If aliens are real (the little grey black eyed creatures) and they resemble humans doesn't that suggest we are related?

[Troon_Patrol]

Accept that we evolved from apes, accept that there is something to the UFO/ extra terrestrial life concept. If apes resemble humans, as in two eyes two arms two legs and the basic physical structure and anatomy and biological functions being damn near exactly the same; then if the "grey" does exist as described in alleged leaked government documents and witness statements the odds a form of life evolved to have the nearly the exact physical form of a human being,once again two eyes, two legs, walk upright like a human being etc etc... doesn't that suggest that they are not actually aliens and more likely from an incredibly distant future and traveled through time or some kind of alternate dimension or timeline? Maybe the question shouldn't be where are they from? Maybe it should be does this prove humans will eventually achieve time or interdimensional travel?

 

[TETRABAX]

Depending on who you ask it was shorty after the Manhattan Project the modern UFO/ET reports really began to appear.

Kind of weird that that lines up with the birth of radio, TV, and tabloid entertainment huh. Almost like the more connected we get, the more fun hoaxes become

Assuming the human race does not die prematurely it's theoretically possible we will discover FTL sooner or later.

It's not. FTL is essentially a time machine. There is no evidence of time machines.

That is unless you follow the bio-drone theory.

The bio-drone theory is also retarded for a simple scouting mission. We had pilotless drones more than a decade ago and a species capable of FTL doesn't? Sending living beings into space is so much more complicated and expensive then sending bots. And the bots do a better job, can withstand more extreme environment, don't need to bring food, water, and oxygen, and don't just randomly die from tripping on their feet and hitting their head, and don't randomly get sick/ARS, and a million other things

 

[Troon_Patrol]

Kind of weird that that lines up with the birth of radio, TV, and tabloid entertainment huh. Almost like the more connected we get, the more fun hoaxes become

It's not. FTL is essentially a time machine. There is no evidence of time machines.


The bio-drone theory is also retarded for a simple scouting mission. We had pilotless drones more than a decade ago and a species capable of FTL doesn't? Sending living beings into space is so much more complicated and expensive then sending bots. And the bots do a better job, can withstand more extreme environment, don't need to bring food, water, and oxygen, and don't just randomly die from tripping on their feet and hitting their head, and don't randomly get sick/ARS, and a million other things

Playing the schizophrenics advocate here, you could argue allegedly a ET craft crashed and then semiconductors were discovered 6 months later, in the same country, advancing electronics forward immensely. lining up with the media you mentioned. The transistor semiconductor was more critical to mankind's technology than anything else I can think of.

The only thing I will reply to that is sub atomic particles randomly appear and disappear. If we witnessed an entire object like an apple or a car disappear we'd have clear evidence of some kind of undeniable change in reality I think most of us would assume it slipped into another dimension or time. This is above my education level frankly, I barely made it out of HS.

Who says they need those things in order to live? Maybe they are easier to construct biologically than mechanically? Maybe an advanced race was concerned a sentient non biological entity would be capable of overtaking them, some kind of insurrection like the prologue to "Dune" if you are familiar. EDIT: The Phillip K Dick universe AKA "Bladerunner" they simply decided synthetic beings were to be given life only long enough to complete their task they were biologically engineered for and also limited their intelligence as necessary. Incidentally, anyone who has never seen the 1982 Harrison Ford film adaptation should do themselves a favor and watch it.

If you do not consider there is anything to this, and we toss out the schizophrenics, the cult leaders, fraudsters that still leaves the Nuclear physicist Stanton Friedman, Colonel David Fraver, the David Grusch and all the rest who are are most likely sane. I'm leaving out Bob Lazar because I find him unreliable, I don't trust him %100. What is their motivation in your opinion?