Is IQ an actual good measurement of intelligence?

How estimate the value of IQ.

Do you come from wealth?
If yes, your IQ is valuable.
If no, then nah. You're just retarded and broke.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: FunPosting101
You can measure height, you can measure physical strength, you can measure someone's testosterone level levels but intellect is too hard and complicated. You simply can't know how quick someone is in thought! You simply cannot know what intelligence is and how fast people are able to figure things out!
 
Depends on the test, some are good for linguistic intelligence, others are good for problem solving skills. I think the latter is better but if you can't articulate how you reached those conclusions it displays a lack of understanding of how you come to your conclusions.
 
Mine was tested when I was young and it just seemed like a lot of pattern recognition to me. I scored high, but I've never done anything of note in my life. I'm indistinguishable from your garden variety retard. I mean it measures intelligence I guess, but all the intelligence in the world is worthless if you don't want to use it.
 
Issue with intelligence is that it won't help you in shit if you can't apply it. Like not being good in being able to concentrate means your only virtue is reaching obvious conclusions faster.
 
As I see it, IQ tests are fantastic for detecting the dreggs of society. I believe the army won't accept anybody below 70 IQ. At that point you are a literal mouth breathing retard with 0 use.

Above that, some use can be gotten out of you, but it opens the very uncomfortable discussion about how certain demographics seem to be concentrated in that area and how people will never be able to do certain things no matter how hard they try.

At the upper level on the other hand, it doesn't mean that much. Somebody can have amazing pattetn recognition and mental agility with a 150 IQ, but if they focus all of that into speed running Sonic 06, he has the same value as the sub 70 retard (though will likely turn tranny and remove themselves from the genepool anyway).

Moral of the story? Anybody below 90 and above 110 goes to a woodchipper.
 
No one disputes the validity of IQ until the IQ of certain groups - ie, niggers, abos, etc. - gets brought up. Then everyone who's not a hardline racist falls over themselves to deny that there's any validity in it at all until the subject changes.
 
No one disputes the validity of IQ until the IQ of certain groups - ie, niggers, abos, etc. - gets brought up. Then everyone who's not a hardline racist falls over themselves to deny that there's any validity in it at all until the subject changes.
IQ does a good job of tracking countries that aren't shitholes/value education. In that regard, it is an absolutely incredible metric. Who could have otherwise known that East Asia, Europe, and North America are good places to live? It really was hard to otherwise pin down why sub-saharan Africa is perpetually in a state of war and disrepair. If only we didn't have to rely on IQ tests to see if a certain group of people are prone to building civilizations or tearing them down. No, just impossible that the nicest countries in the world are overwhelmingly populated by East Asians and Europeans; noticing this is fascism and against the spirit of diversity.
 
IQ does a good job of tracking countries that aren't shitholes/value education. In that regard, it is an absolutely incredible metric. Who could have otherwise known that East Asia, Europe, and North America are good places to live? It really was hard to otherwise pin down why sub-saharan Africa is perpetually in a state of war and disrepair. If only we didn't have to rely on IQ tests to see if a certain group of people are prone to building civilizations or tearing them down. No, just impossible that the nicest countries in the world are overwhelmingly populated by East Asians and Europeans; noticing this is fascism and against the spirit of diversity.
We already knew why Sub-Saharan Africa is and has always been a shithole. It's just that almost no one reads the books about it now. Faggots will say "I read banned books!" all day and mean To Kill a Mockingbird, but give them anything by Madison Grant or Lothrop Stoddard and they'll demand it be banned.
 
Off topic, but I've always felt that being a genius means you've had a thought that no one else in human history has thought.

I'm at seven so far. Might make it ten within a few years.
It's not hard, just engage your mind in any creative problem solving and you'll quickly become frustrated by how few things you can search for online that will answer your niche question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: melty
In the 90s and 00s, there was a big push to expand the definitions for "gifted" programs and other accelerated paths

Like virtually all attempts to redefine intelligence, this was because niggers weren't making it into G&T programs. The fantasy of egalitarians is there's some way to measure intelligence and teach math that will result in the blacks coming out equal with the whites, and there just isn't one.
 
When I was investigated for ADHD (inattentive type confirmed, still unmedicated) my IQ was measured at 144, but in my everyday life about half that seems seem more realistic.
 
Back