I made a TERF starter pack!

From Wikipedia:

"The spelling of "woman" in English has progressed over the past millennium from wīfmann[9] to wīmmann to wumman, and finally, the modern spelling woman.[10] In Old English, wīfmann meant 'woman' (literally 'woman-person'), whereas wermann meant 'man'. Mann had a gender-neutral meaning of 'human', corresponding to Modern English 'person' or 'someone'; however, subsequent to the Norman Conquest, man began to be used more in reference to 'male human', and by the late 13th century it had begun to eclipse usage of the older term wer.[11] The medial labial consonants f and m in wīfmann coalesced into the modern form "woman", while the initial element wīf, which had also meant 'woman', underwent semantic narrowing to the sense of a married woman ('wife').

It is a popular misconception that the term "woman" is etymologically connected to "womb".[12] "Womb" derives from the Old English word wamb meaning 'belly, uterus'[13] (cognate to the modern German colloquial term "Wamme" from Old High German wamba for 'belly, paunch, lap').[14][15]"
 
men are not women
You're correct. Good job! We agree. Men cannot be women, and men can never be women.
I'm sure we also agree that sex is a biological reality and sex has no spectrum. You're either a man or a woman.
But if we agree that sex is a biological reality and we agree that the physical dimorphism is binary, one or the other. Man or Woman.

then it logically follows that we also have to agree that there is also no spectrum between the social/behavioral expressions of the sexes, since male testosterone levels and female estrogen levels affect how men and women behave. Women don't need to be taught to walk with their hips, and men don't need to be taught to walk with their shoulders, that's just something men and women do subconsciously as a byproduct of the biological realities of their individual sexes, yes?

So if we both agree that sex is a binary without a spectrum, and I'm sure we both agree that men and women have sex-exclusive behaviors that are innate and instinctual that are caused by their respective hormones and neurologies...

Then we either have to agree that the social/behavioral expressions of sex are also a binary, and women who do not embody the social/behavioral expressions typical of their sex are not real women... or you have to come up with a cope for why sex is skin deep and women can be women without a drop of femininity to their personalities or characters, and the only way I can see anyone making that argument is from some faggy marxist commie social constructionist point of view...
 
Last edited:
Troons are men on the outside, and TERFs are men (by virtue of being anti-feminine) on the inside.
I thought this previous was the single stupidest thing I had ever read on this site,

until I read this.
Then we either have to agree that the social/behavioral expressions of sex are also a binary, and women who do not embody the social/behavioral expressions typical of their sex are not real women
 
I don't look on there often, only if I fancy a little chuckle at what they are currently crying about
I make starter pack memes about things I don't care about all the time too! and then proceed to post them on websites I also hate while replying to all the comments. Not caring is the greatest
 
then it logically follows that we also have to agree that there is also no spectrum between the social/behavioral expressions of the sexes, since male testosterone levels and female estrogen levels affect how men and women behave. Women don't need to be taught to walk with their hips, and men don't need to be taught to walk with their shoulders, that's just something men and women do subconsciously as a byproduct of the biological realities of their individual sexes, yes?

So if we both agree that sex is a binary without a spectrum, and I'm sure we both agree that men and women have sex-exclusive behaviors that are innate and instinctual that are caused by their respective hormones and neurologies...

Then we either have to agree that the social/behavioral expressions of sex are also a binary, and women who do not embody the social/behavioral expressions typical of their sex are not real women... or you have to come up with a cope for why sex is skin deep and women can be women without a drop of femininity to their personalities or characters, and the only way I can see anyone making that argument is from some faggy marxist commie social constructionist point of view...
i'm not reading that
men are not women
 
I thought this previous was the single stupidest thing I had ever read on this site,

until I read this.
Yeah, for someone who "hates trannies" this guy spouts a lot of tranny talking points. Literally saying a woman isn't a woman if not feminine, which logically indicates he thinks a feminine tranny is "a real woman". It doesn't take a triple digit IQ to see the inconsistency there.
Really his larp is kinda pathetic, arguably worse than woodclocks.
Also I'm a little perplexed woodclock doesn't have a pink triangle yet, can't tell me staff doesn't know about his autism.
 
I make starter pack memes about things I don't care about all the time too! and then proceed to post them on websites I also hate while replying to all the comments. Not caring is the greatest
I meant bumsnet, the site where middle-aged British TERFs cry about porn and LGBT people.

The hate stuff aside, I guess this place is ok for a laugh or two. Just don't think I'm a TERF because I post here.
 
Yeah, for someone who "hates trannies" this guy spouts a lot of tranny talking points. Literally saying a woman isn't a woman if not feminine, which logically indicates he thinks a feminine tranny is "a real woman". It doesn't take a triple digit IQ to see the inconsistency there.
Really his larp is kinda pathetic, arguably worse than woodclocks.
Also I'm a little perplexed woodclock doesn't have a pink triangle yet, can't tell me staff doesn't know about his autism.
LMAO let me mansplain it to you slowly sweetheart.

Boys can't be girls, but girls who act like boys are also not really girls because people aren't just walking meatsacks who get to act however they want to act and still call themselves whatever they want to call themselves.
1708264727427.png
1708264933982.png

I understand your confusion, thinking I'm using tranny talking points, but the reality is that it's YOU and women like you who say "We can act and do whatever we want and still call ourselves women" using tranny talking points.

It's the trannies who argue that it's how they look on the outside and all they have to do is throw on a dress and say "I'm a she" that makes them women regardless of how they behave or their biological reality.

I'm saying that while you are 100% right about girls bodies and boys bodies; you're also wrong about girls behavior and boys behavior.

To me, a troon pointing at his dick saying "this is a feminine penis, this is a girl dick" and a woman saying she is "strong and independent and don't need no man" are equally delusional and equally contradictory. "Strong, independent" women "who don't need no man" are as much women as a fleshlight is a woman.

I also haven't said a single time that a feminine acting tranny is a woman, stop trying to be a man; you're not logical or rational, you are a woman. Embrace it.
I am saying women who do not embody femininity are as much women as these soyboy numales are men
1708267042590.png


Go bake some cookies and try laughing at some deathfats like a good girl and stop trying to use logic, you're bad at it.

@Hooked on phobics
If you don't want to read, or want to pretend you didn't read, my other post just answer this simple question.
Do you believe masculinity and femininity are social constructs or do you believe masculinity and femininity are the behavioral endpoints of the biological realities of men and women?
A or B sweetheart.
 
Last edited:
Want to be just like the once beloved children's author famous for Harry Potter but then became obsessed with trans people? Or the former funny-man who used to write Father Ted whose wife left him after his trans obsession began? Here's all you need to get started!


This is a heckin funny big chungus meme, you should post it over on Reddit so you can get some updoots!

1708285518236.png
 
Do you believe masculinity and femininity are social constructs or do you believe masculinity and femininity are the behavioral endpoints of the biological realities of men and women?
GENERALLY, masculinity / femininity are biologically inclined, but SEX is the highest imperative. Sex is what actually QUALIFIES one to be a woman / man, quality of woman / man might indeed be heavily influenced by masculinity and femininity, but you don't seriously say a man "isn't a man" or a woman "isn't a woman" because they lack it, unless you are supporting tranny ideology, because its a clear question of WHICH is more important in determining what is a woman? Genitals, or femininity. I say genitals. And you are saying feminity.... Which means you have no argument why a "passing" tranny isn't a woman, because you already said genitals don't matter.

If your autistic ass struggles, think of it of levels of "being a man" or "being a woman". you ALWAYS start out at level 1 (genitals) and most develop some (level 3, basic physical development) but to say someone is under level 5 (refined masculinity / femininity) ISN'T a man or woman, is ignoring they AT LEAST hit level 1. And level 1 of course, omits all trannies, because you cannot be level 3 without first being level 1. And even the soyboys you've mentioned (I've seen worse) I'd class as male, because they got dicks. Doesn't mean you have to respect those people.

I know you are probably coming from a "be a real man!" type ethos, But you can get this message across with different words that don't sound like buying into gender ideology. Call them fags, call them failed men / women, whatever. But stop encouraging tranny verbage.

Also why are you calling a guy a sweetheart? you sound like a fag.
 
GENERALLY,
Stopped reading here. There's nothing "general" about it. I view feminists, faggots, bulldykes, and all other similar human stains as facsimiles of people, let alone the various identities as anything other than simulations of those essentialisms. To me, a feminist, a faggot, a bulldyke, or anything of any similar nature is, in every principled way, fundamentally no different than a tranny. Post modern abominations, approximating the qualities they represent as they're continuously redefining them. They're anti-humans, let alone identifiably male or female.
A) devalue the authentic manifestations of masculinity and feminity by allowing people to transpose their own subjective preferences, their algaes on the statues, over top of those intrinsic qualities.
B) Flatter degenerate post modernists and social constructionists who believe women can be anything except women and men can be anything except men and be granted the honor without the obligation of adhering to those essentialisms.

I value what is Real, capital R, Real. Not the inauthentic, inorganic, confusions that people adopt as masks. I have no value for feminists who desex themselves, I have no value for numale faggots who are completely divorced from anything even possibly representing a manifestation of their masculine energy.
Feminists are as much women to me as troons are, which is to say not at all; similarly, faggots, dykes, and their post modernist sympathizers.

Have you ever been around people who are being completely inauthentic, think back to high school, I'm sure you remember "that kid" who tried way too hard to be one of the "cool kids" but you knew, and everyone knew, he was an interloper, a fraud, inauthentic; anti-real. You knew it just by looking at him or her, that this wasn't the person he or she actually was, it was an act.
That is how I feel when I look at women behaving in every possible way other than what would be feminine and therefore, to me, they're only approximately women, the same way you feel about troons, I feel about both those kinds of women and troons.

Also why are you calling a guy a sweetheart? you sound like a fag.
LMAO, my mistake; I thought, based on your blatent stupidity and unwarranted arrogence that you had to be a woman, but you're really just proving my point for me.
 
Last edited:
Stereotypes are built off the broad behaviors of groups, but do not define or influence individual choices. Behaviors do not decide biology. An "effeminate" man is still a man, and a "masculine" woman is still a woman.
 
Back