Is it more acceptable to eat ugly animals, or cute ones?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
C

Catler

kiwifarms.net
Joined
May 24, 2022
Pigs, cows, turkeys, chickens all share something in common: they are uncute.
Cats, dogs, and bunbuns: they are cute.

Is it more moral to eat the ugly animals? You eat 10 chickens and no one cares, you eat one pug and you go to jail.

Perhaps we hate looking at ugly animals so much we prefer to get them out of our sight by any means possible? If that's true another question arises: it it more moral to eat ugly people than cute people in the event of disaster?

Thoughts?
 
  • Dumb
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: I'm Retarded? and 1Tonka_Truck
Solution
I'm Retarded?
Catler said:
Pigs, cows, turkeys, chickens all share something in common: they are uncute.
Click to expand...

1708961520600.png1708961539600.png1708961581000.png

1708961628700.png1708961667100.png1708961702200.png1708961780600.png

I think the more important distinction is that pork, beef, and chicken are delicious. dog meat is for disgusting peasants.

Catler said:
If that's true another question arises: it it more moral to eat ugly people than cute people in the event of disaster?
Click to expand...

absolutely.
Sort by date Sort by votes
Catler said:
Pigs, cows, turkeys, chickens all share something in common: they are uncute.
Click to expand...

1708961520600.png1708961539600.png1708961581000.png

1708961628700.png1708961667100.png1708961702200.png1708961780600.png

I think the more important distinction is that pork, beef, and chicken are delicious. dog meat is for disgusting peasants.

Catler said:
If that's true another question arises: it it more moral to eat ugly people than cute people in the event of disaster?
Click to expand...

absolutely.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: 2LtMashengo, Mesh Gear Fox, Waifu Days and 4 others
Upvote 1 Downvote
Solution
  • Like
Reactions: SandyCat and eatler
Upvote 0 Downvote
Catler said:
W...what? People eat buns? You have ruined my day, I'm gonna cry now.
Click to expand...
Rabbit meat's actually better for you than chicken meat.
rabbit-meat-vs-chicken-meat.jpg
No eggs with rabbits though. But they are a lot easier to raise than chickens. They take up less space.

Guinea pigs are actually supposed to be the most economical animal to raise for meat. They need the least amount of space and they have the highest $ to calorie ratio.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: eatler and dick brain
Upvote 0 Downvote
Grub said:
Rabbit meat's actually better for you than chicken meat.
View attachment 5758416
No eggs with rabbits though. But they are a lot easier to raise than chickens. They take up less space.

Guinea pigs are actually supposed to be the most economical animal to raise for meat. They need the least amount of space and they have the highest $ to calorie ratio.
Click to expand...
Yes and no, depends on how much you eat. People on the trail used to eat rabbit constantly because it was the only meat available, but they would actually go mad from eating only that meat.

Catler said:
W...what? People eat buns? You have ruined my day, I'm gonna cry now.
Click to expand...
Don’t watch mike Moore’s doc on the failing Detroit factories then because there’s a scene we’re a woman’s killing a rabbit for meat and she bludgeoneds a rabbit to death.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
eatler said:
Yes and no, depends on how much you eat. People on the trail used to eat rabbit constantly because it was the only meat available, but they would actually go mad from eating only that meat.
Click to expand...
There's not enough fat content in rabbit meat to subsist entirely on it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: eatler
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back