Internal Monologues / Apple Visualizers / Cow Rotators - The line between real people an NPCs (?)

Can you do each of the following (Mark all applicable)

  • Think using words (Internal Monologue)

    Votes: 34 94.4%
  • Visualize an Apple (Rudimentary)

    Votes: 32 88.9%
  • Visualize an Apple (High Detail)

    Votes: 30 83.3%
  • Rotate a cow (or any object) in your mind

    Votes: 33 91.7%
  • None of these :(

    Votes: 1 2.8%

  • Total voters
    36
my mind never stops running
I am quite similar. I’ll sit and knit for example, and be playing a tune in my head, counting stitches, and thinking about something, maybe a few things at once. It’s not really ‘one person monologue’ but I’m counting to myself and the old brain is rattling along a few tracks. Various lines of thought surface and dip - I’ll count the row of knitting and it’ll have say 267 stitches, and I’ll start 1-2-3 then think about something else and then be all ‘shit I must have lost track’ but no, I haven’t, I’m still counting away. I guess it’s like driving on autopilot. I dont like TV much but I do very much like books. Books let you create the world in your mind, and go and explore it. TV is like looking through a small window into one set ‘run’ of the event.
I cannot stop it, even when I’m asleep. I often solve crossword answers in my sleep. I know I’m asleep but I’m also partly conscious and thinking sometimes.
I hear people say ‘clear your mind’ for meditation and I have tried and tried but nothing (including dope) does it. Maybe I’m missing something there, it’s supposed to be beneficial. The only time I’ve ever had a blank mind is when I’ve been seriously (as in close to death) sick and it was a very unpleasant experience. I felt like I’d died
I guess all this just shows you we have so many different ways of ‘being’ internally. That’s kind of cool, really. The brain is amazing
I just cannot accept some people don’t ‘reflect’ internally - maybe they do it differently but they must be capable of self reflection, becasue if not, they’re not sapient.
(Although I look around at the world and do wonder sometimes…)
 
I like sometimes thinking in text against a colored background along with my internal monologue. In different fonts, too.

I don't know what that says about me but I have a preference for Times New Roman and comic sans. Black text on white background.
It says you're a Bill Wurtz video.

If I read in my first language I don’t ‘read out loud in my head’ becasue that is slooooow. I kind of snapshot half a page or so and it is like an immersive experience. BUT if I’m reading something in my second language (which I’m not good at) then I more often read aloud in my head, as I do if it’s technical info.
That's weird, because I always sub in voices when I read; I can't just absorb words without that. I read pretty damn though, so even though the voices sound normal speed in my head, I'm pretty sure they're going by faster than those small-print reads you get at the end of american adverts for weird new medicines. Always consult a physician.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LurkTrawl
That's weird, because I always sub in voices when I read; I can't just absorb words without that.
I read very early. By age two apparently. I’ve always just kind of absorbed it. I love reading and read very fast. I dislike audiobooks because of the speed of it.
I am retarded in many other ways but this is something I’m good at
 
Smoke some dope/eat some dope and just lay around. Note the utter emptiness of your head. That's what I assume normalfags are like all day every day.
On the other hand I can't stop ruminating on things if I smoke/eat marijuana. Astronomy in particular, I can lose myself for hours on that stuff. Might be the strain though.

I read very early. By age two apparently. I’ve always just kind of absorbed it. I love reading and read very fast. I dislike audiobooks because of the speed of it.
I am retarded in many other ways but this is something I’m good at
Exactly the same in fact. On all counts.

For the question itself, I can do all four but the apple's detail increases only if I focus on specific pieces of the image. Inorganic objects I can visualize in high detail at all scales.
 
For me it depends on what I’m doing. Generally, I have an inner monologue except when I’m contemplating something. This happens more often when I’m working on puzzles, playing a strategy game, or working on a creative venture. It’s like I’m thinking faster than I am able to speak or put my thoughts into words. While I’m around people or in a social setting I tend to monologue more often.

This personal experience of mine makes me wonder if some people’s brains are like that all the time. I have certainly met people who don’t really think for themselves and go along with what’s popular. I am curious how some of the zanier folks process things. Especially skitzos and autists.

My inner monologue has also changed over the years. When I was just an English speaker, my inner thoughts were always in English, but now it jumps between languages.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Kaktus Kompot
Like as I write this I guess it's being read, but it shouldn't reach a point where there's an actual voice attached to it. Imo that should be seen as a negative symptom.
I read it but with my own voice.
You know how at first you read outloud as akid?
Imagine that but in your head.
 
The thought of people having no internal reflection, or being unable to reflect verbally internally is bizarre. Surely people are misunderstanding the question and thinking they mean ‘a voice all the time talking to you.’
I've concluded that most people simply don't think about thinking. This might be someone who is incapable of doing so or it might be someone with the capability. It's pretty easy to wind up arrogantly believing the way you think is simply what thinking is. Even when people do think about it, it's incredibly difficult to characterize it in a way that makes sense to anyone that doesn't think as you do. Just like you struggle to "clear your mind" it is probably just as much a struggle for someone without your abilities to really understand what it is like. It's somewhat comforting to at least believe it happens for these people to some degree but is simply misunderstood.
If I read in my first language I don’t ‘read out loud in my head’ becasue that is slooooow. I kind of snapshot half a page or so and it is like an immersive experience. BUT if I’m reading something in my second language (which I’m not good at) then I more often read aloud in my head, as I do if it’s technical info.
This makes me think of speed-reading and a lot of the common pitfalls. Some people are able to see and understand whole groups of words or chunks of text. Consciously reading it "aloud" internally is going to slow things down but these readers still "get" everything. I'd imagine you probably build a setting, have an idea of what a character looks like, and what they might sound like. For a lot of people they may be able to speed-read quickly but there is very little comprehension/understanding. They can usually get there by reading slower and taking the time to do the mental work that you do quicker. I'd imagine reading your second language "aloud" gives your noggin the chance to do the same work in the background.

One really enlightening experience for me was working with functionally illiterate people. They could "read" in that they would be able to say the words in this sentence aloud, but there would be zero understanding of the meaning. They might get very simple and direct sentences. Nuance, conditionals, and things like lists of steps will be lost on them. However, if you take the time to actually go talk to them about the same exact thing they don't struggle to understand. Surprisingly many of them were a lot better at remembering one verbal encounter than I could ever be. I'm fairly certain for most of them it was a tragic circumstance that lead to their illiteracy, not an outright inability. If someone hasn't taken the time to consider how others think or never utilized these skills, they might find themselves in a similar situation.

I probably wouldn't have thought about this much if not for going hunting a lot growing up. You might have a book but it might be too dark to read it, you'd be potentially missing things in the field, and even the motion of turning pages might spook game. Otherwise, it's just you, your thoughts, a largely unchanging nature scene, and hours of still silence. Effectively staving off boredom pretty much required recognizing these skills and working those mental muscles. I think many of these people have never had an experience like that.
The people that can't visualize or have monologue function just fine, sometimes even better. It's not necessary and I think it's actually kind of detrimental.
I would agree only if you consider "function" to be a lot closer to surviving than thriving. Sure these people might be fine as tiktok scrolling consumers. But these skills are imperative for people trying to do actually do things. I'm not even talking about science or engineering. It can be as simple as troubleshooting computer problems, parking a car, or assembling a box/flat-pack furniture. They might be able to get there with guidance and instructions but would struggle without it. Here's some slightly tougher visualization than the apple:
1696916513959.jpeg
This is pretty straightforward to figure out with visualization skills. Even if you cannot "assemble" the whole thing with no problem, being able to conceptualize the basic shape of most of it, and reason your way through the last bits should get you there. Absent these skills I'm not sure how you'd arrive at the right answer without cutting this out and physically folding it.
1696916645905.png
 
This makes me think of speed-reading
I’ve seen speed reading (uni actually sent us on a course to do it) and it’s not what I do at all. I also couldn’t do what they were asking of me well, but I could still ‘absorb’ the words faster. I would categorise speed reading as skipping over a lot of stuff. I found it unpleasant and jarring and I missed a lot of info. What I do is more look at the page and I’m kind of in there and the info is in my head. I can rewind it, go back to specific texts etc. I can’t describe it verbally (irony…) I do not have a photographic memory either. It’s not that.
You’re right that it’s almost impossible to describe your own inner world. It defies verbal explanation. That’s one reason I think people are misunderstanding the question, because it’s asked by people who have a strong single functional way of processing?
It’s really fascinating to think that other peoples internal worlds and internal reflection work just as well but are completely different. I have very mild synaesthesia and I once got talking to an old mathematician, she must be in her eighties now, who used what she described as colour tones to do her work. Very smart lady, no deficits, and an internal world almost completely unlike my own although I understand what she means about each ‘item’ having an inherent colour or shape
I wonder what makes these differences - inbuilt? Upbringing? and I also can’t quite believe that people have NO internal reflection at all and simply react. That would make them non sapient.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures
Also is b correct? None of those answers look like they are possible from the shape.
 
Also is b correct? None of those answers look like they are possible from the shape.
I think you have to fold the little tab on the bottom left a certain way to get it but even then it doesn't seem quite right to me. Guess I can't visualize well.

Edit: ok figured it out but giving me the answer first definitely saved a lot of time :)
 
Yeah I can't do any of these things. No internal monologue and almost no minds eye. If I had to give a description to police of a missing person I knew well, I'd at best be able to recite a list of rote facts I know about that person (age, weight, height). Life's pretty normal though, and my spatial/mechanical reasoning seems to be above average perhaps as some kind of cope.
This is pretty straightforward to figure out with visualization skills.
Figured it out in about 10 seconds from just walking along the folds and edges to match things up. The extra ridge at the top gave me a few seconds of trouble because it's not formed by the edge pieces and I had to backtrack a bit in my thinking to line things up. None of this involved visualizing anything beyond what could at best be described as a 'flash'.
 
Last edited:
I think you have to fold the little tab on the bottom left a certain way to get it
Doh, yeah the little extra bits at the bottom. Clearly I’m Visio-spatially retarded and will never make flight school.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Pedophobe
I remember reading that some people (specifically Asians lol) are very unlikely to have an internal monologue. This kind of freaked me out because my mind never shuts the fuck up and just trying to visualize people, let alone lots of people, walking around with empty heads spooked me. My better half said that the concept was bizarre to her as well, she’s a bit ADHD, so her mind is constantly going. We have long conversations about stuff we’ve thought about whilst at work, so for us the concept that others don’t do that, let alone are incapable, is very odd. For me I constantly hear a voice in my mind, if I’m not hearing a voice I’m visualizing something. Sometimes I go on ‘autopilot’ if I’m doing something particularly mundane or if I’m very tired, but this is pretty rare. Sometimes I internally switch languages depending on the situation or location.

Perhaps it’s a cultural or racial thing? Libyans (and I mean Berbers like my namesake, not our Arab invaders) put a value on musing about life over coffee and such in the evenings. We’re very animated when we speak, and get very emotionally invested in discussions of religion and politics. Pretty typical of Mediterranean Caucasian folks, perhaps the climate led to more leisure time, ergo more opportunities for these types of social interactions?
 
Back