Is there actually "justice" in prison? - AKA "Is there actually merit to A&H's pipe-dream that pedophiles get assaulted in prison?"

OhGoy

i'm out
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Whenever someone who committed a more "immoral" crime (e.g pedophilia) gets imprisoned, everyone jokes and says "LOL I BET HE'LL HAVE FUN WHEN TYRONE AND BUBBAH GET A HOLD OF HIM." I don't know if there's any truth to this, though, and it got me thinking; do the really bad people "get theirs" in prison? Or are they treated the same as any other inmate?
 
People convicted of harming children seem to get treated exactly how you imagine they would be. A quick search brings up several stories of paedophiles and other sex offenders being beaten/strangled to death. Apparently, it's an unspoken rule that if you hurt a kid you've painted a target on your back.

I remember watching a documentary, can't remember for the life of me what it called, that spoke about how sex offenders have their own yard times in some cases. Some even have fake crimes that the prisons tell people they've committed so that someone doesn't bash their brains in after finding out they're a sex criminal.
 
Apparently, it's an unspoken rule that if you hurt a kid you've painted a target on your back
I find it ironic that violent criminals in prison feel the need to be judge and executioner to pedophiles. People, even the violent criminals themselves, like to believe what they do is out of moral righteousness. But honestly, it's because they're faggots who need an easy reason to cave someone's skull in.

I get it. Pedophiles=bad. But I don't believe some faggot who has no relation to the victim while also lacking in a concrete moral compass, i.e. that's why the faggot is in prison in the first place, should be passing a violent judgement on a pedophile.
 
I'm always disappointed when liberals who claim to believe in reform minded justice and view rape as the worst thing go on to celebrate prison rape.

Some people might be getting punished by this situation but I'd imagine that rapists and people that like getting raped don't feel punished at all.

I find it ironic that violent criminals in prison feel the need to be judge and executioner to pedophiles. People, even the violent criminals themselves, like to believe what they do is out of moral righteousness. But honestly, it's because they're faggots who need an easy reason to cave someone's skull in.

I get it. Pedophiles=bad. But I don't believe some faggot who has no relation to the victim while also lacking in a concrete moral compass, i.e. that's why the faggot is in prison in the first place, should be passing a violent judgement on a pedophile.


People convicted of harming children seem to get treated exactly how you imagine they would be. A quick search brings up several stories of paedophiles and other sex offenders being beaten/strangled to death. Apparently, it's an unspoken rule that if you hurt a kid you've painted a target on your back.

I remember watching a documentary, can't remember for the life of me what it called, that spoke about how sex offenders have their own yard times in some cases. Some even have fake crimes that the prisons tell people they've committed so that someone doesn't bash their brains in after finding out they're a sex criminal.

It's called Protective Custody. People from targeted groups like transsexuals, pedophiles, ex-cops, known snitches, rapists, gang-traitors and others are separated from the general prison population.

It's very interesting, even the Black and Hispanic gangs of Chicago had an honor code. If you killed somebody who wasn't playing "the game" people would call you out for going too far and you would be expected to hand yourself in. British gangs used to avoid carrying guns to glorify the idea that crime harmless game about wits. Criminals seem to have the need to convince themselves that they're not the worst of the worst. For whatever reason, gangs like MS-13 do not have this at all. Considering that pedos are the worst of the worst it makes sense they'd be a target. Not being the worst of the worst is pretty important to these people.
 
Most prisoners convicted of sex crimes or anything else which would get them canned on the daily (ex cops, snitches etc) "take the numbers" - ie. opt for segregation. It's dealt with differently in other countries, but in the UK it's Rule 63 (oi finks) and it means they are segregated from general population.

There's usually similar in force even in US prisons because they really do cause serious aggro. The pecking order inside is incredibly hierarchical and those at the bottom not only get a pasting, but are held in such contempt that it can affect prison security. They don't want to be beaten to a pulp daily and the authorities don't need the disquiet when others don't want to be housed with them. And sentimentality is rife in prisons, they're stupid about their wives and kiddiwinks (even if reality is they can't even name them) so that it becomes a matter of honour.

Some will choose general population (some have no choice, the Governor may specify they have to seg) and they will often end up the bitch of a higher-ranking inmate. It gives them a degree of safety inasmuch as Bill the Bank Robber is ploughing them to a pulp but nobody else will touch his property.

It's no easy ride tho. Sometimes the only option is total segregation which is no soft option, and it almost becomes a game for other inmates to get them. And tbh, the guards are not too bothered as long as it doesn't get out of hand. For instance, a child-killer here was napalmed (boiling water and sugar thrown in the face) within a couple of weeks of sentencing despite precautions due to the high-profile of the case. And even seg units have a hierarchy, so those exiled from GP will still have a pecking order, with chomos at the bottom. What happens inside stays inside - prison culture is fascinating, but utterly closed to outsiders.

Source: cheese in UK prison system.
 
Last edited:
Most of the time Thieves, your the average murderer, thug, or scam artist can find a group to roll with. The ones who have it the worst are ones who hurt children,Rapist, Animal Abusers. Well at least that was what my uncle told me and he is a fucking jailbird if i ever knew one.


Can confirm. The only group that is more reviled is snitches.
 
I find it ironic that violent criminals in prison feel the need to be judge and executioner to pedophiles. People, even the violent criminals themselves, like to believe what they do is out of moral righteousness.

This is magnified to the nth degree in prisons; the hypocrisy is jaw-dropping.

You've got some persistent offender inside who smacks the living shit out of his kids and/or SO constantly and considers sex from his partner a divine right to be enforced through terror and violence, who could be jailed for that very reason.....yet he/she will absolutely consider themselves superior to the bogeyman-stranger paedophile or rapist, despite the fact the vast majority of these crimes are committed by those known to the victim.

They see no dichotomy in this. Those in prison have, by definition, had all the normal routes of autonomy taken from them so there's a whole raft of finer distinctions which have little meaning outside. It's different for women - there are still unwritten hierarchies but they centre round other things - but in men's prisons it's all about being above somebody else, jostling for that one rung higher on a pointless ladder because it gives the illusion of control.
 
This is magnified to the nth degree in prisons; the hypocrisy is jaw-dropping.

You've got some persistent offender inside who smacks the living shit out of his kids and/or SO constantly and considers sex from his partner a divine right to be enforced through terror and violence, who could be jailed for that very reason.....yet he/she will absolutely consider themselves superior to the bogeyman-stranger paedophile or rapist, despite the fact the vast majority of these crimes are committed by those known to the victim.

They see no dichotomy in this. Those in prison have, by definition, had all the normal routes of autonomy taken from them so there's a whole raft of finer distinctions which have little meaning outside. It's different for women - there are still unwritten hierarchies but they centre round other things - but in men's prisons it's all about being above somebody else, jostling for that one rung higher on a pointless ladder because it gives the illusion of control.
I know of a case with a bit of "local" connection: Criminal A (who lived in the vicinity of one of my uncles at the time of his crimes), who was in prison for manipulating his mistress into killing his wife, tried to make a name for himself in prison by making the other criminals gang up on Criminal B, who had been convicted of raping and killing a woman and a young girl.
 
In the UK, sex offenders are kept in separate wings and don't mix with general population. That doesn't stop them from getting beaten/murdered, though. I'm sure plenty of guards "accidentally" let them mingle.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Last Stand
The entire concept of justice is completely illusory. Through no choice of our own we are born into a cosmic oblivion of which we will never escape, and one where any notion of justice is conspicuously absent. Punishing a cruel person with cruel retribution doesn't undo the harmful effects of their cruelty, it just adds more cruelty to the mix in what can only be described as a vainglorious and futile gesture.
 
The entire concept of justice is completely illusory. Through no choice of our own we are born into a cosmic oblivion of which we will never escape, and one where any notion of justice is conspicuously absent. Punishing a cruel person with cruel retribution doesn't undo the harmful effects of their cruelty, it just adds more cruelty to the mix in what can only be described as a vainglorious and futile gesture.
Everything is illusory or transient from an objective perspective, but that doesn't mean that justice doesn't exist: just that it's a societal construct.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Big Nasty
You've got some persistent offender inside who smacks the living shit out of his kids and/or SO constantly and considers sex from his partner a divine right to be enforced through terror and violence, who could be jailed for that very reason.....yet he/she will absolutely consider themselves superior to the bogeyman-stranger paedophile or rapist, despite the fact the vast majority of these crimes are committed by those known to the victim.

A communal punching bag/scapegoat is a good source of unity. I think the reason chomos get shit on so often is that it makes the other inmates feel like they're defending children when they're really just beating up another prisoner. You see things like this in the free world as well. Pretty much any culture has some behavior that they will absolutely not tolerate. It may seem arbitrary or stupid, but this serves an important social function. If you want to see an example try voicing your dislike of minorities or gays in polite company and watch people absolutely lose their shit. Not because they actually care, but because you've outed yourself as a heretic and they must punish you in order to fit in.
 
I find it ironic that violent criminals in prison feel the need to be judge and executioner to pedophiles. People, even the violent criminals themselves, like to believe what they do is out of moral righteousness. But honestly, it's because they're faggots who need an easy reason to cave someone's skull in.

I get it. Pedophiles=bad. But I don't believe some faggot who has no relation to the victim while also lacking in a concrete moral compass, i.e. that's why the faggot is in prison in the first place, should be passing a violent judgement on a pedophile.

It's always nice for horrible people to externalize evil unto others as more evil. It helps them to live with themselves, I presume.

The scarier thought is that each of us might be doing something like this while being mostly oblivious to it, though perhaps not to the same degree. Hopefully.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Last Stand
A communal punching bag/scapegoat is a good source of unity. I think the reason chomos get shit on so often is that it makes the other inmates feel like they're defending children when they're really just beating up another prisoner. You see things like this in the free world as well. Pretty much any culture has some behavior that they will absolutely not tolerate. It may seem arbitrary or stupid, but this serves an important social function. If you want to see an example try voicing your dislike of minorities or gays in polite company and watch people absolutely lose their shit. Not because they actually care, but because you've outed yourself as a heretic and they must punish you in order to fit in.


Atavistic feelings like hate and anger etc. are addicting.

The average first worlder craves an outlet for it because they are over socialized into denying they have a shadow at all.
That’s why you see left fanatics shrieking racial slurs at minorities who leave the plantation.
Add in some of girards’ mimetic theory and you’ve got a fractured creature of unexamined impulses.

You can’t intellectuallize your shadow away. You can only integrate it into yourself and subsequently leverage it.
 
Even Jesus was imprisoned between His arrest and execution, and we also should not forget Saint Paul whose many epistles were written from prison. Is it justice to hold the holiest Man that has ever lived in prison? Jesus the Christ? I must admit—the more I ponder this world, the less I am able to make sense of it.
 
I've heard of prison gangs telling potential members some random guy (or a suspected rat) is a pedophile and to kill him to prove loyalty, or dirty guards saying the same thing to take out troublesome prisoners. Prisons are vastly different across the country, it depends on whether prisoners feel they can get away with that sort of thing.
 
Pedophiles usually have a pretty hard time but if you're thinking the guy who killed a family in a home invasion is getting beaten or raped on the daily, you're probably wrong. Predators are predators and that guy is probably preying on weaker inmates 10 minutes after he walks through the door.
 
Oh of course. All the immoral lowlives in prison make sure to arrange their heirarchy by morality, naturally, so the people who commit the worst crimes obviously get targetted by the less bad criminals.

Sarcasm aside, obviously not, the big strong pedophile gets to rape whoever he wants.
 
Back