- Joined
- Jun 14, 2018
So I read this, this, and this, and I think of the equivalencies and shared characteristics of the many gods, goddesses, and deities throughout human history, and I say to myself:
Let's play a game. The game of Divine Equivalency*.
The rules are: you take two or more gods and equate them together.
The equivalence must be based on multiple shared characteristics between the deities to be "true".
A basic true equivalence (one between two gods) is worth 1 point, with the amount of points earned increasing the more gods are being correctly equated at once.
A false equivalence, one based on no shared characteristics, only minor shared characteristics, or a single shared characteristic to the ignorance of all others, takes away a point, with the amount of points taken away increasing the more gods are being incorrectly equated at once.
A chain of supposed equivalences should be read from left to right.
Those who make the most legitimate equivalences win. Those who make the least legitimate equivalences, or make the most illegitimate or "false" equivalences, lose.
An example equivalence:
Yehowah (the Jewish conception of God) = Jehovah (the Christian conception of God)
An example equivalence chain:
Yahweh (the national god of ancient Israel and Judah) = Yehowah (the Jewish conception of God) = Jehovah (the Christian conception of God)
*"Equivalent" should not be taken to mean "the exact same god". For instance, when the myths or even cult practices of a particular Roman deity were influenced by the Greek or Etruscan tradition, the deity may have had an independent origin and a tradition that is culturally distinctive.
Let's play a game. The game of Divine Equivalency*.
The rules are: you take two or more gods and equate them together.
The equivalence must be based on multiple shared characteristics between the deities to be "true".
A basic true equivalence (one between two gods) is worth 1 point, with the amount of points earned increasing the more gods are being correctly equated at once.
A false equivalence, one based on no shared characteristics, only minor shared characteristics, or a single shared characteristic to the ignorance of all others, takes away a point, with the amount of points taken away increasing the more gods are being incorrectly equated at once.
A chain of supposed equivalences should be read from left to right.
Those who make the most legitimate equivalences win. Those who make the least legitimate equivalences, or make the most illegitimate or "false" equivalences, lose.
An example equivalence:
Yehowah (the Jewish conception of God) = Jehovah (the Christian conception of God)
An example equivalence chain:
Yahweh (the national god of ancient Israel and Judah) = Yehowah (the Jewish conception of God) = Jehovah (the Christian conception of God)
*"Equivalent" should not be taken to mean "the exact same god". For instance, when the myths or even cult practices of a particular Roman deity were influenced by the Greek or Etruscan tradition, the deity may have had an independent origin and a tradition that is culturally distinctive.