UN ISIS Calls For Assassination on Trump's Kid - Good luck with that faggots

https://www.aol.com/article/news/20...lls-for-barron-trumps-assassination/23284626/

ISIS is reportedly calling for the assassination of President Trump’s 11-year-old son, Barron.

That’s according to the Washington Free Beacon, which claims the call has come from pro-ISIS internet channels.

ISIS supporters have reportedly shared a map showing where the child’s school is located and other personal information on a Telegram channel.

According to the Middle East Media Research Institute, the initial message, sent on November 21 by an ISIS supporter via Telegram, reportedly “called for the assassination of Barron Trump, and shared the address, and called for the backers of the terrorist organization to assassinate him.”

A hashtag using the words "handle the son of the mule of America" was said to be used, along with a photo of the youngest of President Trump’s children.

The call for assassination has reportedly been widely spread, with a series of pro-ISIS telegram channels sharing and forwarding the post.
 
Did i specify 9/11 in that post?

Im talking about the Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam War

The US gov used a fabricated attack by Vietnamese soldiers on their ship as an excuse to launch a proper invasion, they later admitted it never happened and just used it as an excuse, yet people still claim that the US went into vietnam because they attacked their ship

Oh. Okay, well, I'm retarded then. Yeah, the Vietnam war was totally a clusterfuck, and I will give you that one on a silver platter. Got my hackles up for nothing, apologies.
 
And Bush Did 9/11

hqdefault.jpg
 
Did i specify 9/11 in that post?

Im talking about the Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam War

The US gov used a fabricated attack by Vietnamese soldiers on their ship as an excuse to launch a proper invasion, they later admitted it never happened and just used it as an excuse, yet people still claim that the US went into vietnam because they attacked their ship
I think it's more interesting that most people in the US don't remember what the Vietnam war was about in any form (neither the trumped up allegations nor the actual causes).
 
No I read somewhere that most of the Air Force were busy with training exercises up north and weren't available to scramble to shoot down passenger jets used as missiles, one of which that was barreling towards the pentagon, that rammed a wall that just happened to be closed for renovations. wow much coincidence.

Can't tell if shitposting or not. But there is a reason why that part of the pentagon was closed for renovations. 9/11 is the day they do renovations and they've been doing for decades. The always renovate on the anniversary of the pentagon (Which was coincidentally 9/11 so the government must have had a lot of foresight since the 40s). Which also raises the question of wasn't the WTC evacuated like the pentagon was? Once again fucking nothing, I bet the israelis were also remote controlling the planes too huh?

Judging by the previous attacks in london which were poorly carried out, I doubt ISIS gets even close to the white house before they get snipped.
 
Believe it or not, the government being incompetent isn't a conspiracy. It's the government being the government. You could burst into the president's office with taped video footage of someone planning to nuke Nebraska and they'd probably ignore it unless you slipped them a few grand under the table.

I'm sure this was all incompetence as well.

article-1230824-075CFD49000005DC-984_468x555.jpg
 
What brave warriors of unsurpassed faith, these IS-jihadis. To threaten the life of a little boy.

If only they knew that in the MOSSAD, they refer to Trump's son as Barron "Mess with me and become Carrion" Trump.

No I read somewhere that most of the Air Force were busy with training exercises up north and weren't available to scramble to shoot down passenger jets used as missiles, one of which that was barreling towards the pentagon, that rammed a wall that just happened to be closed for renovations. wow much coincidence.
Fighterjets were scrambled, you massive autist. They just couldn't get there in time - mainly due to a lack of military radar stations in the american mainland and the planes switching off their transponders.


ections 9 and 10 of the memo are said by Gore Vidal to be the "smoking gun" revealed in Stinnett's book, suggesting it was central to the high level plan to lure the Japanese into an attack. Evidence the memo or derivative works actually reached President Roosevelt, senior administration officials, or the highest levels of U.S. Navy command, is circumstantial, at best. Regardless, the US Government followed all the recommendations of the McCollum memo, and the Japanese attacked the US as the McCollum memo indicated they might, and no evidence has been presented that indicates Roosevelt did not see it.
This is the most autistic thing I've seen on this forum in a long time... and I'm following the Brad Watson thread.
:story:

When Commodore Matthew Perry showed up and forced the unequal treaties upon the japanese, they modernized their military and society and at the turn of the century, began to go completely batshit insane. Driven by an inferiority complex towards the west and their own megalomania, they tried to set up a big sphere of influence by attacking China, Russia and Korea. The western nations were a hindrance to their plans - especially America, since it was cutting off Japan from Oil while Japan was expanding their empire with fire and sword.

Yeah. America totally tricked the japanese into attacking them. :story:
 
When Commodore Matthew Perry showed up and forced the unequal treaties upon the japanese, they modernized their military and society and at the turn of the century, began to go completely batshit insane. Driven by an inferiority complex towards the west and their own megalomania, they tried to set up a big sphere of influence by attacking China, Russia and Korea. The western nations were a hindrance to their plans - especially America, since it was cutting off Japan from Oil while Japan was expanding their empire with fire and sword.

Yeah. America totally tricked the japanese into attacking them. :story:

So you are saying that Japan, launching a surprise attack on the largest and most powerful naval fleet in history, with planes they could barely keep in the air at the time, due to them only being recently industrialized, and a lack of oil, was a master stroke that would completely cripple the US Military, and cause the US to immediately surrender.

I'm sure Japan never thought, the US would not immediately declare war, go into War economy mode, join WWII, and then eventually wipe two of your cities of the face of the earth. Anyone could see that Japan attacking Pearl Harbor was basically them deciding it's time to suicide run. How terrible the Japanese were, occupying Manchuria. Surely the US or any other Western country would never use military force for a land grab. Like say Guam, American Samoa, or the Dominican Republic.

The US was the bully, flicking the Japanese in the ear til he attempts to throw a cheap shot, then the US turns around an piledrives him into the pavement, saying that it's the Japanese that threw the first punch.

But hey, that's politics isn't it. The American government is nicer than other governments because, reasons. You don't get to be the superpower of the world by being "nice".
 
Last edited:
Sorry guys, my autism has been triggered.

So you are saying that Japan, launching a surprise attack on the largest and most powerful naval fleet in history, with planes they could barely keep in the air at the time, due to them only being recently industrialized, and a lack of oil, was a master stroke that would completely cripple the US Military, and cause the US to immediately surrender.

I'm sure Japan never thought, the US would not immediately declare war, go into War economy mode, join WWII, and then eventually wipe two of your cities of the face of the earth. Anyone could see that Japan attacking Pearl Harbor was basically them deciding it's time to suicide run. How terrible the Japanese were, occupying Manchuria. Surely the US or any other Western country would never use military force for a land grab. Like say Guam, American Samoa, or the Dominican Republic.

The US was the bully, flicking the Japanese in the ear til he attempts to throw a cheap shot, then the US turns around an piledrives him into the pavement, saying that it's the Japanese that threw the first punch.

But hey, that's politics isn't it. The American government is nicer than other governments because, reasons. You don't get to be the superpower of the world by being "nice".

Thanks for showcasing how you have absolutely no clue of what you're talking about.

Japan modernized at an insane speed and went toe to toe with Russia in 1904/05 and won. In WW1 they sided with the Allies and conquered the German colonies in Asia.

By the time the Pacific War broke out, Japan was in all regards equal to western powers.
The Mitsubishi A6M Zero was outstanding in its climb rate, range, maneuverability and speed at the start of the war (its shortcomings would emerge later on, though). The Nakajima B5N Kate is considered one of the finest Carrier-based Torpedo Bombers of WW2. And they had very skilled pilots.
If anything, the japanese military leadership lacked imagination, which made them cling to an outdated Battleship doctrine when Carriers slowly started to take over the waves - however fwiw that did mean they build the biggest and most powerful Battleship of all time.
The lack of oil didn't become a major factor until the second half of 1942, after the Battle of Midway and the Guadalcanal Campaign.
What you're so conveniently ignoring while talking so badly about the IJN is that they had a huge success in Pearl Harbor - it just wasn't sufficient to decide the war as they expected.

The idea behind the attack on Pearl Harbor was to cripple the Navy and Japan had two massive miscalculations here:
1) They assumed it would take a long time to replace the lost ships and crewmen, thus they could use the time to get footholds all over Asia and dig themselves in
2) That this would actually break the american war spirit, since they'd start at such a disadvantage that they'd not be willing to engage the japanese fleet in the first place.

Japan completely underestimated the power of the lust for revenge and the capabilities of the american war economy. It seems they did not learn from the Lusitania incident. Meanwhile with Germany pressing on in Europe and the japanese treaty with Stalin, the Japanese were reassured that they'd not be caught up in between 2 enemies.
But this just to clarify a few things.

Japan didn't need encouragement to attack the US. They had been expanding very very aggressively in Asia for decades and they even left the League of Nations in protest over every other country telling them to stop. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor for no other reason than to help their war efforts in Asia. To say they were tricked/bullied into an attack by the US is simply delusional and shows a severe lack of knowledge concerning the political situation of pre-WW2 Asia in general and Japan in particular. Full stop.

But come to think about it, I honestly don't understand what point you're trying to make here. You say that the US tricked Japan into attacking so they could join the war. Ok, fine. How did they trick them? You spent a whole lot of words to describe why it might have been a terrible mistake to attack Pearl Harbor, but how is that relevant to your argument? You called the American Navy the strongest fleet in the world (Great Britain would like to have a word with you on that one, btw.), so why did the japanese attack if it was such a terrible idea to begin with?
Oh sure, that's in favor of your ridiculous conspiracy theory, but why exactly should the japanese comply if it's going to fuck their shit up?
 
Sorry guys, my autism has been triggered.



Thanks for showcasing how you have absolutely no clue of what you're talking about.

Japan modernized at an insane speed and went toe to toe with Russia in 1904/05 and won. In WW1 they sided with the Allies and conquered the German colonies in Asia.

By the time the Pacific War broke out, Japan was in all regards equal to western powers.
The Mitsubishi A6M Zero was outstanding in its climb rate, range, maneuverability and speed at the start of the war (its shortcomings would emerge later on, though). The Nakajima B5N Kate is considered one of the finest Carrier-based Torpedo Bombers of WW2. And they had very skilled pilots.
If anything, the japanese military leadership lacked imagination, which made them cling to an outdated Battleship doctrine when Carriers slowly started to take over the waves - however fwiw that did mean they build the biggest and most powerful Battleship of all time.
The lack of oil didn't become a major factor until the second half of 1942, after the Battle of Midway and the Guadalcanal Campaign.
What you're so conveniently ignoring while talking so badly about the IJN is that they had a huge success in Pearl Harbor - it just wasn't sufficient to decide the war as they expected.

The idea behind the attack on Pearl Harbor was to cripple the Navy and Japan had two massive miscalculations here:
1) They assumed it would take a long time to replace the lost ships and crewmen, thus they could use the time to get footholds all over Asia and dig themselves in
2) That this would actually break the american war spirit, since they'd start at such a disadvantage that they'd not be willing to engage the japanese fleet in the first place.

Japan completely underestimated the power of the lust for revenge and the capabilities of the american war economy. It seems they did not learn from the Lusitania incident. Meanwhile with Germany pressing on in Europe and the japanese treaty with Stalin, the Japanese were reassured that they'd not be caught up in between 2 enemies.
But this just to clarify a few things.

Japan didn't need encouragement to attack the US. They had been expanding very very aggressively in Asia for decades and they even left the League of Nations in protest over every other country telling them to stop. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor for no other reason than to help their war efforts in Asia. To say they were tricked/bullied into an attack by the US is simply delusional and shows a severe lack of knowledge concerning the political situation of pre-WW2 Asia in general and Japan in particular. Full stop.

But come to think about it, I honestly don't understand what point you're trying to make here. You say that the US tricked Japan into attacking so they could join the war. Ok, fine. How did they trick them? You spent a whole lot of words to describe why it might have been a terrible mistake to attack Pearl Harbor, but how is that relevant to your argument? You called the American Navy the strongest fleet in the world (Great Britain would like to have a word with you on that one, btw.), so why did the japanese attack if it was such a terrible idea to begin with?
Oh sure, that's in favor of your ridiculous conspiracy theory, but why exactly should the japanese comply if it's going to fuck their shit up?

But you just said before that any conspiracy regarding America is merely due to incompetence, and yet the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor was a calculated strategic master stroke that no one knew was coming, they just didn't realize the scale of the fallout.

Clearly Japan should have won due to American incompetence. I mean they just keep falling for these surprise attacks that thrust them into global wars.
 
Back