💊 Manosphere IceCat - the defender of loveshies

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Simplicity111 said:
Alright @IceCat, answer this please: I'm aware that you gave your answer about why you defend loveshies in general, but why do you defend Marijan? You said you dislike him in other threads anyway, so I really don't get it.
Click to expand...
I don't think I really defended him. My stance was if the guy has a kid on the way like he says he does I might think more about the things I say to him e.g. cut down the impulsive insults to a minimum.
 
IceCat said:
I don't think I really defended him. My stance was if the guy has a kid on the way like he says he does I might think more about the things I say to him e.g. cut down the impulsive insults to a minimum.
Click to expand...
If he actually had a kid then he should be raising that kid, not spending all his time defending his ideologies on Kiwi Farms and neglecting him/her. Since he was doing that and not raising this hypothetical kid, I think we were justified to. Also, he wouldn't be a good parent anyways.
 
IceCat said:
I don't think I really defended him. My stance was if the guy has a kid on the way like he says he does I might think more about the things I say to him e.g. cut down the impulsive insults to a minimum.
Click to expand...
You don't think you were defending him. I can assure you, you were. LOL at believing anything @Holden says. Because he's a totally reliable source of information. Is it easy being this naive?
 
IceCat said:
I don't think I really defended him. My stance was if the guy has a kid on the way like he says he does I might think more about the things I say to him e.g. cut down the impulsive insults to a minimum.
Click to expand...
If he has a kid coming, that's MORE of a reason to insult him. I'm not aware of CPS services in Croatia, after all.
 
IceCat said:
I really haven't seen much good evidence against the things I believe in, and of-course personally have seen much evidence for most of the things I talk about
Click to expand...
IceCat said:
basically, yes I am

cherry picked ppl some from hundreds of years ago aren't enough to sway me, sorry
Click to expand...
IceCat said:
Walt Disney?

The only real one you mentioned is Charlie Theron. Look I'm not saying it doesn't happen once in a while, I'm just saying I've never seen it happen.
Click to expand...

This is you right now:
1.jpg


And not only that, but it does look like you're either unable to or too chickenshit to explain why you and the rest of you losers need women so bad. I mean as I've sated, it can't be for the emotional bonds: strong friendships often serve a very similar role. It sure as shit isn't for the physical ones, since as I mentioned, you can get exactly the same feeling for that with cranking dat. So why is it?

And as an aside:
09018679bbbcbac57bf058cb795379a0.png

4b5a814a30d8fbbf5ee786c9c44ef42b.png

Nice to see that you are still a pussy who can only use the rating system when you can't explain shit or someone says something that causes you to sob into a tub of lard.

Predicted Rating from your cowardly ass: Dislike

Received Rating from your cowardly ass:
8f2de74b64e3697a842488b8fb7e021b.png

Close enough.
 
Last edited:
Adamska said:
This is you right now:
1.jpg


And not only that, but it does look like you're either unable to or too chickenshit to explain why you and the rest of you losers need women so bad. I mean as I've sated, it can't be for the emotional bonds: strong friendships often serve a very similar role. It sure as shit isn't for the physical ones, since as I mentioned, you can get exactly the same feeling for that with cranking dat. So why is it?

And as an aside:
09018679bbbcbac57bf058cb795379a0.png


Nice to see that you are still a pussy who can only use the rating system when you can't explain shit or someone says something that causes you to sob into a tub of lard.

Predicted Rating from your cowardly ass: Dislike
Click to expand...
I think it's rather obvious, really. Take something away from a child, and they want it a whole lot more.
 
Wolfenmaus said:
I think it's rather obvious, really. Take something away from a child, and they want it a whole lot more.
Click to expand...

Oh I'm well aware that that is the most likely reason, but I would like to see their excuse. Because it's always fun to see a person desperately try to find a way to stop reality from smashing their delusions with a wrecking ball.
 
How was I wrong?

To the guy above you I already told you my belief that many ppl need and desire a partner.
 
IceCat said:
How was I wrong?

To the guy above you I already told you my belief that many ppl need and desire a partner.
Click to expand...
Because religion has nothing to do with computers. You can't just state a factual statement (ie you not being atheist) and think you've answered a question.

For Example-
Q- What day is it?
A- Puppies have fur.

That's basically what you do but somehow even more retarded.

IceCat said:
To the guy above you I already told you my belief that many ppl need and desire a partner.
Click to expand...
Have you ever considered that you're wrong?
 
IceCat said:
How was I wrong?

To the guy above you I already told you my belief that many ppl need and desire a partner.
Click to expand...

There is literally a button for each post you refer to called "Quote me now" you doofus, unless you want to keep things and statements to others intentionally ambiguous so you can wiggle your way out of actually specifying shit or try to dodge people.

So that's your reason eh?

You losers want women because people want and need women. Your entire reasoning is circular and has nothing to supplement that or reinforce it. Your conclusion is exactly the same thing as the question I'm asking. Good job; you've decisively proven that you have no good reason for this and that @Wolfenmaus ' supposition is a far more likely candidate.

Expected Rating: Disagree
 
IceCat said:
How was I wrong?
Click to expand...

The premise was yours. Paraphrasing, "people who have had bad lives end up being bad people." We gave you a lot of historical and factual examples that disprove that. The closest you came to admitting you're wrong was "I'm not saying it doesn't happen every once in a while". Which is bending the truth.. You originally said:

"Because I'll be honest with you I know ppl that have had truly terrible things happen to them. And they've all turned out to be bad and/or underachieving ppl. With 100% confirmation rate."

That's a pretty darned affirmative statement with no room for "it can happen every once in awhile".

To the guy above you I already told you my belief that many ppl need and desire a partner.
Click to expand...

I can believe the sky is purple, that doesn't make the sky purple. That is the crux for why anecdotal evidence is not good evidence.
 
Adamska said:
There is literally a button for each post you refer to called "Quote me now" you doofus, unless you want to keep things and statements to others intentionally ambiguous so you can wiggle your way out of actually specifying shit or try to dodge people.

So that's your reason eh?
Click to expand...
THIS. Multiple people, including I, have told IceCat to use the quote feature, and have also told him I didn't know who he was replying to. Hell, he uses it sometimes, so I'm assuming his attempt is to dodge all the crucial questions in order to "win" the argument.

...and oh, I almost forgot. Expected rating from IceCoward: "Disagree"
 
supdup said:
The closest you came to admitting you're wrong was "I'm not saying it doesn't happen every once in a while". Which is bending the truth.. You originally said:

"Because I'll be honest with you I know ppl that have had truly terrible things happen to them. And they've all turned out to be bad and/or underachieving ppl. With 100% confirmation rate."

That's a pretty darned affirmative statement with no room for "it can happen every once in awhile".
Click to expand...
No it isn't.

If it does happen (which I admitted it did), I just haven't seen it yet.
 
IceCat said:
No it isn't.

If it does happen (which I admitted it did), I just haven't seen it yet.
Click to expand...

This is pretty hilarious, since you are using the same and I do mean the same type of defenses and rhetoric as creationists. Hell, I've seen this happen with a lot of conspiracy theorists, where when they get caught on their shit, they climb down to an easier position to defend. But then will use the same rhetoric since they just don't give a fuck about the truth.

Do you also believe that fossils are just things placed into the ground by @Satan to fool the righteous?

Expected Rating From you: Dislike
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom