I just found a game made by the deep state

TheTrumanShow

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 11, 2021


Banks = good
Government control of food distribution = good
Government controlled death squads = good
Lockdowns = good
Internal passports a la Soviet Union = good

Rioters = always bad. They are evil guys in hoods trying to steal food and medicine to RESELL IT AND MAKE A PROFIT those bastards... Only our corporate overlords can make a profit.


Let alone that to play this singleplayer game you have to be connected to the internet.


(Also for extra spicy conspiracy filling, the game was released before Covid and is about a post pandemic NYC).



edit: Ending is actually kinda interesting. Could the game be made by a developer to make people question it? :)
 
Last edited:
edit: Ending is actually kinda interesting. Could the game be made by a developer to make people question it? :)
Nah, it's a Tom Clancy game. You're thinking too hard about it.

Passports were in use long before commies, CHECK MATE ATHEISTS.
Passports yes, internal passports, no.

Fuck commies.
 
It definitely gets the noggin joggin that less than a decade after the game's release was a real pandemic.

I never played it but I remember watching the debut trailer and thinking "yikes, that's a little too plausible"
 
As much of an absolute faggot as OP is being, he's not wrong, per se. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together was backing away from this game back at release, because an unaccountable government black-ops team going Judge Dredd on American citizens on American soil is not a concept to be celebrated.
 
As much of an absolute faggot as OP is being, he's not wrong, per se. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together was backing away from this game back at release, because an unaccountable government black-ops team going Judge Dredd on American citizens on American soil is not a concept to be celebrated.

IIRC, either on launch or in a beta or something you could literally soft lock everyones game at the start by simply not leaving the actual line you had to wait in to get into the quarantine zone or whatever.

So even outside all of the weird Judge Dredd shit, the game was shit and that should been enough to get people to back away.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BlazikenLover
Lol Division 2 is literal about how giving all these people powers was a horrible mistake that only made things worse except for a few that actually helped (the player character).

I also loves that the factions in Division 2 basically shook out to be:
True Sons: Proud Boys
Hyenas: Black Lives Matters
Outcasts: Antifa
 
Anyone with two brain cells to rub together was backing away from this game back at release, because an unaccountable government black-ops team going Judge Dredd on American citizens on American soil is not a concept to be celebrated.
>people backed away because you could shoot looting niggers in the face and not because it was another shitty ubisoft game
ok

also that's an opinion straight outta reddit, when shit hits the fan and society has broken down, who you are going to be accountable to? good luck calling the police with no cell service, and then what, put the criminal in a cell till his trial? good luck finding a judge and a jury of his peers at this point, to again, put him where when there are no more prisons or they are literally run by the criminals?

it's not much different than the programs during the cold war after the nukes started flying, pretty sure that's where clancy got it's original inspiration from (and it's not the first time he dabbled with "end of the world" scenarios featuring a virus).

Lol Division 2 is literal about how giving all these people powers was a horrible mistake that only made things worse except for a few that actually helped (the player character).
don't forget in the intro basically saying "if all else fails, have a gun" (which got reddit riled up to no end), and showing the government being incompetent and corrupt.

it also didn't really matter, without the division nothing would've really changed and would just take longer for society to get back on it's feet organically. keener going rogue after the shit in the dark zone could be anyone else, it just makes for a better twist and villain than some rando going on the warpath.

I also loves that the factions in Division 2 basically shook out to be:
True Sons: Proud Boys
Hyenas: Black Lives Matters
Outcasts: Antifa
nah. true sons are literally run by a nignog warlord committing war crimes, that's the irony. hyenas are just your average druggie gang (rikers in D1 were BLM), outcasts are "antivax" antifa and probably the closes to having a point, but that's where the antifa parts come in just wanting to break shit.
 
>people backed away because you could shoot looting niggers in the face and not because it was another shitty ubisoft game
ok

also that's an opinion straight outta reddit, when shit hits the fan and society has broken down, who you are going to be accountable to? good luck calling the police with no cell service, and then what, put the criminal in a cell till his trial? good luck finding a judge and a jury of his peers at this point, to again, put him where when there are no more prisons or they are literally run by the criminals?
>it's okay because it's niggers
>only niggers, you shoot 0 white people the entire game


And yes, it's very important that you have a gun when civil society breaks down, which is why it's doubly fucking retarded that The Division shoots anyone holding a gun on sight. There are legit fucking war zones out there with more restrictive ROEs.
 
The Division doesn't shoot any one with a gun on sight, they just have no oversight. If a Division agent goes Rogue there is no one to do shit about it (except for other Division agents). Division 2 Seasons was basically all about hunting down Rogue agents that had been screwed over by the system or just didn't care anymore.

There was a reason why the player character was called "Sheriff" during the cutscences: They were sent to a lawless land to bring order and help out the citizens just trying to make it after the collapse.

And fuck it, I'm ust going to say it - Division 2 is a fun as hell game that is worth the $7 on the Epic Store for the base game and expansion. I played it 100% single player and had a great time. Highly suggest getting the Deluxe version for $6 more for the extra story flavor missions and 3 extra specializations auto unlocked.
 
Last edited:
>it's okay because it's niggers
>only niggers, you shoot 0 white people the entire game


And yes, it's very important that you have a gun when civil society breaks down, which is why it's doubly fucking retarded that The Division shoots anyone holding a gun on sight. There are legit fucking war zones out there with more restrictive ROEs.
ah yes, rules when there's no one around to enforce them and anyone else ignores them anyway. guess "being right" feels great when you bleed out on your carpet while a bunch of nignogs are stealing all your shit.
I'm curious, what do the rules state how you're supposed to operate and engage in a kill or be killed scenario?

And fuck it, I'm ust going to say it - Division 2 is a fun as hell game that is worth the $7 on the Epic Store for the base game and expansion.
it was fun till you slam headfirst into the poor itemization and proof they have learned fucking nothing from D1, and then had the gall to ask $30 bucks for a fix "expansion".
not to mention the blatant lying about nerfing event keys so people by their shitty lootboxes with even shittier cosmetics (sandals, shorts and hawai shirt? ah right, it's summer!). not even EA or activision treat their dumb cattle customers that obviously.
 
Tom Clancy-esque story about a guy who uses a CRISPR to meld a couple viruses together, including smallpox, add them to one dollar bills, pass them out in the major malls.

Fits with bioterrorism scenarios from multiple books. Follows the MULTIPLE bioterrorism tests that took place in LA, Seattle, NYC during the Cold War, the 90's, and the GWOT.

Adds "Secret Agents who live unknown among us" because they couldn't use Clancy's usual thing of jerking off snake eaters. Missions center around trying to stop warlord gangs as well as figuring out who the hell released the virus and where.

It was a pretty thin plot. Game was OK, had a problem where only one person could talk to the contacts at a time in the beginning.

But holy shit, it wasn't by the Deep State. People have been doing plague games for years.

Stephen King's "The Stand" was closer to the Gook Pox (except for the hilarious difference between the lethality) right down to government botch up and it being deliberately spread in the beginning.

It was a forgettable MMO shooter. I played it for a while, got bored, moved on.
 
Tom Clancy-esque story about a guy who uses a CRISPR to meld a couple viruses together, including smallpox, add them to one dollar bills, pass them out in the major malls.

Fits with bioterrorism scenarios from multiple books. Follows the MULTIPLE bioterrorism tests that took place in LA, Seattle, NYC during the Cold War, the 90's, and the GWOT.

Adds "Secret Agents who live unknown among us" because they couldn't use Clancy's usual thing of jerking off snake eaters. Missions center around trying to stop warlord gangs as well as figuring out who the hell released the virus and where.

It was a pretty thin plot. Game was OK, had a problem where only one person could talk to the contacts at a time in the beginning.

But holy shit, it wasn't by the Deep State. People have been doing plague games for years.

Stephen King's "The Stand" was closer to the Gook Pox (except for the hilarious difference between the lethality) right down to government botch up and it being deliberately spread in the beginning.

It was a forgettable MMO shooter. I played it for a while, got bored, moved on.
He's basing the idea on Ross's coverage of the game. Based on what he'd played so far he made the assumption that there was pretty much no point in the quarantine established around NY by the time you as a player are put into the story. Add the whole secret agents in random areas thing, and that you're given discretion to kill random Americans just trying to survive or escape the city, and it really seems like you're doing nothing but make things less stable.
 
ah yes, rules when there's no one around to enforce them and anyone else ignores them anyway. guess "being right" feels great when you bleed out on your carpet while a bunch of nignogs are stealing all your shit.
I'm curious, what do the rules state how you're supposed to operate and engage in a kill or be killed scenario?
Okay, since you seem to be unable to differentiate between a private citizen and a State-sponsored death squad, let me break it down Barney-style for you: The Division is a world where Kyle Rittenhouse gets shot by the cops because he was outside and carrying a weapon.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Toolbox
Back