I hate the Internet and the people who own it

Its rough sailing this morning for me. I'm able to connect over tor (not using the onion) just fine. Nice and quick. But it seems like somethings going on.
@Null , You're more than likely aware, but Ill tag anyway.

fuckery.png
 
Is this it now? Is there any path to get back on the clearnet if every single T1 provider is taking LFJ's threats seriously?
I cannot imagine that anyone would respond to a threat by LFJ with anything other than "I'd like to see you try." I guess even those CEO's are insecure about their sense of self-preservation.
 
It's wild, because this doesn't even seem like the path of least resistance. If you're a CEO and someone is tagging you in bullshit, because you're on Twitter for whatever reason instead of running a company, just say "I'm not familiar with this controversy but threats against the company and it's employees are taken very seriously" and never touch it again. If you're unironically getting trannies fedposting at you, call the cops.

I know half of these fags have connections in the tech industry, but how in the world are companies so afraid of bad press? And if it's literal threats, why capitulate? If someone told them they had to stop servicing Facebook or their office would get bombed, they would absolutely call the cops.
 
The time is fast approaching for Null to go on Tucker and blast Dong Long Gone for his consent accidents. He should also produce a bunch of Consent Accident themed merch and shill it.
 
It's wild, because this doesn't even seem like the path of least resistance. If you're a CEO and someone is tagging you in bullshit, because you're on Twitter for whatever reason instead of running a company, just say "I'm not familiar with this controversy but threats against the company and it's employees are taken very seriously" and never touch it again. If you're unironically getting trannies fedposting at you, call the cops.

I know half of these fags have connections in the tech industry, but how in the world are companies so afraid of bad press? And if it's literal threats, why capitulate? If someone told them they had to stop servicing Facebook or their office would get bombed, they would absolutely call the cops.
You can't see the invisible man, but you can see his shadow. What entities do you think are powerful enough to leave CEOs of key infrastructure companies pissing themselves in fear?
 
The time is fast approaching for Null to go on Tucker and blast Dong Long Gone for his consent accidents. He should also produce a bunch of Consent Accident themed merch and shill it.
We will never go to the media and will probably never take any real legal action. That's why I don't really care about or engage with the DKF movements anymore. When they decide we go down forever, then I guess we go down forever.
 
They decided that six years ago, yet here we are.
They as in our infrastructure providers. I got all hot under the collar last time this happened and Null made it clear anyone talking about going to the media or politicians was out of the question. I'm of the opinion that we should have done something about it a while ago but here we are, filing complaints and hoping someone will sympathize.
 
We absolutely need to go to the media. There's no way to change the Wikipedia article which they can use to their benefit as long as we stay silent and let them dictate the narrative.
It won't happen. I tried getting a semi notable reporter to talk to us the first time around and the only response I got was that the media is only interested in working against us.
 
We absolutely need to go to the media. There's no way to change the Wikipedia article which they can use to their benefit as long as we stay silent and let them dictate the narrative.
The media are a bunch of lying, duplicitous cockroaches who are beholden to the interests of the state. As Twitter has proven, every major media company has glowies working there whose purpose is to manipulate the public in their own image. And right now a transphobic doxxing and stalking hate site is not at the top of their list. If we all chopped off our dicks however, we might have a chance.
 
It won't happen. I tried getting a semi notable reporter to talk to us the first time around and the only response I got was that the media is only interested in working against us.
Who? Taibbi and Greenwald have both spoken briefly about what's happening to the Farms, and they seems at least concerned if not sympathetic.
 
Who? Taibbi and Greenwald have both spoken briefly about what's happening to the Farms, and they seems at least concerned if not sympathetic.
Ben Swann. I emailed him with a short explanation of what was going on and some links to the sources that were trashing us. He asked me if I was interested in talking to him, and I directed him to Null. I asked Null about it, and Null wrote a short diatribe about the media being scum. I sent Ben a screenshot of what Null said and that was the last time we communicated. As much as we don't want to be dragged by journalists, a lot of journalists don't wanna be dragged by us either.
 
Last edited:
Who? Taibbi and Greenwald have both spoken briefly about what's happening to the Farms, and they seems at least concerned if not sympathetic.
Greenwald is almost an outcast in the "journalist" community for having the bad taste to say true things and Taibbi, while closer to still being mainstream, is still mainly found in normal society on outlets like Maher's show, when Maher is himself a disaffected shitlib.
 
Greenwald is almost an outcast in the "journalist" community for having the bad taste to say true things and Taibbi, while closer to still being mainstream, is still mainly found in normal society on outlets like Maher's show, when Maher is himself a disaffected shitlib.
Greenwald's situation is funny because he checks just about every box you can check for leftist approval, but because he's an honest journalist, they hate him more than most.
 
Logged in today to be greeted with a robo checker, good to see there's some protection but goddamn is the DDoS giving it a run for its money. It was mentioned that this is the "less intrusive" way to do it, how was it done before?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gmax alcremie
Logged in today to be greeted with a robo checker, good to see there's some protection but goddamn is the DDoS giving it a run for its money. It was mentioned that this is the "less intrusive" way to do it, how was it done before?
I think it has to do with how many requests come in during a period of time. A few days ago, opening more than 2 tabs at the same time would lock me out. Now I can open about 8.
 
Back