Is Western Civilization now Feminized/Maternalized?

This quote is the kind of thing where it ends up going into cycles the more time moves on:

View attachment 4661397
1677633828644.png
 
Honestly I think it’s Judaized heavily. (It’s been referenced even by Jewish academics which were cited in Culture of Critique)

And there’s a saying, that if your women are fat, or your women are unhinged lunatics, the men will commit more crime and society will be unstable. Good Mothers are the bedrock to making a good society, since they raise young men into becoming good members of society.

Society lacks good women, so no I wouldn’t say it’s feminized, because what is feminine has all but been erased by cultural Marxists and instead a culture of sociopathy has taken its place
 
Honestly I think it’s Judaized heavily. (It’s been referenced even by Jewish academics which were cited in Culture of Critique)

And there’s a saying, that if your women are fat, or your women are unhinged lunatics, the men will commit more crime and society will be unstable. Good Mothers are the bedrock to making a good society, since they raise young men into becoming good members of society.

Society lacks good women, so no I wouldn’t say it’s feminized, because what is feminine has all but been erased by cultural Marxists and instead a culture of sociopathy has taken its place

Yes but I think it's a Feminine sociopathy.
 
Think Asian culture for sure is heavily feminized. I guess one could argue both ways for the West, either that it's also succumbing to femininity or forging its new independent (Judaized?) path
 
It depends on where you live and how terminally online you are. Most of this culture war shit stops existing when I turn off my devices go outside, but I have the luxury of living in a flyover portion of my state. The bigger cities come with their arsenal of big city problems, but none of it comes this way. I don't know what it is about nature heavy areas but it's the ultimate fatherless people repellant.
 
If you you call the general decline of physical violence and diminishing demand of brutal strength "feminization" then yes. Brutal schimpanze force often (wrongly) associated with masculinity falls out of demand. To be sucessfull you need to be clever and learn to communicate which could be regarded as "feminine" traits.
 
Yes. Perhaps not entirely in the way you think though.
I’ve said this before here but will repeat: the current year culture of cancellation and SJW cultism is feminine power expression.
Men exert power with physical force or the threat of physical force. This works well - you can be a leader in a gang sense and just batter or brutalise your way to the top, of course but the great men of history used that power better. It was always backed up with the threat of physical force somewhere along the line. Caesar had his legions, for example. Physical power is straightforward. It’s not deceptive or manipulative psychologically. It allows the strong to lead.
Now, men have been emasculated and they’re told that any manifestation of masculinity is toxic . (The Gillette ads are a great example of that - they were wholesome, men staring into the distance on their yacht or atop a mountain or being adored by attractive wife and children. Nothing whatsoever toxic. ) what’s replaced that is feminine power modes. Women cannot exert power with physical violence becasue we are smaller and weaker. But that doesn’t mean we aren’t power thirsty and brutal. Womens power is almost always exerted through psychological manipulation. Women will dominate a social group of other women and brutally put down the weaker members of the group by social ostracism and mobbing and cancellation. They will dominate family structures.
What you’re seeing is feminine power modes being applied to society and politics, and it’s disastrous. The cancel culture is mean girl culture writ large. It is toxic.
But it’s still feminine power and at some point it will be amd can only be, countered by masculine power exertion, I.e. colossal physical violence.
Society probably functions best with both sexes in balance. Right now things are really out of whack in the west.
 
Yes. Perhaps not entirely in the way you think though.
I’ve said this before here but will repeat: the current year culture of cancellation and SJW cultism is feminine power expression.
Men exert power with physical force or the threat of physical force. This works well - you can be a leader in a gang sense and just batter or brutalise your way to the top, of course but the great men of history used that power better. It was always backed up with the threat of physical force somewhere along the line. Caesar had his legions, for example. Physical power is straightforward. It’s not deceptive or manipulative psychologically. It allows the strong to lead.
Now, men have been emasculated and they’re told that any manifestation of masculinity is toxic . (The Gillette ads are a great example of that - they were wholesome, men staring into the distance on their yacht or atop a mountain or being adored by attractive wife and children. Nothing whatsoever toxic. ) what’s replaced that is feminine power modes. Women cannot exert power with physical violence becasue we are smaller and weaker. But that doesn’t mean we aren’t power thirsty and brutal. Womens power is almost always exerted through psychological manipulation. Women will dominate a social group of other women and brutally put down the weaker members of the group by social ostracism and mobbing and cancellation. They will dominate family structures.
What you’re seeing is feminine power modes being applied to society and politics, and it’s disastrous. The cancel culture is mean girl culture writ large. It is toxic.
But it’s still feminine power and at some point it will be amd can only be, countered by masculine power exertion, I.e. colossal physical violence.
Society probably functions best with both sexes in balance. Right now things are really out of whack in the west.
Retarded handmaiden babbling. First off, men don’t deserve to be adored by anybody, especially attractive women. Secondly, males aren’t being told masculinity is inherently wrong theyre just criticizing the negative aspects of it that affect all of society but mostly themselves and they’re absolutely right to be criticizing it if you think men are gonna rise up and assert “colossal physical violence“ just because they’re not being catered to every five seconds. Men need to learn to stop being so primitive and caveman-like
 
Retarded handmaiden babbling. First off, men don’t deserve to be adored by anybody, especially attractive women. Secondly, males aren’t being told masculinity is inherently wrong theyre just criticizing the negative aspects of it that affect all of society but mostly themselves and they’re absolutely right to be criticizing it if you think men are gonna rise up and assert “colossal physical violence“ just because they’re not being catered to every five seconds. Men need to learn to stop being so primitive and caveman-like
wasn't sure whether to give you the 🎩 coz ur mad ur play was spelled out for all to read or to give you the 🗿 coz u spergged about it and went all meangirl on the whistleblower.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mexican_Wizard_711
It depends on where you live and how terminally online you are. Most of this culture war shit stops existing when I turn off my devices go outside, but I have the luxury of living in a flyover portion of my state. The bigger cities come with their arsenal of big city problems, but none of it comes this way. I don't know what it is about nature heavy areas but it's the ultimate fatherless people repellant.
Deffo not true if you're in either one of the really big cities like NYC or LA or a college town.

Suburban areas can go either way and truly run the gamut.
 
Yes. Perhaps not entirely in the way you think though.
I’ve said this before here but will repeat: the current year culture of cancellation and SJW cultism is feminine power expression.
Men exert power with physical force or the threat of physical force. This works well - you can be a leader in a gang sense and just batter or brutalise your way to the top, of course but the great men of history used that power better. It was always backed up with the threat of physical force somewhere along the line. Caesar had his legions, for example. Physical power is straightforward. It’s not deceptive or manipulative psychologically. It allows the strong to lead.
Now, men have been emasculated and they’re told that any manifestation of masculinity is toxic . (The Gillette ads are a great example of that - they were wholesome, men staring into the distance on their yacht or atop a mountain or being adored by attractive wife and children. Nothing whatsoever toxic. ) what’s replaced that is feminine power modes. Women cannot exert power with physical violence becasue we are smaller and weaker. But that doesn’t mean we aren’t power thirsty and brutal. Womens power is almost always exerted through psychological manipulation. Women will dominate a social group of other women and brutally put down the weaker members of the group by social ostracism and mobbing and cancellation. They will dominate family structures.
What you’re seeing is feminine power modes being applied to society and politics, and it’s disastrous. The cancel culture is mean girl culture writ large. It is toxic.
But it’s still feminine power and at some point it will be amd can only be, countered by masculine power exertion, I.e. colossal physical violence.
Society probably functions best with both sexes in balance. Right now things are really out of whack in the west.

I never thought I'd see you in a round about way, endorsing Sean Connery.

 
Back