Is liking Chris against the rules?

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
The thread was locked because OP was trying to get attention and people were giving it to him. He's also kind of a douche. You ever read someone talking and hear that smug sense of self-importance oozing through text? That's this guy. He thinks he's holding intellectual high-ground or something because he can say something completely uniformed and people will call him out on it.

Here's one line in particular from his chatlog:
"It was the same story when I tried to point out the weakness of Bitcoins on the Bitcoin forum. Except they are more savage. :)"
Not trolling! I just happen to go to various Internet forums and say things I know people will probably disagree with. :ween: lulz!

This is in a really recent string of people with personality disorders joining the forums. Jobbychu, Targaryen, and now this guy all seem to be the same sort of really annoying person that likes being the antagonist. It's not that liking Chris is against the rules, or that we don't understand the word "retarded" might be offensive to some people, it's this: when you come into our forum and say something unpopular you are taking a defensive position. Acting like you hold all the cards and we're just delusional, angry fuckwits that could only hope to aspire to be on your ivory tower is a great way to get banned.

Liking Chris is a subjective thing, and I think on a level most people root for Chris to do well, but his personality is insipid and rude and he does nothing for himself or others. It's hard to call that sort of person "likable" because he's unintentionally hilarious and it took him a decade to give up on Sonichu.
 
All that Null said. We all wish that Chris would improve himself and be responsible for his own actions, but he doesn't. He expects people to give him everything without him doing even an ounce of work and then blaming people for his own problems. This is why Chris isn't a likable person, not because he's "retarted" (but he sure can be stupid).
 
chrisisretarded6.gif
 
Null said:
He's also kind of a douche. You ever read someone talking and hear that smug sense of self-importance oozing through text? That's this guy. He thinks he's holding intellectual high-ground or something because he can say something completely uniformed and people will call him out on it.
Click to expand...

xk1d.png
 
Holdek said:
Null said:
He's also kind of a douche. You ever read someone talking and hear that smug sense of self-importance oozing through text? That's this guy. He thinks he's holding intellectual high-ground or something because he can say something completely uniformed and people will call him out on it.
Click to expand...

xk1d.png
Click to expand...
Holdek must change his profile pic back to smug Chris or bann will happen again.
 
That Ashbeck person wasn't here to have a civil conversation. He wanted to cause trouble. You can tell from his first post that he has already judged "most of the trolls" as "bigger losers than Chris", which can mean anyone from Christorical figures to members of this forum. Do note that he started dodging arguments when the thread really got going.

Is there a log of the chat, btw?
 
Varis said:
That Ashbeck person wasn't here to have a civil conversation. He wanted to cause trouble. You can tell from his first post that he has already judged "most of the trolls" as "bigger losers than Chris", which can mean anyone from Christorical figures to members of this forum. Do note that he started dodging arguments when the thread really got going.

Is there a log of the chat, btw?
Click to expand...

I'd actually argue Ashbeck's tryhard-ness appeared more prominently after he started to defend Chris making fun of 9/11 and threatening to kill people.
 
Dr. Cuddlebug said:
Varis said:
That Ashbeck person wasn't here to have a civil conversation. He wanted to cause trouble. You can tell from his first post that he has already judged "most of the trolls" as "bigger losers than Chris", which can mean anyone from Christorical figures to members of this forum. Do note that he started dodging arguments when the thread really got going.

Is there a log of the chat, btw?
Click to expand...

I'd actually argue Ashbeck's tryhard-ness appeared more prominently after he started to defend Chris making fun of 9/11 and threatening to kill people.
Click to expand...

Or when he claimed sexual harassment isn't as bad as pretending to be Chris's girlfriend?
 
CatParty said:
he showed up in chat? was it funny?
Click to expand...

Not really, it was actually really awkward because we were talking about how much of a 'tard he was and he just shows up and goes all "What prove me wrong"
 
Dr. Cuddlebug said:
CatParty said:
he showed up in chat? was it funny?
Click to expand...

Not really, it was actually really awkward because we were talking about how much of a 'tard he was and he just shows up and goes all "What prove me wrong"
Click to expand...


that's exactly the humor i was looking for :lol:
 
Varis said:
That Ashbeck person wasn't here to have a civil conversation. He wanted to cause trouble. You can tell from his first post that he has already judged "most of the trolls" as "bigger losers than Chris", which can mean anyone from Christorical figures to members of this forum. Do note that he started dodging arguments when the thread really got going.

Is there a log of the chat, btw?
Click to expand...
I have a log of it, but I'll post it later since I'm not well now.
 
Alan Pardew said:
Varis said:
That Ashbeck person wasn't here to have a civil conversation. He wanted to cause trouble. You can tell from his first post that he has already judged "most of the trolls" as "bigger losers than Chris", which can mean anyone from Christorical figures to members of this forum. Do note that he started dodging arguments when the thread really got going.

Is there a log of the chat, btw?
Click to expand...
I have a log of it, but I'll post it later since I'm not well now.
Click to expand...


feel better soon!
 
exball said:
Holdek said:
Null said:
He's also kind of a douche. You ever read someone talking and hear that smug sense of self-importance oozing through text? That's this guy. He thinks he's holding intellectual high-ground or something because he can say something completely uniformed and people will call him out on it.
Click to expand...

xk1d.png
Click to expand...
Holdek must change his profile pic back to smug Chris or bann will happen again.
Click to expand...

Done.
xk1d.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back