Is the alt-right pipeline real?

⚞⛇⚟

This member limits who may view their full profile
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 25, 2024
I have seen many far-left people talk about how the alt-right pipeline "radicalizes" and "grooms" people. I believe that most of these people are either:
a) trying to distract others from the transgender grooming stuff or
b) former alt-righters that are trying to blame others for their old opinions so that they can complain about every right-wing individual being evil without sounding hypocritical.
However, there definitely are some people that get radicalized by right-wing echo chambers. These people usually believe anything, regardless of how retarded or schizophrenic it is, as long as it agrees with their beliefs. These people are basically right-wing redditors.
That being said, "grooming" is definitely the wrong word to describe these what happened to these people. They weren't groomed into their beliefs, they chose their beliefs and they chose to stay in those echo chambers. In addition, many leftists make right-wing echo chambers more appealing because they accuse everyone that questions their beliefs as an evil nazi chud that isn't worth debating.
 
For me, the "alt-right" pipeline was living in a bizarro world where reasonable takes were nowhere to be found and it was only getting worse by the minute.
Then I finally found people making fun of the established rules and I knew that I had discovered my home.
I don't actually consider myself alt-right anymore and haven't for a long time. That's just the label that would probably be assigned to me.
 
There is a spooderweb of different 'pipelines' between different extremist positions. These groups tend to be full of the same sorts of psyches; bitter, alienated misanthropes who want to punish society for percieved wrongs and take resources or power that they believe they are owed. These kinds of people naturally fly from one extremist revolutionary group to the other when their previous ideology fails to give them what they want.

Think of Giovanni Gentile, writing fascism as a response to being part of the utter failure of Italian socialism; these people, and I mean real violent extremists far beyond the gay bullshit concept of 'alt-right' as anything that isn't full throated prog leftism, are all one failed street war away from throwing up their hands and switching out for something they hope will be more effective.
 
Last edited:
alt-right and alt-left as well as normieville/troontube/gaytok/goystagram are all products of guberment programs to give you a sense of influencing outcomes in your own life.

Nothing that harms the government will be left online for norms to consume. Such honey-pots are just for some smarter cattle that lead by a detour to a same slaughterhouse. You are owned since birth and a slave to the system and will devote your entire life to serving it. You were just raised to be slaughtered in the cogs of apparatchiks.
 
I don't have to explain why people would be discontent with the way things are now, and with massive discontent comes people looking at new political Outlooks. The last few years the left has lost its mind and burned it's goodwill with its potential customers, however the inverse had happened with the original alt right post 2016 with A them going off the wall retarded with endless grifting, B the creation of the censorship engine and the transformation of the web into an open air nigger cattle plantation, and C Trump being utterly lackluster from the perspective of the "alt right". The difference between the two is the right had the weight of the system come down on them between massive censorship, Lawfare, and constant horse shit from the feds while the left has every major institution backing them.

The pipeline itself if it could be called that is having a finger point at and blame the problems in society now regardless if it's an actual answer or schizo babble. The deplatforming has meant there is nothing to water down and dilute whatever right wing opinions in the odd corners of the web they were forced into, which results in incoherent schizo posting after a while. Go take a look at the front page of bitchute for an example.

I wouldn't call it a pipeline as much as being exposed to alternative information, what the viewer believes is up to them but the entire complaint by the left is standard for them now. They celebrate the power of censorship and deplatforming against their perceived enemies. They essentially desire to book burn believing if the hostile ideas are eradicated they won't return. Attacking the gateway of this information aka the pipeline is a key part of this strategy to stop new converts to the blasphemous faith. Take a gander at the bread tube thread for whenever a fraction of this power is turned against themselves for the reaction
 
Define alt right.
My definition: Alt-right communities are communities that hold shared extreme right-wing beliefs, and believe that everyone that disagrees with any of their beliefs is evil. There is usually a lot of autistic slapfighting between these communities because they think that the other alt-right communities that have slightly different beliefs are fake and gay.
The definition that a lot of far-left people use is "whatever I feel like", and they usually use it as a way to silence everyone that disagrees with them.
 
Those types talk a lot about it usually because they themselves are guilty of it.

Lefties (and honestly political extremists in general) are obsessed with the concept of drawing kids/impressionable individuals into their ideology. Except when they do it, it's just educating young people on the reality of the world; when it's someone they disagree with doing it, then it's grooming or innocents falling down a pipeline.

However, there definitely are some people that get radicalized by right-wing echo chambers. These people usually believe anything, regardless of how retarded or schizophrenic it is, as long as it agrees with their beliefs. These people are basically right-wing redditors.
That's true, the fact is that the internet in general can serve as a road to all types of insane views and beliefs, and some people are really cattle-brained.

I guess you could say that the alt-right pipeline is real in that someone could be exposed to ideas online that might lead down a road to radicalization, but that's true of everything on the internet. Is the internet a "fandom pipeline"? Is it a "fetish pipeline"? Is it a "hobby pipeline"?

All of those are just as valid, because that's how the internet works. People get exposed to a thing then sometimes follow it to an unhealthy conclusion. Again, the people going on about an "alt-right pipeline" are just salty because someone they disagree with can do the exact same thing they do.
 
Online algorithms drive behavior, and even the influencers themselves are not immune to them.
 
My definition: Alt-right communities are communities that hold shared extreme right-wing beliefs, and believe that everyone that disagrees with any of their beliefs is evil. There is usually a lot of autistic slapfighting between these communities because they think that the other alt-right communities that have slightly different beliefs are fake and gay.
The definition that a lot of far-left people use is "whatever I feel like", and they usually use it as a way to silence everyone that disagrees with them.
So in other words you're asking if echo chambers exist, and if the Internet trends towards them?
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: ⚞⛇⚟
Yes (radicalized by Matt Walsh) :punished:
photo.jpeg
 
No. The entire thing was pretty much made up as one huge ad hominem to slander anyone not on complete normie anti-Trump positions. Ironically almost every single person who complained about said "pipeline" and it's "danger" would inevitably fall into a Breadtuber rabbit hole and become complete faggots.
 
The alt-right started as a bunch of disparate people from all walks of life noticing that statistical data, neurological science, twin studies, and so on all completely contradicted the modern-day dogma that all groups of people are equal in ability and talent in all dimensions, and it's only socio-economic factors that result in differences in outcomes.

Different factions reacted with different levels of extreme retardation to this, but you can't put the genie back in the bottle. The beginning of the pipeline is that the social revolutions of the 1960s were built on objective falsehoods.
 
"If you're under 30 and you're right wing, you have no heart. If you're over 30 and you're not right wing, you have no brain." This observation went back to the Vietnam War era, I'm told.

So basically everybody starts out as drooling leftists who want free stuff. Over the years they see how that side gets co-opted with hypocritical views and there's no reason to reward them, so they switch.

It's just a natural progression.

Now with social media, leftists are trying to make this seem nefarious or avoidable.
 
It's just people with normal views getting angrier at liberal lunacy. I'm not "radicalized" just because I'm more fed up with their insanity the worse it gets. Democrats are radicalized, it's like saying America went too far nuking Japan, but maybe Japan should've thought about that before they turned up the heat and started something they couldn't finish.
 
There is an old adage: 'It is the mark of an intelligent mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.' For much of the Left the idea that you can consider alt-right talking points without becoming seduced by them does not compute; so they talk about pipelines, rabbit holes, brainwashing, the 'risks for young men in these spaces', etc. These are the people who think Adolf was 'a good orator' and 'hypnotic to the masses' and that he rose to power by being Pretty Fly for a White Guy.

There is a certain catharsis when first entering alt-right spaces. You get to take all the 'Protected' people and point out all their flaws and bullshit for the first time without reprimand. Moreover, you get to advocate for yourself and your group and not be pissed up and down your face for doing so. A lot of the cringe in the alt-right are people just enjoying that cathartic release. After all, there is an endless supply of young people growing up and encountering it for the first time. (Edit: I'm sure there's a tonne of reformed Lefties here who remember that same feeling when they were allowed to stick it to the Church or Capitalism for the first time - back when that was still a fresh sensation against hypocrites with power.)

Mature people move on after they've adopted the new information and vented their grievances; cementing the new positions but no longer feeling the need to talk about it 24/7 or blame every last thing on the outgroups. But there are impotent segments who don't move on and prefer to just hate their new idols rather than topple them.

But it's not the behavior of this segment that the Left is complaining about anyway. They love that behavior but think it has been misdirected. That is why they use all that lost puppy terminology.
 
Last edited:
Back