Insurrection 2021

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What's going to happen on January 6th?

  • TRUMP JUNTA GOVERNMENT

    Votes: 40 10.1%
  • CHICOM BIDEN ROUNDUP

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • BOOMERS STANDING AROUND IN Q MERCH ACCOMPLISHING NOTHING

    Votes: 340 85.4%

  • Total voters
    398
  • Poll closed .
I’m just wondering why we haven’t heard of these guys going full on IRA prison protests. At this point, we’d hear of IRA hunger strikers starving to death.
Because this is how it would be framed

"Evil Racist 1-6 Insurrectionist starves to death after refusing to eat provided food, possibly because they were paranoid about a plot that Joe Biden would poison them"
 
Not directly related to the Jan. 6 insurrection but the NY Times aka the NY Slime have some troubles with their Jan. 6 narrative thanks to Project Veritas.

  • Infighting has officially broken out among staffers at the New York Times
  • The infighting comes after Project Veritas released a video showing one of their journalist exposing how fraudulent the coverage of Jan 6th has been by the New York Times
  • The New York Times is scared to confront the allegations because they don’t want to admit that Project Veritas is credible
The Palmieri Report previously reported on a video of New York Times journalist Matthew Rosenberg admitting that feds were involved on January 6th and that the New York Times coverage was not what it should be.

This has led to chaos breaking out among those at the New York Times.
Could we said karma bites back the NY Times?
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — An elected official from New Mexico went to trial with a judge — not a jury — set to decide if he is guilty of charges that he illegally entered the U.S. Capitol grounds on the day a pro-Trump mob disrupted the certification of Joe Biden's presidential election victory.

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden is scheduled to hear attorneys' closing arguments Tuesday for the case against Otero County Commissioner Couy Griffin, whose trial in Washington, D.C., is the second among the hundreds of people charged with federal crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, siege.

The judge heard testimony Monday from three government witnesses. Griffin's lawyer said he doesn't plan to call any defense witnesses.

The case against Griffin is unlike most of the Capitol riot prosecutions. He is one of the few riot defendants who isn't accused of entering the Capitol or engaging in any violent or destructive behavior. He claims he has been selectively prosecuted for his political views.

Griffin, one of three members of the Otero County Commission in southern New Mexico, is among a handful of riot defendants who either held public office or ran for a government leadership post in the 2 1/2 years before the attack.

He is among only three riot defendants who have asked for a bench trial, which means a judge will decide his case without a jury.

Griffin, a 48-year-old former rodeo rider and former pastor, helped found a political committee called Cowboys for Trump. He had vowed to arrive at the courthouse on horseback. Instead, he showed up Monday as a passenger in a pickup truck that had a horse trailer on the back.

Griffin is charged with two misdemeanors: entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds and disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds.

A key question in Griffin’s case is whether he entered a restricted area while Pence was still present on Capitol grounds, a prerequisite for the U.S. Secret Service to invoke access restrictions.

Griffin’s attorneys said in a court filing that Pence had already departed the restricted area before the earliest that Griffin could have entered it, but Secret Service inspector Lanelle Hawa testified that Pence never left the restricted area during the riot.

Hawa said agents took Pence from his office at the Capitol to a secure location at an underground loading dock on the Capitol complex. Pence remained in the loading dock location for four to five hours and never left the security perimeter before the joint session of Congress resumed on the night of Jan. 6, Hawa testified.

Defense attorney Nicholas Smith asked Hawa if it was Pence's decision to remain there for hours.

“I can't answer that,” she said.

Smith said prosecutors apparently believe Griffin engaged in disorderly conduct by peacefully leading a prayer on the Capitol steps.

“That is offensive and wrong,” Smith told the judge during his brief opening statements.

Prosecutors didn’t give any opening statements. Their first witness was Matthew Struck, who joined Griffin at the Capitol and served as his videographer. Struck has an immunity deal with prosecutors for his testimony.

After attending then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6, Griffin and Struck walked over barriers and up a staircase to enter a stage that was under construction on the Capitol’s Lower West Terrace for Biden’s inauguration, according to prosecutors.

Prosecutors played video clips that showed Griffin moving through the mob that formed outside the Capitol, where police used pepper spray to quell rioters.

“I love the smell of napalm in the air,” Griffin said in an apparent reference to a line by Robert Duvall's character in the war movie “Apocalypse Now.”

After climbing over a stone wall and entering a restricted area outside the Capitol, Griffin said, “This is our house … we should all be armed,” according to prosecutors. He called it “a great day for America” and added, “The people are showing that they have had enough,” prosecutors said.

Struck testified that he and Griffin went to the Capitol to find a place to pray. Smith asked Struck if anybody appeared to be “riled up” by the prayer that Griffin led.

“They started chanting, ‘Pray for Trump,’” Struck replied. “It looks like they’ve been calm and they’re listening to Couy.”

In a court filing, prosecutors called Griffin "an inflammatory provocateur and fabulist who engages in racist invective and propounds baseless conspiracy theories, including that Communist China stole the 2020 Presidential Election."

Griffin's attorneys say hundreds if not thousands of other people did exactly what Griffin did on Jan. 6 and haven't been charged with any crimes.

“The evidence will show that the government selected Griffin for prosecution based on the fact that he gave a speech and led a prayer at the Capitol, that is, selected him based on protected expression,” they wrote.

More than 770 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol riot. More than 230 riot defendants have pleaded guilty, mostly to misdemeanors, and at least 127 of them have been sentenced. Approximately 100 others have trial dates.

Earlier this month, a jury convicted a Texas man, Guy Wesley Reffitt, of storming the Capitol with a holstered handgun in the first trial for a Capitol riot defendant. Jurors also convicted him of obstructing Congress from certifying the Electoral College vote on Jan. 6, of interfering with police officers who were guarding the Capitol and of threatening his two teenage children if they reported him to law enforcement.

Reffitt's conviction on all charges could give prosecutors more leverage in negotiating plea deals in many other cases or discourage other defendants from going to trial. The outcome of Griffin's trial also could have a ripple effect, helping others to decide whether to let a judge or a jury decide their case.
 
Will the normies no longer believe the lies the political class has been spewing about 1/6 like the last paragraph says or is it just coping on the author's part?https://www.americanthinker.com/art...remembered_more_like_the_boston_massacre.html

Will J6 Be Remembered More Like the Boston Massacre?​

By J.B. Shurk

I get so ticked off whenever our contemptible congresscritters or their praetorian propagandists in the press call J6 an "insurrection." Did the world really witness a bunch of rowdy Americans try to overthrow the U.S. government on January 6, 2021? Would some of the country's strongest defenders of the right to bear arms really show up for battle bearing none? Did anybody in that crowd — many of whom were retirees welcomed into the Capitol Building by Capitol Police — actually believe that an "insurrection" was taking place? The answer to all three questions is a demonstrable, "No!" But to a federal government addicted to lying about absolutely anything, the "violent attack" on the Capitol was every bit as bad as 9/11, Pearl Harbor, and the Civil War. I don't know what's worse — that our government engages in such blatant propaganda against its citizens or that it can no longer be shamed into retracting its propaganda once its lies get called out.
Words matter. They set verbal place markers for the important events through our history, and I do not like this new linguistic gauntlet being cavalierly thrown down by our government. If an unarmed group of patriotic tourists waving American flags constitutes an "insurrection," then nearly any kind of rollicking assembly of citizen protesters can be deemed an "insurrection." If free speech, public assembly, and petitioning government authorities for the redress of grievances become "treasonous" whenever those same authorities feel disrespected or threatened, then most all political speech and passionate assembly (directed against the government) become acts of "rebellion." And if anything can be so easily deemed "rebellion," then the federal government burns all the middle ground between peaceful resistance and forceful revolution. By treating it as an "act of war," what should have been rebuked no more severely than would have any other political rally morphing into something between the equivalent of a college naked-mile-run and an illicit riot, the U.S. government pushes citizens' backs up against the wall. People will think twice before they protest the federal government, but because protest is now synonymous with "insurrection," once people commit to the former, they will be prepared for the latter, too. I'd say that's a pretty dangerous place marker for our country going forward.
Among the many moral failings in recent years that should have brought great shame upon federal authorities (e.g., the FBI participating in a fake Russia "collusion" hoax to frame President Trump as a Russian spy, the Intelligence Community covering up Biden family corruption by labeling it "Russian disinformation," or federal health agencies coercing Americans into taking experimental mRNA "vaccines" against their will), the government's iron-fisted response to J6 political protesters takes the cake. Mercy, forgiveness, common sense, and any hope for national reconciliation have been thrown out the window so that the sociopaths running the federal bureaucracy can hunt President Trump and persecute his supporters.
Four people died on January 6 at the Capitol, and all were Trump supporters. A Capitol police officer gunned down Ashli Babbitt in cold blood moments after she was seen trying to de-escalate the pandemonium inside the Capitol. Rosanne Boyland was beaten and trampled, although her death was ruled an accidental overdose from amphetamines. Two other rallygoers died of heart attacks while protesting outside near the Capitol steps. January 6, 2021, was indeed a deadly day at the U.S. Capitol — deadly for Trump supporters.
Instead, congressional liars and their stenographic sheep in journalist-less pressrooms loyal not to truth, but to government obeisance, routinely obscure this simple fact, so as to fabricate a narrative that a "Trump rebellion" took innocent lives. In order to perpetuate this falsehood, these same propagandists have pushed an outright lie that Officer Brian Sicknick died from blunt force trauma to the head, when in fact he died from natural causes away from the Capitol after suffering two strokes. Then, in order to tar Trump supporters — some of the strongest supporters of law enforcement in the country — as anti-police, our Ministry of Truth has done everything in its power to transform four subsequent Capitol police officer suicides into J6 "murders."
With no shame whatsoever, Joe Biden continues to lie to the world by declaring insouciantly that "five cops" were "killed" during the January 6 "insurrection." It's a dirty blood libel from a dirty and deranged man whose dementia cannot excuse his vile demagoguery intended to cleave the country in two. When the federal government cannot be relied upon to report truthfully about the deaths of patriotic civilians and police officers, it cannot be relied upon to report truthfully about much of anything. Maybe the feds should add their own dissipating credibility to their already long list of J6 casualties.
I will say right now that nothing good can come from the federal government's attempts to harass and criminally imperil Trump by demonizing his supporters, siccing the FBI on J6 political protesters for committing vague crimes hardly more serious than ordinary trespass, locking up defendants awaiting trial for years, or denying the accused access to thousands of hours of potentially exculpatory video evidence. Nothing good can come from organized efforts to remove Republicans from election ballots because they had the temerity to exercise their First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly during a political rally in support of the sitting president. Nothing good can come from partisan witch hunts conducted by shadowy operatives and anti-American zealots committed to casting shameful, ridiculous, and dangerous aspersions against ordinary patriots intended to render protected political speech as tantamount to the Confederacy's Civil War rebellion. Nothing good can come from the horrendous gall of the illegitimate congressional J6 Committee in declaring President Trump and his eighty million voters "domestic terrorists," especially when Trump supporters have disproportionately served in the armed forces in defense of this great land. These kinds of cheap and partisan tactics, bathed in Machiavellian malice, rarely have the effect governing authorities intend.
Right now, it is the federal government's position that anybody remotely connected to the J6 political rally must be scorned and ostracized. It is the federal government's position that J6 political prisoners be locked up, tormented, and forgotten. It is the federal government's position that only speech condoned by political authorities may be freely spoken. The federal government's positions, in other words, are as crooked as the politicians infesting it.
I don't think Washington, D.C.'s J6 propaganda will succeed. I don't think the friends and family of J6 prisoners will forget. I don't think our cancerous political class will get the public relations victory it desires. There may well come a day in the future when the exact opposite comes to fruition — when Americans who were not even near Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021, nevertheless tell tall tales of their personal participation in such a historic event. J6 may eventually be remembered in a similar vein to other "rebellious" undertakings such as the Boston Tea Party. Remember, when Redcoat soldiers killed five colonials on March 5, 1770, the Crown took the quite defensible position that its soldiers had been attacked in a clear bout of unjustifiable "insurrection." We Americans, however, have never known M5 as anything other than a terrible incident of government tyranny richly deserving of its infamous branding as the Boston Massacre.
 
Oh my god they are seriously comparing the riot to a actual murder of civilians.
 

  • As senators hid from rioters on January 6, Graham interrupted a Capitol officer who was giving evacuation directions.
  • "You're here to protect us," he reportedly told the officer. "You let people breach the Capitol."
  • "Shut up, Lindsey!" replied Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio.
As senators gathered in a secure location amid the riot at the Capitol on January 6, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina was apoplectic, even complaining to a Capitol Police officer that the security force "let people breach the Capitol."

That's according to reporting included in "This Will Not Pass: Trump, Biden, and the Battle for America's Future," a forthcoming book from the New York Times reporters Jonathan Martin and Alex Burns.

After their evacuation from the Senate chamber, senators had been taken to the secure location of SH-216, the Senate Judiciary Committee room in the Hart Senate Office Building. A Capitol police captain reportedly announced to the group that they were hoping to evacuating them onto busses behind the building.

"Right now, the Capitol is breached," the captain said. "We need you to be patient and then we'll move you in orderly fashion."

Another office then began to speak, telling the senators that the plan "is to come here in SH-216, hold until we determine what the next step is going to be—"

But then, Graham interrupted the officers.

"The next step is to get 'em out!" said Graham. "Whatever force you need to do. You're here to protect us. This is the center of democracy. You let people breach the Capitol."

The outburst reportedly drew the ire of fellow senators.

"Shut up, Lindsey!" Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio reportedly yelled, as another person yelled to Graham that "there are no cameras — come on!"

Graham's office did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment. It has previously been reported that the South Carolina Republican wanted officers to use guns on the rioters.

"What are you doing? Take back the Senate! You've got guns. Use them," he reportedly told the Senate sergeant-at-arms.

Graham, a one-time foe of former President Donald Trump, grew into becoming one of the president's closest allies and Senate confidantes, even after the riot.

But that didn't stop him from airing his frustrations with Trump that day.

"Trump and I, we've had a hell of a journey. I hate it to end this way, oh my god, I hate it," Graham said on the floor after the Senate reconvened following the attack. "From my point of view, he's been a consequential president... all I can say is count me out. Enough is enough. I've tried to be helpful."

 
Bump.

The insurrectionists' nefarious plan has been published. It's not the most detailed plan, but it went something like this:

1. Go into Federal buildings.
* If necessary, cause mischief or pull fire alarms (as a last resort) to get access.
2. Chant slogans.
3. Hand out literature demanding a new election.
4. At some unspecified time, block traffic except for emergency vehicles.
5. Do sit-ins at certain senators' offices.
6. At some undetermined time everyone goes home.

It looks a lot like the playbook used by the radical left (now the mainstream left) from 2016 to 2020, though the scale is more ambitious. Most of it didn't happen, but at least they had their ambitions. Notably absent are any plans to capture, kill, or coerce any lawmaker or official. I mean, I guess sitting in someone's office is a form of coercion, but they had to know a sit-in only lasts as long as the person in charge lets it continue.

The only interesting part is their "covert sleeper," who some people have identified as Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) because he took some constituents(?) on a brief tour of the Capitol and they took pictures of things. These tourists were allegedly taking pictures of things that are not normally of interest to tourists, such as a stairwell. Loudermilk says they were just yokels who were impressed by trains and light fixtures [archive]. As a yokel who's more interested in off-the-beaten-path objects than famous statues and paintings, I could buy that explanation.
 
Back