Internet Historian Appreciation Thread - The best thing to come out of Austrailia since Mad Max (The original, obviously)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Honestly I don't know why HBomber would fucking poison the well as hard as he did. He's literally acquaintance to one of the biggest content thief on Twitch.

The only reason why a video was made on IH is because he doesn't like him.
1701839158292.png
 
I hate to defend Hbomber guy, but its a bit annoying how some ITT act like the entire video was about IH, when half the runtime of the video was about a gay liberal breadtuber.

Even without it, Hbomber talked more about Cinemassacre and Iilluminaughtii
That's because this is the Internet Historian thread. We don't give a shit about the other guys.
 
I hate to defend Hbomber guy, but its a bit annoying how some ITT act like the entire video was about IH, when half the runtime of the video was about a gay liberal breadtuber.

Even without it, Hbomber talked more about Cinemassacre and Iilluminaughtii
Its because he spent a disproportionate ammount of time on the IH segment (I checked and its the biggest one, same size as illuminaughty) stretched out way longer than it needed to be, complained about IH not like SJWs revealing his hand, pretended it was the same as reading an article ignoring the animation, music, direction and voice acting that went into it and putting next to already resolved cases.

Not to defend my favourite edaddy, I think this was a huge blunder by IH, but harry's response was still disrpoportionate and clearly an attack because of IH's politics instead of a genuine issue with plaguarism.
 
Rate me optimistic but I don't think IH is really gonna be affected by these unsubs. His channel is content based, not personality based, and furthermore its also foreground viewing, not background viewing, so its not really replacable. It provides something unique you can't get elsewhere and you don't have anywhere to go if you don't like that content.
Good point on active. It's one of the few where you really need to pay attention to enjoy it. So much content nowadays can be consumed as podcasts or passively paying attention.
I hate to defend Hbomber guy, but its a bit annoying how some ITT act like the entire video was about IH, when half the runtime of the video was about a gay liberal breadtuber.

Even without it, Hbomber talked more about Cinemassacre and Iilluminaughtii
I hate HBomberguy and don't give a rats ass about anybody in that video outside of IH, so it's what I'll focus on.
 
Not to defend my favourite edaddy, I think this was a huge blunder by IH, but harry's response was still disrpoportionate and clearly an attack because of IH's politics instead of a genuine issue with plaguarism.
Not a genuine issue with plagiarism? You're leaving out where IH tried to get away with not crediting the author. It was literally plagiarism and you're coping. Also, he took a few shots at IH's politics and fanbase. It's not like this was a takedown video, people are being so dramatic.

I don't think his career should be ruined. He worked something out with the author he plagiarized. So, why be defensive? People just can't stand their faves being criticized at all even when it's valid.
 
Not a genuine issue with plagiarism? You're leaving out where IH tried to get away with not crediting the author. It was literally plagiarism and you're coping.
You're leaving out the part where he had addressed the issue way before hbombergay dropped his hit piece. Yeah IH fucked up by doing it in the first place but Harry's intentions when covering the situation were very, very plain and he's a colossal faggot.
 
You're leaving out the part where he had addressed the issue way before hbombergay dropped his hit piece. Yeah IH fucked up by doing it in the first place but Harry's intentions when covering the situation were very, very plain and he's a colossal faggot.
Who cares if IH already addressed the issue? Does that mean no one else can talk about it? This was a presentation, not breaking news.

The video was a hit piece on Somerton (well deserved). He had other examples of plagiarism and one of them was IH. And then he took a few shots at IH's politics, so what? That made up like two minutes or less of the video.

He had so many examples of plagiarism in his video because apparently people have a hard time understanding what it is. Interpreting this vid as an attempt to destroy IH just comes off as paranoid and yes parasocial DON'T TALK ABOUT MY DAD :jaceknife:
 
He had other examples of plagiarism and one of them was IH. And then he took a few shots at IH's politics, so what? That made up like two minutes or less of the video.

He had so many examples of plagiarism in his video because apparently people have a hard time understanding what it is. Interpreting this vid as an attempt to destroy IH just comes off as paranoid and yes parasocial DON'T TALK ABOUT MY DAD :jaceknife:
You're delusional if you think his inclusion of IH wasn't motivated by politisperging and seething rage, is what I'm saying. It's perfectly fine to criticize IH for his plagiarism and I disapprove of what he's done, but for Harry the plagiarism is only a cudgel to knock le ebil youtube nazi down a peg, which is why he made sure to include the political comments (not to mention IH doesn't even get into politics, he simply used to make fun of SJW cringe) and why he is a faggot. I hope I've managed to dumb the issue down enough for you to understand.
 
So IH can make fun of SJW cringe and that's fine. But HB making fun of rightoid cringe means he must be seething and frothing in a rage. Got it, thanks!
You really are retarded aren't you? You think making a mockumentary about a failed tumblr convention or about Shia Labeouf autistically screeching into a live camera feed, while successfully avoiding any actual political debate or preaching, is somehow equivalent to making a serious youtube video where you directly paint a specific person as alt right and antisemitic? I've watched the HB video and there's barely any humor to be seen in the IH segment, but what is very clear is that HB has a bone to pick with IH on a personal level because of what he thinks are IH's politics, and that is fucking gay.
 
Not a genuine issue with plagiarism? You're leaving out where IH tried to get away with not crediting the author.
Yeah and you're leaving out multiple things.

For one, IH didn't copypaste the article. He got a whole group to voice act it, animate it, provide a soundtrack, and added multiple skits and jokes in it.

Comparing it to other people just copypasting and reading stuff verbatin with no additions or alterations is disgenuous to begin with.

For another, hbomber makes it clear this is a political hitjob when he complains about IH dunking on sjws.

And finally, the drama is already resolved, he credited the creator and edited the video. Again, it was wrong to do it in the first place, but its done, he apologized, he fixed it.
 
It literally wasn't, though.
No it was, because one bald faggot that doesn't believe in private propriety said he did ( and said mean things about SJW :( ).
I am just laughing this situation because he already solved like a professional months ago, and IH worked with copyright before being a youtuber. So he probably know what's he doing.
 
>Hangs out with different people with different backgrounds and culture
>Make edgy shitposts.
>Get called Nazi.

I don't even. WHAT!?

I'm having a hard time grasping this shit. I'ma go lay down and chill for a bit.
If there are 10 people at a table and 9 of those people are Nazi’s and the 10th doesn’t speak against them, then you have 10 heckin unwholesome Nazi chuds at a table.

That’s the Fatrick S. Tomlinson logic of it, so you can kind of assume it’s a braindead leftist meme.
 
Back