, that's not something they give a shit about.

If boomers on ND talking about loose dogs in the area attacking/killing animals is any indication Huskies seem to be the next breed idiots are churning out and not taking proper care of (and I know even well-bred Huskies are a lot of work since they need tons of exercise and whatnot, like they're not dogs for lazy idiots).

Yeah, if you want a pet that you don't have to do as much with that looks cute, get a cat*. If you want the most dog-like cat get a Maine Coon

While every animal is going to have their own quirks you cannot predict, but if you can't even put in the work to try to understand the nature of the beast you are getting-- especially one that is known to be highly aggressive or energetic -- you really should not be adopting an animal. Not even a cat. It seems like too many people regard animals as objects as opposed to living creatures with their own needs.

*Even cats you should still do your homework before adopting, especially if you choose to get an exotic breed like a Savannah
 
Pit bulls are the niggers of the dog world. Fitting that their owners are usually the type of dumb white girl that thinks she can turn a beast bred for destruction into her "sweet lil doggobaby."
Every pitbull owner I know is male. Most women prefer small dogs.
 
Yeah, if you want a pet that you don't have to do as much with that looks cute, get a cat*. If you want the most dog-like cat get a Maine Coon

While every animal is going to have their own quirks you cannot predict, but if you can't even put in the work to try to understand the nature of the beast you are getting-- especially one that is known to be highly aggressive or energetic -- you really should not be adopting an animal. Not even a cat. It seems like too many people regard animals as objects as opposed to living creatures with their own needs.

*Even cats you should still do your homework before adopting, especially if you choose to get an exotic breed like a Savannah
Yeah even the AKC page about AmStaff mentions that they can be aggressive to other dogs, so obedience and other training is mandatory if you want one. You should always research the proper care for a breed or species before you get one and if you can't meet those care needs, don't get one.

People impulse buying animals only to not care for them properly is a huge problem with reptiles too. Have firsthand experience with that with volunteer stuff I do.

In the end of the day the issue is less any specific breed or animal, and more stupid people not taking proper care of their animals and breeding fucked up dogs that shouldnt be bred.
Not all heroes wear capes
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Cthulus Nutsack
If you can’t afford a car, you sell it, and you don’t have the right to tell the new owner what gas to run in it or how often to get it serviced.
When you sell a house you don’t get a say in what colors the new owners paint the walls.
By selling or giving up an animal, a person is giving up all legal rights and responsibilities relating to that animal.

And if you think lying to someone before putting down a dog is bad, you should see what pit bulls do to people, and other animals.


How hard is this to understand. I cant believe it's riling so many of you up.
The dog is irrelevant.



Industrialized slaughter of puppies based on massive deceit is morally degenerate.
The fact that someone spends so much of their time doing this makes them into a lolcow of epic proportions with all the typical traits of one, including the notion that their emotions and feelings are somehow more important than that of the hundreds of people that they lie to. Had this person been filming themselves the hundred times they've essentially been frothing at the thought taking someones pets and killing them they would have blown up the internet.

And no, it's criminal, and hopefully people will get wise to this now and demand promises in writing but even implicit, let alone oral agreements can be enforced and could this persons actions somehow be tracked and compiled then they would be liable and they would certainly lose in civil court.

Action has been taken several times against people who have sold bodies/organs or pets to places other than the destinations agreed upon.

For example:


Bottom line, it's not a fucking car and you know better. But even if it was a car and we agreed upon that you'd keep it in a museum for public viewing, as is the case with paintings, and you slammed it into a wall on a casual nights out then you'd get sued.
 
Last edited:
How hard is this to understand. I cant believe it's riling so many of you up.
The dog is irrelevant.

Industrialized slaughter of puppies based on massive deceit is morally degenerate.
The fact that someone spends so much of their time doing this makes them into a lolcow of epic proportions with all the typical traits of one, including the notion that their emotions and feelings are somehow more important than that of the hundreds of people that they lie to. Had this person been filming themselves the hundred times they've essentially been frothing at the thought taking someones pets and killing them they would have blown up the internet.

And no, it's criminal, and hopefully people will get wise to this now and demand promises in writing but even implicit, let alone oral agreements can be enforced and could this persons actions somehow be tracked and compiled then they would be liable and they would certainly lose in civil court.

Bottom line, it's not a fucking car and you know better. But even if it was a car and we agreed upon that you'd keep it in a museum for public viewing, as is the case with paintings, and you slammed it into a wall on a casual nights out then you'd get sued.
You have no rights over the legally purchased property of others, no matter the undertakings made as part of the purchase, where such undertakings are not specifically stated in a written contract of sale.

‘It’s criminal’ you say. No, it’s not. The damages awarded in the one case you cite were civil and compensatory as the result of a lawsuit, not damages from a criminal case.

Human remains are also an edge case, as depending on how the law regards them they can be either people or property. Dogs have no such protection as they are regarded as chattels. Sell your dog and don’t have a binding written contract stipulating that the dog won’t be put down except in case of incurable disease or severe injury? Well tough shit, pal.

I heartily approve of unwanted and potentially dangerous dogs being put down, but that’s because I’m not a jellybrain pit parent who cries about muh poor misunderstood furbabies being put down while I eat meat and wear leather.
 
You have no rights over the legally purchased property of others, no matter the undertakings made as part of the purchase, where such undertakings are not specifically stated in a written contract of sale.

‘It’s criminal’ you say. No, it’s not. The damages awarded in the one case you cite were civil and compensatory as the result of a lawsuit, not damages from a criminal case.

Human remains are also an edge case, as depending on how the law regards them they can be either people or property. Dogs have no such protection as they are regarded as chattels. Sell your dog and don’t have a binding written contract stipulating that the dog won’t be put down except in case of incurable disease or severe injury? Well tough shit, pal.

I heartily approve of unwanted and potentially dangerous dogs being put down, but that’s because I’m not a jellybrain pit parent who cries about muh poor misunderstood furbabies being put down while I eat meat and wear leather.

Lying in business is a crime. If the person is intentionally defrauding the person of property that otherwise would never have been sold to the person then they are criminally liable. As this person has done it a hundred times it would be easy to prove their deceitful nature.

If a seller wishes to sell something to someone who is of a certain conviction or intent and that person demonstrably lies to a hundred such persons then thats jail time. The fact that you add that bit about the contract shows that you understand this. As I wrote in my OP, the folks giving up their puppies to adoption should wise up and create written contracts that can be followed up. But the fact that a written contract is lacking does not mean the oral contract is void. Its just harder to prove.

But regardless the civil suit would be a worse consequence anyway as it would bankrupt the person.

The fact that you're willing to to defend a serial liar and fraudster because they lie about something you politically or socially support makes you a degenerate.
 
Last edited:
Lying in business is a crime.
Is it though? Maybe if it's done maliciously for financial gain, but I'd like to see your sources on this.

If the person is intentionally defrauding the person of property that otherwise would never have been sold to the person then they are criminally liable.
I believe 'fraud' is when deceptive or misleading conduct is engaged in for the purpose of financial gain. Wouldn't necessarily apply in this case.
And certainly difficult to prove when no written and signed record exists of the specifics of the deal.

As this person has done it a hundred times it would be easy to prove their deceitful nature.
"Your honnah, the man standing before you in the dock is bein' accused, I say accused, of bein' deceitful." Hoo boy.

If a seller wishes to sell something to someone who is of a certain conviction or intent and that person demonstrably lies to a hundred such persons then thats jail time.
Do they still put law degrees in crackerjack boxes?

The fact that you add that bit about the contract shows that you understand this.
Better than you do, apparently, as you don't even seem to know the difference between civil law and criminal law.

the folks giving up their puppies to adoption should wise up and create written contracts that can be followed up.
Most of them appear to be low-IQ, low-income mouthbreathers. Smart people generally make a good income and can afford dogs that aren't dangerous and that complement their lifestyle. What makes you think the seller would be in a position to know about and insist on a written contract that binds the purchaser after sale?

But the fact that a written contract is lacking does not mean the oral contract is void. Its just harder to prove.
Jesus fucking christ, how old were you before you learned to tie shoelaces?
The world doesn't work the way you want it to just because you do.

But regardless the civil suit would be a worse consequence anyway as it would bankrupt the person.
Person A sells dog. Person B buys dog. Dog is now person B's property. There are no records of post-purchase obligation upon person B.
Good luck with that civil suit. All person B needs to say is "The pit bull turned out to be vicious and snapped at me several times. Rather than pass on an aggressive dog to another person I regretfully decided to have it put down". And as the dog is chattel, as long as it's humanely euthanized in line with legal policy, that suit would be kicked out in any real court.

EDIT: “Oh, and I’m countersuing as the previous owner failed to disclose that the dog was aggressive. Here are the Facebook posts claiming that Fluffles was a cuddly wuddly snugglebug that liked to curl up and watch TV with his human. You will note no mention of aggression. Here is a notarized statement from the vet that confirms the dog is aggressive, unpredictable and snapped at him as well. I am so traumatized that although I do not seek damages, I feel it only right that the prior owner reimburse me for the dog, one week’s care and feeding, and the euthanasia and body disposal charges which collectively come to $1000.”

The fact that you're willing to to defend a serial liar and fraudster because they lie about something you politically or socially support makes you a degenerate.
The fact that you're mad as fuck is amusing to me. That's why I'm defending a "serial liar and fraudster". Because it's funny to me when people can't keep their spergism under control.

Am I am degenerate? Yeah. At least you got one thing right.

@AnOminous care to review this fine fellow’s bar exam?
 
Last edited:
Ah, good to see the moderates have arrived.
If I had to give up my cat to somebody on the understanding that they were going to take care of it, and it turned out they put it down immediately, I'd torture them to death on principle.

That's a separate issue from the merits of if we should have the police legally death-squad the whole breed. (Which might be worthwhile.)
 
Sargon of Akkad producer Vee has come out as a pit mommy and penned a counterargument.

View attachment 2989239
I don’t know if that’s supposed to be funny, but it’s full of the usual logical fallacies that seem to keep being brought up every time the pit bull argument is brought up. Might have a dissection later.
 
Back