Is Twitter Dying?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Twitter was never alive to begin with. Its continued existence is because media types (and out-of-touch boomers who consume media uncritically) are obsessed with it and think it represents the entire world.
I don't think most of them (at least the higher ups like politicians and executive management) actually believe that since they have access to actual data, but I do think most of them want to believe that because it gives them a good cover for their evil plans when they can just say "well it's popular because Twitter!'
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dream_Cooter
I hope so, as slowly as painfully as possible. Most people with Twitter accounts are amping the most insufferable drama filled people the internet has to offer, posting fair weather bullshit few people actually give a shit about. Aside from a few stand out accounts the site needs to die off soon.
 
It's gradually losing relevance, but I doubt it will ever totally die. Except for the DPRK News Service, most of the interesting, fun people are long gone. I think will slowly become a niche site for circle-jerking (figurative and literal). If someone buys it and does what Yahoo did to Tumblr, that might be a final deathblow.
 
Just started getting the nag popup for the first time here tonight, wasn't getting it earlier today.

Locks scrolling and makes the site completely unreadable. Can't even use ublock to get rid of the popup itself because it still locks scrolling.

And using an extension to force scrolling doesn't work, because the popup disables loading of additional comments while scrolling down.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe
Twitter was never alive to begin with. Its continued existence is because media types (and out-of-touch boomers who consume media uncritically) are obsessed with it and think it represents the entire world.
I think Twitter will survive as the social network of politicos, thunk-thankers and journalists. There number is few, but their influence is great enough to allow Twitter to live.
Twitter was dying before Trump basically brought it back to life by being on it during his presidency. Now it's back to where it was headed before as the format is annoyingly limiting and the user enjoyment just sucks. It used to nag you before about logging in to navigate, but you could just right click and open in a new tab to bypass most of it, but now you scroll a couple of posts and it locks you out unless you log in. Fuck that, I'll just wait for someone to post the funny shit somewhere else instead.
So it's basically the CNN of social networks.
 
It might be worth to bump this thread now that Elon Musk bought a stake in Twitter. I spotted a interesting rant about this.

In 2021 Elon Musk created overnight millionaires by pushing the Dogecoin meme. In 2022, he may be gearing up for something far more dramatic. The world’s richest man might be on the cusp of launching a global crusade to restore freedom of speech.

Creating an alternative platform could be interesting, though several of these exist already. Twitter remains, by Elon’s own admission, the de facto public town square. Despite its severe censorship, it is still the only major digital public space where anonymous accounts can interact with celebrities, journalists and business titans (including Elon), where world leaders engage in spirited public diplomacy, and where dominant cultural and political narratives incubate and spread.

The most exciting possibility is therefore the most obvious one: Musk should simply buy a controlling stake in Twitter itself. He could certainly afford it. At $31 billion, Twitter’s market cap is less than 15 percent of Musk’s current net worth. Even if one regards Twitter stock as entirely worthless, Musk could theoretically buy a controlling stake in it and still be the world’s richest man by fifty billion dollars, and free speech would be restored to the “land of the free.”

But in practice, it’s not that easy. In fact, one would be hard pressed to imagine a project more dangerous and difficult than restoring free speech to a major tech platform like Twitter. At the same time, it’s hard to imagine a more worthwhile project. Restoring genuine free speech would do more for patriotic Americans than the GOP taking back the White House in 2024, and it would pose a greater threat to the ruling Regime than anything Russia, China, or Iran might plausibly do.


Free speech online is what enabled the Trump revolution in 2016. If the Internet had been as free in 2020 as it was four years before, Trump would have cruised to reelection. Massive censorship and suppression are the tools needed to prop up Covid tyranny, the Ukraine war fever, and the idea that Lia Thomas is a “woman.” America’s decrepit and illegitimate ruling class intuitively understand this: Absolute freedom of speech, or even the speech norms that prevailed a mere decade ago, would instantly cause the American regime as we know it to crumble.

In short, transforming Twitter back into a real free speech platform would represent nothing less than a declaration of war against the Globalist American Empire.

To fully understand why this is so, it is crucial to understand that Twitter is anything but a conventional “private company.” A company like The Home Depot might have a market cap ten times as large as Twitter’s, yet in terms of power and influence, who controls Twitter is profoundly more consequential. Home Depot would probably not remove its best selling paint cans or cardboard boxes from the shelves. Twitter, on the other hand, deplatformed its most high profile user, Donald J. Trump, while he was the sitting President of the United States. This is only the most dramatic example of censorious policy changes that restrict information flow and profit for Twitter.

But, let's watch it by being cautious and careful and the guys of American Thinker seems to watch it with cautious eyes too.
April 5, 2022

Will Elon Musk erase Twitter’s censorious ideological slant?​

By Andrea Widburg

On Monday, news broke that Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, in one fell swoop also became the single largest stakeholder in Twitter, for he now owns 9.2% of its shares. The big question now is whether he intends to use his position to push for change in a platform that has become a toxic echo chamber for “woke” ideas and cancel culture, even as it relentlessly silences opposing views.
If I had to describe Musk, I’d call him an eccentric libertarian who is, nevertheless, just a little suspect in that role given his commitment to alternative energy and climate change principles. He’s also an outspoken visionary and genius.
Perhaps most importantly, unlike so many other billionaires whom the mob can still silence, Musk speaks his mind. He outraged the woke mob when he supported hydroxychloroquine treatments for COVID (almost certainly helpful), stated that children are not vulnerable to COVID (true), was suspicious of government COVID death statistics (which the CDC has since revised), and criticized lockdowns (which the government concedes made no difference). He’s also criticized the push in Western countries to lower the birth rate below replacement level, attacked public transportation and, most recently, when Biden’s policies drove up fuel prices, called for more drilling.
Like President Trump, Musk is a billionaire who’s enjoyed using Twitter as a platform for his opinions. That’s why it was stunning when, a week ago, Musk made it clear that he believes that Twitter, as the modern town square, rather than shutting down free speech, must be a free speech platform—or be overtaken by competing technology:
 
I use Nitter: -


There's no login prompts, no ads, no recommending that you follow X or Y etc. If all you want to do is read other people's tweets, it's great, cos it's fast and just shows you the stuff you want to see.

All you need to do to use it is install a browser extension: -

Nitter redirect is also a part of a handy Chromium extension called Privacy Redirect, which also redirects Youtube videos to an Invidious instance, Wikipedia pages to Wikiless, Google Maps to OpenStreetMap, Reddit to a number of proxy instances and so on.

edit. a typo
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FATTESTCUNT
Did Elon Musk actually buy twitter shares so he could still mock them and not get sued? Is that real?
 
There are some Twitter features that don't work on nitter, not just Twitter spaces but you also cannot log in on it. So it's really for people who want to read only. Yes, it's good for that but a complete Twitter replacement it's not quite there yet.
 
Noticed recently that the replies section below a tweet ambiguously ends and then is filled with other tweets in hope you don’t close the browser. You have to literally count the replies in advance to know which ones were in reference to the original post. Outside of a weekly scrape or a few different accounts that use twitter as their primary it’s such a shit experience I wouldn’t use it even if 99% of their checkmark site left the site.
 
Back