Business Inside Moonbug, the YouTube channel watched by 500 million toddlers - How did a small production company in north London become the envy of Disney, Warner Bros and Netflix?

Inside Moonbug, the YouTube channel watched by 500 million toddlers

How did a small production company in north London become the envy of Disney, Warner Bros and Netflix?


Imagine, if you need to, that you wake up and find yourself charged with looking after a young child for the day. You do everything you’re supposed to: you read them stories, you take them to the park, you give them healthy snacks of carrot sticks and apple slices. You indulge them in their endless games of make-believe, you answer their very many questions and you genuinely try your hardest to remain patient and attentive. But as the day wears on, they start to get tired and you start to get tired and, eventually, all you both really want is to stop, sit down in a café and quietly kill some time watching children’s TV. Some parents – some pure, sinless parents – will probably shoot you disapproving looks. But, well, whatever. You take out your phone and, as the eyes of the child beside you light up, you ask them what they would like to watch.

Well, what would they like to watch? There is, in 2022, a good chance that they are fans of CoComelon, a series in which CGI children with outsized heads and saucer eyes learn about the world around them through the medium of song. Or they might like Blippi, a show in which a childlike man with orange glasses visits various places, from fire stations to chocolate factories, and enthuses about what he sees in a high, nasal voice. They may also love Arpo (a robot babysitter), or Go Buster (an anthropomorphic bus), or Gecko’s Garage (literally, a gecko with a garage).
These shows are all bright, benign and, for children of a particular age, highly digestible. They also have some other things in common. Rather than being broadcast on terrestrial television channels such as the BBC or via established streaming services such as Netflix or Amazon Prime, these titles can all be found on YouTube. Here they have gained incredible popularity with children all around the world. For example, one episode of Go Buster has been viewed two million times over the past three months. A video in which Blippi learns about dinosaurs has been viewed more than eight million times in just four weeks. The CoComelon YouTube channel has 130 million subscribers and its computer-generated videos of swollen-headed infants smiling along to nursery rhymes have now been viewed more than 120 billion times. Which, just for scale, is more than Justin Bieber, Taylor Swift, Ed Sheeran, Beyoncé and Katy Perry’s official YouTube channel views combined.
1647795895957.png
Moonbug co-founder René Rechtman
FREDERIK LENTZ ANDERSEN
1647795909498.png
Moonbug co-founder John Robson
JULIE EDWARDS

But the most important thing that CoComelon, Blippi and many more have in common is that they are all owned and operated by a London-based company called Moonbug. Founded in 2018 by a pair of entertainment executives named René Rechtman and John Robson, Moonbug was created to test a hypothesis both men had quietly come to believe. Namely that the two to five-year-old demographic was being neglected by the big players such as Disney. But by going on YouTube, finding content that was doing well with this age group and then acquiring it, Rechtman and Robson sensed they could build a pre-school entertainment powerhouse. This plan was greeted with some derision within the industry. YouTube – a free site where anybody can upload more or less anything – was still regarded as an amateurish place where the production value of original content was patchy and where novelty, rather than quality, determined a video’s success. “People were laughing at us when we started,” says Rechtman.
He and Robson ploughed on, however, acquiring the rights to YouTube shows like Blippi and CoComelon with little fanfare. They built up Moonbug’s roster while, thanks to Covid, parents around the globe were finding that working from home while juggling childcare meant their attitudes towards screentime relaxed significantly. Demand for programmes that could hold the attention of young children swelled. Moonbug, with increasing momentum, became a serious proposition. Its YouTube shows were attracting billions of views every month, while new merchandise deals were seemingly done daily. (Blippi backpacks! CoComelon Deluxe Family House Playsets!)
In a short space of time, Rechtman and Robson had, in fact, built their pre-school entertainment powerhouse, one with direct access to the hearts and minds of millions of children. And then, at the end of last year, Moonbug was acquired by a private equity-backed investment company for a reported $3 billion (£2.25 billion). Rechtman smiles. “People,” he says, “aren’t laughing any more.”
The Moonbug offices are in Camden on the Regent’s Canal. About 300 people work here – the bulk of whom were hired over the past year or so – and another 100 are in Los Angeles, where Moonbug has an office. They are overwhelmingly young and perky. Some are involved in marketing, others in production, dubbing Moonbug’s 20 or so shows into dozens of languages. I meet Rechtman and Robson in a private office. Rechtman, who is from Copenhagen, is tall, spindly, with a goatee beard and sharp, direct manner. Robson is from Cambridge, has a shaggy, bookish look and speaks with a measured thoughtfulness. Moonbug, he always tries to explain to people, is kind of analogous to Calpol. “In that, if you don’t have young children, you’ve never heard of it. But 100 per cent of people who do have young children know exactly what it is.”
Both men are 51. Rechtman is the former president of international at Maker Studios, a conglomeration of YouTube channels designed to appeal to millennials. Robson was managing director of a company that distributed kids’ TV shows. They are not themselves fizzing with ideas for new children’s programming. “Neither of us are creative geniuses,” admits Robson. Instead, they have built Moonbug into the phenomenon it is by adopting a clinical, calculated approach to acquiring content.
1647795938846.png
CoComelon
Before founding Moonbug it was clear to them, says Rechtman, that more and more children were turning to YouTube for entertainment. So they dug into the data – “data” is a word they both use a lot – and discovered something they found remarkable. Of the 100 most popular YouTube channels for children worldwide, the vast majority were operated by small, independent outfits. “They were mom’n’pop shops,” Rechtman says. And in more than a few cases, literally so. CoComelon was created by an American couple who first started making 3D nursery rhyme videos as a hobby. Little Baby Bum, another hugely popular YouTube channel acquired by Moonbug and featuring similarly animated children and songs, was founded by a British husband and wife who wanted to make videos their own young children would enjoy. The character of Blippi was born after the man who plays him, a young US Air Force veteran called Stevin John, decided to create some fun videos for his nephew. They were all ordinary people who had thrown something they had created onto YouTube and, over time, found an audience.

From a business perspective, says Rechtman, this was all “too good to be true” because the intellectual property, or IP, was owned by these small outfits rather than big media players. “So there was an opportunity to step in and professionalise that space,” says Robson. In 2018, they bought Little Baby Bum for a reported $9 million. In 2020, they acquired Blippi and CoComelon for a reported $120 million. These sound like big figures but really, says Robson, it’s all good value. “We’ve been able to pick up and grow such powerful pieces of IP without anyone being interested.”
They are also open about the role that Covid-19 has played in helping their business. An increase in watch-time coincided with lockdowns around the world, Robson explains. “The screen became a de facto babysitter.”

The use of data is not limited to how Moonbug acquires content. Data also helps direct the content itself. Because it is now possible to track how viewers respond to the YouTube videos in front of them – by monitoring what they click on and when – Rechtman and Robson have been able to build a very detailed understanding of what their young audience likes, almost as though they are at their side, observing them, silent and invisible. “So for example, you can look at a video on YouTube and see where people stop watching it,” says Robson. “And if at that moment a yellow bus appears and previously you’d had a red bus, but now you’ve had a 50 per cent drop-off, then that starts to tell you that yellow buses are less appealing than red buses.” This information is fed back to the teams who create the content for Moonbug’s YouTube channels and who factor it into their work accordingly. “This isn’t cheating or tricking children,” says Robson. “It’s working out what it is they really like and then giving them more of it.”
1647795926869.png
Blippi
This ability to glean what children want by monitoring their viewing habits is, they both say, a good thing. For example, young kids all around the world, they noticed, respond to vehicles. So Moonbug gave them more. “We created a spin-off of one of our shows and made Buster the Bus,” says Rechtman. “And that’s because we have the insight that there is a huge demand for vehicles.” Similarly, they began to notice that their audience really liked seeing animals in familiar, urban settings. So they developed an entire show called Lellobee City Farm. They say they are freeing their audiences from simply having to take what they are given by the adult “tastemakers” who have always commissioned kids’ TV. “Our content is being consumed democratically, and what I mean by that is the children and parents are picking it,” says Robson. “It’s not being broadcast to them [in the traditional way]. So the consumption is highly engaged.”

This is all true. And it is, as they say, a far cry from forcing yourself to sit through hours of whatever happens to be on TV simply because there is nothing else available. But Rechtman and Robson are also asking parents to do something that has not always been easy, which is to embrace YouTube as a platform. To understand why this is a challenge, we first need to appreciate that in order for a traditional piece of pre-school programming to be commissioned, made and broadcast on television there is a legal requirement for it to tick certain boxes. “It would have to address diversity and inclusivity and it would have to have an educational purpose,” explains Greg Childs, a director and producer of children’s programming who serves as the editorial director of the Children’s Media Conference. “Whether it’s CBeebies or Channel 5’s Milkshake! in the UK, or PBS Kids and Nickelodeon in the US, they will all have educational consultants putting together curricula for the programmes.”
In other words, you can’t just make anything. There is tight regulation. But on YouTube, this isn’t the case. There are no comparable requirements to meet if you want to stick up videos in the hope of attracting enough clicks to start earning advertising revenue. And this is a problem that has blighted YouTube for years as cheap, poorly made and often cynically calculated videos aimed at kids have still managed to attract millions of views. Nellie McQuinn is head of production at Moonbug and, at the age of 19, began recording and posting children’s videos on YouTube. “I was presenting a show called Nellie and Ned, which was myself and a puppet. I spent a lot of time on camera chatting to that puppet,” she says, chuckling. “We were making content in my living room with a bit of green cloth put up behind us and doing everything ourselves.”

McQuinn found herself one of a growing number of people drawn into the cottage industry of creating YouTube kids’ content. To pay the bills and keep her small operation alive, she took on jobs that involved producing novelty stuff. There was, for a while, an online fad for “hot knife” videos. “You’d take a knife and you’d heat it up with a blowtorch and then you’d just cut through things. You’d cut through toys, cut through food, cut through mobile phones and laptops. It was weird.”
Then, she continues, there were the weird cosplay videos she would make – chaotic melodramas that ripped off popular characters while appealing to children’s fever-dream imaginations. “We’d dress up as superheroes and it was like a sort of soap opera for children: ‘Elsa’s pregnant and Spider-Man’s the dad.’ A colleague of mine, on his first day on the job, had to dress as Batman and sit in a bath of slime. I remember thinking, ‘What are we doing? This is ridiculous.’ ”

These fads all passed. But they were popular and they were prevalent, which is part of the reason that Rechtman and Robson encountered so many sniggers when they announced they would build their business off the back of kids’ YouTube content. McQuinn ended up working with Little Baby Bum and then, upon its acquisition, for Moonbug. She says that the quality and quantity of stuff being made for children on YouTube has increased dramatically and that she is now proud of all the shows she is involved in. “We’re working hard to legitimise it,” she says.

Moonbug makes a point of stressing that its shows are conceived to teach its young audience “compassion, empathy and resilience” – none of its content involves Elsa impregnations or the use of blowtorches wow wow wow– and the whole point of the venture is to win parents’ trust, so acquiring popular but tacky YouTube programmes would be self-defeating. “If we don’t think kids can get entertained in an intelligent way, and help develop their life skills, then we won’t do it,” says Rechtman. “We have access to more than 500 million kids and their families around the globe and with that comes a lot of responsibility.”

One big advantage that Moonbug has over more traditional providers is the speed and efficiency of its production. None of its shows are what you would call aesthetically sophisticated, but they are comparatively easy to make. This, believes Greg Childs, is partly the reason that the success of Moonbug’s shows has come as a surprise to a lot of people. “There are many in the industry who just did not understand why these things could be so popular when they themselves were making beautifully crafted shows that were costing hundreds of thousands of pounds per episode,” he says. And these lovely-looking productions really do take time. “With a show like Teletubbies, it could take between four and six years from coming up with the idea and the point when it hits the screens.”

Moonbug, on the other hand, can produce shows much more quickly and at a much lower cost. Is this, then, the future of children’s television? Agile, responsive, data-driven programming that’s stacked high and given away online to a huge global audience in exchange for online ad revenue and merchandise deals? Kay Benbow was the controller of CBeebies between 2010 and 2017, which I suppose makes her one of the adult “tastemakers” Rechtman thinks we have been in thrall to for too long. Benbow believes that while the quality of kids’ programming on YouTube has increased over the years – “It’s no longer the Wild West” – it’s also a good opportunity to stop and think about what we really want children to watch. “You can put children in front of anything and they’ll probably watch it,” she says. “But good-quality content that inspires them and helps them understand the world? I think that’s really important. And we still need to have that.”

She would be sceptical if Moonbug relied too heavily on data when developing its shows. “Red buses or yellow buses? That feels quite basic,” she says. Rather than tweaking vehicle colours, she would hope that more important questions were also being asked. “What is the show doing for the child? What is it explaining? Is it engaging? And so I would say it requires a little more than just data that shows when the children have switched off. It’s also about understanding why.”

Benbow also wonders if the universality of Moonbug’s output is worth thinking about. None of its shows are set anywhere real or recognisable. This is part of its business model, as it allows the content to be dubbed and consumed around the world. “But I think it’s quite important to have content that reflects the world in which you live, your country and culture. That’s what resonates.”

More than anything, though, Benbow says that when it comes to TV, young children deserve the very best. When she commissioned a reboot of The Clangers they used stop-motion animation, not because it was quick but because the results were distinctive and charming. Michael Palin did the narration, not because toddlers know who Michael Palin is but because she felt that they deserved him nonetheless.
The good news, for young children and their parents alike, is that it is not an either/or choice. Moonbug is not stopping anybody from watching The Clangers. It is not stopping parents from telling their children that they have watched enough TV for today and it’s time to do something else. In fact, increasingly, Moonbug has been taking its programmes beyond YouTube. Deals have been struck with Netflix, Amazon Prime and the BBC to screen Moonbug shows and develop new content.

Rechtman reclines on the office sofa and yawns. The past four years have been intense. “You’re literally sprinting a marathon,” he says. Last month, Moonbug shows attracted nine billion views. On a recent trip to Los Angeles, he says he was taken aback by the hysteria surrounding the company.

“Our toys, our music – any product is the bestselling product in the world,” he says, slapping the sofa for emphasis. The CoComelon Bedtime JJ Doll was, according to Moonbug, the No 1 selling toy in North America at Christmas. “They’re sold out the second they go on the shelves. Walmart, Target, Amazon, Hamleys, everywhere. We’re much bigger than I realised. Every platform talks about us, whether it’s HBO, Warner, Disney. They say, ‘You’ve created a phenomenon,’ ” says Rechtman, before taking a breath and letting it out slowly. “We’ve created a phenomenon.”
 
Cocomelon is the equivalent of giving your toddler unending access to cocaine. It's too overstimulating and there's little to no educational value because of that. How can kids focus on nursery rhymes when they're too focused on the constant scene changes every 2 seconds and some bright, oversaturated colors are burning into their retinas?

Thank you for sharing that video, that is food for thought. Honestly, I have not had a problem with Cocomelon but then again my child is more interested in playing with toys and flipping through books then watching TV. The TV is more like background noise.

I can't argue that it is a really fast pace show, it makes sense what that lady is saying. I was more focused on the content itself not necessarily the pacing.

I still don't think it is entirely bad, but I think the key thing is you don't allow Cocomelon to be the only show your kids watch and you don't use the TV as a babysitter. Bluey looks interesting, I will add that into the rotation.
 
The answer is stupid parents seat their kids in front of a screen because they're too lazy to entertain them themselves.
The best way is to teach kids how to entertain themselves. Stuff like the Montessori method does this well. But that takes time and effort and being consistent so the modern parent doesn't bother.
 
My mother told me when I was a toddler I had to watch the Christopher Reeves' Superman movie, the 1960s Batman show, or Who Framed Roger Rabbit. I literally wouldn't watch anything else. TV time in my house was limited to 1hr max.

I get why parents might get tempted to sit their kids in front of a TV for a bit every now and then. Sometimes so that they can get some stuff around the house done, or to just sit down for a little bit to relax. It's when the over rely on it, is when it becomes an issue. Or, that they don't vet the shows they're sitting them in front of because they assume it's okay because it's on a children's channel.
 
My mother told me when I was a toddler I had to watch the Christopher Reeves' Superman movie, the 1960s Batman show, or Who Framed Roger Rabbit. I literally wouldn't watch anything else. TV time in my house was limited to 1hr max.

Who Framed Roger Rabbit? That seems a little too "intense" for a toddler to watch, particularly the scene with the shoe going into "The Dip"..
 
Yeah because music wouldn't be better.

"I only let my kid watch the globalist-approved happybox sometimes."

You're a bad parent. You're one of the bad ones.
You have a good point about just music and it could encourage LO to be an early reader since LO seems to be naturally drawn to books now that I think about it.

I have a question what do you do with your little one if you have one? I am not being snarky here I am curious what others do here and exhange notes. Peace dude. The suggestion box is open. (I am reconsidering Cocomelon.)

My mother told me when I was a toddler I had to watch the Christopher Reeves' Superman movie, the 1960s Batman show, or Who Framed Roger Rabbit. I literally wouldn't watch anything else. TV time in my house was limited to 1hr max.

I get why parents might get tempted to sit their kids in front of a TV for a bit every now and then. Sometimes so that they can get some stuff around the house done, or to just sit down for a little bit to relax. It's when the over rely on it, is when it becomes an issue. Or, that they don't vet the shows they're sitting them in front of because they assume it's okay because it's on a children's channel.

Yeah, it is easy to say you will not do screen time, and I swore that too, but when you have housework you need to get done it is an easy distraction. Food, dishes, laundry, basic house cleaning.

It is not healthy nor cheap getting delivery all the time and you cannot go without clean clothes.

If you don't keep up with the house cleaning and you have a little little one especially you cannot reasonably ensure their safety if a small choking hazard pops up like a bottle cap or rubber band. Plus living in filth is not healthy for anybody. I suppose you could hire a housekeeper if you have the money.

You can find ways to corners, but sometimes you need a distraction to buy time. I suppose you could let them just fuss until you get what you need done. That is probably what they did in the old days until they just go to their toys. That is food for thought though now that I think about it.
 
I have a question what do you do with your little one if you have one?
No, I'm sure I'll fuck it up in my own way. But I'm very obstinate and won't be doing the screen thing at all. Everyone says you have to do it, but everyone also says homeschooling will make your kids antisocial. We're 4+ generations into kids being raised by screens, the average parent doesn't know shit and is only doing it because their parents did it, because their parents did it, back to the 1950s with everyone's kids watching Howdy Doody.

Check out this channel for some good childraising content: https://www.youtube.com/c/HapaFamily/videos

Not that they're perfect or even close to it but it changed my opinion on a lot of stuff.
 
Very confusing. No PIB for any of the individuals I searched; no DEI called out; the word “resilience” used as something to encourage in kids.

Yet, search shows these are shitlibs.

I’m going to interpret this as shitlibs getting a clue and changing up their language to try to lull increasingly vigilant parents back to sleep.

Re: Caillou. There’s an argument to be made that the reason kids born after around 1995 act as they do is because they were Caillou’d. It explains a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pee Cola
It's such a far cry from the effort and care that used to go into something like Sesame Street back in the day - bringing together creatives, ad executives and psychologists to find a way to make television an entertaining and educating tool for young children.

If you haven't, I'd give this documentary a go. Obviously it's probably morphed into something else entirely now, but the intentions and efforts behind the scenes in those early days are like something you'll never see a Youtuber attempt to approach.

 
My kid just turned two and when she watches tv its mostly older kids shows, veggie tales, nature shows, and cocomelon.

Cocomelon doesn’t have the woke shit that most of the current day netflix trash has. At worst its the 90s colorblind diversity. We can manage that and it doesn’t trash fathers or treat brothers as literal retards like the rest of these shows do.

When we were new parents we put chip and potato on for her and it seemed sappy but fine, then fucking two zebra dads out of fucking nowhere.
 
I “break” the TV during the summer and we spend our time outside. I only need you tube for long winter days when it’s too cold to go out for more than a few minutes. We don’t use tablets and the kid never touches our phones.

My kid watches astronomy videos, mostly the Kids Learning Tube channel because he’s a bit on the spectrum (both his parents are, this isn’t exactly shocking). It just sings space facts at him, so he can memorize the names of long period comets, what size order the stars go in, etc. Then we go outside and find rocks that he names after them and categorizes and sorts all summer. It’s his favourite hobby.

There is a bunch of Chinese animation that is pure cancer. Songs about how to survive an earthquake in an apartment building and how to always listen to police. Chills.

I mostly don’t try to get worked up about stuff. We haven’t had TV or cable since we became adults in the nineties (when the first Survivor reality TV show started I cut the cord and never looked back). We pirate whatever we watch, I don’t even feel bad.

There is some dumb crap on YouTube, but there’s some great stuff too. Moderation is key, as in anything. Also, we use the Vivaldi browser to block you tube ads.

My kids Pre-k teacher just sent a gentle email out wondering if any of the parents read fairy tales with their kids anymore? Because she planned to do a day or two with activities for the kids but they didn’t seem to know any of the stories. Not that she’s judging modern parenting mind you! (I really love her, no gender or race nonsense with her). I found it a little sad.

CBC, Ceebeebies, and all the the other “approved” kids content is also on YouTube. So it’s not the platform that’s the problem. It’s using the screen as the babysitter (which has been happening since the 50s so, it’s a fact of modern life)
 
No, I'm sure I'll fuck it up in my own way. But I'm very obstinate and won't be doing the screen thing at all. Everyone says you have to do it, but everyone also says homeschooling will make your kids antisocial. We're 4+ generations into kids being raised by screens, the average parent doesn't know shit and is only doing it because their parents did it, because their parents did it, back to the 1950s with everyone's kids watching Howdy Doody.

Check out this channel for some good childraising content: https://www.youtube.com/c/HapaFamily/videos

Not that they're perfect or even close to it but it changed my opinion on a lot of stuff.
So you don't have kids? Every single parent says "oh my kid will never watch or like tv" and they invariably end up being exposed to it somehow. The solution is to limit it to rare occasions, and carefully curate what they watch. There is nothing wrong with cocomelon, it is a completely 100% inoffensive show that is literally just nursery rhymes. There is perhaps an argument that it is overstimulating, but this is true for all children's television- that's why they love it. The solution is MODERATION.

Unless you go the route of literally owning no screens, no phones, no computers, your kid will be exposed at some point and want to watch something. If you do take the scorched earth approach it can happen anyways at friends or relative's houses. 100% forbidding all forms of screens will do nothing except foster resentment in kids who then act out later in life. Not to powerlevel but I've been in adjacent circles to this train of thought and sheltering children like that NEVER ends well.
 
So you don't have kids?
So you don't have kids? Every single parent says "oh my kid will never watch or like porn" and they invariably end up being exposed to it somehow. The solution is to limit it to rare occasions, and carefully curate what they watch. There is nothing wrong with pornhub, it is a completely 100% inoffensive site that is literally just penetration. There is perhaps an argument that it is overstimulating, but this is true for all porn- that's why they love it. The solution is MODERATION.

Unless you go the route of literally owning no screens, no phones, no computers, your kid will be exposed at some point and want to watch something. If you do take the scorched earth approach it can happen anyways at friends or relative's houses. 100% forbidding all forms of screens will do nothing except foster resentment in kids who then act out later in life. Not to powerlevel but I've been in adjacent circles to this train of thought and sheltering children like that NEVER ends well.

I can't control what my kids do! They'll hate me if I don't give them access to the shiny box! They'll grow up wanting to MURDER ME if I don't let them have cocomelon!
 
Damn, I sure wonder how they got that big. Lets do a quick early life check on their founders!
9392.PNG
Why is it always jews?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pee Cola
I can't control what my kids do! They'll hate me if I don't give them access to the shiny box! They'll grow up wanting to MURDER ME if I don't let them have cocomelon!
Nice straw man, retard. Did you skip the entire point of my post? The part about moderation? I even capitalized it for emphasis. I'm obviously not saying give kids whatever they want and you're a cunt for implying that I did. Children should be taught and guided, not manipulated and controlled.

Do you have a single piece of evidence to support your claim that scorched earth parenting works and creates well-adjusted adults? Or that it's even possible? If you want to participate in society, then society will affect your offspring whether you like it or not. If you choose to separate from society entirely and live in the woods, well that has its own massive issues.
 
So you don't have kids? Every single parent says "oh my kid will never watch or like porn" and they invariably end up being exposed to it somehow. The solution is to limit it to rare occasions, and carefully curate what they watch. There is nothing wrong with pornhub, it is a completely 100% inoffensive site that is literally just penetration. There is perhaps an argument that it is overstimulating, but this is true for all porn- that's why they love it. The solution is MODERATION.

Unless you go the route of literally owning no screens, no phones, no computers, your kid will be exposed at some point and want to watch something. If you do take the scorched earth approach it can happen anyways at friends or relative's houses. 100% forbidding all forms of screens will do nothing except foster resentment in kids who then act out later in life. Not to powerlevel but I've been in adjacent circles to this train of thought and sheltering children like that NEVER ends well.

I can't control what my kids do! They'll hate me if I don't give them access to the shiny box! They'll grow up wanting to MURDER ME if I don't let them have cocomelon!
This is pretty silly. I hope one day you get to enjoy watching your toddler grow up (no sarcasm here, it’s awesome and exhausting and you will do your best).

You will find it’s a combination of your kid’s personality, your energy levels and values and the support you have. During the pandemic a lot of parents were left locked down without even grandparents occasionally helping out, and if some dumb nursery rhyme cartoons got everyone through, I’m gonna cut people some slack.

Unbroken hours of screen time are bad, for sure. Kids have a lot to deal with and I hope everyone can get outside as much as possible. Kids and adults.
 
Back