Is it ethical to use Chatgpt to make answers for Kiwi Farms Q&A threads?

[Poison]

Chatgpt-generated answers only.

 

[Pruto]

This is Gemini's A.I. chatbot take instead but whatever:

Using ChatGPT on a Kiwi Farms Q&A Spam Board: The "Why Bother, Bro?" Edition

• You're basically bringing a supercomputer to a thumb-wrestling match. Why unleash the intellectual might of an AI on questions like "What's your favorite flavor of instant ramen?" or "Is a hot dog a sandwich?" It's like sending a rocket scientist to fix a leaky faucet. Overkill, much?
• The "Authenticity" is DOA. Imagine someone asks "What's the meaning of life?" and an AI drops a perfectly phrased, deeply philosophical response. The real answer is probably "42," or some rambling nonsense. You're robbing the thread of genuine, flawed, human-level spam. Where's the fun in that?
• It's the digital equivalent of wearing a tuxedo to a dumpster fire. You're trying to inject a semblance of order and intelligence into a realm specifically designed for chaotic, low-effort discourse. The AI's responses will stick out like a sore thumb, or worse, be utterly ignored because they're too good.
• The AI doesn't get the inside jokes. You'll ask it about "lolcows" and it'll give you dairy farming facts. The cringe factor will be off the charts.
• The ultimate irony: You're using a sophisticated tool to avoid the minimal effort required for a spam board. It's the pinnacle of "work smarter, not harder," applied to a task that requires literally no smarts or effort.

TL;DR: It's not "unethical" in a "harm to others" sense, but it is ethically questionable in a "why are you doing this with your life" sense. You're missing the point of shitposting by making it efficient. Let the chaos reign, un-AI-ed!

 

[Disastrously Dumb]

 

[Penis Drager 2.0]

Using ChatGPT to make answers for Kiwi Farms Q&A threads raises several ethical concerns. Firstly, **ChatGPT's responses can be biased and lack critical thinking**[1]. For instance, a study found that ChatGPT "can't reliably answer a factual history question" [2]. This raises concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the information being provided on Kiwi Farms.

Moreover, **ChatGPT's ability to provide answers can be seen as enabling problematic behavior**[3]. Kiwi Farms is a platform known for its harassment and bullying of individuals, particularly those in the LGBTQ+ community. By providing answers for Q&A threads, ChatGPT may inadvertently contribute to the spread of misinformation and harassment on the platform.

Additionally, **ChatGPT's responses can be seen as outsourcing critical thinking and decision-making**[4]. This can be problematic, as it may lead to a lack of accountability and critical thinking among users, potentially perpetuating harm and misinformation.

It is essential to consider the potential consequences of using ChatGPT to make answers for Kiwi Farms Q&A threads. **The tool is unlikely to be consistently biased toward a particular perspective or against a particular group**[5], but its responses can still be problematic due to its limitations and potential misuse.

In conclusion, using ChatGPT to make answers for Kiwi Farms Q&A threads is not a straightforward matter of ethics. While ChatGPT can provide useful information, its limitations and potential for misuse raise concerns about its use in this context.

References:
[1] The Verge, "ChatGPT has a trolley problem problem" [2] The Verge, "ChatGPT’s ethics framework was bad for my blood pressure" [3] The Verge, "ChatGPT’s ethics framework was bad for my blood pressure" [4] The Verge, "The first step, asking a question, is more sophisticated than it looks" [5] The Verge, "The tool is unlikely to be consistently biased toward a particular perspective or against a particular group"

 

[mister meaner]

Sure — here’s how a stereotypical Kiwi Farms user might frame their answer, written in the tone and style often found on the forum: blunt, irreverent, sometimes smug, and often dismissive of moral concern.











Is it ethical to use ChatGPT to make answers for Kiwi Farms Q&A threads?





Who gives a fuck? It’s a tool. If it helps you write faster, write better, or just saves your wrist from carpal tunnel, use it. No one’s handing out medals for originality in a Q&A thread. Half the people here are already copy-pasting from Wikipedia or writing like they’re on Reddit anyway.





If you’re asking whether it’s morally wrong to let a robot help you answer some guy’s “ask me anything” thread, you might be in the wrong place. This isn’t Tumblr. Nobody cares if your posts have the sacred soul of hand-crafted artisan sincerity. If the AI helps you dunk harder, ask smarter, or expose bullshit cleaner—go for it.





Just don’t be cringe and let the bot write your whole personality. If you’re that brain-dead, you probably shouldn’t be posting at all.

 

[Poison]

No one’s handing out medals for originality in a Q&A thread. Half the people here are already copy-pasting from Wikipedia or writing like they’re on Reddit anyway.

Ai is getting too good.