I hate the Internet and the people who own it

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
mentioning Triggernometry it might be worth even trying some of the more normie guys, like ACLJ or Seb Gorka
ACLJ actually does serious business constitutional shit, Gorka hates the fuck out of Fuentes and Kirt among others who have threads, so he might be game for "enemy of my enemy" even if he reeeees about no-no words and talking shit about the Comedian of Kiev
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: SIMIΔN and LGHDR+
Wasn't Kiwi always Polish?
kiwi.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, Doc Cassidy, Judas Connor Moon and 40 others
dustbuster said:
Warning:
Debanking is a thing in the USA.

Old Glory Bank might be an option to avoid debanking.
Founded by John Rich and various anti-cancellation literally whos?

There are plenty of banks that use fednow.
The problem is actually retaining the account itself.
Andrew Torba is instructive. Banks will drop people at the drop of a hat now.

If you have a merchant account you can do check by internet without fednow.
If you can't maintain a bank account, fednow is worthless.
Click to expand...
It is a thing in Canada as well. Scotiabank did it to Jeremy makenzie and another person so far, RBC did it to rebel news sort of. TD bank were freezing accounts BEFORE the emergencies act was called.
So it looks Scotiabank is the worst offender for "De-banking" north of the border with TD being the second worst, with RBC coming in third. Canada is usually the Canary in the coal mine for the U.S and vice versa, as what one does first, the other tends to follow,
This is why Credit unions are extremely vital right now. in order to do your financials, you have to buy a share of the bank(usually like a dollar or 2) so "de-banking" in a credit union is way more difficult than simply being a customer at a bank. If the board wants to be a politically-motivated POS SJW, you can literally vote them out in a credit union, so they have more skin in the game to avoid being political, where a bank doesn't have that same level of accountability.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Autistic Joe, Harvey Danger and 9 others
ZatLit said:
4:51 AM - Joshua: God DAMNIT
4:51 AM - Joshua: I don't understand why NOBODY
4:51 AM - Joshua: can loving love me for who I am
4:51 AM - Joshua: Nobody
4:51 AM - Joshua: My parents
4:51 AM - Joshua: Grandparents
4:51 AM - Joshua: Everyone I've ever loving met
4:52 AM - Joshua: I swear to god I want to kill and rape as many people as I can
4:52 AM - Joshua: before getting gunned down by SWAT
4:52 AM - Joshua: That needs to be my life aspiration
4:52 AM - Joshua: You stupid loving cunts need to suffer
4:52 AM - Joshua: All living things with a vagina

Your legal representation and the general public will love defending a retarded faggot like you @Null kek
Click to expand...
I've given you your tophat, but you have a point there. With all the news appearances lately, Kiwifarms is straight optics cyanide these days. Upper tech is full of social climbers - you have to be RMS levels of autistic to say, "Oh, this Stormfront adjacent website that literally bullied the most talented emulator dev and a few trannies to death being allowed to exist is a good for society akshually".

Even EFF, one of the only groups that are solidly on our side still, are extremely careful in their wording. Suggest you have any sympathy for Nool and the local sneeders and suddenly the Googlebuxx making up 90% of your funding are gone, Metabuxx making up half of the rest are gone too, and some Discord child predator gets your legal charity status rescinded.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: Matt Damon, Procrastinhater, Not A Skinwalker and 2 others
Dyn said:
Russell Brand has been pretty consistently pro-speech and pro-freedom in everything I've seen about him
Click to expand...
I can't prove this, but there's a longstanding rumour in the UK comedy scene that Russell Brand has a super-injunction to stop anyone discussing the rapes he's committed. He's not a free speech advocate, and he's unlikely to speak up for a website where people dox rapists.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Autistic Joe, Markass the Worst, Nancy and 7 others
If Russell Brand has any super injunctions out, they're only enforceable under English and Welsh law. Under the rules of a superinjunction it's illegal to even know it exists.
They're not enforceable under Scots law, (the fact that Scottish media doesn't report on them is merely a long standing tradition) or anywhere else on the globe, so if anyone has got wind of them, American media, say, is free to report on it.
In the Internet age, superinjunctions are useless, and even rumours of them are suspicious enough.

Edit: Wasn't it known that Russell Brand was a bit of a consent accident connoisseur from his sex addict, drug addict, wild man days? There were always rumours that his new women every night escapades were not always consensual in the gossip columns of the red tops. No out right accusations, I suppose, (libel) but certainly enough if you read between the lines.

*Also, fuck these ddos-ing cunts.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Autistic Joe, Markass the Worst, Nancy and 6 others
Pee Cola said:
Russell Brand is too far to the left to take the troon menace seriously.
Click to expand...
would people in general take him seriously? last i recall most people considered him to be conspiracy theory guy whos only famous because he was kinda cool in a movie once. i know he has been willing to cross lines other people with his type of platform wont cross but i dont really see him as someone who would be willing to do anything to help out here and even if he did people would write him off. unless i am missing something here?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Procrastinhater, LGHDR+ and Pedophobe
FuckedOffToff said:
If Russell Brand has any super injunctions out, they're only enforceable under English and Welsh law. Under the rules of a superinjunction it's illegal to even know it exists.
They're not enforceable under Scots law, (the fact that Scottish media doesn't report on them is merely a long standing tradition) or anywhere else on the globe, so if anyone has got wind of them, American media, say, is free to report on it.
In the Internet age, superinjunctions are useless, and even rumours of them are suspicious enough.

Edit: Wasn't it known that Russell Brand was a bit of a consent accident connoisseur from his sex addict, drug addict, wild man days? There were always rumours that his new women every night escapades were not always consensual in the gossip columns of the red tops. No out right accusations, I suppose, (libel) but certainly enough if you read between the lines.

*Also, fuck these ddos-ing cunts.
Click to expand...
Nobody reported on Saville while he was alive, despite him having zero super-injunctions. Private Eye reported knowing about 53 super-injunctions in the 2011 scandal, but less than a dozen were revealed to the public. The British media aren't willing to deal with libel suits, even when they're legally able to report.

Katherine Ryan reported working with a rapist on a TV show (source | a) - the details line up with her working with Brand. Fern Brady implied he was a rapist in a tweet (source | a). Super-injunctions took off in 2009, which was around the time Brand tried to clean up his act, after the Sachs scandal and prank calling that rape hotline (source | a).

He's not going to defend the Farms. I'd be shocked if any UK public figures did.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: the_real_debbil, Markass the Worst, Nancy and 5 others
I have another suggestion, albeit an unconventional one...what about Plebity? Yes, they are aligned with "feminism" whatever that word means at this point, but they have spoken out against cancel culture as well as troons in general on several occasions and many of their guest speakers have talked in detail about how destructive and censorious the trans movement is and how it harms people, not just women.

It is a long shot and a strange recommendation, I know, but we need all of the positive exposure we can get at this point. Looking at our supporters on Ovarit of all places, a temporary true TERF/Kiwi Farms alliance might not be so outlandish.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: Autistic Joe, Mojo Thief, Useful_Mistake and 1 other person
Tryphine said:
I can't prove this, but there's a longstanding rumour in the UK comedy scene that Russell Brand has a super-injunction to stop anyone discussing the rapes he's committed. He's not a free speech advocate, and he's unlikely to speak up for a website where people dox rapists.
Click to expand...
Call me a retard, but what the everloving fuck is a super injunction?
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Markass the Worst, Joshuan Moon and 1 other person
din365 said:
This is why Credit unions are extremely vital right now. in order to do your financials, you have to buy a share of the bank(usually like a dollar or 2) so "de-banking" in a credit union is way more difficult than simply being a customer at a bank. If the board wants to be a politically-motivated POS SJW, you can literally vote them out in a credit union, so they have more skin in the game to avoid being political, where a bank doesn't have that same level of accountability.
Click to expand...
Credit unions are the worst offenders for promoting POS SJW shenanigans though, Vancity is the financial embodiment of the Greens.
 
Procrastinhater said:
Call me a retard, but what the everything fuck is a super injunction?
Click to expand...
It's a form of injunctive relief (an "anonymised privacy injunction") that prevents the media reporting on the subject of the injunction, or even reporting that the injunction exists. They're usually associated with the UK, but they didn't originate here. Our courts just love them.
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Lizard Pope, 12345, Markass the Worst and 4 others
Dyn said:
Of course there'd be a catch. If I can only rape British women I might as well just not rape.
Click to expand...
A sentiment Paki's do not share.
I suppose if the alternative is Paki women though :thinking:

Ranking the attractiveness of the detritus of the British Isles is a pointless task, however, and I am part of that detritus.
Hobbit's an ethnicity, right?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Lizard Pope, Kees H, Princess Terf Bong and 2 others
I think it's safe to assume that the girl-talk portion of the attack has begun, now. The pattern is becoming very predictable: DDOS -> extra fat DDOS, -> seethe and dilate when DDOS fails -> girl talk -> recruit embedded troon to fuck things over from the inside -> celebrate until null brings the site up again -> redo from start

And all because one autistic retard refuses to lie down and die.

God bless that man.

:semperfidelis:
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Averagest Redditor, the_real_debbil, Autistic Joe and 12 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back