Is it just me, or is every possible future a bad one.

Why can Black Nationalists say hateful and genocidal things about whites, but get shut down when they criticize Israel or Jews (See: Louis Farrakhan, Marc Lamont Hill, and Tamika Mallory)?

Do they though? The left is more than happy to cover up antisemitism all over the fucking place. They claim it's a witch-hunt or whataboutery and the real problem is antiblackness and Islamophobia. Ever been to a Palestine Solidarity Campaign meeting? I have. It basically swings between "the Holocaust never happened" and "the Holocaust was too good for them." These are the same people who are shouting about black lives mattering in their next breath.

The West keeps getting more cucked and passive every year.

Add "stupid" to that mix. I'm convinced that people in 2020 are stupider than they were in 2010. Anti-vaxxers are all over the fucking place to the point at which they're actively causing rates of infectious diseases to increase. People burnt down a load of 5G towers because they believed those were giving people the Kung Flu. They don't think for themselves and worse, are horribly ignorant. Like the whole "America was founded on slavery" shite. Even though the Atlantic slave trade wasn't in existence at the time the first colonists arrived in North America from Britain, and that it fought an extremely destructive civil war to end slavery later on, it was still founded on and is irredeemably tainted by slavery. But they can't actually explain or justify or evidence this myth other than by spouting the same tired old talking points.

No wonder in Britain we end up importing NHS staff from abroad.

Notice that your conspiracy theory only works if we assume China is the cause of all the ills and woes in the west and China's downfall will magically make all of your problems go away, but I suspect you, being controlled opposition, already know that's just wishful thinking.

Oh quieten down little boy. Haven't you got a struggle session to attend?
 
Do they though? The left is more than happy to cover up antisemitism all over the fucking place. They claim it's a witch-hunt or whataboutery and the real problem is antiblackness and Islamophobia. Ever been to a Palestine Solidarity Campaign meeting? I have. It basically swings between "the Holocaust never happened" and "the Holocaust was too good for them." These are the same people who are shouting about black lives mattering in their next breath.

There are fringe groups on the left that engage in "antisemitism", but they get cancelled and deplatformed very quickly by the ADL and the media (See: Marc Lamont Hill and Louis Farrakhan). Truth is that the Mainstream Right and Mainstream Left should just be called the "Judeo-Right" and the "Judeo-Left". They're both beholden to different factions of Jews who don't agree with each other as much as they pretend to. They both push Jewish interests and hate White Identitarianism.

Despite making up 2% of the US population Jews are 50% of donors to the Democrats and 25% of donors to the GOP. And that's just counting the donors that can only give up to $2,000. The SuperPACS and media are even more Jewish. Out of the 6 media moguls who own 90% of the media you read, see, and hear 5 out of 6 of them are Jewish. The 6th (Rupert Murdoch) is gentile, but is a bigtime donor to Jewish and Zionist causes. MSNBC, CBS, CNN, Vox, Salon, NPR, New York Times, NBC, ABC, etc. are all owned by Jews.

Antisemites don't own the Left. Semites and their shabbos goyim own the Left.

 
There is only one future and it is heat death so just try to enjoy what you can until that happens and you will not even be around to experience that so hey--chin up buttercup!

Sru4.gif
 
Indeed, that is the grade I would give humanity right now. We had the opportunity to revolutionise the world with the internets and freedom of information, and we squandered it on endless political squabbling and e-girls. We had the opportunity to bring about, at the end of the Cold War, a world where democracy and liberty became truly universal values, and we squandered it on self-doubt and navel-gazing and grievance-mongering. We had the opportunity to provide truly green energy in the form of properly developed nuclear power, and we squandered it in favour of fucking windmills because we were terrified of radiation. We had the opportunity to resurrect the space program and begin spreading to other planets, but we squandered it by telling ourself it was only any good as a test bed for nuclear missiles.

The sickness of the leftist ideology is what truly doomed us from the 60s onward. Not so much that leftism itself has a negative effect, but the way in which its been used to push social change has overall caused a negative effects towards people in general and political discourse in particular. People only have so much mental energy to expend each day, think of how much is and has been used in furtherance/hindrance of this sort of progressive ideology. Again it's not that these ideas are bad themselves but the way they are applied: dogmatically and at odds with people who most likely agree with them on the base level. This distracts from other issues of greater importance to the survival of western civilization. The "progress" we've made socially in the last 60 years would of no doubt happened eventually anyways, probably a bit slower but I think not by a significant amount. Now what we've seen, after the most social progress that could ever hope to be achieved in 3 generations, is they are starting to invent issues and deny reality to serve the ideology itself (or serve themselves since the ideology no doubt suffers from this).

Technology in general has a profound negative effect on everything around us at all times. It pollutes the air, turns the environment into concrete and most importantly transformed all of humanity into labor to be bought and sold. The main point against technology is that it can never be undone and it can't be kept secret (at least not for long). Social Media and the Internet is just some of the latest technology that has radically altered the daily lives of billions of people. It's a great example of how a breakthrough in technology can have massive negative effects on human behavior that are not first known at the genesis of the technology. No one would've known about Social Media and the damaging effect on the human psyche when the internet was first discovered decades ago. Even if people had known beforehand, how would they have stopped it in the first place? The point is that technology by its very nature cannot be slowed because it compounds on top of past technology, the internet was merely a new evolution that would have occurred a thousand different ways if Tim Berners-Lee failed to discover it. Technology gives us everything we could ever want at the push of a button, it trivializes our existence and robs us of the only thing that would truly make us happy: control and power over our own existence.

Jacques Ellul said:
With the final integration of the instinctive and the spiritual by means of these human techniques, the edifice of the technical society will be completed. It will not be a universal concentration camp, for it will be guilty of no atrocity. It will not seem insane, for everything will be ordered, and the stains of human passion will be lost amid the chromium gleam. We shall have nothing more to lose, and nothing to win. Our deepest instincts and out most secret passions will be analyzed, published, and exploited. We shall be rewarded with everything our hearts ever desired. And the supreme luxury of the society of technical necessity will be to grant the bonus of useless revolt and of an acquiescent smile.
 
There is one good future.

The world is engulfed in nuclear fire and sent back to the high middle ages, and the US breaks up into a rich patchwork of feudal states, unsullied by modern technology.View attachment 1451989

"Engulfed in nuclear fire" and "good future" are absolutely mutually exclusive.

I think a lot of people underestimate how destructive modern thermonuclear weapons are. It was estimated that just a single strategic warhead landing on Britain in the 1980s would have consumed the entire peacetime resources of the NHS. Flash and blast might only kill 50,000 or so upon detonation, but then there's the fires started by same, which will consume entire swathes of cities and get to the point at which they are uncontrollable. Think a Californian forest fire in a major city. The blast would also damage water mains, roads, power grids and so forth, thus hampering the ability for rescue workers to respond or fight fires. Then there's the second wave of deaths as people trapped in burning buildings or crushed by rubble expire.

Then, say hello to the fallout. Depending on the prevailing wind, radioactive particles blow for miles and isotopes such as cobalt-60 and caesium-137, which might only have a half-life of a few years, will be breathed in and irradiate people from the inside. Less radioactive isotopes will persist for decades. Anyone within the worst fallout zones will inevitably die within a couple of days. Those a bit further out will have a "walking ghost" phase as they appear to be getting better, but they aren't. After a couple days of getting better the gastro-intestinal symptoms take hold and they will shit themselves to death.

Yeah, radiation poisoning is probably one of the most horrific ways to die.

Now imagine that on every population centre of 50,000 people or more.

Oh, and living in a rural area will not protect you. Fallout can travel for hundreds of miles on the wind and irradiate everything it settles on. At Chernobyl they had to bury the topsoil because plants growing in it would take up radioisotopes in the soil and become unsafe to consume. In a post nuclear world, that's your arable land. Expect cancer rates to shoot upwards for years as a result of this. And there's probably no real healthcare any more or anything. Or food distribution networks. Or authority. Or education. And then children suffering brain damage from radiation or malnutrition or both.

Humanity might recover, but it would take centuries, or even millennia. It might even require the increased general level of background radiation worldwide to cause humanity to evolve greater innate resistance to ionising radiation before a resurgence of civilisation is possible.

Notwithstanding the now discredited theory of nuclear winter, global thermonuclear war is nicknamed bombing oneself back to the Stone Age for a reason.
 
"Engulfed in nuclear fire" and "good future" are absolutely mutually exclusive.

I think a lot of people underestimate how destructive modern thermonuclear weapons are. It was estimated that just a single strategic warhead landing on Britain in the 1980s would have consumed the entire peacetime resources of the NHS. Flash and blast might only kill 50,000 or so upon detonation, but then there's the fires started by same, which will consume entire swathes of cities and get to the point at which they are uncontrollable. Think a Californian forest fire in a major city. The blast would also damage water mains, roads, power grids and so forth, thus hampering the ability for rescue workers to respond or fight fires. Then there's the second wave of deaths as people trapped in burning buildings or crushed by rubble expire.

Then, say hello to the fallout. Depending on the prevailing wind, radioactive particles blow for miles and isotopes such as cobalt-60 and caesium-137, which might only have a half-life of a few years, will be breathed in and irradiate people from the inside. Less radioactive isotopes will persist for decades. Anyone within the worst fallout zones will inevitably die within a couple of days. Those a bit further out will have a "walking ghost" phase as they appear to be getting better, but they aren't. After a couple days of getting better the gastro-intestinal symptoms take hold and they will shit themselves to death.

Yeah, radiation poisoning is probably one of the most horrific ways to die.

Now imagine that on every population centre of 50,000 people or more.

Oh, and living in a rural area will not protect you. Fallout can travel for hundreds of miles on the wind and irradiate everything it settles on. At Chernobyl they had to bury the topsoil because plants growing in it would take up radioisotopes in the soil and become unsafe to consume. In a post nuclear world, that's your arable land. Expect cancer rates to shoot upwards for years as a result of this. And there's probably no real healthcare any more or anything. Or food distribution networks. Or authority. Or education. And then children suffering brain damage from radiation or malnutrition or both.

Humanity might recover, but it would take centuries, or even millennia. It might even require the increased general level of background radiation worldwide to cause humanity to evolve greater innate resistance to ionising radiation before a resurgence of civilisation is possible.

Notwithstanding the now discredited theory of nuclear winter, global thermonuclear war is nicknamed bombing oneself back to the Stone Age for a reason.
1594910468012.png
 
God, this generation and the last one need a war; you've become so soft that any conflict or difficulty blackpills you into a fetal position.
People in 1st nations have forgotten about real issues, so they invented issues like faggotry and oversensibilites to cope.
Embrace situations that test your mettle instead of crying. Your great-grandparents must be either laughing or enraged; too pussy to defend your beliefs, too lazy to do anything about it, too scared at the idea of trouble. Too gay to defend the homeland some of them died to uphold.
 
Last edited:
Everytime someone has predicted "the end of history," history carries on. The Qing, Ming, Song dynasties lost the mandate of heaven and that will be no different in communist China, China will collapse, it's just a fact of history. They were saying in 1914 that it was the end of history (seriously, read what people were saying at the time, it's eerily similar to today), and then the great war happened, and 20 years later WW2 happened.

And the ultra-totalitarian 1984 type regimes cannot exist for genetic reasons. At some point the population will decay enough that they can't maintain that highly complex totalitarian system. And contrary to popular belief evolution happens very fast, especially in humans because humans can select for specific traits in a population, and when the government is stopping specific people from having kids then evolution happens real quick. And we're seeing evolution today, the IQ of the European is dropping dramatically because only dumb people have kids, and the IQ of the African is rising because their societies are in a constant struggle. The future of the world might be Afrocentric.

What I'm trying to say is, we need war, war is a good thing and we need as many people to die as possible, preferably in the trenches fighting against the chinese menace.
 
How about: leftism continues to rise, and we enter a new dark age as the attack in enlightenment values continues.

Or the three gorges damn goes pop and scours away a few tens of millions, the resultant famine and unrest sends China back to the fifties, we lose huge swathes of our supply lines for critical things like pharmaceuticals, and we enter a new dark age.

or aliens
Or a carrington type event
or a real plague
Or a meteor
Or some Dumbass sets off a nuke.

I dunno, I also feel quite dispirited about the world right now. 2020 has been a pile of shite so far. Maybe the aliens will land and usher us to glorious futures.

whatever happens, neither of us can do much about it, so you may as well just enjoy life and have a cup of tea/large gin depending on proclivities and laugh at dangerhair Sjws.
 
Birthrates will decide the world's fate more than anything. China and the leftest west will implode and have drastically lower populations leaving the global south with greater influence. Largely Christian Latin and African countries will make up a significant bloc and keep those values going, Muslim nations will have a decent sphere of influence for a while but mideast global influence in a post-oil economy is iffy, though they'll finally get the European lands they've wanted for centuries through birthrates alone, and India will be the dominate APAC power. The USA will still be around, but they won't have their much taken for granted post WW2 bargaining power. Think of the reduction of influence of the Netherlands, Britain, Russia from their historical peaks for examples.

Big tech seems ready to implode too (if only from internal incompetance and the fact that some things are too large to manage well), and these other newly powerful countries will view it differently as they grow in dominance, having the current state of it thrust upon them without the earlier intermediaries so it's not as much a slow boil as it is in the west (imagine going from having a single radio in a household to each member having a smart phone overnight). Not sure how that will go socially, but expect more distrust and alternate platforms, and some epic hacking to fight back in the nearer term.

And another world war, and/or a nuke or two dropping is bound to happen and like the last world wars will feel like the end of the world, but it won't be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Local Fed
The only thing keeping me from going Ted Kaczynski is my family. I'm pretty fed up with this world, the people who run it and the people living in it. My outlook of the future is bleak:
  • America going full Marxist with the re-writing or outright deletion of history
  • Must wear masks at all times forever.
  • Paper currency completely gone. If you commit wrongspeak or wrongthink they turn off your chip and can no longer buy or sell.
  • Mandatory homosexuality and sex changes.
  • White genocide
 
Birthrates will decide the world's fate more than anything. China and the leftest west will implode and have drastically lower populations leaving the global south with greater influence. Largely Christian Latin and African countries will make up a significant bloc and keep those values going, Muslim nations will have a decent sphere of influence for a while but mideast global influence in a post-oil economy is iffy, though they'll finally get the European lands they've wanted for centuries through birthrates alone, and India will be the dominate APAC power. The USA will still be around, but they won't have their much taken for granted post WW2 bargaining power. Think of the reduction of influence of the Netherlands, Britain, Russia from their historical peaks for examples.

Big tech seems ready to implode too (if only from internal incompetance and the fact that some things are too large to manage well), and these other newly powerful countries will view it differently as they grow in dominance, having the current state of it thrust upon them without the earlier intermediaries so it's not as much a slow boil as it is in the west (imagine going from having a single radio in a household to each member having a smart phone overnight). Not sure how that will go socially, but expect more distrust and alternate platforms, and some epic hacking to fight back in the nearer term.

And another world war, and/or a nuke or two dropping is bound to happen and like the last world wars will feel like the end of the world, but it won't be.
Nukes ensure that another world war won't happen, or will be over almost as fast as it began.

It makes a lot more sense for interstate conflict to be fought on the civilian level. Rebellion. Insurrection. Civil wars.
 
Holy shit, everyone needs to calm down.

Go outside. Enjoy the sun. Take a nap with a fresh dryer blankie. Life continues the way it always has--badly but with good moments in between that makes it all worth it.

The world is not a dark place. People are not all bad. Tomorrow will be a great day if you make it. And if it's not? Wait for the next day. And the next day and the day after that.

I'm an extremely cynical person irl but if there's one thing I can't stand, it's doomer whine-posting. Society changes little by little, sometimes better and sometimes not. You have to take it as it comes and not lose faith. You owe yourself more than that.
 
Back