Is Chris Notable Enough For Wikipedia Now? (Is Chris Historically Relevant?)

Is Chris Notable Enough For Wikipedia? Is Chris Historically Relevant?

  • Yes

    Votes: 472 55.1%
  • No

    Votes: 81 9.5%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 87 10.2%
  • He wasn't before but now he is because he fucked his mom

    Votes: 216 25.2%

  • Total voters
    856
cross post from the dumb Wikipedia thread
1628029207727.png

1628029258651.png

1628029273001.png

1628029955306.png

i have a feeling these people don't let a page get made because they don't like that most things about Chris are bad and disgusting and Chris is an autistic transgender who was bullied and trolled which makes him enough of a victim to not have one.
 
Last edited:
i have a feeling these people don't let get made because they don't like that most things about Chris are bad and Chris is an autistic transgender which makes them want to downplay stuff about him.

Tampon Johnny gets a Wikipedia article, complete with "proper" pronouns and mention of his disgusting behavior. Up until a few days ago Chris wasn't quite THAT bad but now? Write the damn article, harass Jimmy Wales until it gets unsalted.
 
There are tons of people less historically relevant than Chris who have Wikipedia pages. Chris being the most documented person in history should be enough for him to get his own Wikipedia page, imo
How good the Wiki page itself will be is another thing entirely. Knowing Wikipedia's biases, they may try to frame Chris-Chan as some poor, abused autistic tranny who got buwwied on the internet by mean right-wing trolls >:(
 
Never underestimate the autism of Wikipedia editors. He’s 100% notable enough for an article, but they’ve staked out their little fiefdom of cockblocking a Chris article 10+ years ago over petty trolling and they will never budge under any circumstance, long after the original reason why has been forgotten.

Here is their current take:
1628048658352.png
 
Last edited:
>contrapoints get referenced
Do Wikipedians really?
Also Chris Chan is literally in Chris's twitter name.
Screenshot_20210804-001901_Brave.jpg
 
Last edited:
I think Chris is way notable to have one, it's just an interesting paradox because the whole trolling is based on Chris being mentioned online, so a wiki article would end up being "part of the trolling" (or at least that's how the editors feel). And writing about things However, I think now Chris probably counts as a true crime article.

The problem is the entire morally good/left wing side of the internet considers it their duty to cover Chris info up and never mention him (despite the fact that he has always wanted attention and fame) as a way of fighting the trolling/doxing.
 
Chris has an article on the Russian language wikipedia https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Чендлер,_Кристиан_Уэстон
If anyone speaks some other language than English you can try creating an article on that language's wikipedia. Chris is getting coverage in mainstream news so as long as you source the article properly it's less likely to be deleted.
English wikipedia is run by troons and will not allow anything that paints trannys in a negative light.
 
For people saying "being a lolcow isn't enough to have an article on Wikipedia", here's an interesting little article I found a while ago about what could be described as an early lolcow. If this guy can have a Wikipedia article, then why not Chris? Chris is certainly way more famous than this guy ever was.

 
He's more relevant than most people on Wikipedia.
Ask random people "who are Daniel Kibblesmith and his superheroes Screentime, Snowflake, Safespace, B-Negative and Trailblazer?" and see how many know about it.
Christian Weston Chandler and his Sonichu/CWCville universe are probably the most well known independently produced comics of the 2000s.
His music videos have inspired a whole generation, if you blasted them across schoolyards and campuses alike, people of all ages would sing along to "Tell me why I'm stuck as a virgin with rage! Tell me why I so need a cute girl my age! Tell me why I never wanna hear you say, "I have a boyfriend!".
Chris Chan is a cultural phenomenon.
He shouldn't only be on Wikipedia, he should be in the library of congress.
They should put sonichu medallions in those space capsules.
 
Wikipedia has an article about Henry Darger. He may have been autistic or perhaps had Tourette's syndrome and had menial employment while writing and illustrating thousands of pages of fantasy stories that were discovered after his death. Chris is less prolific and far more public, and has committed a grievous crime, but I feel like some parallels could be drawn that could be used to convince Wikipedia to include Chris.
 
my fucking ex girlfriend has a wikipedia article and she only did stupid shit on youtube no one cares about any more
it's not fair that Chris doesn't get one. Fucking your mother is infinitely more entertaining than being a gay youtuber
cross post from the dumb Wikipedia thread

View attachment 2408782
This bitch wrote an article on a feminist rock band fronted by a tranny who no one but her has ever heard of and released like one album. yes much worthy of an article.
she also wrote MGTOW and Incel articles which is hilarious because I bet they're full of cringe lefty crap she inserted
 
Last edited:
Chris is the single most meticulously documented human being in history. By that criteria alone he merits a wiki page.
 
Back