US Illegally placed concrete blocks have taken over public parking in Seattle. Why are they there?

Illegally placed concrete blocks have taken over public parking in Seattle. Why are they there?
The Seattle Times (archive.ph)
By Amanda Zhou
2022-07-30 15:35:24GMT

sea01.jpg
Flowers brighten one in a line of ecology blocks on South Homer Street in Seattle’s Georgetown neighborhood in May. People living in RVs are having a harder time finding parking because of the illegally placed barriers. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)

For the last month, Michael Diaz has been living out of a recreational vehicle parked outside Ruby Chow Park, a triangle-shaped field, where planes roar overhead as they fly into the nearby King County International Airport.

Ahead of Memorial Day weekend, the city is asking him and nearly two dozen other RVs parked around the Georgetown park to leave.

Red “no parking” signs have gone up and Joe Ingram, an outreach worker, asked Diaz what he needs to avoid his vehicle getting impounded.

Diaz thought all he needed were some new batteries and gas. But getting the RV to move is one thing, he said, finding a place nearby to park is another.

“Where can we go from here? To the next block? Nope,” he said. “Can’t park there. They got blocks.”

sea05.jpg
Michael Diaz is among the RV dwellers near Ruby Chow Park in Georgetown who were told they needed to move in May. “Where can we go from here? To the next block? Nope,” he said. “Can’t park there. They got blocks.”(Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)

These days, a significant portion of public parking in Georgetown has been blocked by large chunks of concrete, between 3 and 6 feet long. The blocks, which are sometimes referred to as “ecology” or “eco” blocks, have been placed anonymously and illegally by people hoping to prevent RVs from parking in front of their homes or business.

Large vehicles cannot park overnight in Seattle unless they are in areas zoned for industrial use, concentrating RV dwellers in a few neighborhoods. Ecology blocks have followed, quietly increasing the last two years in neighborhoods like Georgetown, Ballard and Sodo as the city of Seattle suspended parking enforcement during the pandemic.

But now parking enforcement has resumed, with people living in their vehicles facing fines and the possibility of losing their shelter.

However, enforcement of the growing number of eco-blocks is almost nonexistent.

sea04.jpg
Concrete blocks line South Front Street between Fifth and Sixth avenues south in Seattle’s Georgetown neighborhood in May. One business owner said in his experience, residents and businesses only place ecology blocks because they feel like they have no other choice. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)

Disproportionate enforcement​

It is illegal to place ecology blocks in public streets, sidewalks or parking spaces. Ecology blocks cause “parking spillover into adjacent streets, block utility access and cause other accessibility or transportation problems,” according to the Seattle Department of Transportation.

Of the hundreds of concrete blocks across Seattle, only 25 unique property and business owners since June 2021 have been warned they could face fines. According to the city, violators could be charged $250 for the first violation, $500 for the second and $1,000 for the third violation, with no limits on the number of fines within a year.

While the department has issued second warnings to some properties, no citations have been issued.

Earlier this year, the transportation department said that it intends to step up enforcement on the rule that vehicles can only be parked on the same block for 72 hours at a time. Since October, the Seattle Department of Transportation has written 4,000 citations and impounded 2,100 vehicles, though the department says it did not impound lived-in vehicles until mid-May.

Homeless advocates say it is not fair that the city expects vehicle dwellers to obey parking laws when it allows businesses to prevent those living in cars from following them by taking up public parking.

“The new mayor ran on a law-and-order platform and this is the law,” said Bill Kirlin-Hackett, the director of the Interfaith Task Force on Homelessness, which runs the Scofflaw Mitigation/Vehicle Residency Outreach Program. “We just find it to be quite hypocritical.”

sea08.jpg
Joe Ingram, right, with the Interfaith Task Force on Homelessness, offers his services to Seattle parking enforcement officers as they place notices on RVs parked in Seattle’s Georgetown neighborhood. Ingram does vehicle residency outreach. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)

The city says the main challenge of responding to complaints about illegal ecology blocks has been identifying who is responsible for them. Because the blocks are placed on public streets, sometimes in the vicinity of multiple properties, it is not always clear who paid for them.

While ecology blocks are typically made with excess concrete and cost around $20 each, each block weighs 1 to 2 tons and cannot be moved without specialized equipment, making it potentially costly or burdensome for the city to remove. The department says it also only responds to ecology blocks through public complaints and does not pay for staff to “continuously patrol the city looking for violations” as it does for parking violations.

“Tow companies have a contract with the city which determines the fees they may charge for an impounded vehicle, but there is not a similar contract when it comes to moving ecology blocks,” SDOT said in a statement.

sea02.jpg
RVs line South Hardy Street next to Ruby Chow Park in Seattle’s Georgetown neighborhood in May. The city told the nearly two dozen RV dwellers they had to move but with parking scarce homeless residents wondered where they could go. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)

Why businesses put blocks down​

Dee Powers said that blocks were occasionally placed before the pandemic but have proliferated in the last year while the city was not enforcing the 72-hour parking rule. During that time, RVs stayed put, sometimes accumulating trash and rats, and drew criticism from locals.

Powers, who previously was an outreach worker for the city-funded Scofflaw Mitigation/Vehicle Residency Outreach Program, remembers the stress of trying to find a new parking spot every few days. For around three years, Powers lived out of a 32-foot motor home in Georgetown and regularly moved their vehicle between two or three spaces to avoid impoundment.

Often Powers moved their vehicle at night when the streets were empty, sometimes swapping spots with a nearby friend. Underlying this “shuffle” of vehicles, Powers said, is an overwhelming fear of impoundment, losing your home and all your belongings, as well as harassment from local residents.

Powers said most RV dwellers have found free parking harder to come by because of blocks and no parking signs, so are more reluctant to move unless they are forced to.

sea06.jpg
A notice from a Seattle parking enforcement officer placed on an RV warns the owner to move the vehicle. Homeless advocates say it is not fair that the city expects vehicle dwellers to obey parking laws when it allows businesses to prevent those living in cars from following them by using public parking. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)
sea07.jpg
The city of Seattle placed a “no parking” sign in front of this RV located near Seventh Avenue South and South Fidalgo Street in the Georgetown neighborhood in May. The orange sticker indicates when the vehicle will be towed. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)

Businesses often drop the blocks right after Seattle Public Utilities asks RV dwellers to temporarily leave so city workers can clean the area.

The practice is so common that when the city of Seattle removed an RV and homeless encampment along Southwest Andover Street in June, the neighboring West Seattle Health Club made no secret of its plans in a letter to its members.

“To avoid the return of the encampment, the West Seattle Health Club is partnering with our neighboring businesses to place eco-blocks along the surrounding area,” the letter said.

Eco-blocks did appear, but in an email, West Seattle Health Club general manager Chauna Agosto said the gym did not place them after the city recommended against it.

JW Harvey, one of the owners of the Orcas Business Park in Georgetown, said people who judge those who put ecology blocks on the street do not know the reality of living and working near a homeless encampment.

Over the last 10 years, but especially during the pandemic, Harvey said he has spent more time providing water and tools and speaking with the people living on the streets next to his property than he has running his business.

Harvey said he does not want to place ecology blocks around his property because they look bad and take up public parking. However, he’s growing tired of trying to manage the “ripple effects” of the homeless population in his neighborhood.

Every time the city removes an RV encampment and cleans up the garbage, it only takes a few weeks for the sidewalk to return to its former state, he said. Harvey said in his experience, residents and business owners only place ecology blocks because they feel like they have no other choice.

“Individual businesses and residents are putting ecology blocks out as taking matters in their own hands because if they call the city and say there are RVs out in front of their business or out in front of their home, they can’t do anything about it,” he said.

Erin Goodman, executive director of the Sodo Business Improvement Area, said businesses owners are concerned about the safety of their employees or worried about losing their livelihood when they place ecology blocks.

In many parts of Sodo, the rats that RV encampments can sometimes attract can put food manufacturers at risk for losing their license, she said, and fires that start in RVs can damage nearby buildings.

Although the Sodo Business Improvement Area does not recommend people break city rules, Goodman said business owners have been asking for help and are frustrated when they are threatened with citations.

“I don’t think [warnings] are going to deter anybody,” she said. “They’re still going to do it and even for the period of time before the city notices, they get a bit of relief.”

sea09.jpg
Fremont Brewing’s production facility in Ballard has ecology blocks outside, July 28, 2022, in Seattle. (Ken Lambert / The Seattle Times)

Where city stands on enforcement​

Fremont Brewing’s production facility in Ballard has become a particularly criticized example of ecology blocks. The beer company is owned by Seattle City Councilmember Sara Nelson and her husband Matt Lincecum.

After receiving reports of ecology blocks around the facility, the city issued a warning to the brewery on Sept. 29, 2021, stating that citations or notice of violation could be issued if they were not removed by Nov. 10, according to records obtained by The Seattle Times.

In November, Lincecum emailed a city employee, saying he appreciated “your assurance that the [Department of Transportation] has decided to pause and reconsider how to proceed.” Lincecum said he is looking for “written confirmation that the city of Seattle has paused enforcement of the alleged street use violation for our brewery and the hundreds of other businesses also using ecoblocks,” including a substation in Ballard.

There are also ecology blocks along Northwest 46th Street next to a U.S. post office building.

“As I also reiterated, I do not want Fremont to be in violation of any city codes and have only kept the ecoblocks in place upon the reassurance from you that we are not currently in violation of Seattle City codes,” the email stated.

Lincecum and Nelson declined to comment.

After being asked about the email, the transportation department denied in a statement that it has suspended enforcement and said it has started to send out second warnings when there is not a resolution.

“Our objective is to make sure that we have correctly identified the responsible party and then to work collaboratively with them if they are willing,” the agency said in a statement. “We hope to encourage them to take responsibility for removing the unauthorized obstructions so that we can find a solution that works well for everyone.”

In the meantime, with fewer parking spaces available, RVs are pushed into other neighborhoods or residential streets and are forced to park closer together, forming clusters.

There, they draw more ire.

Garth Caroll, who has lived out of an RV for six years, said the concrete is a physical symbol of the animosity toward homeless people.

“So much of the community has so much built-up hatred against us,” Caroll said. “We’re just trying to fend for ourselves until we can get some permanent housing.”

sea03.jpg
Ecology blocks line South Homer Street between Padilla Place South and Seventh Avenue South in Seattle’s Georgetown neighborhood in May. It is illegal to place these blocks in public streets, sidewalks or parking spaces, according to the Seattle Department of Transportation. (Steve Ringman / The Seattle Times)
 
Funny thing about these blocks, they're a source of local Facebook drama as they've been showing up in my town (middling purple area of California) at complete random and nobody knows who's dropping them or why. All of them are in very public areas in commercial districts that don't ever get RV traffic or abandoned cars, and several are in the parking lot for a bank. There's no possible purpose for them other than being a nuisance.
 
Funny thing about these blocks, they're a source of local Facebook drama as they've been showing up in my town (middling purple area of California) at complete random and nobody knows who's dropping them or why. All of them are in very public areas in commercial districts that don't ever get RV traffic or abandoned cars, and several are in the parking lot for a bank. There's no possible purpose for them other than being a nuisance.
Check the /fuckcars local reddit and Facebook posts.
 
they are junkies

what the fuck is wrong with everyone on this thread

these are longterm hardcore junkies. they don't drive their shitboxes to any of the zillions of places less expensive than motherfucking *Seattle* because they want to stay near their supply.

also this article completely leaves out the fact that these RVs frequently catch fire and explode.
Fucking thank you.

In threads like these, it becomes really obvious who has personally dealt with junkies and who hasn't. Their fix is the most important thing in the world to them, and they'll do some horrible shit to get it, to the point where it can be tough to still see the humanity in them. And yes, the vast majority of homeless people you see are addicts, so it's not ridiculous to assume the asshole who's been squatting in his RV in front of your home is a junkie.

Sorry, but dopesick, mentally ill people can be terrifying. We're talking about the kind of desperation that leads to a son putting hands on his own mother for not handing over another $20. If they're capable of that, what do you think they're capable of doing to a stranger?

So no, I do not want those kinds of people living anywhere near my home, because I know just how fucking dark addiction can get. I do hope they get help, honestly, but that help isn't found in a filthy RV parked on the curb.
*these people are the ones being the most harmed by bum toleration policies.* they need tough love, or maybe they needed it 10 years ago, maybe it's too late now. they needed society to make real clear to them that they only had two choices: incarceration, or getting a joe job and a shitty apartment and their asses to regular AA meetings.
Yeah, this is the only way out. You have to be tough with them.
An ex-heroin addict I know, he used for between 25 and 30 years. I don't know what the ultimate trigger was for him to get clean, but it happened a handful of years ago. His dad, who had banned his son from his home years back (you can guess why), actually helped his son get a job with a friend's company. This ex-junkie was the kind that everyone who knew him would've sworn any humanity he once had was long dead and gone.

Whatever happened to give him the desire to get clean, it must've been something fucking huge. His dad is a very grounded person, very practical, kind and loving, but refuses to be taken advantage of. If this guy managed to convince his dad to help him out, the only way he managed was to be genuinely sincere for once in his life. Maybe he was recently clean but looking for a way to pull his life together and hopefully give himself more of a reason to avoid relapsing.

Lots of physical labor, but the job pays well and provides decent benefits. However, the agreement with his employer from day one was, the only way he keeps his job is if he agrees to random drug tests three times a week. He pisses hot, he's done. He refuses the test, he's done.

The agreement continues to this day, and the son of a bitch actually stayed fuckin' clean this time.
You have to be firm and be clear that they are the ones responsible for their own actions, no one else, and you will hold them to that standard. You cannot give a junkie an inch, or they'll take ten miles. Those "bum toleration policies" are just plain enabling. It's not the kind you usually see up close, like with a parent-child relationship, but it's still enabling, and it helps no one.

As a matter of fact, it might be worse, because there aren't any immediate up-close and personal consequences. This allows the enabling to continue for even longer. It takes a while for shit to hit the fan with these public toleration policies. Only once the problem is literally parked on the curb in front of their house does the average person realize just what a shit idea these "compassionate" policies are.
 
All you need to know is, people with VEHICLES they are using as their HOMES are being told to MOVE THEM and complaining they have NOWHERE TO GO and NOWHERE TO LIVE.

If nobody cares you don't have a parking permit, well, they won't care if you store your buddy's rusty and unable-to-pass inspection there, right? And if they don't care about the project car, they certainly won't care about the weed in the trunk that he has to store there less he get kicked out of his current place, right? And if they don't care about that, they won't care if you start selling some on the side to make a few bucks....right? And if they..... well, you get the idea.
I can second this.

I ve had to work at an apartment building that has a few carport that face an alley. The whole block is apartment building.

Someone will not have space at their building so they will go park in the alley carport. Then before you know it their car is missing wheels, its broken into, A huge mother fucking black dude has spiderwebbed the window and is sleeping in it.

People park in the car port to do meth 2 in the morning.

I saw a dude get his start living in a RV. See he lived in the meth neighborhood, and didnt pay his property taxes. So he did what any normal person would do when the city sells your home pays the taxes and then gives you the left overs he bought a 1980s motor home with a fucking cracked windscreen. his plan was to just park in front of his old house and live there.

Also trailer parks will not let older trailers stay on site 10 years and older is a no go for them. They are gonna keep shit classey let me tell you.
 
Fucking thank you.

In threads like these, it becomes really obvious who has personally dealt with junkies and who hasn't. Their fix is the most important thing in the world to them, and they'll do some horrible shit to get it, to the point where it can be tough to still see the humanity in them. And yes, the vast majority of homeless people you see are addicts, so it's not ridiculous to assume the asshole who's been squatting in his RV in front of your home is a junkie.

Sorry, but dopesick, mentally ill people can be terrifying. We're talking about the kind of desperation that leads to a son putting hands on his own mother for not handing over another $20. If they're capable of that, what do you think they're capable of doing to a stranger?

So no, I do not want those kinds of people living anywhere near my home, because I know just how fucking dark addiction can get. I do hope they get help, honestly, but that help isn't found in a filthy RV parked on the curb.

Yeah, this is the only way out. You have to be tough with them.
An ex-heroin addict I know, he used for between 25 and 30 years. I don't know what the ultimate trigger was for him to get clean, but it happened a handful of years ago. His dad, who had banned his son from his home years back (you can guess why), actually helped his son get a job with a friend's company. This ex-junkie was the kind that everyone who knew him would've sworn any humanity he once had was long dead and gone.

Whatever happened to give him the desire to get clean, it must've been something fucking huge. His dad is a very grounded person, very practical, kind and loving, but refuses to be taken advantage of. If this guy managed to convince his dad to help him out, the only way he managed was to be genuinely sincere for once in his life. Maybe he was recently clean but looking for a way to pull his life together and hopefully give himself more of a reason to avoid relapsing.

Lots of physical labor, but the job pays well and provides decent benefits. However, the agreement with his employer from day one was, the only way he keeps his job is if he agrees to random drug tests three times a week. He pisses hot, he's done. He refuses the test, he's done.

The agreement continues to this day, and the son of a bitch actually stayed fuckin' clean this time.
You have to be firm and be clear that they are the ones responsible for their own actions, no one else, and you will hold them to that standard. You cannot give a junkie an inch, or they'll take ten miles. Those "bum toleration policies" are just plain enabling. It's not the kind you usually see up close, like with a parent-child relationship, but it's still enabling, and it helps no one.

As a matter of fact, it might be worse, because there aren't any immediate up-close and personal consequences. This allows the enabling to continue for even longer. It takes a while for shit to hit the fan with these public toleration policies. Only once the problem is literally parked on the curb in front of their house does the average person realize just what a shit idea these "compassionate" policies are.
You can tell who has actually lived in a city based on how they feel about the poor and homeless.
 
It's not the kind you usually see up close, like with a parent-child relationship, but it's still enabling

I actually think it's exactly like parent/child or spousal enabling, just on a societal scale. If you don't understand what we're talking about here and you want to, look into alcoholic family dynamics. This is what is playing out in these cities, people are playing roles in order to have emotional and physical needs met, just like in a dyfunctional family, and just like in a dysfunctional family the entire structure acts to protect itself from change.
 
they are junkies

what the fuck is wrong with everyone on this thread

these are longterm hardcore junkies. they don't drive their shitboxes to any of the zillions of places less expensive than motherfucking *Seattle* because they want to stay near their supply.

also this article completely leaves out the fact that these RVs frequently catch fire and explode.

This.

It's not like it's some decent guy who retired and wants to travel the country in a luxury decked out RV. These are drifters looking for a place to park and meth up. Their vehicles are practically duct taped together. And they do not comprehend the concept of "garbage goes in garbage can" at all. They leave a trail of filth everywhere.

Any good people currently stuck in vehicles instead of homes due to financial problems will be able to make use of resources. Junkies are pretty much unemployable and don't want to work or get help for their addiction. So they can't get out of the situation they are in. Because they don't want to. Why bother when you can just sit in your junk heap RV which is close to your dealer and get high until you OD?
 
Funny thing about these blocks, they're a source of local Facebook drama as they've been showing up in my town (middling purple area of California) at complete random and nobody knows who's dropping them or why. All of them are in very public areas in commercial districts that don't ever get RV traffic or abandoned cars, and several are in the parking lot for a bank. There's no possible purpose for them other than being a nuisance.
Funny thing about those blocks. They don't just appear magically. They take people with resources, organization infrastructure and power. It's not "someone" dropping hundreds of 2 ton blocks in neat precisely placed rows. Its the business community. The merchants association and chamber of commerce. The combined lanlords and property owners. They have had enough and are taking collective action. That this does not seem to involve the city government bodes poorly for elected and appointed officers of said government.
 
When I lived in an area with public parking, the city would go enough times through that they'd notice if a car hadn't moved recently. It would get red-tagged and eventually towed.

But these RVs are not going anywhere. They know that those things are too heavy for traditional towing, they're not going to pay any tickets, and there's no way to enforce it.
 
Blatant pro-homeless propaganda from the Seattle Times, must be a day ending in 'y'.
Could they not just allow these RVs to park in a city parking lot with some enforcement to keep it tidy? Or is it because these RVers want their cake and eat it too (they don’t want people finding out their less savory business)?
The city tried that at great expense. It failed spectacularly because these people can't function in civilized society.

The state has also started closing down rest stops along the freeway because of what these fucks get up to.
For me the big, visible thing that's changed are the tents and RV's. These are not people who are spending their literal last dollar on a fix; they obviously had something somewhere when they left solid housing.
They get a lot of shit for free. The tents, in particular, are donated. As mentioned upthread, often they don't own the RVs, they rent them from RV ranchers. Even when they own them, they can get the RVs super cheap at auction. I'm talking several hundred dollars, which is well within reach for a vagrant who shoplifts hundreds of dollars in merchandise every day.
How are they dealing with the sewage? Or getting water and electricity? I thought that stuff was the reason they were forced into trailer parks since otherwise it’s just a shitty box.
The city has a truck that goes around to collect their sewage, but they also often dump into storm drains, which goes right into Puget Sound. They tend to steal electricity and water from neighboring businesses, if not homes.
 
I actually think it's exactly like parent/child or spousal enabling, just on a societal scale. If you don't understand what we're talking about here and you want to, look into alcoholic family dynamics. This is what is playing out in these cities, people are playing roles in order to have emotional and physical needs met, just like in a dyfunctional family, and just like in a dysfunctional family the entire structure acts to protect itself from change.
You said that much, much better than I did. Describing it as enabling on a societal scale is perfect phrasing.

I think what I also meant was that, unlike parent/child or spousal enabling, the chaos isn't right up in your face. Even when the addict puts on a good act and pitifully says, "I need gas money, just to get me through the end of the week," or, "I can't afford my medication for this month, but I'll definitely be able to next month," I'm pretty sure at least a tiny part of all but the most deluded people know, on some level, what they're hearing is bullshit. Even if it sounds plausible, you get to point where you just know, if money is brought up, they're fucking lying. That frustration hits differently than it would with a junkie parked in front of your house.

If the addict is a family member, especially living with or very close by, you can see them getting worse in real time. You know how many jobs they've lost. You know how many times they've dinged or wrecked their car by driving while fucked up. You know for how many more months their driver's license is suspended. You can smell the stench they leave behind after they're done visiting, because they haven't showered or changed their clothes in the past week. You've met the shitty people they date. And you know they're going to die if you keep giving them money, and you've had a front row seat to the pain they've caused. The consequences of your enabling are inches from your face and deeply personal.

Contrast this to enabling on a societal scale. Your tax dollars are going to something called "Harm Reduction." Who wouldn't be in favor of reducing harm? It's nice to see the city putting effort into fighting addiction, and they're fighting it with love, compassion, and understanding. And hey, they're also setting up programs to help the homeless.

Slapping on a cheap coat of feel-good paint only leads to the problem quietly festering just below the surface. But that shiny paint makes it easier to keep telling yourself that those public programs are actually helping people. I mean, it seemed like there were fewer tents on the sidewalks the last time you went into the city, right? At least, you think so. But it also kinda seemed like there might've been less in some areas and more in others...

By the time the chaos spills out into the suburbs, by the time it finally becomes up close and personal, the situation is way out of control. And these people in the article, having never dealt with homeless junkies, are completely at a loss as to how this could've happened.
 
I think what I also meant was that, unlike parent/child or spousal enabling, the chaos isn't right up in your face....

Contrast this to enabling on a societal scale. Your tax dollars are going to something called "Harm Reduction." Who wouldn't be in favor of reducing harm?...

By the time the chaos spills out into the suburbs, by the time it finally becomes up close and personal, the situation is way out of control. And these people in the article, having never dealt with homeless junkies, are completely at a loss as to how this could've happened.

this is a really interesting perspective, I've always had it up in my face and I've always always been close to people working with them. so for me it's just straight up the same as families. but you're right, most people don't look at it that way and people like me are so angry that regular people tune us out.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Formica Sample
Funny thing about those blocks. They don't just appear magically. They take people with resources, organization infrastructure and power. It's not "someone" dropping hundreds of 2 ton blocks in neat precisely placed rows. Its the business community. The merchants association and chamber of commerce. The combined lanlords and property owners. They have had enough and are taking collective action. That this does not seem to involve the city government bodes poorly for elected and appointed officers of said government.
My first thought on seeing them: "Wow, someone in Seattle actually stooped to finding a blue-collar guy with front end loader certification and, *gasp*, working with him.
 
Back