I hate the Internet and the people who own it

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
cybertoaster said:
The original illuminati were actually a small group of guys who were trying to expose the bullshit of its day and got prosecuted to hell and back for doing that.

So in a way we're the illuminati.
Click to expand...
The Fraternal Order of Sneed.

Sneedmasons.jpg

Null should sell lime-green fezzes and aprons as merch.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Aunt Carol, Oxyjen, Autistic Joe and 11 others
Meat Target said:
Reputational and legal risk is the only actual blackmail material that the Dickless Dink and Daddy Toadstool Toes actually have. It's not like they have access to these execs' spank banks.

Companies don't wanna be known as "the ones who enable the big bad Autistic Illuminati Stalking Forum!" They know trannies are tattle-tales who will go to their friends like Ben Collins and Brandy Zadrozny to write hitpieces on them.

So rather than do their homework and realize everything we do here is perfectly legal, they boot us to save their own asses.

It's unfair and it's bullshit, but ç'est la vie.
Click to expand...
You may be right, I just thought Michael Janke might have stronger connections since he was supposedly a former glowie.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Considering how the tides are turning against the troons and shown their true face to the public on the total abolition of the freedom of speech. I just hope for serious repercussions against the pieces of shit who embrace this and seriously pay for it.

Yabbit said:
View attachment 5237454
They're now trying to get archive.today shut down for having, well, archives of their insanity
Click to expand...

John doesn't want to get exposed how he was stalking people on Fallout 76 and blackmailing them. Seriously dude, too old for this shit.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Cheese, REGENDarySumanai, make_it_so and 9 others
I looked over the AUP of the domain registrar and nothing directly states that PII or its presence on a domain is considered a violation.

However, on the Abuse Report portal, they list PII as inappropriate content. Inappropriate content is considered abuse, and abuse is seen as a violation of the AUP. The example of PII brought up is social security and credit card information.

I might look back to see if there was anything that I missed or if there other policy documents that talk about PII, but it seems that there is some ambiguity in the policies.

Given that AUPs have specific reasons for determining violation, could this ambiguity be brought up as a legal issue?
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Richard Cheese, Pee Cola and 6 others
Elwood P. Dowd said:
Any way to change out of this hideous default color scheme?
Click to expand...
If you're on PC:
Click "Style chooser" on the bottom of the page. Right click on "Use default style" then click "Inspect element". You should see this in your browser console:
1690488547725.png

Double click on "href" and replace that 0 with any of the following (just the number, obviously) to pick your theme:
default 0
light 54
dark 61
biden blue 65
usa 79
china 68
kawaii 69
spooky orange 70
stealth 72

Finally, click on the blank space next to "<a href" and either click the modified link or on "Use default style".

Edit: Oh, I forgot. If you're on mobile for some God forsaken reason, press and hold "Use default style" to copy the link, paste the link in a new tab and just replace that same "0" next to "style_id" with one of the numbers in the list.

On topic: Thank you for all the work, Null. TTD.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Kosher Salt, 12345, bijoux_hexjinx and 16 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back