Disaster Inside ‘Elio’s’ “Catastrophic” Path: America Ferrera’s Exit, Director Change and Erasure of Queer Themes - No viewers at a test screening raised their hand when asked if they would see the movie in a theater

Elio-Main-1-2025.webp


Those who worked at Pixar while its latest film release, Elio, was in production were delighted by footage they saw roughly two years ago. Among the moments cited as favorites by those at the animation studio at the time included a sequence in which the titular boy collected trash on the beach and turned it into homemade apparel that included a pink tank top; the movie’s team would refer to Elio showing this off to a hermit crab as his “trash-ion show.”

But if you bought a ticket to Elio and don’t remember seeing this, it’s not just that you chose the wrong time to refill your soda. According to multiple insiders who spoke to The Hollywood Reporter, Elio was initially portrayed as a queer-coded character, reflecting original director Adrian Molina’s identity as an openly gay filmmaker. Other sources say that Molina did not intend the film to be a coming out story, as the character is 11. But either way, this characterization gradually faded away throughout the production process as Elio became more masculine following feedback from leadership. Gone were not only such direct examples of his passion for environmentalism and fashion, but also a scene in Elio’s bedroom with pictures suggesting a male crush. Hints at the trash fashion remain in the released film, with the boy wearing a cape decorated with discarded cutlery and soda can tabs, although without any explanation for the unusual attire.

Elio’s turbulent ride began well before its calamitous nosedive at the box office durin the June 20-22 corridor. Indeed, the summer of 2023 became a fateful one for the animated film about a lonely boy beamed into outer space by an intergalactic organization after being misidentified as the leader of Earth. The writing was first on the wall for the troubled production when the film from Molina, known as the co-director of Pixar’s Oscar-winning 2017 hit Coco, conducted an early test screening in Arizona. Although viewers expressed how much they enjoyed the movie, they were also asked how many of them would see it in a theater, and not a single hand was raised, according to a source with knowledge of the event. This sounded alarm bells for studio brass.

It was around this same time that Molina screened his latest cut of the film to Pixar leadership. There are differing accounts of the exact feedback that the director received from Pixar boss Pete Docter when the lights went up, with rumors circulating in some of the studio’s circles that Molina was hurt by the conversation. The part that is clear is that Molina exited the project soon after, and much of Elio was reworked under new co-directors Madeline Sharafian and Domee Shi.
After a year-long delay, the film arrived in theaters June 22 and bombed with just $20.8 million domestically, the lowest opening frame at the box office in Pixar’s history.

“I was deeply saddened and aggrieved by the changes that were made,” says former Pixar assistant editor Sarah Ligatich, who provided feedback during Elio production as a member of the company’s internal LGBTQ group PixPRIDE. Although she praises Sharafian and Shi as filmmakers, Ligatich notes that a number of creatives working on the film stepped down after the directors shared their first cut of the movie. “The exodus of talent after that cut was really indicative of how unhappy a lot of people were that they had changed and destroyed this beautiful work.”

The changes to Elio were clear to one former Pixar artist who worked on the film and asked to remain anonymous: “It was pretty clear through the production of the first version of the film that [studio leaders] were constantly sanding down these moments in the film that alluded to Elio’s sexuality of being queer.”

Not long after that final 2023 screening of Molina’s cut for Pixar brass, the company announced internally that Molina would take a break from the project, leading to a period of inactivity for those working on the film. Sources tell THR that Molina was informed shortly thereafter that Sharafian, who wrote and directed Pixar’s 2020 short Burrow and was a storyboard artist on the 2022 feature Turning Red and Elio, would be elevated to director. Molina was given the opportunity to direct Elio with Sharafian, but after the numerous notes and changes to his original vision, he decided to leave the project. A short time later, Pixar announced internally that Shi, the director and co-writer of Turning Red, would join Sharafian to direct Elio. During the summer of 2024, Docter told The Wrap that Molina left Elio to move to an unnamed “priority project”; a fuller picture came in March of 2025 when Disney CEO Bob Iger announced the studio’s development on Coco 2, which sees Molina returning as co-director. (Disney acquired Pixar in 2006.)

“Suddenly, you remove this big, key piece, which is all about identity, and Elio just becomes about totally nothing,” says the former Pixar artist. “The Elio that is in theaters right now is far worse than Adrian’s best version of the original.” Adds another former Pixar staffer who worked on the film: “[The character] Elio was just so cute and so much fun and had so much personality, and now he feels much more generic to me.”

Still, the film that was released in theaters earned solid reviews, sporting an 81 percent critics rating on Rotten Tomatoes. In her review for THR, critic Angie Han calls the film a “perfectly nice kiddie sci-fi adventure.”

Some of Elio’s changes were more noticeable than others. When the film was first announced at Disney’s D23 fan event in 2022, America Ferrera took the stage to describe her role as Olga, Elio’s mom. At the following D23 in 2024, the Emmy winner was announced as having left the film amid scheduling conflicts, with Saldaña joining the cast as Olga, now Elio’s aunt. Sources tell THR that Ferrara had already recorded dialogue for the film but that her decision to exit was attributed to Molina’s departure, not to mention that frequently being called back to re-record lines due to script changes likely took its toll. Says the former Pixar artist, “America was upset that there was no longer Latinx representation in the leadership.” (Ferrera did not to respond to a request for comment, nor did Molina.)

Pixar finished 2024 on quite the high note, with Inside Out 2 topping $1.6 billion at the global box office to become the year’s biggest film. Additionally, the studio had announced that Andrew Stanton, the Oscar-winning director of such hits as Finding Nemo and WALL-E, would helm Toy Story 5, the latest installment for Pixar’s highest-grossing franchise as the studio continues to prioritize sequels of its flagship characters. But the looming cloud over the coming months was the fate of Elio, given limited public awareness of the original movie and the fact that its release had been delayed significantly.

Media reports have cited its production budget as $150 million, but former Pixar employees tell THR that the film cost far more than that. The artist who worked on the movie was not privy to the specific figure but estimates it was well north of $200 million, given that Molina’s version was nearly complete, which she says makes the “catastrophic box office” feel worse. In citing a similar theme to other former Pixar staffers, the artist emphasizes that Sharafian and Shi did all they could to give the leadership the best film possible, amid the circumstances.

The Elio production resulted in fraught feelings for those with ties to Pixar who have come to question whether the company intends to prioritize diversity. Docter sparked debate when he noted in a 2024 interview that the studio should make the “most relatable films” possible, which was perceived as advocating for a shift away from underrepresented characters and voices. These remarks came in the wake of the 2022 criticism of then-Disney CEO Bob Chapek’s response to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill. Additionally, Toy Story spinoff Lightyear whiffed at the box office in 2023 after right-wing pundits ignited a furor over its same-gender kiss. And the Pixar series Win or Lose launched on Disney+ earlier this year after creating controversy over its transgender storyline getting scrapped.

But did the decisions to downplay Elio’s queer themes actually come from the parent company? Insiders aren’t so sure. “A lot of people like to blame Disney, but the call is coming from inside the house,” says the artist. “A lot of it is obeying-in-advance behavior, coming from the higher execs at Pixar.” The person cites such examples as next year’s animated feature Hoppers having to tone down themes of environmentalism and also reveals that a movie in early development got a startling note: “That director was told, ‘You can’t have divorce in this movie,’ which is so wild.” A different source with knowledge of the project downplays the notion of this representing major meddling and sees such suggestions as typical of any early development process, not a mandate.

Although the studio will hope for Elio to exhibit the same theatrical legs as Elemental, the 2023 title that overcame a slow start at the box office to turn a profit, most eyes now turn to next year, when Hoppers’ theatrical release in March will give an assessment of the original film pipeline, while astronomical expectations build for the summer launch of Toy Story 5. One former Pixar staffer who worked on Elio appreciates that the studio has planned “48-hour hackathons” where employees have been given free rein to pursue any creative ideas. But whether the sessions lead to projects or concepts that will ever see the light of day is another matter.

In the meantime, the pain of the Elio process still stings for the creatives who saw the movie’s trajectory become something of a cautionary tale. “I’d love to ask Pete and the other Disney executives whether or not they thought the rewrite was worth it,” says the artist. “Would they have lost this much money if they simply let Adrian tell his story?”
 
I went to the movie theater to see 28 years later and the only people in the line to the kiosk that wanted to see Elio were these three old boomer ladies. They were super slow too.
Point is this movie failed hard.
Literally nobody in the test audience, when asked, would raise their hands to say they'd see this in an actual theater.

In modern year, it would be practically statistically impossible for there not to be a single alphabet person in such an audience.

EVEN FAGS DO NOT WANT TO WATCH THIS FAG SHIT!
 
Ligatich notes that a number of creatives working on the film stepped down after the directors shared their first cut of the movie. “The exodus of talent after that cut was really indicative of how unhappy a lot of people were that they had changed and destroyed this beautiful work.”
In almost all cases I blame the executives for shoehorning gay shit into media. This is hilarious, it was actually the other way around. Sensible executives, histrionic faggots actually making the product. Amazing. It's truly a mind virus whether it comes from the top or the bottom.
 
“Suddenly, you remove this big, key piece, which is all about identity, and Elio just becomes about totally nothing,” says the former Pixar artist. “The Elio that is in theaters right now is far worse than Adrian’s best version of the original.” Adds another former Pixar staffer who worked on the film: “[The character] Elio was just so cute and so much fun and had so much personality, and now he feels much more generic to me.”

When did all these animation companies fill up with women who want to groom kids? That's what strikes me about a lot of these anonymous quotes, they all come off like they're from female employees. They have vibe of "I want a cute queer child pet" that you get from females who groom 'trans kids.' And these people have taken over Pixar?

“America was upset that there was no longer Latinx representation in the leadership.” (Ferrera did not to respond to a request for comment, nor did Molina.)

Have they tried representing good directors? Like imagine if "being good at your job" was on their identity checklist, instead of being a fat Asian non-binary indigenous lesbian two-spirit furry or whatever.

It's a lot of things. It's the way he's sitting. It's the fact that he's all to one side of that chair, like he's trying to take up as little space as possible. It's the little shorts and the long socks. It's the troubled, apprehensive, faraway look in his eyes. It's the fact that he looks like he wishes he wasn't there.

Also, men don't cross their legs like that, it's mostly a habit you see in women and some gay men. Even boys won't do it because they don't see other boys doing it.

Given that a) it's a child and b) he looks so uncomfortable, you are left with two options to explain this picture: one, he is imitating the actions of an older gay man in an effort to appease that man (hence his uncertainty and discomfort), or two, he is crossing his legs in an attempt to self-soothe and create a defensive barrier while maintaining the appearance of sitting normally, also to appease some offscreen presence. It's deeply creepy.
 
Last edited:
And even if L&S is successful, it's not going to make back enough money to cover all the other flops Disney's shat out this year alone, to say nothing of the past 5 years (and longer).
I will reiterate: if The Black Cauldron getting BTFO by The Care Bears Movie at the box office couldn't kill Disney, nothing can.
 
When did all these animation companies fill up with women who want to groom kids?
The disturbing part is, I don't think they believe it's grooming. I think they believe they're doing queer kids (if you believe such a thing exists, and I don't) a favor. A lot of them seem to come at this sort of thing with the idea that it's important to have positive images of certain identities in the media because it's just influential enough to give them role models, but is conveniently not influential enough to give otherwise normal kids the idea they might be queer.

Though if more kids conveniently ended up queer to grow their community, more's the better for them?

But it's like everyone who engages in an ideology that clearly doesn't understand the implications of their idealism: they're useful idiots.

Given that a) it's a child and b) he looks so uncomfortable, you are left with two options to explain this picture: one, he is imitating the actions of an older gay man in an effort to appease that man (hence his uncertainty and discomfort), or two, he is crossing his legs in an attempt to self-soothe and create a defensive barrier while maintaining the appearance of sitting normally, also to appease some offscreen presence. It's deeply creepy.
I feel like I learned a lot from the posts about that one image. The lot I learned makes me feel pretty queasy, though. What they're trying to market to kids these days, yikes.

EVEN FAGS DO NOT WANT TO WATCH THIS FAG SHIT!
You'd have thought they would have learned from Bros. Well, I suppose you would have thought that if the studios could have learned from Ghostbusters 2016 about shoving identity politics at the audience, but good lord, there is an element of society that just refuses to learn.
 
Of course not, grooming (as they define it) doesn't exist in their yaoi anime.
It goes further than that.

If I've learned anything from pop culture in the past few years, it's that women don't particularly mind if a man is significantly older, or is particularly abusive. As long as you're a young, dewy ingenue, you're just special enough to tame the wild man that nobody else could.

Also, young people can solve problems that adults are befuddled with, even if these adults solved them decades ago.

Taken together, we've cultivated this idea that when someone is much younger, it doesn't make them inexperienced or immature; it's that the kids have a lot to teach us, the adults. And if they know enough to teach us, they're mature enough to understand and accept adult stuff.

We're in a pretty unhealthy place as a culture.
 
It goes further than that.

If I've learned anything from pop culture in the past few years, it's that women don't particularly mind if a man is significantly older, or is particularly abusive. As long as you're a young, dewy ingenue, you're just special enough to tame the wild man that nobody else could.

Also, young people can solve problems that adults are befuddled with, even if these adults solved them decades ago.

Taken together, we've cultivated this idea that when someone is much younger, it doesn't make them inexperienced or immature; it's that the kids have a lot to teach us, the adults. And if they know enough to teach us, they're mature enough to understand and accept adult stuff.

We're in a pretty unhealthy place as a culture.
Wasn't there a saying that time was a circle that repeated like every 100 years? Welcome to Weimar Republic 2 Electric Boogaloo!
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
That would have gone down astoundingly. I know its just an ancient Greek word for "outsider", but the word itself looks freakish compared to modern tongues.

On the bright side there would have been no end of 40k crossover memes with a name like that, so at least something good would have come from this movie if that had happened.
Disney films are a drop in the bucket to their bottom line. Their money comes from tourism and merchandise. You want fewer people going to Disneyworld and buying toys
Man, its a good thing for Disney then that all their Star Wars merch and attractions are pulling in big spenders.
 
The changes to Elio were clear to one former Pixar artist who worked on the film and asked to remain anonymous: “It was pretty clear through the production of the first version of the film that [studio leaders] were constantly sanding down these moments in the film that alluded to Elio’s sexuality of being queer.”

The sexuality of a child character.
Everyone who worked on this film should get their hard drives checked.
 
The disturbing part is, I don't think they believe it's grooming. I think they believe they're doing queer kids (if you believe such a thing exists, and I don't) a favor.
They're lying through their teeth in hopes of exposing enough children to their preferred sexual behavior, along with glorifying those engaging in it, that the kids will be more pliable by faggots targeting teenagers, thus creating more buttbudies in the age ranges liked by them. Remember, 50%+ fags were molested.
It's a vicious cycle, and I mention these facta every time I'm forced to state my opinion on this matter. It's a mental illness that we are supposed to pretend to consider perfectly healthy. Just the very idea that sexual preferences preventing an individual from continuing the species are not disordered is preposterous.
 
They're lying through their teeth
I don't think they're consciously lying. I think some of them are "true believers" in the way cult followers exist.

You know how some feminists honestly and truly believe the dictionary definition of feminism, but just haven't thought through the implications of their belief system? That's these people. They might be engaging in grooming, they just don't see it that way, because they've convinced themselves that what they're doing is not only good, it can't possibly be bad.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Back