If there is to be a science or medical specialty of mind and behavior how should it be run? - There are many types of Psychology and Psychiatry

Which type of study should we use to correct bad mental behavior first?

  • Application of Public Humiliation

    Votes: 6 46.2%
  • Study of Social Environment and relationships for unhealthy situations

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Study of their Spirituality and Moral Values

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Physical means such as medication, electroconvulsive therapy, or psychosurgery

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Psychiatric Yes/No questions fed into a machine for analysis

    Votes: 1 7.7%
  • Study of semi-structured social tasks for the patient to cooperate with a examiner on

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Psychoanalysis of his or her thoughts, including free associations, fantasies, and dreams

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Study of their childhood mental development

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Study of their attention, reasoning, memory, learning, language, and emotion under observation

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Genetic Sampling and analysis against other patients with similar symptoms

    Votes: 1 7.7%

  • Total voters
    13

Haim Arlosoroff

We all failed to secure the existence of Linconia.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
There are many problems with modern medicine and study of our brain and behavior today where we treat the symptoms and not the cause. Where we suggest normal parts of human experience such as loneliness, grief, disappointment and sadness are reclassified as mental disordered if they affect someone too deeply or for too long. Where once we locked up patients for years and subjected them to testing rigorously, now we proscribe medication and give them a category to define themselves or their illness by with a hands-off approach to underlying causes. Where one in four women report being 'on psych meds' In other words, we poorly attempted to find causes before so now expertly give labels and categories of symptoms without looking and contextualizing the conditions in which the disorder developed.

Is this quick system helping or harming greater society and the individuals looking for a cure? Is there a simple catch-all to try first, a method of sorting easy answers and suggesting correctly of which to look deeper on? Do we simply have no answer to this issue but to either lock them all up or medicate them all?
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: I Love Beef
Is this quick system helping or harming greater society and the individuals looking for a cure? Is there a simple catch-all to try first, a method of sorting easy answers and suggesting correctly of which to look deeper on? Do we simply have no answer to this issue but to either lock them all up or medicate them all?
I think Huxley said it best when talking about the coming revolution of antidepressants back in the 70s:

(Paraphrasing slightly)

"People that take antidepressants might be happy, but it also means they'll be happy in situations where perhaps they ought not be"

If you eliminate people's natural responses, of course things are easier to take off the rails. You might even see widespread lockdowns and curfews with only minimal resistance.
 
It should be completely separate from science.

The mind as an organism should be the realm of technological science. If there is a disorder to be had, there should be (there is now starting to be) the technology to diagnose those physical changes.

Psychology itself needs to be delegated back into the 'counselling' realms. Dealing with the coping mechanisms, the relationships, anything that is emotional. They should not be diagnosing anything, they should only be the possible gateway (not gatekeeping), along with GPs, to further testing, to scientifically diagnose the actual disorder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: melty
Back