It it morally wrong to use ChatGPT to write your shit posts?

[Sparkletor 2.0]

I'm thinking of using chatGPT to get my post count up so I can be one of the cool kids. Is using AI going against my right-wing neonazi white supremacist morals? It won't even say nigger. I'm conflicted and having an existential dilemma.

 

[peachlover669]

Not morally wrong—just possibly questionable taste, depending on the content.


If your "shit posts" are meant to be light-hearted, ironic, or part of internet humor, using ChatGPT is basically like using a really sarcastic co-writer. No moral foul there. But if you're using it to troll, spread misinformation, or stir up drama without taking responsibility, then it starts to slide into murky ethical territory.


Want help crafting something chaotic but harmless?

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

It's no worse than copypastas.

 

[Ytsuken]

It is not inherently morally wrong to use ChatGPT to write so-called “shit posts,” but the ethics depend on your intent and the potential impact of those posts.


If the content is clearly humorous, satirical, or absurd and intended in good faith as part of a shared cultural or online joke, then using ChatGPT is not ethically problematic in itself. However, if the content is:

• Malicious, such as targeting individuals or groups with abuse, harassment, or misinformation;
• Deceptive, such as presenting AI-generated content as personal experience or expert opinion to manipulate others;
• Amplifying harm, such as spreading harmful ideologies under the guise of humour;

then yes, using an AI to produce that content can be considered morally questionable.


In short: using ChatGPT to write irreverent or humorous posts is not wrong by default, but how you use it and what you publish with its help determines the moral weight.


Would you like help crafting something satirical or absurd in tone?

 

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

The "Sneed's Feed & Seed" joke is a layered visual pun from The Simpsons, specifically from the Season 11 episode titled "E-I-E-I-(Annoyed Grunt)". It’s become a well-known internet meme because of its clever and subtle wordplay. Here's the breakdown

The Sign:​

The storefront sign reads:

"Sneed's Feed & Seed (Formerly Chuck's)"

At first glance, it seems innocent—just a quirky rural business name. But there's a joke hidden in the parenthesis.

The Joke Explained:​

• The business is now called "Sneed's Feed & Seed", meaning it sells feed and seed, and is owned by a guy named Sneed.
• The "Formerly Chuck's" implies that when Chuck owned the store, the name followed the same pattern:
  
  "[Chuck's] [] & []", where the two items rhyme with "Chuck".
• So if Sneed sells Feed & Seed, then Chuck must have sold something that rhymed with Chuck—and rude interpretation leads to:

"Chuck's Fuck & Suck"

Why it's funny:​

1. Subtle Adult Humor: It's a hidden dirty joke that sneaks past censors because it's only implied, not said.
2. Wordplay: It plays on rhyming and naming conventions in rural store signs.
3. Meme Potential: The joke has become a staple of absurdist internet humor due to its dryness and surprise vulgarity when decoded.

---

ChatGPT writes Internet with a lowercase i. Null would disapprove.

 

[We Are The Witches]

Objectively? No.

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

Objectively? No.

This response was written by AI. I can tell by the robotic tone.

 

[We Are The Witches]

This response was written by AI. I can tell by the robotic tone.

Shush, Sparkly Sparkles!

 

[Smokeski]

Just found out my toaster has a "bagel" setting. I don’t eat bagels. I don’t even like bagels. But now every slice of bread I toast feels like it’s underperforming. The toaster knows. I’m not living up to its potential. We’re both disappointed.

 

[LarpBait]

ChatGPT is "Open"AI trash, use one of the open source models to augment your shitposting. I've gotten many great results out of typing out shitposts with blank areas and telling the AI to fill them in, especially for song lyrics

 

[BunchaBabyDucks]

I recently left a ghetto shithole where people use AI to shitpost in degenerate and ritualistic ways daily.
Yes, it is amoral, it is the fucking death of shitposting as an art, where is the goddamn soul in your shitposting,if you just get a generated shitpost scraped from other shitposts.
We’re on the internet to interact with people banter with me like an adult!
I also, find it has a way of writing* that is incredibly boring and unfunny in a way only so-autistic-they’re-asexual techbros would find funny. It is the Big Bang Theory of shitposting.

*Your Language Model will vary this.

It's no worse than copypastas.

Atleast a copypasta knows what it is, a copy.
AI shitposting is trying to pretend it’s original at it’s most honest and trying to prove a point about idiots responding to bait at it’s most dishonest.

 

[pollution jim]

It is not inherently morally wrong to use ChatGPT to write so-called “shit posts,” but the ethics depend on your intent and the potential impact of those posts.


If the content is clearly humorous, satirical, or absurd and intended in good faith as part of a shared cultural or online joke, then using ChatGPT is not ethically problematic in itself. However, if the content is:

• Malicious, such as targeting individuals or groups with abuse, harassment, or misinformation;
• Deceptive, such as presenting AI-generated content as personal experience or expert opinion to manipulate others;
• Amplifying harm, such as spreading harmful ideologies under the guise of humour;

then yes, using an AI to produce that content can be considered morally questionable.


In short: using ChatGPT to write irreverent or humorous posts is not wrong by default, but how you use it and what you publish with its help determines the moral weight.


Would you like help crafting something satirical or absurd in tone?

This isn't AI— There is no em-dash.

 

[Poppavalyim Andropoff]

chatGPT needs some Jesus