Iowa caucus vote totals delayed amid 'inconsistencies'; Trump team suggests contest 'rigged' - Beyond Parody

From Fox News (archive)
--------
The Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) still has not reported official vote totals in the critical Iowa caucuses as of early Tuesday morning, in a largely unexplained and unprecedented delay that has raised questions about the legitimacy of the contest -- and campaign officials are livid, Fox News has learned.

The Trump campaign, meanwhile, openly suggested that the delay meant that the caucuses were being "rigged," and that the embarrassing night proved that the Democratic Party can't be trusted to run Americans' health care and implement sweeping new government programs. Even if a winner is ultimately announced, the chaos and confusion has seemingly erased any hope for the major momentum boost that would normally result.

"We found inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results," the IDP said in a statement at 11:30 p.m. ET. "In addition to the tech systems being used to tabulate results, we are also using photos of results and a paper trail to validate that all results match and ensure that we have confidence and accuracy in the numbers we report. This is simply a reporting issue. The app did not go down and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results."

Fox News is told that during a call with the campaigns, an IDP representative said the party would be "getting photos of the paper results sent over," but didn't answer any questions and then hung up on all the campaigns, even as frustrated staffers pushed for answers. A campaign staffer told Fox News the brief call was "crazy." A second campaign official told Fox News, “Yes, they did hang up.”

The Biden campaign then wrote to the IDP, complaining about the "considerable flaws" in the caucus reporting process.

"The app that was intended to relay Caucus results to the Party failed; the Party’s back-up telephonic reporting system likewise has failed," the campaign wrote in a letter. "Now, we understand that Caucus Chairs are attempting to — and, in many cases, failing to — report results telephonically to the Party. These acute failures are occurring statewide. We appreciate that you plan to brief the campaigns momentarily on these issues, and we plan to participate. However, we believe that the campaigns deserve full explanations and relevant information regarding the methods of quality control you are employing, and an opportunity to respond, before any official results are released."

About an hour earlier, IDP spokesperson Mandy McClure said in a statement, "The integrity of the results is paramount. We have experienced a delay in the results due to quality checks and the fact that the IDP is reporting out three data sets for the first time. What we know right now is that around 25% of precincts have reported, and early data indicates turnout is on pace for 2016."

Turnout in the 2016 Democratic caucuses in Iowa was 171,109. That was far below the nearly 240,000 that took part in the 2008 Democratic caucuses, when then-Sen. Barack Obama won the contest.

"With every passing minute that there is a delay, we worry that the process will lose credibility," a top Elizabeth Warren aide told CNN.

In a surreal moment shortly before Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar took the stage to thank her supporters -- even as no voting results were available -- a precinct chief was being interviewed on CNN while he was on hold for more than an hour with the IDP to report results. The IDP then hung up on the precinct chief live on-air after he was too slow to respond once they took him off hold.

At least four precincts had to resolve ties in their vote results by flipping a coin during the evening, Fox News has learned.

Speaking at 11:30 p.m. ET, former Vice President Joe Biden said he felt good about the caucus, then remarked, "It's on to New Hampshire! ... We're in this for the long haul."

Taking the microphone ten minutes later, Sanders said that when the results were in, he had a "good feeling we're going to be doing very very well here in Iowa."

For the first time ever, the IDP has previously said it will report three sets of results at the end of the state’s first-in-the-nation caucuses: a tally of caucus-goers’ initial candidate preference; vote totals from the “final alignment” after supporters of lower-ranking candidates were able to make a second choice, and the total number of State Delegate Equivalents each candidate receives. There is no guarantee that all three will show the same winner.

Earlier in the evening, an IDP official told Fox News the party was doing “quality control checks, making sure the numbers are accurate,” adding that “people are still caucusing; we are working to report results soon.”
----

tl;dr: Results from the Democratic Iowa Caucus are late coming in, DNC is blaming an app and claiming they are currently doing "quality control."
 
Who cares, trumps gonna win anyway lmao

Truth Jokes aside.
No doubt it's rigged against bernie. Although i think and know his "for ze people!!!" stance is as genuine as chinas. He at least can connect more than these other tards.
 
So, we're now two days removed from the very first Democratic primary and we still have no idea who won. Hell, we probably never will because of how fucked everything was.

This has got to be one of the most embarrassing 72 hours a political party has experienced in modern history. You're caught red-handed rigging a primary, the "winner" you went with is a complete unknown, the possible real winner's supporters are threatening riots, the incumbent just delivered a fiery SotU address that looks to have engaged his core, AND he was acquitted from a sloppy impeachment attempt. That's a lot for any party to weather in a small time frame but with a party this deeply fractured? I don't know how you bounce back from all of this. There's no silver lining to any of this, nothing on the horizon to suggest things are going to get better, and no indication that the party itself is going to change. It's just depressing to be a Democrat right now.
Serious question. Can the Democrats change? Seriously? It just seems that they are all so hellbent on NOT learning anything from the last four years.
 
EQD6Av0W4AAb3Uf.png
 
Serious question. Can the Democrats change? Seriously? It just seems that they are all so hellbent on NOT learning anything from the last four years.
Oh they can change alright, it's just that this combination of fuckups(Failed impeachment, Pelosi having a tantrum while Trump delivers an effective and energizing speech and most importantly, what at the very least LOOKS like, if not actually is, vote rigging during the Iowa caucus.)has practically guaranteed Trump's second term unless the DNC gets it's shit together in a hurry and runs some absolutely top-tier damage control(lol probably not gonna happen because look at what they've been doing for the past four fucking years).

The question here though, is how big will the resulting shitstorm be? Is it possible that the Dems will not have recovered by the 2024 Presidential election? If so, an obvious indicator will be how the Democrats fare in the 2022 mid-term elections. They lose there, and it's bad, bad news for the Dems.
 
Last edited:
I know this is tangential but why is there someone named buttglug allowed to run?

Its an unelectable name.
My understanding is that's supposed to be pronounced "booty-age" but I agree it's entirely unelectable. Then again, Barack Hussein Obama got elected, maybe the electorate is less hung up on silly names than we think.
 
I feel bad for Elizabeth Warren’s “trans” kid who won’t be able to ever help pick the secretary of education.

I’m still very confused why she said that stupid shit, it doesn’t play to any voting demographic that matters. She probably could have won this whole thing by being in-between Bernie and Bootyjudge. Now she’ll lose by a wide margin and the wine moms and black waahmen on twatter will shriek about misogyny and “more old white men”.
 
I feel bad for Elizabeth Warren’s “trans” kid who won’t be able to ever help pick the secretary of education.

I’m still very confused why she said that stupid shit, it doesn’t play to any voting demographic that matters. She probably could have won this whole thing by being in-between Bernie and Bootyjudge. Now she’ll lose by a wide margin and the wine moms and black waahmen on twatter will shriek about misogyny and “more old white men”.

The reason Warren (and all Democrats) say shit that doesn't jive with any actual demographics is because they're hilariously isolated and horribly out of touch with thier common voter.
 
Just as Bernie starts an upswing in the results...


archive

DNC chair calls for immediate ‘recanvass’ of Iowa after botched caucus: ‘Enough is enough’
Published Thu, Feb 6 2020 12:33 PM EST

  • DNC Chairman Tom Perez called for an immediate “recanvass” of Iowa as concerns mounted about the integrity of the results from Monday’s first-in-the-nation caucuses in the state.
  • “Enough is enough,” Perez wrote in a post on Twitter. “In light of the problems that have emerged in the implementation of the delegate selection plan and in order to assure public confidence in the results, I am calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to immediately begin a recanvass.”
  • Perez's tweet is sure to inject even more uncertainty into a process that has threatened to upend the public trust in Iowa's caucus results, which historically have shaped the narrative of Democratic presidential primaries.
Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez called on Thursday for an immediate “recanvass” of Iowa as concerns mounted about the integrity of the results from Monday’s first-in-the-nation caucuses in the state.

“Enough is enough,” Perez wrote in a post on Twitter. “In light of the problems that have emerged in the implementation of the delegate selection plan and in order to assure public confidence in the results, I am calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to immediately begin a recanvass.”

Perez’s tweet came hours after The New York Times said that its analysis of the Iowa results revealed inconsistencies in data from more than 100 precincts.

Perez didn’t provide details or the specifics of what a potential recanvass would entail. The DNC and the Iowa Democratic Party didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

Perez’s tweet is sure to inject even more uncertainty into a process that has threatened to upend the public trust in Iowa’s caucus results, which historically have shaped the narrative of Democratic presidential primaries.

Monday’s caucus has been plagued with problems, including the failure of an app that was supposed to be used for the reporting of results from nearly 1,700 precincts. The state party has insisted that despite the app’s problems, the underlying data is accurate. It has slowly released results throughout the week.

As of Thursday morning, the party released data from more than 97% of precincts that showed former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., vying for the lead.

But the precinct-level data has come under scrutiny from journalists and public observers, raising questions about the integrity of the election results. There is no evidence that the errors were intentional or designed to favor any candidate in particular.
 
Just as Bernie starts an upswing in the results...


archive

DNC chair calls for immediate ‘recanvass’ of Iowa after botched caucus: ‘Enough is enough’
Published Thu, Feb 6 2020 12:33 PM EST

  • DNC Chairman Tom Perez called for an immediate “recanvass” of Iowa as concerns mounted about the integrity of the results from Monday’s first-in-the-nation caucuses in the state.
  • “Enough is enough,” Perez wrote in a post on Twitter. “In light of the problems that have emerged in the implementation of the delegate selection plan and in order to assure public confidence in the results, I am calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to immediately begin a recanvass.”
  • Perez's tweet is sure to inject even more uncertainty into a process that has threatened to upend the public trust in Iowa's caucus results, which historically have shaped the narrative of Democratic presidential primaries.
Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez called on Thursday for an immediate “recanvass” of Iowa as concerns mounted about the integrity of the results from Monday’s first-in-the-nation caucuses in the state.

“Enough is enough,” Perez wrote in a post on Twitter. “In light of the problems that have emerged in the implementation of the delegate selection plan and in order to assure public confidence in the results, I am calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to immediately begin a recanvass.”

Perez’s tweet came hours after The New York Times said that its analysis of the Iowa results revealed inconsistencies in data from more than 100 precincts.

Perez didn’t provide details or the specifics of what a potential recanvass would entail. The DNC and the Iowa Democratic Party didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

Perez’s tweet is sure to inject even more uncertainty into a process that has threatened to upend the public trust in Iowa’s caucus results, which historically have shaped the narrative of Democratic presidential primaries.

Monday’s caucus has been plagued with problems, including the failure of an app that was supposed to be used for the reporting of results from nearly 1,700 precincts. The state party has insisted that despite the app’s problems, the underlying data is accurate. It has slowly released results throughout the week.

As of Thursday morning, the party released data from more than 97% of precincts that showed former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., vying for the lead.

But the precinct-level data has come under scrutiny from journalists and public observers, raising questions about the integrity of the election results. There is no evidence that the errors were intentional or designed to favor any candidate in particular.

This will do nothing but foment more distrust in the DNC. This has utterly kneecapped the Dem primaries. Sped lefties will be flinging shit at each other right up to and including the Convention. It could be '68 all over again.
 
Holy shit, the media is now blaming the hacker known as 4chan for the clusterfuck.
Nigger if this winds up with Gamergate being named as the official culprit I might actually have to take a week off the internet for my own sanity.....jesus fucking christ the dems have fucked up worse than if they had Hillary Clinton parachuted in as a "unity" candidate.
 
Back