Insurrection 2021

What's going to happen on January 6th?

  • TRUMP JUNTA GOVERNMENT

    Votes: 40 10.1%
  • CHICOM BIDEN ROUNDUP

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • BOOMERS STANDING AROUND IN Q MERCH ACCOMPLISHING NOTHING

    Votes: 340 85.4%

  • Total voters
    398
  • Poll closed .
That's not accurate to the actual facts remotely, the US is still in Iraq with no plan for leaving even st the behest of the Iraqis who have voted in their parliament for the US to leave. In Afghanistan there's suppose to be a withdrawal but Trump did actually pull out like how he could have at any time.
That's not mentioning the thousands of troops Trumo allowed to remain in Syria

>muh killary
Nice strawman, I never supported her

Not really he had constant coup attempts on Venezuela which would cause a further spike in migration, built the bombs the Saudis use to bomb school busses full of kids, and set up awful deals like the Morocco western Sahara one over what it gives to Israel rather then how it helps America. These mistakes have consequences and simply because it's not another grand war doesn't make it any better.
Trump also bomb more civilians in a year in Afghanistan than Dubya or "Obomber" did.
And who got the peace prize? You think any of this would stop by an executive office? The mere fact that someone that high said, "maybe we should stop this" was enough to send the entire country into a tailspin before everyone with stake in the game decided to jump and continue course. Your peacekeeper Obama was all to happy to continue what was set before him.
 
Last edited:
We killed plenty of you.
1578334981599.jpg
 
Not really he had constant coup attempts on Venezuela which would cause a further spike in migration, built the bombs the Saudis use to bomb school busses full of kids, and set up awful deals like the Morocco western Sahara one over what it gives to Israel rather then how it helps America. These mistakes have consequences and simply because it's not another grand war doesn't make it any better.
Trump also bomb more civilians in a year in Afghanistan than Dubya or "Obomber" did.
Can't wait for MAGAtards being all WAKE UP SHEEPLE about shit I already know about that's been going on forever thinking they are on some third eye shit just because they decided to stop paying attention to everything for four years and let a diaper shitting grifter get away with everything short of murder. Then when they snap back to reality it's still as shit as when they left.


You guys really haven't been paying attention. It's like the last four years are a blind spot. Incredible.
View attachment 1814216
View attachment 1814217
It's like you intentionally misread my posts so you can try to argue nonsense.
Trump is objectively the least pro-war president in my lifetime. He's also very pro-military. They are not the same thing and reaching into nuances to try to argue that he's somehow very much a hawk like any of his recent predecessors shows how much he didn't do. Regarding troops in Afghanistan, the withdrawal agreement pissed Congress off so much that they tried to further limit Trump's ability to withdraw troops without their approval.
You guys really haven't been paying attention. It's like the last four years are a blind spot. Incredible.
Pot, meet Kettle. By summer of this year there was a reduction back down to ~8,000 troops and the 13,000 includes the lies previously told (under Obama) where the existing ~8,400 turned out to actually be ~11,000. So under Trump it went up to a ceiling of 13,000 and then back down to an actual ~8,000 last I knew. Stop trying to find stuff that lines up with your views to own le ebil drumpfkins you retard.
Also, bitching about drone usage when it's almost guaranteed to increase under each president is silly, I hope you're mad about Obama's massive reliance on drone strikes while he pretended they weren't striking a bunch innocents nearly every day. I care about the American bodies most of all and just want to get out of there and Trump has done more in that regard than Obama and more than Hillary would have done and that's good enough for me.

Biden's record is 100% pro-war and I doubt that's going to change any.

This isn't me saying Trump can still win, it's me expressing something I liked about Trump and don't like about Biden. The MIC is fucked and Biden has a closer relationship with it than Trump probably ever will.
 
Can't wait for MAGAtards being all WAKE UP SHEEPLE about shit I already know about that's been going on forever thinking they are on some third eye shit just because they decided to stop paying attention to everything for four years and let a diaper shitting grifter get away with everything short of murder. Then when they snap back to reality it's still as shit as when they left.


You guys really haven't been paying attention. It's like the last four years are a blind spot. Incredible.
View attachment 1814216
View attachment 1814217
The problem is that none of them verify anything by themselves: they just take Trump at face value and that’s good enough for them. Problem with that is Trump is a serial bullshitter.

Also anyone who says Trump had no power: that’s not a valid excuse. The guy who ran on making the best deals who is unable to get any deals done. But even that isn’t true as he managed to get everything he wanted for Israel. He was able to get “criminal reform” passed because his bimbo daughter cried to him about it. He managed to get things done when he really wanted to - problem is the stuff he got elected for wasn’t too high on his priority list. The saber rattling with China was ultimately a scheme to outsource to India instead. The demographic Trump fucked over the most didn’t show up for him and he lost.
 
I'm still convinced a great deal of Biden's win had to do with tech companies propping him up. Around the first of the fiscal year (July 1) numerous social media platforms banned conservative posters/subs, started censoring conservative (or non-Biden) posters. It was pretty obvious to me at the time, and I was not a self-described Trump fan. This development made me extremely suspicious. I might not agree with hardcore right wingers, but I don't advocate banning them outright. Most of the mainstream media outlets had already backed Biden by that time. However, I imagine it's already well known that a great deal of the younger voters DON'T rely on mainstream news for their information... they go to twitter, reddit, other platforms. The admins of these platforms were firmly in support of Biden as of mid-Summer, were given free reign to censor and ban people, and made sure most anti-Biden sentiment was squashed.

In hindsight, in 2016, it seemed many of these same social media platforms and search engines were backing Trump and/or propping him up. Everything outside of mainstream media was pro-Trump online. The exception that time around was that mainstream news media didn't back Trump. Weeks before the election, it seemed many of these platforms pushed the anti-HRC narrative hard. I couldn't help but think at that time that this was deliberate and that the admins for these platforms were turning a blind eye to it. I remember the Trump admin granting cable/phone/internet companies the right to harvest, collect, and sell user data. Perhaps the tech industries saw that the GOP would push whatever they wanted under the guise of "pro-business practice", whereas for some reason they thought HRC would not? I don't know.

Going further back, I vaguely remember Obama being heavily pushed on Facebook and other online platforms in 2012 and 2008.

I guess my point is: whomever Tech supports will ultimately win any given election. This is aside from voting machine shenanigans. The "grassroots" campaigning for Antifa/BLM/Democrats was largely organized via online platforms, twitter accounts, etc., as was grooming young people into extreme ideology. Conservative entities were banned from these same platforms. One notorious tr00n mod from Reddit who advocated "trying registered Republicans for treason" was also shilling for campaign donations for "act Blue".. there are numerous other examples I've seen of this-- high ranking admins on social media openly shilling for Biden.

People have a short attention span nowadays, and a huge number of them seem easily manipulated by what they read and hear online. Pushing propaganda or "hot news stories" right before an election will sway people. Tech companies know this. For whatever reason, they saw Biden as their winning horse. Tech squashed the Hunter controversy story hard whereas in 2016 they helped push Pizza Gate.

My assumption is that the whole transhumanism ideology/global economy/environmental issues were what drove them to support Biden/ the Democrats as they will make tech and bio-med companies huge profits. They know COVID will be a great excuse to automate more people out of work, to invade more people's privacy, and they wanted to back whomever would also support the most micromanaging COVID restrictions as well. The whole "Great Reset" ideology hinges on globalist governmental policies and grifting via environmental policies, and vested interests (including many tech moguls) knew the Republicans wouldn't accept that to some extent as many of their constituents are against "one world government", hate the UN, are anti-transhumanistic ideology, don't want invasive policies that include compulsory vaccination.
If you don't work in anything remotely related to tech, you might imagine there's a grand scheme at play. Once you do get under the hood, though, you begin to realize that notion is as absurd as the idea of massive government conspiracies that somehow don't get revealed for aeons despite the fact that fucking phishing attempts are frequently enough to crack 'ironclad' government security: it's a massive, unfathomably large bureaucracy wherein no-one knows exactly what it's doing or who is doing what.

There is no Big Book of Content Moderation for tech. There are no standards issued as to what is or is not acceptable (beyond terroristic threats and so-on), because tech managed to swing in after the FCC's heyday and avoid the onerous shit they slap on TV and radio. When it comes down to content moderation, these massive bureaucracies were getting away with doing the absolute bare minimum for a long, long time - because I will tell you from experience working with tech engineers, the tech engineers never ever ever fucking consider what the consequences of the products they ship are. The concern is mostly just "does it work under ideal circumstances?" and good enough, ship it, that's a product for the quarter. The problem of dealing with unintended consequences or even non-ideal behavior (content algorithms banning lesbians calling each other dykes) are ignored for as long as possible, and then later pushed off to people with some leeway to figure out. Once measles cropped up again and some retard busted into a pizza shop with a shotgun, there was a sudden push for tech to stop being fucking lazy and pick up the slack.

This is where the modern content moderation that favored Biden comes into play. And I don't take a qualm with this - the mainstream media is more obviously corrupt in what it chooses to curate, but Tech is more a consequence of circumstance and the fucking retarded approaches conservatives take to it. I don't like it because it realistically makes everyone stupider.

When you ship off content curation to a team, you're probably asking for a three-pronged approach. High-level operatives decide what is and is not acceptable, and under what circumstances certain phrases may be acceptable or not -- certain bars and measures for what is "OK" that are necessarily arbitrary, again because there's no real standard or playbook for any of this shit.
Below them, you're probably having a much larger group of people running effective audits on flagged content to render judgments -- who may or may not be in the US. I would guess that it depends on the industry, but a lot of them run the stuff offshores to SEA or the Indian subcontinent for this kind of task. These people do nothing but render judgments based on their guidelines for days on end, presumably bringing up any difficult questions to the people in charge.
And these judgments are used to train automated algorithms which feed off of all that historical data and effectively self-reinforce content curation. Conservatives often imagine that there's an army of angry soyboys watching their every move at all hours of the day - because no way could an algorithm discriminate between the presidential election and the georgia gubernatorial election!

Which moves me to my next point: conservatives don't understand fucking tech, don't want to understand tech, and don't care enough to actually try to get people in at the highest level of this tree. Conservatives tend to bang on about algorithms with a bare understanding of how they (or how machine learning as a broad concept) works, as if there was just some switch that could be flipped to suddenly give them carte blanche. Getting to the point where you are the big cheese in terms of deciding content moderation would mean that you'd need to be able to tolerate the office culture in places where this shit gets decided, which is usually the west coast. And that's the other problem:

Conservatives tend to waste their energy on stupid, idealistic shit. You are not going to make it long in one of these content moderation committees/teams if you spend your time trying to argue for shit like Gab. You're not going to get big tech to accept that "hitler was right and the holocaust is a hoax designed to turn everyone gay" is an important form of speech to host on their platform. Conservatives have wasted so much time and effort not trying to get relatively mainstream conservative talking-points protected on social media shit, but rather in trying to enshrine the ability to call people NIGGER and conspiratorial bullshit. Rather than taking a realpolitik approach of recognizing what forms of speech would be necessary to get their political objectives accomplished, they have instead wasted a LOT of time trying to argue for ALL forms of speech. It's a losing battle - leave that to the lolbertarians and their own wonky, niche websites. But there is one final problem:

Troons. Even if a conservative manages to keep their head down while working at one of these offices long enough to get onto one of these content committees, even if they are specifically chosen because they identify as a conservative, and even if they are amicable and personable enough to distinguish between abstractions to be used for the purposes of content moderation and their own personal beliefs... it really isn't going to matter, because troons are going to zero-in on these content moderation entities and they're going to pressure and petition them until the end of time, because they recognize that people are too stupid to think for themselves and choosing what people see allows you to think for them. Troons tend to come from ungodly amounts of money and influence, with a massive media apparatus focused at any moment to spring on any tech titan that dares run afoul of them -- I hypothesize that troondom is the expression of old money into new industries like tech.

The hypothetical mild-mannered conservative who gets onto a content moderation team is going to be in no position to point out that Abigail Shrier's position is pretty mainstream and she's arguing from the mainstream. He won't be able to argue that religion's intolerance of the gays doesn't necessarily transmit to personal intolerance (IE, if one believes that marriage is something that government should have nothing to do with and is a purely religious expression); he'll have trouble explaining why anti-abortion sentiments are not necessarily anti-woman; etc. etc. because it's going to keep coming down to what the troon in the room thinks on absolutely everything. And HR at tech companies is notoriously bad at dealing with speds and creepers alike - so troons that enmesh themselves on these committees aren't going to be wrenched from them anytime soon. (For what it's worth, I imagine these troons are as it were not 'trutrans,' and instead are the incredibly common image of a child of privilege looking to run unchecked and force their whims upon the world.)
 
Democrats are setting up a vote for later today to bump the $600 COVID aid relief checks to $2000. President Trump says he was given assurances that the GOP would would take up the matter in the Senate. This will see who's with Trump and who's not.
 
If you insist on spending your final days in office threatening to burn it all down, that will be how you are remembered. Not as a revolutionary, but as the anarchist holding the match.
Better to be remembered as an anarchist with a match than as the corporate stooge who surrendered

If the outcome is the same either way you got nothing to lose by going down fighting.

Admitting defeat has no positive gains
 
InB4 the FBI ask for APC's details. SIGSEGV showed that ironic Fedposting can still be interpreted as Fedposting by G-men, who are not known for their sense of humor or Internet literacy.

Then again, maybe the his Fedposting isn't ironic...
Null's warning is still on the front page too. Can't wait for the outrage against dear Erverlord for acquising to the Feddies demands.
 
lol calm down
Nothing emotional about it. It's just a fact that if Trump has just less than a month in office anyhow he has nothing to lose by not surrendering.

What's emotional is writing articles begging the president to concede as to give legitimacy to the next administration. Or to project on Internet forums
 
I plan to join ISIS. I just ordered my plane ticket to Souria(Syria for you westerners) and already have gotten to email addresses of 4 prominent Jihadists from my Imam so I can receive instructions after getting off at Beirut-Rafic Hariri International Airport. I will be smuggled across state lines in the dead of night, once I arrive I will be trained in guerilla warfare, drug smuggling and CQC. I already have an entire broodwife chosen out. I fully understand this won't be easy and if in caught I'll be held as a traitor, but this is what it means to make Jihad particularly against Donald Trump and libs, then so be it. I would like to add that I throughly disavow all violence, calls to violence or actions that could lead to violence.
View attachment 1814220

If you would like to inquire more about joining the cause, please check out this site:
If you want to get your ass in an FBI van, then by all means continue this course of action.







In other news there's apparently some good shit coming out of the Ukraine. They want their money back from Biden.


Archive this please. I dont know how. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKDXVo-OKeQ&feature=emb_title




1609169688161.png
 
Last edited:
I plan to join ISIS. I just ordered my plane ticket to Souria(Syria for you westerners) and already have gotten to email addresses of 4 prominent Jihadists from my Imam so I can receive instructions after getting off at Beirut-Rafic Hariri International Airport. I will be smuggled across state lines in the dead of night, once I arrive I will be trained in guerilla warfare, drug smuggling and CQC. I already have an entire broodwife chosen out. I fully understand this won't be easy and if in caught I'll be held as a traitor, but this is what it means to make Jihad particularly against Donald Trump and libs, then so be it. I would like to add that I throughly disavow all violence, calls to violence or actions that could lead to violence.
View attachment 1814220

If you would like to inquire more about joining the cause, please check out this site:
Too close to the sun, man.
 
SMASH UR LED LIGHTBULBS

View attachment 1813535
hErE's HoW tRuMp CaN sTiLl WiN
View attachment 1813537
KRAKEN
View attachment 1813538

I can't imagine supporting Trump, who's been trying to move US manufacturing jobs to India which has considerably less labor protections to China, and saying something this fucking stupid.

If you can put trade barriers up against China because it's more successful, you can put up trade barriers against India or anywhere else with no labor protections. Honestly, you people...
To be fair, night-driving when everyone else had LED headlights is really annoying, especially if you have the slightest bit of frost on the windshield, not surprised Q-loons would make conspiracy theories about them.
 
Back