Is Chris Notable Enough For Wikipedia Now? (Is Chris Historically Relevant?)

Is Chris Notable Enough For Wikipedia? Is Chris Historically Relevant?

  • Yes

    Votes: 472 55.1%
  • No

    Votes: 81 9.5%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 87 10.2%
  • He wasn't before but now he is because he fucked his mom

    Votes: 216 25.2%

  • Total voters
    856
There's enough primary material on the Cwcki that it could be compiled into a book about Chris's life. If a book were published it would likely be enough to meet notability standards. It would be faster to read than watching the comprehensive documentary too.

well he is the most documented person of all time, I believe, not only that, he is actually very famous on the internet, for example, I remember pewdiepie made a video about him. I think he's very much deserving to have a wiki article, especially since his crime echoed through the internet and lesser well known cows like sargon have an article. Even high mungus has one.
Is Chris really the most documented person of all time?

“The Dymaxion Chronofile is Buckminster Fuller‘s attempt to document his life as completely as possible. He created a very large scrapbook in which he documented his life every 15 minutes from 1920 to 1983. The scrapbook contains copies of all correspondence, bills, notes, sketches, and clippings from newspapers. The total collection is estimated to be 270 feet (80 m) worth of paper. This is said to be the most documented human life in history.” (Wikipedia)

“If somebody kept a very accurate record of a human being, going through the era from the Gay ’90s, from a very different kind of world through the turn of the century—as far into the twentieth century as you might live. I decided to make myself a good case history of such a human being and it meant that I could not be judge of what was valid to put in or not. I must put everything in, so I started a very rigorous record." Link​

 
I don't know if there needs to be a thread discussing this.

To be quite frank, Chris Chan's life has been so chaotic there wouldn't be a way to make a formally structured, wikipedia-compliant article from verifiable sources; and don't try to cope yourself into believing that the CWCiki will be considered as verifiable to the eyes of those wikipedia admins. They look at the CWCiki the same way we look at ED.

Besides, why Wikipedia when the CWCiki has everything anyone would need when researching or revisiting Christory? This would be just reinventing the wheel with heavy use of red ink and white washing.
 
Besides, why Wikipedia when the CWCiki has everything anyone would need when researching or revisiting Christory? This would be just reinventing the wheel with heavy use of red ink and white washing.
Wikipedia has remained up for many years. CWCki could go down at any time. Currently it takes more than one try to get to any given webpage on the site.
 
There's enough primary material on the Cwcki that it could be compiled into a book about Chris's life. If a book were published it would likely be enough to meet notability standards. It would be faster to read than watching the comprehensive documentary too.
A few months ago somebody published a book analysing Chris and comparing him to Andy Warhol, so if having a book published about you is the criteria for notability then Chris already falls under it.
 
Wikipedia is retarded, if there is one it’ll be ultimately written and edited by the kind of people who use Vice and Huffington Post as news sources. I tried editing the troon ranch wiki to describe them as anarchists, and a compound rather than a community. No matter how many sources you provide they’ll just make up reasons to shut down dissent.
 
cross post from the dumb Wikipedia thread
GorillaWarfare is now removing information from Chris-Chan's wikidata page.
GorillaWarfare.png

There are also people trying to delete the wikimedia commons category.
wiki.png
 
Chris is no doubt bad optics for a lot of movements. Transexuals, Gamers, Virgins, Autists, Bronies, Sonic fans, etc. Chris would fall under several protected groups and thus if he cannot be turned into a hero, role model or victim, he will most likely be driven into obscurity to protect the interests of progressivism.
His poor Moms might testify that he is no longer a virgin, insofar as a male can be a virgin. The virgin remains unsullied. Transsexuals are sullied from the word go.

There so many minor things on Wikipedia significant to maybe six normal people or one autist. Many articles are advertising.
 
If Chris wasn't eligible before I don't think fucking his mom would change anything.

It's not like they have articles on motherfuckers just because they are motherfuckers, and clearly all of his antics in the past weren't worthy for some reason
 
Wait so Christopher Cantwell is a person notable enough for Wikipedia but Chris isn't? No bias here at all.
Christopher Charles Cantwell (born November 12, 1980), also known as The Crying Nazi,[1][2][3] is an American white supremacist, neo-Nazi, antisemitic conspiracy theorist, federal informant, and convicted felon.[1][6][14]A member of the broader alt-right movement, Cantwell earned attention during and immediately after his participation in the August 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.[18][19] Cantwell was featured prominently in a Vice News Tonight documentary about the rally and its participants, in which he is shown threatening to kill protesters, wielding rifles and a handgun, and joining fellow antisemitic conspiracy theorists in marching with tiki torches, chanting "Jews will not replace us!"[10][20][21]
wow such notable
 
Wait so Christopher Cantwell is a person notable enough for Wikipedia but Chris isn't? No bias here at all.

wow such notable
i cant see any motive in this at all

there's no way that he has an article up just so when potential employers look him up on google that this is the first thing that pops up

certainly not!
 
I think an article in what they call a 'respectable' publication would push it over into them being unable to NOT have a Chris page.

Just have to hope a journalist at the Jew York Times or BBC decides to profile him.
There is an insider article which is generally "respectable".
 
  • Informative
Reactions: hambeerlyingnreed
He's definitely notable enough. In many ways he's sort of 'patient zero' for Internet trolling in the public consciousness, having fallen for literally every trolling op under the sun for the last 14 years. If I had to get into the mind of the kind of autist who wants to document everything on Wikipedia, you could argue that he's a notable example of the trolling phenomenon and therefore deserves a page. It's not really about the political or social consequences of putting his story out there.

Let's be real though, if he does get a page the narrative will 100% be 'she is a trans wamen, she is a victim'
 
Now they're trying to delete Chris-Chan's wikidata page, which they can't, since it's connected to the Russian article about him.
wikidata.png

English speaking wikipedia editors are trying to contact admins on Russian wikipedia to have the article deleted. Usually you have to let the community have a discussion and vote before deciding to delete an article. The English speakers are trying to contact a troon friendly admin on Russian wikipedia who can nuke the article so they can circumvent the community input process.
talk.png
 
To be honest I would say no, but given that thousands of infinitely more unknown and irrelevant people have articles, by Wikipedia standards he absolutely deserves an article. In reality none of these irrelevant losers should have articles. But given that we live in clown world none of that matters. Give the man an article.
Yeah a ton of Twitch streamers and fags like Egoraptor have articles, there's no way the former people are more notable than CWC unless you're a zoomer simp.

what is the actual reason he isn't allowed a page? I don't understand all this tranny nonsense muh abuse muh muh

what the fuck is the issue? is it just that they want to hide the fact that a FAMOUS TRANNY raped his mother??
The admins won't let internet/social stuff that doesn't push their narrative on Wikipedia. They consider a random tech company saying that Byuu was an employee and they definitely killed themselves without providing any evidence he worked and his friend saying "trust me guys I definitely spoke to the Japanese police who told me they're dead" credible sources, and they had the article on the Higan emulator and IIRC Kiwi Farms both locked so people couldn't remove their unproven "facts". Not surprising for trannies, but surprising for an encyclopedia. And of course because it's run by a non-profit organization from California they're not gonna clean the site up. Since the text is is licensed under Creative Commons somebody should just make an alternative using the text from articles that aren't part of the tranny admins' agenda.
 
Back