In extremely rare case, doctors remove fetus from brain of 1-year-old

Article
Archive

In extremely rare case, doctors remove fetus from brain of 1-year-old​


A young child had the remnants of her absorbed twin removed from her head.

1678720044693.png
Doctors found a malformed fetus in an infant's brain. (These brain scans are stock images and not from the case report described below.)

1678719444237.png
Brain Scans and Fetus Removed From Brain. (Spoilered due to nature of image.)

In an extremely rare case, doctors surgically removed a fetus from the brain of a 1-year-old child. Doctors found the fetus after the child showed delayed motor skill development, an enlarged head circumference and a buildup of fluid in the brain.

The report, published Dec. 12, 2022, in the journal Neurology, noted that the mass in the young child's head was a "malformed monochorionic diamniotic twin," meaning in the womb, the fetuses had once shared the same placenta but had separate amniotic sacs, the thin-walled, liquid-filled sacs that surround fetuses as they develop. These types of twins come from the same fertilized egg, meaning they're identical.

The anomaly in which one fetus becomes enveloped by another is known as "fetus in fetu," or sometimes "parasitic twin." The absorbed twin typically stops developing while the other continues to grow, the Miami Herald reported.

The phenomenon occurs in an estimated 1 in 500,000 live births; usually, the malformed fetus appears as a mass in the other fetus's abdomen, wedged behind the tissues that line the abdominal wall. However, in this case, the mass appeared in the "host" fetus's head, and likely arose very, very early in development, at the stage when the fertilized egg forms a cluster of cells called a blastocyst.

Brain scans of the 1-year-old child's head revealed that the fetus contained a vertebral column and two leg bones (the femur and tibia), and that the malformed fetus had spina bifida, a condition in which part of the spinal cord is exposed, rather than covered by tissues of the back, due to a problem during development. Once removed, the fetal mass was also determined to have "upper limb and finger-like buds."

The brief case report does not include details of the 1-year-old's condition following surgery.
 
Can we stop turning this thread into abortion sperging and talk about the scientific implications of this whole thing instead. This is a very interesting article and yet you are all acting like retards instead.
Where do you think you are? On the Farms serious threads descend into shitflinging, and joke threads turn into serious discussion about the merits of Plato vs. Socrates until some Diogenes-fag feels the need to intervene.
We oppress women, but we aren't even doing it optimally
We need to do better.
 
The kid wasn't showing severe signs of hydrocephalus to start with (the motor delay is concerning but not alarming at that age) so if I had to guess I'd say unless something got damaged during the surgery she will probably come out of this alright. Neuroplasticity can do a lot at that age.
 
also i hope people understand why i think pregnancy is a fucking terrifying process now
This kid wasn't pregnant and the mom was not in any way injured by this. All this proves is that life is fucking terrifying. Wrap your mind around that and maybe you can stop trembling under the bed at the thought of normal biological processes.

Life is pain, princess, and nobody makes it out of this joint alive.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Neurotypical Mantis
Back