Is communism inherently better at conservatism than conservatism? - Communists doing something right?

Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL

Anime avatar supremacist
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 1, 2017
One thing I've noticed is that communist countries tend to be very conservative. Communist countries don't have gay pride, second/third wave feminism, sexual degeneracy, or state promoted racial self-hatred. Many countries went the opposite direction--for instance, although the USSR was the first nation globally to legalize abortion (1920), it also banned abortion for all but medical reasons in 1936. Romania's abortion ban was famous and greatly increased the birth rate. Cuba and the USSR threw gays into gulags, and it was widely believed that homosexuality was a creation of capitalist societies and aristocratic decadence. Today, North Korea publically claims a difference between homosexuality and the gay lifestyle, the latter being a capitalist product. And while communism supported feminism, it stopped at the "put women in the workforce" part of feminism.

Now yes, communism did have some sexual degenerates, especially among Western communists where many were/are openly gay or troon and groups like the Spartacist League (in the US) promoted NAMBLA and defended Roman Polanski. Lenin surrounded himself with degenerates and as noted, legalized abortion and homosexuality. But as a whole, degenerate behavior under communism appears associated with only the initial revolutionary phase. Once a communist society has established itself, it gradually erases these degenerate laws as Stalin did when he was in power.

A look at communist societies today shows a general support of strong public morals. Petty crime is harshly punished, there is minimal porn and sex in public, homosexuality is kept out of sight (except in Cuba which nowadays is by far the most liberal communist state), gender ideology is nowhere to be seen, and men and women know their respective positions in society. Communist states have also done straight genocides on minority groups like Chechens and Uyghurs, but also have had laws that banned ANY sort of ethnic hatred (which for instance if applied to the US would mean BLM and many Democrat politicians and activists would be arrested for hate speech against whites). The same is true in former communist states in Eastern Europe. Even the most liberal states there like former East Germany are still very conservative by European standards, let alone countries like Poland with their LGBT-free zones or Russia with the bans on gay propaganda.

In contrast, conservatism has achieved few long term gains and countless losses. I suspect the reason why is capitalism. Since conservatism gradually (in the 19th century) and then wholeheartedly (20th century, especially by the Reagan/Thatcher era) embraced capitalism, conservatism has been absolutely toothless. Because free markets dominate capitalist societies, the market will demand more and more people be incorporated into it. The market will create rights movements be it feminism, pro-black, gays and troons, etc. to undermine the innate moral resistance of people and fight them economically. Because communism doesn't have capitalism, or has it only under strict state control (i.e. China, late 80s USSR), communism thus has none of these problems.

For instance, troon rights are simply Big Pharma, plastic surgeons, and psychiatry trying to expand their market, and it was embraced by fashion/makeup companies, etc. to increase their own market. Another good case of this would be the Civil Rights movement, where once desegregation became law, there was little resistance by many business owners to keep segregating. The role of cigarette companies in promoting feminism is very old (the infamous propagandist Edward Bernays helped do so in the 1920s) and was done to "liberate" women so they could smoke like men did (incidentally, this campaign has been fairly unsuccessful in Communist China compared to marketing cigarettes to men).

So is conservatism just a losing battle against the tide of "progress" and communism better at stopping it? Discuss.
 
"tHaT's NoT rEaL cOmMuNiSm ThOuGh!!1!"
 
You’re wrong though. During the soviet era, Soviet women aborted their babies 3x more than American women did in the 1960s and that says something

The conservative aspect is mostly societal. However on the government level, Communists promoted the same degenerate shit we see in America today. Equality being one such lie peddled by communists quite often
 
You’re wrong though. During the soviet era, Soviet women aborted their babies 3x more than American women did in the 1960s and that says something
Under Stalin it was illegal, and is also illegl. In communist countries with widespread abortions like China, it's because the government has strict family planning policies. It is also banned in North Korea.
The conservative aspect is mostly societal. However on the government level, Communists promoted the same degenerate shit we see in America today. Equality being one such lie peddled by communists quite often
What do you mean? The only way communists promoted degeneracy was when they funded Western communist groups, and the most degenerate Western communist groups (like the Sparticist League aka "Sparts") were the ones which never had state support from the USSR, China, or any other country.
 
What do you mean? The only way communists promoted degeneracy was when they funded Western communist groups, and the most degenerate Western communist groups (like the Sparticist League aka "Sparts") were the ones which never had state support from the USSR, China, or any other country.
Yeah that’s the entire point. The USSR allowed gays and trannies to exist in the early Soviet period, and spread propaganda to weaponize Niggers in the US. Plus, the soviet regime actively attacked people’s tradition societies and destroyed their history.

The USSR was a decadent society, especially during the Lenin years and for much of its later years. And abortion was plentiful. Stalin only represent one period of soviet history.

Hilarious you fell for the meme of le based Soviet Russia too when the USSR pioneered affirmative action (they openly discriminated against ethnic Russian and Germans in Russia) and “fag rights”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-41737330
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Feline Supremacist
The whole dictatorship of the proletariat thing makes it much easier to be conservative than in pluralistic societies where you have to earn some measure of the population's consent.

I also would argue that communism is an inherently conservative ideology, it assumes the future will be a permanent status quo utopia with a single dominant class and no deviation of any kind throughout the entire society.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Wallace
Yeah that’s the entire point. The USSR allowed gays and trannies to exist in the early Soviet period, and spread propaganda to weaponize Niggers in the US. Plus, the soviet regime actively attacked people’s tradition societies and destroyed their history.

The USSR was a decadent society, especially during the Lenin years and for much of its later years. And abortion was plentiful. Stalin only represent one period of soviet history.

Hilarious you fell for the meme of le based Soviet Russia too when the USSR pioneered affirmative action (they openly discriminated againstey ethnic Russian and Germans in Russia) and “fag rights”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-41737330
Anyone that reads up on Soviet leadership will notice that it was a Burger King Kid's Klub of ethnic minorities, Jews mainly but also Ukrainians, Poles, and other things. It's completely consistent with the Western Left's coalition of minorities.

And this is what all Communist countries do, they push turboprogressive stuff, but due to the extreme dysfunction of certain policies (mostly the economic ones), the need to widen their ranks (to staff their government, takes many more people to run a country than to run a revolution) resulting in normal people getting in positions of power and diluting it ideologically, and their own malicious hypocrisy, the Communist country always either crashes and burns or turn into a pseudo-fascist state or both. You even see it in their shift away from avant-garde art to the same tradcuck obsession with classics and public morality as fascist/reactionary societies.

Fascist societies are just as bad. Most of them crashed and burned on their own warmongering, but we have an excellent example of one that didn't (Spain) and it was a pisshole where the government funneled everything to a small elite and the country was still on the verge of starvation over 15 years after its civil war. Substitute the pretense of equality for the pretense of property under a system where the government commands, either through dictate or "suggestion," and a creatively sterile culture that only makes soulless copies of their earlier works. And both of them a brutal disregard for the human as individual.
 
The USSR was infamous for pushing the state as forcefully secular, that's another mark against this concept. As the first poster said any illusion of conservative values in the communist state are a result of everything having to go through corrupt bureaucrats with huge amounts of power slowing all progress to a standstill, that includes actual innovations and improvements.
 
The core tenant of communism is that everyone has equal respect and privileges, which by it's very nature requires it's members to be in agreement on what is considered correct behavior. You can't have a communist society where 99% of it's members pool their money together to invest in the community, while 1% hoards their money and snatches up every shekel they can get their hands on. You can't have a woman operate a shop while some members think woman should not ever own property or work, and any unaccompanied woman is fair game to kidnap and rape. You can't even have a collection of family mementos if some members think that they have the right to break into other people's homes and steal anything shiny.

For communism to even remotely work, every single member must be held to the same expectations and moral code, and anyone who threatens that unity must be removed or forcibly made to comply.
 
Degeneracy of public morals seems to more closely connected to the worst aspects of Capitalism, than I think any political ideology.

Once Capitalist Corporations have gained enough power to overtake institutions. They will get the government to keep "progressing" the allowances of the society, and will use certain political ideologies as tools to find more markets. LGBT is illegal? Why? It's a new market. Bestiality is illegal? Why? It's a new market. Pedophilia is illegal? Why? it's a new market. Necrophilia is illegal? Why? It's a new market.

That's the theory I'm going to go with within the perspective of this argument.
 
Hilarious you fell for the meme of le based Soviet Russia too when the USSR pioneered affirmative action (they openly discriminated against ethnic Russian and Germans in Russia) and “fag rights”
Well of course they persecuted Germans, there were too many who were rich kulaks and later were too close to the Nazis. But there was a degree of affirmative action since there outside of Stalin and his bros, barely anyone who wasn't a Slav or a Jew (mostly in the early days) got to high leadership positions. Tatars and Central Asians were a huge minority, but they rarely achieved major positions.
Anyone that reads up on Soviet leadership will notice that it was a Burger King Kid's Klub of ethnic minorities, Jews mainly but also Ukrainians, Poles, and other things. It's completely consistent with the Western Left's coalition of minorities.
Most of them were gone or retired by the 30s. IMO the USSR was an All-Russian state, so Ukrainians/Malorussians and Belarusians count just as much as Great Russians, and that just leaves Poles, Germans, and Jews, who were mostly gone/retired by the 30s. And Georgians of course because of Stalin's clique, but they were mostly gone post-Stalin. The ethnic minorities mostly held power in their own ethnic region, there's not too many who rose to national prominence.

I've admittedly never checked the stats, but it would not surprise me if the USSR had a greater proportion of ethnic Russians in the government than the Russian Empire which had a huge number of Germans holding prominent offices and posts (in addition to occasional Georgians/Armenians and Poles).
Degeneracy of public morals seems to more closely connected to the worst aspects of Capitalism, than I think any political ideology.

Once Capitalist Corporations have gained enough power to overtake institutions. They will get the government to keep "progressing" the allowances of the society, and will use certain political ideologies as tools to find more markets. LGBT is illegal? Why? It's a new market. Bestiality is illegal? Why? It's a new market. Pedophilia is illegal? Why? it's a new market. Necrophilia is illegal? Why? It's a new market.

That's the theory I'm going to go with within the perspective of this argument.
The problem is that conservatism has long had a liberal undercurrent ever since the mid-19th century. Even the successor ideologies to the paternalistic big government conservatism still support capitalist economics to an extant even if they aren't totally down with mass deregulation like the modern Thatcher/Reagan sort of conservatism.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Feline Supremacist
The only reason why Stalin cracked down on degeneracy and reintroduced social conservatism was because of the situation America faces now: they couldn’t meet quotas for the military and certain occupations. For dangerous jobs, you need something to potentially die for. But even this was not going to get them there so it was back to good old fashioned press ganging - who knew that allowing Christmas trees again was not going to motivate millions of people to die for their country.

Most post-Soviet countries are more based because they correctly see globohomo neoliberalism as yet another invasion but there’s already signs that the rot has taken root in countries like Poland. I wish them luck in fighting it.
 
[religious] Virtue is a working class value, because the underclass has no other way to try to protect its interests.

Whether the working class is upheld by Communism or (pick a region and time period) small business Capitalism is mostly irrelevant, although the free market does have a tendency toward degeneracy, both because the powerful are degenerate and command higher wealth, and because people get corrupted by exposure to degeneracy and demand progressively grosser content, which the free market would be obliged to produce.

Like, what the fuck is this?
- pedophilia
- prostitution
- chickenhawk faggotry
- chickenhawk faggotry apologia (you're evil and deserve humiliation and madness if you're disgusted by catching your husband getting railed by an elderly faggot)
- rape
- by a certified faggot
- critically acclaimed and widely broadcast
As expected,
The original Broadway production was produced by Irene Mayer Selznick and directed by Elia Kazan.
-- but nothing of the sort could have possibly happened in the USSR, despite it being largely run by the (((usual))) suspects.

However, since the 1960s, Capitalism, fighting Communism for Lebensraum, decided to adopt Civil Rights as its official ideology. I'll be generous to the filthy degenerates in this thread and say this is a massive break with the ideology of early Capitalism. Differences between the Capitalist working class culture and Communist working class culture are about the same order of magnitude as the difference between Holy War and March of the Defenders of Moscow, negligible compared to the catastrophe that was the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For the origins of Capitalism's failure to defend public virtue, you have to dig into that -- which is the real of US-specific conspiracies on which I'm not an expert. Some possible historical origins are:
  • the UN Declaration of Civil Rights (1945) (both the USSR and the US were members, but not the PRC which didn't exist at the time)
  • the earlier US Civil Rights Acts (1866+)
  • the French Revolution (1789) feat. Thomas Jefferson
  • the Magna Carta (1215) (oooh blaming the bongs, this I can get behind)
An easy answer, beloved by twatter "conservatives", is to Blame The Commies (externalize the guilt and keep their tranny porn). It is however clearly wrong, because Civil Rights were primarily a weapon against Communism and the USSR in particular. As early as the 1970s, Western degenerates were bugging the Soviets about pedophile rights and their allegedly unjust fursecution.

I think it's a quirk of history, reducible to "why globohomo decided to wield the US against the USSR and not the other way around". It was because the US was stronger and the USSR weaker, and thus it was easier to subvert the former and destroy the latter, and the USSR was weaker because of their (our) betrayal of China, perpetrated by Khrushchev (so arguably the USSR was always doomed to fail, because any system that allows Ukes to be put in charge deserves to be destroyed).

TL;DR the correlation is not meaningful because it originates from a single historical event, the Civil Rights-powered Cold War. That said, I'd appreciate if trannies stopped lying about my homeland, kthx.
wormtongue.jpg
 
One thing I've noticed is that communist countries tend to be very conservative. Communist countries don't have gay pride, second/third wave feminism, sexual degeneracy, or state promoted racial self-hatred. Many countries went the opposite direction--for instance, although the USSR was the first nation globally to legalize abortion (1920), it also banned abortion for all but medical reasons in 1936. Romania's abortion ban was famous and greatly increased the birth rate. Cuba and the USSR threw gays into gulags, and it was widely believed that homosexuality was a creation of capitalist societies and aristocratic decadence. Today, North Korea publically claims a difference between homosexuality and the gay lifestyle, the latter being a capitalist product. And while communism supported feminism, it stopped at the "put women in the workforce" part of feminism.
Pretty good post, people negrating effort posts conducive of discussion just because they got mad at the title or w/e.
My personal thoughts are that these were totalitarian, authoritarian countries, often with homogenous ethnic composition, opposition to the West and its capitalism/Liberal Democracy pushing, and very intolerant of potentially destabilizing dissent. Yes, we used to consider a lot of these more exotic habits as "bourgeois decadent". These are euphemisms, obviously. We can't call it degenerate cause Nazis did, so hey, here's a synonym! We have a system that's like 80% National Socialism, but that was the Nazis, so we'll just call it National Communism or Socialism in One Country!
Feminism in socialism was incredibly different from liberal feminism, it was about giving women a vote and a job, and equality in front of the law (mostly...), not denying biological differences and the sort, and there was minimal affirmative action, if any.
Romania's abortion law was nearly as tragic as the demographic decay that followed it. It was badly enforced, badly implemented, and managed to get quite a few women killed and doctors and nurses imprisoned, sometimes just because they tried to save the mother's life. Abortions took place still, but without the medical care, amateur style.
Even if you don't give a fuck about women, you should know that a lot of the children ended up in state institutions, abandoned. Mental illness, disability were common, and the orphanages were pure horror shows - as nobody wanted to care for these souls. And since society was very poor, the means to care for them were also scarce.
One can control abortion in much smarter ways IMO.
 
Last edited:
They didn't have gay shit because those regimes were established in the 1940s and before. Communists today are very pro fag
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matt Damon
Back