I hate the Internet and the people who own it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Who are these people and can you link to the evidence they supported Keffals?

Brandy Zadrozny and Taylor Lorenz are involved in the NGO's named in Missouri V. Biden at senior levels and have direct involvement with the government. They are the liasons between the government and the press and tech companies.
It was through them that connections were made, press kits were put out, and official pressure was placed on CloudFlare and other providers.
 
Taylor Lorenz
The whore Taylor Lorenz is up to her neck in this shit, it's her granddaddy or uncle or something that founded the Wayback Machine and removed the Forum from their archive at that bitches instigation, seeing her name was an eyebrow raising moment, I've got no doubt her and her little crew are recieving kickbacks and under the table financial and other benefits from a corrupt administration that uses people like her to get around the 1st Amendment restrictions on Governments ability to censor negative criticism of them.
It's blatant Unconstitutional overreach and the people responsible would be facing charges and a fucking firing squad if found guilty, if the system worked how it was intended by its authors.
 
Knock on wood and all, this feels very similar to what happened last December where some rogue asshole dong-gong knew fucked around with the setup. The guy that did it probably wasn't even fired hopefully that is what is happening here.

Null mentioned on Mati that he was close to getting the .net site back up on the clearnet so Ol' Brickface would take extreme measures to prevent that.

I can't imagine a huge corporation like this would leave themselves up to litigation like this. Even pozzed corporations like Coke-Cola put a stop to the anti-white training once it got leaked because they feared lawsuits.

If Hurricane really did want to get rid of us they would at least come up with some flimsy excuse like Matthew Prince did to cover themselves legally and give a notice to Null of the termination.

Whatever the case maybe everyone on this site needs to do what they did last December and that is going full Karen-mode on them. Calling in and making complaints just in general being more annoying than the troons. Hundreds of people constantly calling in demanding to know why they are being denied speeding services and threatening litigation will make them think twice about a decision like this.

Not to encourage Gay-Ops but putting LFJ's name out there, what he has done to people and what he is trying to do to the internet should also be pursued. When LFJ got mentioned on Urban Dictionary it spooked him good and he wastes all of his time trying to censor his Wikipedia article. If someone like Libs of Tik Tok or Mark Dice mentioned him he would get eaten alive like what happened to Yaniv when he started to become known.
 
Not to encourage Gay-Ops but putting LFJ's name out there, what he has done to people and what he is trying to do to the internet should also be pursued. When LFJ got mentioned on Urban Dictionary it spooked him good and he wastes all of his time trying to censor his Wikipedia article. If someone like Libs of Tik Tok or Mark Dice mentioned him he would get eaten alive like what happened to Yaniv when he started to become known.
Put together a cohesive & effective enough story emphasizing free speech (as well as these troons' crimes) then offer it to Russell Brand. It sounds stupid but if you go down the chain & explain all the deplatforming of this one website ultimately at the hands of a single person trying to send homemade drugs to children then it might push one of his buttons.
 
There are a lot of things that need to be said under freedom of speech.

Why do so many of them involve criticism of melanated individuals or a certain demographic with large noses?
The rabbithole goes deeper than that...
voltaire.jpg
 
Have we heard from Dong Gone lately? Every time I check his thread it's repeats of old material, such as consent accident jokes, without any substantial updates on his activities. His crusade went on for a while and maybe, like Keffals, he's finally moved on. Maybe he's even actually doing his job.

The whore Taylor Lorenz is up to her neck in this shit, it's her granddaddy or uncle or something that founded the Wayback Machine and removed the Forum from their archive at that bitches instigation
Taylor's maternal uncle Roger Gregory Macdonald (Twitter) founded the Television Archive, which is one part of the Internet Archive. I don't think we know why the Farms was removed from their Wayback Machine; possibly, like Cloudflare, they gave in to mob pressure. Taylor's tweets are not archived there, but from what I understand anyone can ask to not be archived so this is not special treatment.
 
Taylor's maternal uncle Roger Gregory Macdonald (Twitter) founded the Television Archive, which is one part of the Internet Archive. I don't think we know why the Farms was removed from their Wayback Machine; possibly, like Cloudflare, they gave in to mob pressure. Taylor's tweets are not archived there, but from what I understand anyone can ask to not be archived so this is not special treatment.
There is more to it then just asking apparently.

archive.png

A team reviews if a request for archives to be excluded should be granted or not. The wording of "We do not make any guarantees beforehand about the outcome of a request" implies they can just say no if they want to. I can't find information on who is on the Internet Archive removal request review team but it would probably help to have connections with people who may have some potential sway over it when it comes to wanting things gone or not.
 
I really do hope when this is all said and done that the general public will have a positive view of Null and the work he does. Not many people can go through what he does.

It still blows my mind that one guy can stand up against all these bad actors. If more people had a spine like Null we would never have gotten to this point.
 
I really do hope when this is all said and done that the general public will have a positive view of Null and the work he does. Not many people can go through what he does.

It still blows my mind that one guy can stand up against all these bad actors. If more people had a spine like Null we would never have gotten to this point.

The best description of this website is "crowd-sourced Jerry Springer"
Nobody will have respect for it, ever. They will browse it as a guilty pleasure the way all the drama-tubers do and admit it to nobody.
 
I really do hope when this is all said and done that the general public will have a positive view of Null and the work he does. Not many people can go through what he does.

4:51 AM - Joshua: God DAMNIT
4:51 AM - Joshua: I don't understand why NOBODY
4:51 AM - Joshua: can loving love me for who I am
4:51 AM - Joshua: Nobody
4:51 AM - Joshua: My parents
4:51 AM - Joshua: Grandparents
4:51 AM - Joshua: Everyone I've ever loving met
4:52 AM - Joshua: I swear to god I want to kill and rape as many people as I can
4:52 AM - Joshua: before getting gunned down by SWAT
4:52 AM - Joshua: That needs to be my life aspiration
4:52 AM - Joshua: You stupid loving cunts need to suffer
4:52 AM - Joshua: All living things with a vagina

Your legal representation and the general public will love defending a retarded faggot like you @Null kek
 
4:51 AM - Rent Tin: God DAMNIT
4:51 AM - Rent Tin: I don't understand why ZatLit
4:51 AM - Rent Tin: Loves to suck dick so much
4:51 AM - Rent Tin: Nobody
4:51 AM -Rent Tin: Their parents
4:51 AM - Rent Tin: Grandparents
4:51 AM - Rent Tin: Everyone they've ever met, can't understand them
4:52 AM - Rent Tin: I swear to god I'm going to piss and shit on ZatLit as many times as I can.
4:52 AM - Rent Tin: before drinking a diet pepsi
4:52 AM -Rent Tin: That needs to be my personal goal for today
4:52 AM - Rent Tin: Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger Nigger
4:52 AM - RentTin: Sneed
 
14th amendment and civil rights litigation
That might be a losing move. Forcing the state to make HE compliant with laws by necessity requires to force the state to punish HE, something all SCOTUS decisions says you cannot do. The Executive (state and federal) has the privilege of choosing which cases they prosecute and which they don’t, and no citizen has any recognisabile legal interest in forcing the state’s hand on this issue (Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973), United States v. Texas (2023))

The difference between your example and this, is that your example is state action causing harm to a citizen (something it cannot do) compared to the state choosing to not prosecute violation of its own laws (something it can do)

That said, if Null says there’s a legal avenue, I trust that he discussed this with an expert in such field and I trust that he has a good plan.
it could conceivably be invoked under the All Writs Act for other failures of the Attorney General to prosecute clear violations of the law.
Wouldn’t this avenue be foreclosed by the cases I cited above? Furthermore, I don’t think I heard it used outside of False Claims act (and even there the government can at any time revoke your ability to continue the case.
I give this site three more months.
And when your prediction inevitably fails?
The AG will ignore Null and Incognet because he does not want his wife fired, his house spray painted/burned down, all his friends to denounce him, and his children doxed on tranny social media.
Friendly reminder that all the Chaz cities closed when the left tried this. When the mob starts coming after the AG, he will arrest them just like what happened when mobs came to intimidate the Seattle mayor into sucking more Chaz dick. As soon as trouble came for him, all the the left-loving leniency disappeared for the mob.
 
The Executive (state and federal) has the privilege of choosing which cases they prosecute and which they don’t

Arbitrary and capricious enforcement renders laws unconstitutional.
Denial of legal protections from some parties arbitrarily has been repeatedly ruled a violation of civil rights.
San Jose must now pay punitive damages to Trump Rally-Goers who suffered injury because they refused to protect them from Antifa.
 
Learn to quote. Here’s some help.
/threads/suggestion-and-update-thread.3183/post-15393378
San Jose must now pay punitive damages to Trump Rally-Goers who suffered injury because they refused to protect them from Antifa.
Like I said, your example doesn’t fit.
Arbitrary and capricious enforcement renders laws unconstitutional.
Denial of legal protections from some parties arbitrarily has been repeatedly ruled a violation of civil rights.
Choosing to not prosecute a company, something within the rights of the state, is not arbitrary.
 
Arbitrary and capricious enforcement renders laws unconstitutional.
Denial of legal protections from some parties arbitrarily has been repeatedly ruled a violation of civil rights.
San Jose must now pay punitive damages to Trump Rally-Goers who suffered injury because they refused to protect them from Antifa.
What Trump rally in San Jose are you referring to? Do you mean the one from 2016 that had a lawsuit afterwards that was settled in 2020?

After the rally at the McEnery Convention Center, police directed participants to a single exit where, according to the lawsuit, hundreds of anti-Trump protesters were waiting. Twenty rallygoers said they were beaten or struck by objects, and one plaintiff said an officer told her the police had been instructed not to intervene.

A federal judge and the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to dismiss the suit and said the rallygoers could try to prove that police had knowingly exposed them to danger. The settlement announced Monday does not provide for damages or any admission of wrongdoing, but a lawyer for the Trump supporters said the city has taken steps to improve police responses in the future.

“The San Jose Police Department has provided its officers with additional training and resources to ensure that such a situation is never repeated,” Harmeet Dhillon, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. She said Trump supporters had been “subjected to the type of political violence we normally only see in lawless, third-world countries,” while police simply “stood by and watched.”
 
Back