- Joined
- May 14, 2019
I think of objective reality as being like an OLS estimator for truth. You have this idea in statistics that there is a model that could explain reality, and when you run the regression (it’s just a big formula, so big it has to be done on a computer) it gives an estimate of the parameters to the model. It tries to minimize error. Assume the world we’re in is the most likely of all worlds, what numbers would best match with what we see.
In an idealist world, which is what I think we live in, it’s all in the head, objective reality is like that, but for the laws of nature. Instead of just the parameters (like fundamental constants), it’s the rules themselves. What set of rules can best explain the perception of everybody, is the least internally inconsistent.
My view opens the possibility that reality can shift with perception, but only very slightly.
In an idealist world, which is what I think we live in, it’s all in the head, objective reality is like that, but for the laws of nature. Instead of just the parameters (like fundamental constants), it’s the rules themselves. What set of rules can best explain the perception of everybody, is the least internally inconsistent.
My view opens the possibility that reality can shift with perception, but only very slightly.