I Asked Reddit Why Trans Guys Like Me Keep Getting Ghosted - Because people are too polite to tell freaks to fuck off.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Article
Archive


I Asked Reddit Why Trans Guys Like Me Keep Getting Ghosted

The subreddit /r/dating_advice didn't hold back, but I actually found the replies strangely cathartic.

By Lee Hurley


Internet dating when I was a lesbian was infinitely easier than how it is now as a trans man. Granted that was years ago when only saddos partook and the rest of the world hadn’t joined in to ruin it for us. Ghosting wasn’t even a word back then, let alone a tolerated behaviour.

Now dating online is like rifling through the bargain bin in your local supermarket – you scan the aisles quickly for something that catches your eye with little attention paid to anything else. Swipe, swipe, swipe.

But dating as a lesbian was more understood, too. People know what that means. As a trans guy, the majority don’t seem to know what to make of me, so they run away. I’ve played around with the big reveal and I know the two are linked. It’s hard not to see a connection when you arrange a second date, drop the T bomb and then she cancels in the next breath.

So, I did the most obvious thing to try and understand what was going on – I asked randoms on Reddit. “Why do women vanish when I tell them I'm a trans guy?” I posted on /r/dating_advice, an advice forum with 1.1 million readers. That might sound like a recipe for disaster – and yes, I was prepared for nasty replies. They did come, but not in the volume I expected.

At the start of my dating adventure following the end of a three-year relationship, I had profiles on three different dating apps but only stated I was trans on one. I racked up the likes on Tinder and Bumble – nothing exceptional, but enough to know I wasn’t repulsive. Things were significantly slower on OKCupid where I had stated that I was trans.

I won’t lie. It got to me for a while. I’d be chatting with a woman, making her laugh and seemingly getting on well. Then I’d tell her and she’d vanish. Over and over and over. Before dates, during dates, after dates, it didn’t matter. The result was almost always the same.

When I went back to collect the comments on Reddit for this piece, I was glad I’d saved some because many had been deleted. Determined not to take the horrible posts to heart, I actually found it all quite cathartic.

One of my personal favourites was the person who told me they would ghost me because I seemed too insensitive to people being “squicked out” before revealing “that kind of thing squicks me out”. (By “thing”, I assume she meant me.)

Another said: “A woman born a woman is always a woman, no matter what. The women on the dating apps are not interested in dating other women so they vanish because they are interested in me.”

It made me feel sorry for those who have such a limited view of how gender and sexuality works and it helped me realise that it isn’t, actually, anything to do with me. It’s a societal problem, theirs not mine. I mean, how do you counter someone who thinks an Adam’s apple is an essential component in a mate?

What also struck me was how a lot of the replies were penis-centric: “It’s probably the genital issue,” replied more than one. Another answered: “I would assume it’s the thought that you don’t have a penis that puts them off." I have a drawer full of dicks, a size to suit every pleasure and not one of them has ever failed to get up, get hard, or get her off. Not something I can say for these all-singing, all-dancing, superdicks that cis men are apparently endowed with. But is that all sex is to a ton of cis het people? And all men are worth? A penis to go in a vagina? Seriously?

The suggestions on how to address this ‘problem’ were varied. One helpful user informed me I should find some lesbians to date, presumably because of their well-known love of hairy men like myself, as they assumed (wrongly) that I hadn’t had lower surgery.

More than one accused me of trying to trick potential mates by not declaring my transness upfront. I didn’t check their dating profiles but I assume they’ve listed every medical condition they have on theirs. I noted how they didn’t seem to expect a man who’d lost a testicle to cancer, for instance, to declare that upfront on his profile, nor a woman who might have lost breasts to the same disease.

Women obviously want a ‘real’ man, I was told – one born that way. As I was born a woman, I’d always remain one I was told by someone else. Perhaps these potential dates wanted children, I was informed. Yet we don’t require anyone else declare their fertility status on their profiles, so I doubt that’s the real reason either.

The overriding sense I got from the replies was one of ignorance about trans people and while most of the offensive and ridiculous replies are now gone, there was some hope in the others that remained.

“I keep clashing with people because of this but I honestly don't think that trans people are obligated to put their transsexuality [sic] as a disclaimer in front of each and every potentially romantic interaction,” wrote one woman.

“I know I'd be uncomfortable as hell if I had to disclose what my genitalia look like or what my fertility status is to complete strangers. I wouldn't expect a guy with a micropenis to tell me about it before any feelings could possibly develop just because I might not want to have sex with him after finding out.

“I can't think of any other bedroom issue that is seen as having to be discussed that early on.”

That, really, is the whole issue in a nutshell. We hold trans people to a higher standard than anyone else when it comes to dating. We require of them more than we ask of others, all while constantly sending the message that trans people are somehow ‘less than’.

The reality is, being trans is a magic sorting hat. As tough as it is to have people vanish when you tell them who you are, it does me a favour. By telling them that one thing about me, their reaction tells me everything I need to know about them.

I should probably message them to say thanks.
 
At the end of the day, people with gender preferences (IE anyone sane) wants what their perception of that gender is, not what some fucked up hormone addled pooners perception of it is. If you think a rot tube and premature balding makes a man, you've already lost the plot.

But of course, for these kinds of people, the world must operate in their perception, no others, and their thoughts and opinions must dictate the operation of the world. Feel bad for the people who gotta put up with this persons shit.
 
Even if a person could somehow ignore how weird and gross most trans people look, every single one of them is batshit insane. Why would anyone want to date or be with a person that immediately shows they have no grasp of reality and demand you submit to their delusions no matter how uncomfortable it makes you? These people are a nightmare to be around in any capacity.
 
One thing to consider other than the obvious: How old is she?

Looking at her photo, I genuinely can't tell.

If she's 35 and looking for same-age dating partners, there might be a bit of a jump scare there.

Pooners age like raw shellfish.
Article is a few years old now, but Lee's mid fifties now.
 
You dumb bitch, not everyone knows their fertility status until they actually try to have children. Even then you can get help with that. You will never create sperm, no matter the medical intervention used.

And on the apps I've used, a lot of folks do have children as part of their profile (eg, "Interested in having children," "Not interested in children", etc.), and older folks (late 20s-30s, usually) have things like "have kids but open to more" or "have 2 kids, not interested in more" or whatever. So the whole 'it's not on your profileeeeeeee' is straight up false, lol.
 
The author is a woman. It doesn’t matter that she’s balding, or has a flesh sausage stapled to her crotch. She’s a woman. No straight woman would be attracted to her.
I m going to be careful here and not out myself.

But a woman I went to uni with, is still on my facebook feed.

She moved to hollywood tried being artsy got an office job and I watch the social condition as she (who at that time had a male partner) went "bi".

Then she went "non binary"

Then elon bought twitter so she came back to fb.

She's "trans" now

I see post where she plays rhetorical games of definition about "soft masculinity" and cop posts about how her now former partner is just jelly that her fucking totally not a 12 year old facial hair makes her more masculine than him....

still feel sorry for her
 
>be a butch lesbian
>become a "man" to bag straight girls
>not even a manly "man"
>look like Louie C.K. with terminal cancer
>dating is even more difficult now


Well no shit. Being a man is hard as fuck in current year +9. What did this chick think was going to happen when she traded in being a moderately-not-terrible-looking butch lesbian in for being a balding manlet? The only thing oppressing you is yourself, dumbass.
 
>be a butch lesbian
>become a "man" to bag straight girls
>not even a manly "man"
>look like Louie C.K. with terminal cancer
>dating is even more difficult now


Well no shit. Being a man is hard as fuck in current year +9. What did this chick think was going to happen when she traded in being a moderately-not-terrible-looking butch lesbian in for being a balding manlet? The only thing oppressing you is yourself, dumbass.
A large chunk of women genuinely think that men in the 90th percentile of attractiveness are "average" thanks to social media. You know how there was that massive social movement designed to tell men that women don't actually look like the supermodels and pornstars they see on TV and online, and that they need to be realistic in their expectations? Yeah, there was never an equivalent for women. So they delude themselves and think that they, an average* woman will become that "average" man when they transition, and not the balding baby-faced manlet they inevitably become.

*they're usually below-average, but other women and men will blow smoke up their ass and claim she's totes beautiful to make themselves feel like a saint or try and get into her pants respectively.
 
That, really, is the whole issue in a nutshell. We hold trans people to a higher standard than anyone else when it comes to dating. We require of them more than we ask of others, all while constantly sending the message that trans people are somehow ‘less than’.
No. You are being held to the standard of "male", and you do not fit it. The standard of "normal" and "expected" and do not fit it.

Hang in there lil pooner.
 
And on the apps I've used, a lot of folks do have children as part of their profile (eg, "Interested in having children," "Not interested in children", etc.), and older folks (late 20s-30s, usually) have things like "have kids but open to more" or "have 2 kids, not interested in more" or whatever. So the whole 'it's not on your profileeeeeeee' is straight up false, lol.
That's what I found particularly telling. Even if we're willing to meet this lady halfway and say that not having a dick isn't enough of a reason to ghost, informing a person that you're trans carries a whole ton of other connotations like the fact that you can't have biological children, or the fact that you have medical conditions that will require a lifetime to treat, or that sex is going to involve a lot of prosthetics that won't be able to actually feel anything.

Any one of these could be a deal-breaker even if it was with a "cis" person with a handicap. Does she think paraplegics don't face dating discrimination because incompatibility? Does she think if a disabled person hid that they were in a wheelchair until meeting in person that it wouldn't cause problems? It really is the the cope of believing that there's no difference between them and a real man that allows them to delude themselves into believing that somebody else shouldn't see the difference
 
I m going to be careful here and not out myself.

But a woman I went to uni with, is still on my facebook feed.

She moved to hollywood tried being artsy got an office job and I watch the social condition as she (who at that time had a male partner) went "bi".

Then she went "non binary"

Then elon bought twitter so she came back to fb.

She's "trans" now

I see post where she plays rhetorical games of definition about "soft masculinity" and cop posts about how her now former partner is just jelly that her fucking totally not a 12 year old facial hair makes her more masculine than him....

still feel sorry for her
Sounds to me like she chose to make bad choices, honestly. I don't know if I'd feel sorry for her.
 
I almost feel bad for pooners because there are certainly enough gay guys willing to plow a twink with extra steps and pretend they're totally heterosexual, but dykes often hate men and aren't particularly interested in dating a tiny one with a shitty beard and no dick.
 
There's a difference between a penis and a dildo, you dumb pooner.
It's not the dildo/dick that's the problem:
it's the atrophied, irradiated, burnt-rubber tuna smelling vag just behind it - and the implication that you've eventually got to interact with it, as any normal person would expect- that they don't just get you off in a one way job.

But the writer says that they have had "lower surgery"..?
Jesus christ. That's even worse.
So you've got a rotdog, or a metoidoplasty (basically a different every time, unlucky dip) but still use strap ons....?!
The fake dick doesn't even deserve a response, but it's weird that both the snappy answer of "yeah I've got a dick, which size do you want?! " and "uuhh yea I've had bottom surgery actually" are both employed.
Whatever it is, people don't want in on it.
Any more than someone who might have a foot fetish would be equally happy to lick an amputated knee stump that sits in the false leg harness. People don't like wounds and surgery and unnecessarily medicalised anything. Organic shit is more expensive in the grocery shops and covetted for a reason.
 
Last edited:
It's sort of a tangent, but it is actually kind of amazing how many women don't realize how performance enhanced a lot of male influencers are. Not even the gray area of dubious supplements, but straight up illegal steroids. You think Logan Paul looks the way he does because he's dedicated to the gym?
 
Their echo chambers lied to them about reality and now they are upset when they encounter it. The truth is that they are grotesque even if they pass because of what they have done to themselves. Most other people with medical conditions didn't ask for scars or disabling conditions. Being a troons or pooner says you are willing to spend thousands and thousands of dollars to mutilate yourself in a way that indicates you are not in touch with reality.
 
I think some of y'all only know shallow bitches.

Powerlevel but I grew up in a community with a lot of average-looking people and I went to school with average-looking people and now I work with average-looking people.

If you're a man under 40 and you can't get laid occasionally, the problem isn't your looks, it's your personality.

The kid on the Shriners ad probably crushes some puss.

There are deathfats and terminal autists going balls deep on the reg. Ethan Ralph knocks bitches up.

If you're built like Khal Drogo, yeah 80% of straight women are going to think you're worth fucking, but even if you look like Viserys, what's stopping you from sexing up the 60% or the 30% or whatever you think is attainable?

Fuckin' Buffalo Bill was snagging size 14s and he worked hard at it. Had the tools, had the talent. Miller time.
 
Back