Opinion If we learned one thing from the RNC, it's that the GOP is no longer conservative - America now lacks a truly conservative political party. Voters like me have nowhere to go unless we follow suit, sacrificing our principles as the GOP has.

Article Archive

If we learned one thing from the RNC, it's that the GOP is no longer conservative​

America now lacks a truly conservative political party. Voters like me have nowhere to go unless we follow suit, sacrificing our principles as the GOP has.​

Political party conventions are truly the best forecast for a party's direction, or at least its vision, at that moment. The speakers chosen, the content they cover and the nominees elevated in each convention paint the clearest picture of that direction.

This is especially true for the 2024 Republican National Convention, as we watched the party fully embrace former President Donald Trump’s vision. But what I watched unfold over that week wasn’t conservative. It was the embrace of populism in the interest of winning elections, even at the cost of our principles. It was sad to see.

I watched conservatives sacrifice meaningful stances, such as being anti-abortion, opposing sexual promiscuity and opposing union strangleholds on our economy in the name of winning the election.

The GOP is willing to abandon stances that matter if it means votes

The Republican Party has been toying with abandoning Reagan conservatism for some time now. The embrace of Trump in the 2016 presidential election was the beginning, but the party at the time struck a balance, highlighting Trump as a vessel through which conservative ideas could resonate with Americans whom he appeals to.

From President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s until 2016, the GOP was the party of limited government, free markets and hawkish foreign policy. Now, that's all in the past. The latest platform abandons all of that in exchange for an outlook where breaches of conservative principles are justified if they favor the "common good" of winning control.

The party is building an entirely new coalition behind Trump. This coalition doesn’t care if you're a conservative. All they care about is what will get you to vote for Trump.

Trump's RNC acceptance speech:Trump's triumphant night comes amid calls for Biden to get the boot

In his vice presidential nomination acceptance speech Wednesday, JD Vance said, "We have a big tent in this party on everything from national security to economic policy."

While that may have been true in the 2010s, the Republican Party has made it clear that it wishes to move away from that era and into a new one shaped by a populist vision.

Just look at who Republicans invited to speak at the RNC

The GOP’s new strategy, trading firm stances on abortion and other issues for votes, can be seen through the people they chose to speak at their convention.

First up, and most egregiously, we have Amber Rose, an OnlyFans model and pro-abortion activist. Rose presented herself as a misguided woman who was led by the media to believe lies about Trump. Regardless, she lives a life that is antithetical to that of conservative values. She hasn't exactly hidden it.

"I’m not a Satanist. … Satanists are just atheists as well, but they're just more political,” Rose said in an interview this year in which she defends Satanists. “They help a lot of people, a lot of women, to get abortions in Southern states that, you know, where they're illegal."

Call me closed-minded, but I have no interest in rebranding America’s supposedly conservative party to include people like this. There is no form of conservative ideals compatible with someone who defends Satanists for helping women get abortions. Full stop.

Next up, we have Teamsters President Sean O’Brien. Having a union boss speak at the RNC is a complete reversal for the GOP that, as recently as 2021, introduced the National Right To Work Act into Congress. This act would outlaw forcing workers to join unions and pay dues against their will.

Embracing such an anti-worker and historically corrupt organization as the Teamsters, a group that has actively fought against right-to-work laws, is a complete reversal from the GOP. Allowing unions to keep a stranglehold on the economy and extort workers goes against principles the Republican Party has held for decades.

This particular change is an outright embrace of populism, looking to appeal to the one-fifth of voters nationwide who belong to union households. Joe Biden won this demographic nationally in 2020 and by slightly more in Midwest swing states.

JD Vance was a bad pick:Trump's VP pick makes it clear unity isn't the goal of the Republican Party

Trump's own speech shows GOP's changing message includes making him God's chosen leader

Trump's speech Thursday night at the RNC was shockingly free of divisiveness (relative to his status quo). However, he did take the time to highlight his position as the Republican Party's figurehead.

"I'm not supposed to be here tonight," Trump said, reflecting on the assassination attempt. "I stand before you in this arena only by the grace of almighty God."

A common theme throughout the convention was speakers suggesting that divine intervention was responsible for Trump surviving the attempt on his life.

“God spared President Trump from that assassin,” said Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders in her Tuesday speech, “because God is not finished with him yet.”

Portraying Trump as God's chosen leader for the future of the party and the country is a dangerous line to walk, and deifying politicians is a dangerous game.

Trump loyalists would rather embrace nonconservatives than work with Reagan Republicans

Trump also took time during his speech to speak directly to Vance, his pick for vice presidential nominee.

"You're going to be doing this a long time. Enjoy the ride," Trump said.


Trump's words to Vance highlight exactly his vision in selecting him: a successor who will take over the future of the MAGA movement.

After the events at the RNC, it is clear that the GOP is actively pursuing a new coalition without real conservatives in it. This shift is particularly disheartening to me, a Gen Z voter. I missed out on candidates like Mitt Romney, John McCain and George W. Bush and instead got Trump again.

I had hoped this phase for the GOP would work itself out, and we might return to some semblance of conservative candidates in the future. But it is now clear to me that this will not happen anytime soon.

America now lacks a truly conservative political party. Voters like me have nowhere to go unless we follow suit, sacrificing our principles as the GOP has.

Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
 
Nobody wants the "corporations are people too" style of conservatism.
Most conservative voters hate that shit.
They just don't want infinity migrants, identity politics, pointless wars 10000 miles away, degeneracy and a crumbling economy.
They don't want cosmopolitan assholes who don't care about their own nations to run everything.

Old school conservatism being so off-putting is the reason why lefties took over.
You bring old school political US conservatism and people will start voting Dems en masse once again.
 
Nobody wants the "corporations are people too" style of conservatism.
Most conservative voters hate that shit.
They just don't want infinity migrants, identity politics, pointless wars 10000 miles away, degeneracy and a crumbling economy.
They don't want cosmopolitan assholes who don't care about their own nations to run everything.
I thought that was neocons, not old school conservatives. I'm kind of confused now.
 
ahh yes, the real problem with America: TOO MANY UNIONS
Unions are traditionally communist organizations that are employed by the left to destroy the economy, see France. When the economy is destroyed the left will step in with welfare and take total control over the country. Poor working class niggas are duped into believing that the union has their best interests at heart.
 
Poor working class niggas are duped into believing that the union has their best interests at heart.
It's not like their employers have their best interests at heart either. If given the choice, I'd go with the group that can shake down my employer for more vs. side with them.
 
There are plenty of third parties where he can go take a principled stand and lose with dignity.

It's not like their employers have their best interests at heart either. If given the choice, I'd go with the group that can shake down my employer for more vs. side with them.

Everyone loves it when their employer gets shaken down, right up until the minute a Toyota dealership opens up nearby.
 
Last edited:
"Muh principals" hasn't won a single election since 2004.

This person is actively simping for total failures like Romney and Mccain (which is funny because McCain was a total RINO who had basically no principles of his own) because they were "principled".

And I'm going to be real here on a few of these issues as someone who's in the center, I don't support abortion, but total abortion bans are not widely supported and pushing them will undo any good that repealing Roe v. Wade did. Unions are generally a good thing, although Unions with too much power can be problematic, I will not broadly stand against Unions, because that means bending over for daddy corporation.

Sexual promiscuity can't be put back in the box at this point, at least not without a major paradigm shift. Not to mention, very few people are going to raise a stink over the presence of hot ladies if that's what they mean by sexual promiscuity.

Also, yet another article using populism as a snarl word. It's funny how the idea of appealing to lots of common people is made out to be this dirty evil thing.
Yep

This dumbass actually thinks running on abortion bans or restrictions has a fucking chance on hell of winning an election.... What an out of touch dumbass
 
Poor working class niggas are duped into believing that the union has their best interests at heart.

The problem is the people the Unions claim to be against very clearly don't have the worker's best interests at heart. At least the unions claim to.

I don't have a lot of use for the Unions. But let's not kid ourselves. You know the "And suddenly, for no reason at all, Hitler rose to power" meme? Basically that, but Unions.
 
Reminder that the media of the time sexually assaulted the president for their own perverted means so they could then claim that they saved his life from cancer.

That's the Reagan legacy. I'll never forget because oh yeah, they did it to trump too.
Both presidents they absolutely despised had to have a finger forcibly inserted into their rectum, because the media said so.
(Regan cancer, Trump og covid proper scooper test)
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
The problem is the people the Unions claim to be against very clearly don't have the worker's best interests at heart. At least the unions claim to.
which makes them more duplicitous in that they actively distract from the real issues in the cases in which they should be useful. Instead of the union-workers being able to enact real change they are appeased their whole life in thinking they are fighting the good fight against the gosh darn evil corporation. The battle is trivialized and gamified. Instead they are robbed and are subservient to a union organization that works against their best interest being a higher pay that could only come about by extreme competition.

Unions are used by the modern corporation to sacrifice profit margins for a greater market share. Unions are an impassable start up cost for new companies. They have wrecked the western economy by destroying innovation and local production. They are founded by communist subversive elements for this very purpose and are used gladly by the same corporations that they claim to fight. The alternative is greed I guess, but I think this is solved by a homogenous population that stands up for its fellow man. It is thus extremely relevant to notice how the same elements that are in favor of unions in the west also wish for a gazillion shit skins to immigrate into the country.
 
Conservatism dieing is a good thing for everyone. Conservative politicians haven't done anything useful in more than 30 years. We don't need people that surrender to the left immediately if we want to go left we will just vote for the original.

My disdain for conservatives is a lot bigger than for liberals. Liberals don't pretend to stand for something they don't. They tell you openly what's up.
Project 2025 is a great example of conservatism trying to remain relevant with no real solution other than censorship.
 
which makes them more duplicitous in that they actively distract from the real issues in the cases in which they should be useful. Instead of the union-workers being able to enact real change they are appeased their whole life in thinking they are fighting the good fight against the gosh darn evil corporation. The battle is trivialized and gamified. Instead they are robbed and are subservient to a union organization that works against their best interest being a higher pay that could only come about by extreme competition.

Unions are used by the modern corporation to sacrifice profit margins for a greater market share. Unions are an impassable start up cost for new companies. They have wrecked the western economy by destroying innovation and local production. They are founded by communist subversive elements for this very purpose and are used gladly by the same corporations that they claim to fight. The alternative is greed I guess, but I think this is solved by a homogenous population that stands up for its fellow man. It is thus extremely relevant to notice how the same elements that are in favor of unions in the west also wish for a gazillion shit skins to immigrate into the country.

I'm not saying Unions are great, or even good. I've seen them destroy too many people, companies and professions.

I'm saying "understand some of the reasons they managed to get a foothold". And they got a foothold even in very homogenous times and industries. Corporations earned the plague that is the unions, as much as I hate them.
 
Limited government to this guy seems to mean totally open borders

Free markets to this guy seems to mean letting multinational corporations team up with other countries to hollow out America's productive capacity, both industrial and in brainpower. Replaced by pajeets

Hawkish foreign policy to this guy seems to mean not being able to beat anyone in a fight but instead to go looking for fights

Union members are Americans too and they're concentrated in industries America needs to be strong for national defense

Reagan would not agree with any of this guy's "Reaganism"
 
I'm saying "understand some of the reasons they managed to get a foothold". And they got a foothold even in very homogenous times and industries. Corporations earned the plague that is the unions, as much as I hate them.
I can sympathize with the position, but more I am frustrated at how these people never learn in that in the current state of things no one really has your best interest at heart besides yourself and maybe your family. The ways to stop corporations from behaving the way that they have traditionally has been demonstrated to not be organized labor but by some other social glue that simply stops people from acting bad e.g., a homogenous population or Christianity.
 
Uh, good? Neoconservatism delenda est. Those fags have repeatedly shown they can't and don't want to conserve anything beyond weapon manufacturers' profit margins, time & again. Certainly they have no interest in conserving American jobs (being every bit in favor of offshoring as the neoliberals next to them), American values (Roe v. Wade being overturned was legit the first significant social-conservative win in 60 years and it came from Trump's hands), American demographics ("Illegal immigration is an act of love" --Jeb!), American rule of law (look how heavily they were involved with the institutional left to fuck Trump over everywhere they could) or American lives (nothing these chickenhawks love more than pushing the country into senseless wars abroad, and some like Max Boot had the temerity to suggest hiring illegals as latter-day foederati to keep the war machine going should Americans become tired of seeing their sons & brothers return home mangled or in coffins for no good reason).

Maybe a Republican can run on a national abortion ban and not commit political suicide...in 2084, assuming Trump wins this year and starts unfucking the fundamentals which have made abortion-on-demand politically acceptable to many and a downright religious sacrament to more than a few in modern America. Fact is, that's provably infeasible at this time. Right now, any right-winger who wants to actually win rather than just grift off culture war issues should be looking at finally destroying the Department of Education (oh look, there's yet another issue this article writer's sainted Reagan himself was running on all the way back in 1980 but then didn't follow through on), going to war with teachers' unions, getting Engel v. Vitale struck down like Roe (that would be the 1962 Warren Court decision that bans even voluntary prayer in schools, brought to you by the Judeo- half of 'Judeo-Christian' like so many other modern social woes) and passing more limited European-style 12/15-week abortion bans at the state level in the meantime.

The left wasn't publicly pushing abortion up to or after birth & transing kids in 1964 either, you want to get huge social changes done, you'd best be ready for a generational fight to actually change the society & culture first. And that certainly isn't going to happen for the right until they first break the stranglehold leftist academia has on the minds of their youth, ideally concurrently with leftist domination of the media they consume.
 
Back