Iowa caucus vote totals delayed amid 'inconsistencies'; Trump team suggests contest 'rigged' - Beyond Parody

From Fox News (archive)
--------
The Iowa Democratic Party (IDP) still has not reported official vote totals in the critical Iowa caucuses as of early Tuesday morning, in a largely unexplained and unprecedented delay that has raised questions about the legitimacy of the contest -- and campaign officials are livid, Fox News has learned.

The Trump campaign, meanwhile, openly suggested that the delay meant that the caucuses were being "rigged," and that the embarrassing night proved that the Democratic Party can't be trusted to run Americans' health care and implement sweeping new government programs. Even if a winner is ultimately announced, the chaos and confusion has seemingly erased any hope for the major momentum boost that would normally result.

"We found inconsistencies in the reporting of three sets of results," the IDP said in a statement at 11:30 p.m. ET. "In addition to the tech systems being used to tabulate results, we are also using photos of results and a paper trail to validate that all results match and ensure that we have confidence and accuracy in the numbers we report. This is simply a reporting issue. The app did not go down and this is not a hack or an intrusion. The underlying data and paper trail is sound and will simply take time to further report the results."

Fox News is told that during a call with the campaigns, an IDP representative said the party would be "getting photos of the paper results sent over," but didn't answer any questions and then hung up on all the campaigns, even as frustrated staffers pushed for answers. A campaign staffer told Fox News the brief call was "crazy." A second campaign official told Fox News, “Yes, they did hang up.”

The Biden campaign then wrote to the IDP, complaining about the "considerable flaws" in the caucus reporting process.

"The app that was intended to relay Caucus results to the Party failed; the Party’s back-up telephonic reporting system likewise has failed," the campaign wrote in a letter. "Now, we understand that Caucus Chairs are attempting to — and, in many cases, failing to — report results telephonically to the Party. These acute failures are occurring statewide. We appreciate that you plan to brief the campaigns momentarily on these issues, and we plan to participate. However, we believe that the campaigns deserve full explanations and relevant information regarding the methods of quality control you are employing, and an opportunity to respond, before any official results are released."

About an hour earlier, IDP spokesperson Mandy McClure said in a statement, "The integrity of the results is paramount. We have experienced a delay in the results due to quality checks and the fact that the IDP is reporting out three data sets for the first time. What we know right now is that around 25% of precincts have reported, and early data indicates turnout is on pace for 2016."

Turnout in the 2016 Democratic caucuses in Iowa was 171,109. That was far below the nearly 240,000 that took part in the 2008 Democratic caucuses, when then-Sen. Barack Obama won the contest.

"With every passing minute that there is a delay, we worry that the process will lose credibility," a top Elizabeth Warren aide told CNN.

In a surreal moment shortly before Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar took the stage to thank her supporters -- even as no voting results were available -- a precinct chief was being interviewed on CNN while he was on hold for more than an hour with the IDP to report results. The IDP then hung up on the precinct chief live on-air after he was too slow to respond once they took him off hold.

At least four precincts had to resolve ties in their vote results by flipping a coin during the evening, Fox News has learned.

Speaking at 11:30 p.m. ET, former Vice President Joe Biden said he felt good about the caucus, then remarked, "It's on to New Hampshire! ... We're in this for the long haul."

Taking the microphone ten minutes later, Sanders said that when the results were in, he had a "good feeling we're going to be doing very very well here in Iowa."

For the first time ever, the IDP has previously said it will report three sets of results at the end of the state’s first-in-the-nation caucuses: a tally of caucus-goers’ initial candidate preference; vote totals from the “final alignment” after supporters of lower-ranking candidates were able to make a second choice, and the total number of State Delegate Equivalents each candidate receives. There is no guarantee that all three will show the same winner.

Earlier in the evening, an IDP official told Fox News the party was doing “quality control checks, making sure the numbers are accurate,” adding that “people are still caucusing; we are working to report results soon.”
----

tl;dr: Results from the Democratic Iowa Caucus are late coming in, DNC is blaming an app and claiming they are currently doing "quality control."
 
And the "he's gay too!" angle is just irresistible to the wokemeisters, even though Pete himself has chosen to not make a fuss about it.
Doesn't he hug-n-kiss his boyfriend on camera at every possible opportunity? I know I've seen him do it at at least a couple of the debates and a couple other public appearances. The media sure eats it up when he does.

I know same-sex marriage is legal nationwide now and "the bigots are beaten" and all, but I don't know how wise it is to flaunt "he's gay!" in front of a nation of voters, half of whose opinions were "invalidated" by Supreme Court writ a few years ago and might still be a little grumpy about that. I know there are plenty of people out there who have a "meh, live and let live, I guess" sort of attitude towards LGBT people who were neutral about same-sex marriage, in a "fine so long as it doesn't affect me" sort of way, but would still lean towards a general "ehhhhh, nah, I don't think so" if asked to vote for a gay candidate when a straight one is available.
 
Perkins Coie is the preferred contractor for the Clinton family when things need to get done, and most notably were involved with Crowdstrike and Fusion GPS for the Steele dossier lies and fabrications. And as a law firm, all their spending and contacts are privileged work for a client, and almost impossible to look into.
 
Iowa Democratic Party Chairman Troy Price to resign after caucus chaos
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/s...ad-iowa-democratic-party-resigned/4741566002/ (http://archive.vn/AvKRH)

Troy Price resigned his position as chairman of the Iowa Democratic Party on Wednesday as the organization grapples with the fallout of a botched caucus process that has left the party and state reeling.

In an interview Wednesday evening with the Des Moines Register, he said there was a lot for Iowa Democrats to be proud of, but that the failures on caucus night were "heartbreaking."

"I believed that we were in a good spot," he said when asked whether there were warning signs that should have been heeded. "(I believed that) we were prepared. And we had worked closely with our partners — not just us, but with the DNC and with our tech partners — to make sure we were in a good spot. And I felt that we were.”

Price said he will call for an emergency meeting of that committee for 1 p.m. Saturday to elect an interim chair.

He told Iowa Democratic Party's State Central Committee in a letter that his presence as chair made it more difficult for the party to "begin looking forward."

“Whomever is elected will oversee the completion of the recanvass and recount process and begin the process of healing our party,” he wrote in the letter.

An Iowa native, Price worked as political director for Barack Obama's 2012 Iowa campaign and Hillary Clinton's 2016 Iowa campaign. He served as executive director of the Iowa Democratic Party before being elected its chair in July 2017. He was re-elected in 2018.

More than a week after the party's Feb. 3 caucuses, final results from the night are still not available. Results from Tuesday's New Hampshire primary have already been called, and Democratic presidential campaigns have moved on to focus their campaigns' efforts on Nevada and South Carolina.

South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont have separately called for recanvasses of 143 Iowa precincts, including all of the party's in-state satellite precincts. Party officials said those audits should start on Sunday and conclude two days later.

The party also reviewed results from 95 precincts independent of the campaigns' recanvass requests.

The Associated Press still has not called a winner in the race.

Preliminary results show that Buttigieg holds a slim lead over Sanders in state delegate equivalents, the traditional measure of success in Iowa. Sanders had more individual support at the caucus sites, a metric he aligned with a traditional primary election.

The unprecedented delay in reporting follows an organizational collapse on caucus night. Problems with a new cellphone app used to report results were rampant; chaos enveloped a call center that should have acted as a fail-safe backup; and the data presented to the public even after days of "quality control" checks remained riddled with errors.

Price said he was told they'd be seeing results at 7:45 p.m. on caucus night. When nothing had been posted at 8 p.m., it was his first inkling that something was going wrong.

"It was shortly after that that someone came in and said there was — I believe it was characterized as 'a bug in the system,'" he said in the Register interview. "So that’s when I realized we have a problem. From there on, we were hoping that we could get it unclogged and we could get it fixed and get the results out quicker. But we realized that it wasn’t. So we kept waiting, kept hearing about every 15 minutes that they needed another 15 minutes or so to figure it out. ... But at a certain point we decided we had to call it. That’s when we said we wouldn’t be releasing results that night.”

Price previously announced Democrats would commission an independent investigation of "what went right, what went wrong, from start to finish" with the entire caucus process.

Tom Perez, the Democratic National Committee chairman, has taken to publicly criticizing the Iowa party's handling of the caucuses. Though he said he shares some responsibility for the meltdown, he said he would "absolutely not" step down from his role.

"I'm frustrated. I'm mad as hell. Everybody is," Perez said during a recent appearance on CNN. "And I think what we're going to do at the end of this cycle ... is have a further conversation about whether or not state parties should be running elections."

Asked whether leadership change is needed at the DNC as well, Price deferred Wednesday, saying he would leave that decision up to Perez. He said the DNC's role in the caucus process would likely be considered in the course of the review process.

“They were partners with us right up to Caucus Day, on Caucus Day and in the days after Caucus Day," he said.

With Perez among those leading the call for reviewing review the presidential nominating process, calls to replace caucuses with primaries and remove Iowa from its coveted first-in-the-nation status have grown increasingly forceful.

Concerns over diversity and inclusion have risen to the forefront this caucus cycle as a presidential field that was at one point the most diverse in history has winnowed to a nearly all-white pool of candidates. The problems with this month's results have shifted the focus back to Iowa's arcane rules and complex process and will undoubtedly have repercussions for future election cycles.

But Price said he remains confident in the caucuses as a process and said both that Iowa should not switch to a primary and that it should remain first in the nation.

"I think there’s a lot to unpack," he said. "Obviously, conversations about this will take place, just as they do every four years. And we’ll see how those conversations progress. But I do think that folks saw over the course of this year on the ground that Iowans take this role seriously, that Iowans are not afraid to ask hard questions, and that this has made candidates stronger and better for what comes next."

He said he expects a conversation about the future of the caucuses to begin in earnest after the election. He said he plans to regroup and continue helping the party to grow.

“I’m going to spend some time with my husband," he said. "I’ve been running pretty hot for the past two and a half years. I’m looking forward to having a break to figure out what comes next for me. One thing I’ll tell you, one thing I’ll tell everyone, is my commitment to making this state better has not changed at all. My commitment to making sure that this party grows has not changed all. My commitment to making sure we have leaders who actually are fighting for the people of this state and this country has not changed at all. Whatever I do is going to help achieve those goals.”
 

While the Democratic National Committee over the last 10 days has tried to distance itself from the troubled app that through the results of the Iowa caucus into disarray, a copy of the contract and internal correspondence provided to Yahoo News demonstrates that national party officials had extensive oversight over the development of the technology.

The Democrats’ Iowa caucus took place on Feb. 3 but the outcome is still in question following a series of issues related to the failure of an app that was supposed to be used to submit results. In the days since the debacle, DNC Chairman Tom Perez has criticized the Iowa Democratic Party, which ran the caucus, and the developer of the app, Shadow Inc.

An unaffiliated Democratic operative in Iowa provided Yahoo News with a copy of the contract between Shadow and the Iowa Democratic Party. The contract, which was signed last Oct. 14 and refers to Shadow as the “Consultant,” specified that the company had to work with the DNC and provide the national party with access to its software for testing.

“Consultant agrees to work with the DNC Services Corporation / Democratic National Committee (‘DNC’) on an on-going basis as Consultant develops the software,” the contract reads.

The contract also specifies that Shadow agrees to “provide DNC continual access to review the Consultant’s system configurations, security and system logs, system designs, data flow designs, security controls (preventative and detective), and operational plans for how the Consultant will use and run the Software for informational dissemination, pre-registration, tabulation, and reporting throughout the caucus process.”

An email provided to Yahoo News also appears to show Seema Nanda, the CEO of the DNC, and the national party’s Deputy Chief Technology Officer Kat Atwater were involved in drafting the contract and requested the addition of the provision that gave them access to Shadow and the app. In the email dated July 30, 2019, Atwater provided an IDP official with draft text for the provision detailing the DNC’s access to the app. Atwater, in the email, said the provision was specifically requested by Nanda.

“In discussing our placement in the process with Seema on Friday, she suggested that it would be helpful to include the following provision in the contracts with your vendors,” Atwater wrote to the IDP.

DNC communications director Xochitl Hinojosa responded to questions about the contract language and Atwater’s email by saying the party only wanted access to the app to address potential security concerns.

"We requested access to the tool solely for the purpose of doing security testing,” Hinojosa said.

The copies of Atwater’s email and Shadow’s contract with the IDP obtained by Yahoo News contained some redactions. Sources familiar with the original documents confirmed the authenticity of the copies. Atwater’s email was redacted to omit the name of the IDP official she communicated with. The Shadow contract was redacted to omit signatures and details about how much the company was paid by the IDP.

A source who worked on the caucus said the payment information was redacted from the copy of the contract provided to Yahoo News because there are ongoing questions about how much the company will ultimately receive due to the issues with the app. The source said Shadow has charged the IDP at least $60,000 for its work so far. Shadow Inc. and the firm’s CEO, Gerard Niemira, did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

The Iowa Democratic Party was introduced to Shadow through the state party in Nevada, which also planned to use an app made by the company for its caucus, according to the same source.

In the wake of the Iowa fiasco, the Nevada Democratic Party announced it would not use Shadow’s app for its caucus, which is set for Feb. 22.

Fallout from the Iowa fiasco continues. The Associated Press has declined to name a winner, even though the Iowa Democratic Party had said Pete Buttigieg edged out Bernie Sanders in delegates, while Sanders won the popular vote. The party’s state chairman Troy Price announced his resignation on Wednesday and many experts have suggested Iowa may lose its coveted status as the first state to vote in the next presidential election. Price did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In the days since the caucus, DNC Chairman Tom Perez has laid the blame for the app debacle on the Iowa Democratic Party and Shadow for the issues with the results. “What happened last night should never happen again,” Perez said in a statement Feb. 4, the day after the caucus

Yet the contract demonstrated that the DNC should have had the opportunity to forsee some of the problems. One provision in the contract says Shadow would provide “monthly. written updates to the DNC regarding the Software status and timeline for implementation.” It also required Shadow to work with outside consultants and cybersecurity specialists, which the DNC could “choose in its sole discretion.”

According to the source who worked on the caucus, the DNC did have Shadow work with an outside cybersecurity firm. The source blamed the DNC and its security consultants for some of the issues that took place with reporting the results on caucus night.

“They had a lot of thoughts and feelings on how this app was supposed to function and I think there was advice that was given that led to the difficulties you saw on caucus night with people being able to log in,” the caucus source said. “The security steps that were taken made it difficult for an even technologically apt person to log in.”

Hinojosa, the DNC’s communications director, said there were no issues with security features and the login. According to her, all of the problems stemmed from code in the software’s back-end.

Perez, who was elected chair of the DNC in February 2017, has made security a top priority in the wake of the Russian hack that targeted the party’s leadership during the 2016 election.

“We have staff working around the clock to assist the Iowa Democratic Party to ensure that all votes are counted. It is clear that the app in question did not function adequately,” Perez said. “It will not be used in Nevada or anywhere else during the primary election process. The technology vendor must provide absolute transparent accounting of what went wrong.”

On Feb. 6, Perez tweeted a demand for the Iowa Democratic Party to recalculate the caucus rsesults due to the issues that took place on the night of the vote.

“Enough is enough. In light of the problems that have emerged in the implementation of the delegate selection plan and in order to assure public confidence in the results, I am calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to immediately begin a recanvass,” Perez wrote.

Price rejected Perez’s call for a recount, but said the state party would conduct a recanvass if it was requested by any of the Democratic presidential campaigns. Both the Buttigieg and Sanders campaigns had released statements saying they believed they were victorious based on their own internal numbers, and each requested recanvasses of specific precincts where they think there were discrepancies.

In an interview with the New York Times on Feb. 9, Perez explicitly blamed the Iowa Democratic Party for the mess and noted the state organization had ultimate responsibility for administering the caucus.

“Troy Price was doing his best, but it wasn’t enough,” Perez said.

The source who worked on the caucus said they found Perez’s comments “extremely frustrating” because he did not disclose the DNC’s extensive role in the app.

“They were intimately involved in this process,” the source said of the DNC, noting the committee’s deputy CTO, Atwater, was on multiple conference calls during the app’s development.

Hinojosa responded to that criticism by pointing to an appearance Perez made on MSNBC on Monday where host Chris Hayes asked “who was responsible” for the app’s failure “and what will be done to hold the people responsible to account.” Perez said responsibility was shared between the Iowa party and the DNC. He also said the DNC was “learning from our mistakes.”

“Let me be very clear, we all fell short. While the Iowa party administers the election, we provide help,” Perez said, adding, “We have a partnership with our state parties. We’re all in this together. We all succeed together and, when we fall, we fall together. … We fell short and I’m here to say I apologize for that.”

Shadow was launched by Acronym, a nonprofit organization that was established in 2017. In the aftermath of the caucus crisis, Acronym has tried to distance itself from Shadow, particularly as questions have been raised about ties the organization has with top Democrats, including a senior strategist for Buttigieg’s campaign.

The contract Shadow signed with the Iowa Democratic Party specified that the firm would not take on any clients that would interfere or conflict with its work on the Iowa caucus. A section identifying “current Shadow consulting clients” listed just one; the Nevada State Democratic Party.

The document also suggested Shadow staff who were “providing strategic input” to Democratic presidential campaigns participating in the caucus would not work on the app. One Shadow staffer, Sarah Chabolla, was identified under this section. The contract did not specify which campaign Chabolla is working for and she did not immediately respond to multiple requests for comment.

When did we reach the point when Yahoo News started doing legitimate journalism? The contract they're talking about is hosted as a PDF file in the article or hosted over here if you want to read it, and it kind of nukes any sort of effort by the DNC to claim that they weren't involved in this.

My favorite line in this entire thing is, "According to the source who worked on the caucus, the DNC did have Shadow work with an outside cybersecurity firm [chosen by the DNC]” Gee, what do you think that cybersecurity firm that the DNC loves so much just happened to be?
 
Reminder about the leaks that revealed that in 2016 Bernie was picked as Hillary opponent because he had agreed to pull behind Hillary like he did, Bernie just as corrupt as the rest of them
You know that scene in Downfall where Fegelein heils Hitler right before getting executed on Hitler’s direct orders? That’s Bernie eagerly letting himself get ratfucked.
 
Back