Is Chris Notable Enough For Wikipedia Now? (Is Chris Historically Relevant?)

Is Chris Notable Enough For Wikipedia? Is Chris Historically Relevant?

  • Yes

    Votes: 472 55.1%

  • No

    Votes: 81 9.5%

  • Maybe

    Votes: 87 10.2%

  • He wasn't before but now he is because he fucked his mom

    Votes: 216 25.2%
  • Total voters
    856
Ascension said:
Chris is a cautionary tale about what happens when a mentally impaired man is given free reign to explore the deepest depths of his sexual depravity without intervention. The entire story of Chris really is one about his desire and lust for sex. This caused everything. Inevitably he became so desperate for sex he raped his own mother. He clearly didn't understand concepts like consent or the dangers of letting his sex drive control him. There was an obvious lack of morality that was not instilled him in him. I'm not religious but I think had he stuck with Christianity and had a strong male role model none of this would happen. He not only rejected Christianity, but he rejected masculinity, rejected the companionship of men and ultimately become an abomination with an insatiable sexual appetitive and no moral foundation. If it wasn't Barb it would have probably been anyone that happened to live with him.
Click to expand...
This would make sense if evangelical preachers weren't notoriously perverted
 
  • Disagree
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Syaoran Li, Khantressa, Pickle Built and 4 others
Another cow that has far less of a following then Chris is Dale Wilson, otherwise known as LowTierGod, he has a Wikipedia page that you can see here.

I believe it was made by one of his admirers, and it's certainly written that way with little to no controversies and just highlights his "career", education and his (minimal) media and tv show appearances. So if one was to be written about Chris, I am not completely sure how people should go about it, do they include everything about his childhood and young adult life all the way until the major harassment stopped when his dad died (using footnotes and linking these events based on articles in the cwcki )and uses that as a massive background piece or only stick to the times where Chris has been published/reported on in the media when he's done something stupid, so like the GameStop incident, the Too many games tantrum, this current dilemma etc.

It seems a bit redundant anyway since all his information is plastered all over the internet for all to see, and most tech savvy zoomer and millennial normies have at least heard of his name by now since this has been hardcore trending for days.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: biozeminadae1, The Last Stand and interalia
untlipz said:
There have been previous attenpts to create a page. Variations of his name are 'salted' to prevent creation.

Wikipedia - CWCki

sonichu.com sonichu.com

A draft was rejected a year ago. but is being updated at the moment.
Click to expand...

Submission rejected on 2 August 2021 by Bkissin (talk).
This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Rejected by Bkissin 12 hours ago. Last edited by Susmuffin 2 minutes ago.

From userpage

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article History of the Jews in Maine.

he-1משתמש זה מסוגל לתרום ברמה בסיסית

lol jew
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Maurice Caine, Alex Krycek, Tragi-Chan and 10 others
given the standards wikipedia has, chris has been more than notable enough for a wikipedia article for a while tbh. there are tooons of articles on totally irrelevant youtubers who weren't all that popular even during their peaks. they just really don't want a CWC article and won't allow one until people accuse wikipedia of being transphobic for not allowing it or whatever
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: biozeminadae1, BigTubboWithLittleChina, anionfarflung and 12 others
"Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives; the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment"
Click to expand...

There's no way that a wiki page for Chris would meet even a tenth of the scrutiny required for it to actually be listed. No, the cwcki and kiwifarms threads aren't viable sources for wikipedia. Any sort of citation would essentially have to be built upon Chris' own words verbatim or through his videos. AFAIK there aren't any christorical novels out there explaining all this so if you really want Chris on wikipedia, start there.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: BigTubboWithLittleChina, hambeerlyingnreed, January First and 1 other person
And IMO, he could very well be noteworthy enough for a wikipedia article. There's just no way the crowd of pedants at wikipedia would allow it with the current sources available (ie not many to none). If anyone wants to try to, personally I'd love to see it. It'll be difficult to stay concise and build a coherent narrative of his life, though. And I'm not going to get back into editing to go for it, shit blows
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: anionfarflung, hambeerlyingnreed and From The Uncanny Valley
actual long time wiki faggot editor here, wiki's notability criteria is certainly something to look at but it's important to understand that notability depends on the concensus of editors AND the concerns surrounding writing biographies of living people. Chris probably is notable enough by the criteria, but will not ever be notable because wikipedia's editor cabal are concerned with making sure people aren't damaged by wikipedia (or at least they pretend that is the reason, lmao.) my feeling is that unless there's like a 20/20 special or some kind of true crime documentary on a major network/website there will be no article, even though I really think he belongs on there as he's such a significant cultural figure who created a notable artistic (read: autistic) body of work.

Here's the notability criteria I think apply in Chris's case:

People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.
Click to expand...
(this is the central and most important notability requirement.)
Creative professionals:

  1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.
  2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.
  3. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
  4. The person's work (or works) has: (a) become a significant monument, (b) been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) won significant critical attention, or (d) been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.
Click to expand...
(this is in support of the first, and only applies if the 1st is true)
Crime victims and perpetrators:


A person who is known only in connection with a criminal event or trial should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article if there is an existing article that could incorporate the available encyclopedic material relating to that person.

The victim or person wrongly convicted, consistent with Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Subjects notable only for one event, had a large role within a well-documented historic event. The historic significance is indicated by persistent coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources that devote significant attention to the individual's role.

The victim of the crime is a renowned national or international figure, including, but not limited to, politicians or celebrities.

The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role.
Click to expand...
(ditto)
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: BigTubboWithLittleChina, hambeerlyingnreed, the ketchup man and 6 others
Wikipedia is very fickle over what counts as "notable" but I don't think being troll-bait fits their criteria. She is extensively documented online, but mainly from blogs, wikis and troll sites like 4Chan and Encyclopedia Dramatica, legitimate media outlets have barely given her any coverage over the years. That might change depending on how this Incest saga plays out. Sonichu seems notable on the surface, but let's face it, people don't follow Chris Chan for her "art", it's the drama that keeps this shit show going. Attempts have been made over the years to do a Chris Chan wiki, even attempts by Chris herself, but they have all been deleted. Hell, even the Wikipedia page for Ruckersville is locked to prevent people from adding Chris to the "Notable Residents" section.

So yeah, as of now, I doubt Chris would be considered notable enough by Wikipedia standard. Given more time and increased notoriety, that might change.
 
  • Dumb
  • Dislike
Reactions: Giovanni, sweetstone and Alex Krycek
DeeCeeBees said:
Did Chris misbutton his prison shirt? The stripes don't line up. I doubt he's worn a button up shirt since he graduated from highschool.
Click to expand...
I thought that too but the collar seems to be okay? I stared at that pic for too long and didn't come to a solid conclusion either way
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back