Is being annoying the worst crime ever?

[Just A Butt]

Annoying people suck. I wish they would all just kill themselves. God! Why do they even think we are bothered by their antics? It's not even funny.

 

[StreetGangsta]

I hate annoying people. They make me feel various negative feelings.

 

[some Sketchy dude]

It's just a prank bro

 

[KateHikes14]

Yes.

 

[Loosey Goosey]

If it was, OP would be doing life without parole.

 

[Vingle]

Being annoying to troons and fags give me life though.

 

[Idiotron]

Yes so can you turn yourself in already?

 

[Not Vordrak]

The worst crime is not being funny.

 

[TheRetardKing]

Fucking fido and being a MAP are worse crimes.

 

[Spartacus Mills]

this is pretty offensive to me as an annoying asshole fuck you

 

[Deluxe]

The formal accusation was the second element of the trial of Socrates, which the accuser, Meletus, swore to be true, before the archon (a state officer with mostly religious duties) who considered the evidence and determined that there was an actionable case of "moral corruption of Athenian youth" and "impiety", for which the philosopher must legally answer; the archon summoned Socrates for a trial by jury.[23]

Athenian juries were drawn by lottery, from a group of hundreds of male-citizen volunteers; such a great jury usually ensured a majority verdict in a trial. Although neither Plato nor Xenophon of Athens identifies the number of jurors, a jury of 501 men likely was the legal norm. In the Apology of Socrates (36a–b), about Socrates’s defence at trial, Plato said that if just 30 of the votes had been otherwise, then Socrates would have been acquitted (36a), and that (perhaps) less than three-fifths of the jury voted against him (36b).[24] Assuming a jury of 501, this would imply that he was convicted by a majority of 280 against 221.

Having been found guilty of corruption and impiety, Socrates and the prosecutor suggested sentences for the punishment of his crimes against the city-state of Athens. Expressing surprise at the few votes required for an acquittal, Socrates joked that he be punished with free meals at the Prytaneum (the city’s sacred hearth), an honour usually held for a benefactor of Athens, and the victorious athletes of an Olympiad. After that failed suggestion, Socrates then offered to pay a fine of 100 drachmae—one-fifth of his property—which largesse testified to his integrity and poverty as a philosopher. Finally, a fine of 3,000 drachmae was agreed, proposed by Plato, Crito, Critobulus, and Apollodorus, who guaranteed payment—nonetheless, the prosecutor of the trial of Socrates proposed the death penalty for the impious philosopher. (Diogenes Laërtius, 2.42). In the end, the sentence of death was passed by a greater majority of the jury than that by which he had been convicted.

The motion to kill Socrates got more votes than the motion to find him guilty of charges. This means that there were Athenian voters who believed he was innocent but still wanted him dead because he was just that annoying.