Culture ‘It’s a Weird Time to Be Rich Right Now’ - A therapist who specializes in treating the neuroses of the ultrawealthy says that many of his clients are in the privileged position of getting freaked out by eat-the-rich sentiments these days.

1.webp
Photo-Illustration: by The Cut;
Photos: Getty Images


When the one percent starts to feel paranoid, Clay Cockrell is the first to hear about it. A therapist who specializes in treating the neuroses of the ultrawealthy, Cockrell says that many of his clients are in the privileged position of getting freaked out by eat-the-rich sentiments these days. “The Birkin bags are going into hiding,” he says. “I’m seeing a lot of people increasing their security and privacy. They’re worried about being too showy, too flashy.” One client is driving a ten-year-old Toyota and leaving his Lamborghini in the garage; several others have put away their multi-carat diamond rings. They’re all posting less on social media.

A real-estate agent who sells luxury properties in the tristate area is seeing the same thing. “It’s a weird time to be rich right now,” she says. “All the wealthy people I know are keeping their cards closer to the chest.” Sure, maybe they’re a smidge unnerved by the economy’s flashing red warning signs, but they’re largely immune to such things. “When people have that much money, stuff like inflation doesn’t really affect them,” she says. What they do care about, though, is being judged for their conspicuous consumption. “When the whole world is crying poor and you’re living your life in this wealthy bubble, it’s really frowned upon,” she says. They’ve all seen The White Lotus. “No one wants to be like that.”

Obviously, the idea of the über-wealthy wringing their hands about looking too rich is maddening in itself. But many of them don’t know exactly where to turn. One multimillionaire I spoke to, who owns about $15 million in Florida real estate, told me that he’s taking extra precautions to be low-key. “We’re just kind of standing around with our hands in our pockets, not sure what to do,” he says. “We’re not taking any vacations this year. I’d like to, but my wife thinks it’s a better idea to just stay close to home and not spend a lot.” They’re not anxious about their expenses, he says. “It’s more that we don’t want to rub it in people’s faces or draw attention to ourselves.”

Some might even view this swing away from ostentation as an extension of the quiet-luxury trend, but there’s a distinction. These people aren’t going for an IYKYK, old-money aesthetic, which conveys status in its own “tasteful” way; they’re genuinely trying to downplay what they have. It’s not just quiet — it’s silent. In an era of rising economic tension and class rage, a rich person’s privacy has become the ultimate commodity. They don’t want to be seen at the Chanel store. If they go to St.-Tropez, they’ll keep their circle tight.

Cockrell started noticing an undercurrent of nervousness among his clients after the UnitedHealthcare CEO was shot this past December. “I heard a lot of, ‘We’re getting gunned down in the street now,’” he recalls. Then came the inauguration, that striking display of American oligarchy. “There’s been a mood shift since everyone saw that row of billionaires sitting with Trump,” he says. “In times past, wealthy people were considered aspirational figures. Now, it’s more like, ‘If you’re wealthy, you did something wrong. You cannot be a billionaire without being a criminal. The system is stacked against the rest of us.’ And that has gotten louder and louder, and my clients are hearing it, and it’s disturbing to them.”

Katherine Fox, a financial adviser who caters to people who have inherited money (and has inherited money herself), says that many of her clients hide their wealth because they’re worried about how it might be perceived. “A lot of younger inheritors have this huge amount of internalized guilt and fear that has no outlet because they can’t talk about these things with anyone,” she says. “Especially over the past couple of months, when they’re faced with the overwhelming scope of problems in the world, they feel like they should be doing a bigger part to make a difference. But then it’s like, Well, what does that even look like?

Unlike most of her clients, Fox is public about her inheritance and posts frequently about it online. “I know it’s rage-bait,” she says. “I get a ton of comments like, ‘Eat the rich,’ or ‘Just give it all away.’ But I am careful to moderate the more controversial stuff I post with captions that recognize the privilege and nuance of the situation.” Most people don’t read those, but she’s made her peace with that. “If I was the type of person who was bothered by angry trolls, I could never put myself out there the way I do. But I’m confident enough in what I’m actually saying that I can live with it.”

Her honesty has also been great for her business. Fox used to work in wealth management at Wells Fargo, where she realized that clients with multigenerational wealth — like she also had — came with a unique set of needs, financially and psychologically, that weren’t being met by more traditional advisers. So she broke off and started her own firm, Sunnybranch Wealth, a few years ago. “My impetus was to use my personal and professional expertise to help these people and also to normalize the fact that their problems are real,” she says. “They may only affect the top one percent of the one percent, but they are still problems. It’s just that no one talks about them because it’s not socially acceptable.” Sure, she gets a lot of hateful messages online, but she also hears from fellow inheritors with no one else to talk to. “I’m just the one saying the quiet parts out loud,” she says.

If you’re wondering, she does encourage her clients to donate to charity. “But you can’t just give it all away tomorrow,” she says. “First of all, it’s not that simple. It’s logistically difficult. Then you’re still going to be dealing with the same guilt and uncertainty of, Did I make the right decision?

Of course, there are plenty of rich people who don’t have any qualms about enjoying their money as visibly as possible, who have even made excess their personal brand. As Cockrell points out, those usually aren’t the types who reach out to him or lie awake at night fearing a Marxist revolution. “Great wealth can make empathy challenging, let’s put it that way,” he says. Studies even show that wealthier people tend to be less compassionate; researchers postulate that it’s because their money insulates them from needing to cultivate and rely on (and care about) their communities. Cockrell notes that many of his clients live cloistered lives, cut off from the economic realities of tariffs and inflation and a looming recession.

He’s also seen that popular sentiment toward the über-rich is cyclical. “The last time the backlash against the wealthy was this strong was probably at the beginning of the pandemic,” he says, alluding to the stark divide between the people who quarantined in their country estates with live-in staff and those who had to risk their lives to deliver takeout. Before that, the lowest moment was probably the Great Recession, when he was just starting his career as a therapist and had a few clients who worked on Wall Street. “Societal attitudes toward the wealthy ebb and flow,” he says. “There will be moments when people get more comfortable, take their diamond bracelet out of the safe and start wearing it again.”

The real danger of times like this, he says, is not that rich people will face actual harm from the ravaging masses. (“Or at least, it’s extremely unlikely,” he clarifies.) Rather, it’s that their fears of public judgment and animosity — no matter how much they might deserve it — drive them further into their sequestered, comfortable worlds, away from a sense of accountability or responsibility. “For a lot of my clients, there’s a degree of confusion. Like, ‘One day I’m looked up to, and the next day, I am vilified. But I haven’t done anything horrible, and nothing has changed. What do I do?’”

The answer, he believes, is encouraging them to understand why regular people might feel so angry about the concentration of wealth, and to get involved in their communities. “I try to get them to be curious and to connect with people outside their orbit. Don’t just write a check — hand out blankets, ladle soup, have an impact, and interact with people in a way that’s meaningful,” he says.

But for some, stepping out of their manicured lives is just too intimidating — or, in this climate, feels too risky. They’d prefer to hole up and retreat into their money instead. “They can lead incredibly isolated lives,” Cockrell says. “It’s not good for anyone.”

Article Link

Archive
 
Last edited:
You could try paying people a fair wage for a fair days work, that might make people more sympathetic when you are gunned down in the streets. Outside that maybe don't look for every opertunity possible to give a cheaper shittier product to the end user for a higher price. Ohh, and also maybe allow people to actually own the fucking things they buy.
It really is insane how these people see the profit motive as some inescapable law that requires them to be evil and all ramifications from that are outside their control.
What they really ought to do if they want to be beloved instead of reviled is take all that wealth and use it to start some private ventures that don't have a fiduciary responsibility to public shareholders so they can actually do the things you say.

That sounds like a lot of work though. They just want to vacation in Aspen while continuing to collect their rent from a machine that exploits others.
 
You should be scared. We don't view you as our fellow countryman. You are a parasitic blight who's self interest has led to the suffering and exploitation of others. You have things we can only dream of. Been places we will only see pictures of. You live a life of extreme security, comfort, prosperity, and affluence.

Most of your perceived lessers have the audacity to want a house and affordable food in there lifetime. You struggle to decide on taking a vacation or not this year.

Rather odd you and your people are viscerally opposed to gun ownership and flaunt your riches as you do.

Nice gated community you got here...
 
Most people don't object to rich people existing. It is the antisocial bullshit they keep pulling that is the problem, not their wealth. The author is butthurt about Trump and co, but the American people put him and his friends there, over the screaming objections of rest of the ruling class, so it clearly isn't the wealthy per se that people object to. Trump is a famously extravagent billionaire who is known for owning gold versions of normal things, and yet his support base tends to be poor people. Trump is there because he is one of the few members of the ruling class that has noticed America kind of sucks to live in for most people, and he wants to at least try to fix it. For all their butthurt about him, I think Trump may well be their last chance to resolve things peacefully and within the confines of the existing political system before things boil over. If they were wise, they'd help him instead of doing everything in their power to blocka nd sabotage him. It transcendes party too. Many "Republicans" are as much a part of the problem as Democrats, and half of Trump's movement are old school Democrats who remember the working class exists. Watching politics over the last few years, it has become inescapable to me that the entire ruling class is the problem. They basically want all the perks of being rich and powerful, but they don't want to accept any limitations, or to put in any effort to make the country work properly.

The psuedo-Marxist framework they have been educated in restricts them to looking at things through the lens of class, so they feel guilty about being rich. The truth is, most people don't care. Just govern the country in a manner that doesn't make life suck for normal people. The real faultline is between nationalists and globalists. If you are trying to make your country a better place, you will probably be fine, even if you are rich. If you just want to loot the North American economic zone, then things are probably going to get worse for you. Have a sense of sexual propriety and keep away from kids. Stop telling people to hate themselves for being born white. Stop trying to destroy the native working class by outsourcing everything, and then importing a ton of hostile foreigners for the stuff you can't outsource. It blows my mind how they don't get it, because it is so obvious, and they could have easily nipped this in the bud decades ago.
 
Trump is a famously extravagent billionaire who is known for owning gold versions of normal things, and yet his support base tends to be poor people.
Socialism has always been a method by which authoritarians manipulate the poor into doing their bidding. Luigi breaking ranks and getting wide support for doing so must have a bunch of them scared as hell.
Buddy, there are few things in this world more cringe than middle/upper class people pretending to be poor on the internet.
 
No one really hates the scummy acts the rich do to enrich themselves, they're just mad they aren't the ones committing those scummy acts to enrich themselves.
Pretty much.

It's just envy and jealousy.

I don't hate billionaires, I admire them. Nobody worries about their property values if a billionaire moves into their neighborhood, the opposite can't be said when "working class" people move in.
 
I know a few rich people. Couple of self made multimillionaires, couple of random aristos I went to uni with. Not billionaires, but a combo of old money and decent enough new.
None of them are showy. Where I live it’s seen as very déclassé to show off money. The multimillionairess lives in a standard house and drives a beat up Volvo. The old money, you’d never know it until you visited them at home. Corduroys with holes in, beat up car, you’d peg them closer to poor than rich unless you were very attuned to accent.
I don’t have a problem with people being rich, but I do have an issue with people who trod over a lot of others to get there and stay there. And my main ire is reserved for the ones who use the money to engineer society. Have the decency to shove it up your nose or shower it on expensive hookers and leave the rest of us alone
 
The simplest explanation is their increase in wealth is more and more ill-gotten and driven by taking it from everyone else or manipulating money, not by producing, innovating or investing in long-term development.

They're taking a bigger piece of the pie from everyone else through corruption in government and unaccountable institutions like the Federal Reserve, not getting a bigger slice because the pie is bigger and people as a whole are collectively better off. It is going on a generation of this decline and shows no signs of stopping.

Something will give and this should be a warning sign that disaster is imminent without action, a lot like when earthquakes start happening around a volcano.
 
Most people don't object to rich people existing. It is the antisocial bullshit they keep pulling that is the problem, not their wealth. The author is butthurt about Trump and co, but the American people put him and his friends there, over the screaming objections of rest of the ruling class, so it clearly isn't the wealthy per se that people object to. Trump is a famously extravagent billionaire who is known for owning gold versions of normal things, and yet his support base tends to be poor people. Trump is there because he is one of the few members of the ruling class that has noticed America kind of sucks to live in for most people, and he wants to at least try to fix it. For all their butthurt about him, I think Trump may well be their last chance to resolve things peacefully and within the confines of the existing political system before things boil over. If they were wise, they'd help him instead of doing everything in their power to blocka nd sabotage him. It transcendes party too. Many "Republicans" are as much a part of the problem as Democrats, and half of Trump's movement are old school Democrats who remember the working class exists. Watching politics over the last few years, it has become inescapable to me that the entire ruling class is the problem. They basically want all the perks of being rich and powerful, but they don't want to accept any limitations, or to put in any effort to make the country work properly.

The psuedo-Marxist framework they have been educated in restricts them to looking at things through the lens of class, so they feel guilty about being rich. The truth is, most people don't care. Just govern the country in a manner that doesn't make life suck for normal people. The real faultline is between nationalists and globalists. If you are trying to make your country a better place, you will probably be fine, even if you are rich. If you just want to loot the North American economic zone, then things are probably going to get worse for you. Have a sense of sexual propriety and keep away from kids. Stop telling people to hate themselves for being born white. Stop trying to destroy the native working class by outsourcing everything, and then importing a ton of hostile foreigners for the stuff you can't outsource. It blows my mind how they don't get it, because it is so obvious, and they could have easily nipped this in the bud decades ago.

Yup. When it comes to the ultrarich, for me it's "You hate the ultrarich because you are a talentless cockroach who hates anyone with more money than you, I hate the ultrarich because they are globalists who actively encourage third-world immigration and seek policies to make the common man poorer and the world worse; we are not the same."
 
Douglas Adams already did it.

“Do you want to have a good time?” said a voice from a doorway.
“As far as I can tell,” said Ford, “I'm having one. Thanks.”
“Are you rich?” said another.
This made Ford laugh.
He turned and opened his arms in a wide gesture. “Do I look rich?” he said.
“Don't know,” said the girl. “Maybe, maybe not. Maybe you'll get rich. I have a very special service for rich people ...”
“Oh yes?” said Ford, intrigued but careful. “And what's that?”
“I tell them it's OK to be rich.”
Ford stopped and peered into the dark doorway.
“You what?” he said.
The girl laughed and stepped forward a little out of the shadow. She was tall, and had that kind of self-possessed shyness which is a great trick if you can do it.
“It's my big number,” she said. “I have a Master's degree in Social Economics and can be very convincing. People love it. Especially in this city.”
“Goosnargh,” said Ford Prefect, which was a special Betelgeusian word he used when he knew he should say something but didn't know what it should be.
Walking north he again passed a steel grey limousine parked by the kerbside, and from a nearby doorway he heard a soft voice saying, “It's OK, honey, it's really OK, you got to learn to feel good about it. Look at the way the whole economy is structured ...”
I often wonder what Douglas Adams would have made of the current nightmare.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: cactus
If you didn't want Class War, why create the conditions for it?

Part of the problem is that most of them subscribe to globalism and actively sell out their own country and countrymen. Most of the others just don't have any idea how their company works. If you own a chain of restaurants or stores, don't just say that you'll increase wages, actually talk to employees and ask them questions about what the real problems are. I bet every one of the real issue of all of these big corporations is that middle management is overrun with incompetent assholes which infect every facet of the company.

James Burnham talks about this already happening in the 1940s. In many ways, we've already hit a post-capitalist society as the capitalists, while still technically owning most things, don't actually run them. The manager and bureaucrat do.

That might be worse. The rich want to make money, but the bureaucrats want *control.*
 
I know a few rich people. Couple of self made multimillionaires, couple of random aristos I went to uni with. Not billionaires, but a combo of old money and decent enough new.
None of them are showy. Where I live it’s seen as very déclassé to show off money. The multimillionairess lives in a standard house and drives a beat up Volvo. The old money, you’d never know it until you visited them at home. Corduroys with holes in, beat up car, you’d peg them closer to poor than rich unless you were very attuned to accent.
I don’t have a problem with people being rich, but I do have an issue with people who trod over a lot of others to get there and stay there. And my main ire is reserved for the ones who use the money to engineer society. Have the decency to shove it up your nose or shower it on expensive hookers and leave the rest of us alone
I agree with this comment and considering that I've dealt with the super rich in my life I've come to this conclusion.

The Air Thieves must go. The immorality of this group is beyond comprehension for most normies.
They have the literal power of a god to destroy your life. Or one way or another, just make you disappear.

As proven many of times on this site and elseware, many of the super rich have a real tendency of being narcissistic and/or sociopathic mindset.

The ones I've met always have this "what have you done for me lately" approach in establishing any sort of relationship. Business or otherwise.

Shit man, lets just kick back and drink a beer or two and try to enjoy life instead of how many bitches you fucked in your private jet/yacht.

Naa... it's just not their way to be and act as an normal human.

So for the sake of humanity... IMHO... The Air Thieves must Go...
 
Back