Opinion It’s hard to be right when arguing with the right - Conservatives’ rhetoric shows that their ideas are not raised in good faith

It’s hard to be right when arguing with the right​

maga.jpg

Colin Houston, Opinion Columnist | October 13, 2022

When you look at the rhetoric and policies of the American left, a noticeable trend appears in the way liberals attempt to engage with the right. Specifically, liberals tend to be interested in reason and the effectiveness of compromise, believing that their political opponents have good intentions, but different ideas for their implementation.
While it may be true that the average conservative on the street has good intentions, their beliefs come from people who very much do not. The ideology and rhetoric of the American right are based on one thing — maintaining a status quo that exists to exclude essentially anyone from power and security who falls outside the lines of white, cishet and male. Conservatives scoff at this and accuse the left of making radical attacks based on a mere difference of opinions, but I’m fed up with pretending they have any rhetorical leg to stand on.
Conservatives’ rhetoric shows that their ideas are not raised in good faith. For example, the House of Representatives passed the Respect for Marriage Act this year, the aim of which is to codify the protection of same-sex marriage into law. 77% of House Republicans voted no and justified it with unbelievable mental gymnastics, such as North Carolina representative Dan Bishop, who called it an attack on Americans who hold traditional views of marriage. This seems like an almost impossible conclusion for a Constitution-loving Republican to arrive at, considering freedom of religion is guaranteed by the First Amendment, but that apparently doesn’t matter.

That issue hardly stands alone when it comes to inflammatory Republican rhetoric. When people raise genuine concerns about the wave of anti-trans legislation pushed by Republicans nationwide, Republicans such as Ron DeSantis have accused them of pedophilia and child grooming. When people raise concerns about an abortion ban’s effect on women’s rights, Republicans have accused them of supporting murder. When there was a push to improve public education about America’s racist past and its effect on the present, Republicans fought tooth and nail to demonize critical race theory and accuse the left of being racist against white people.

Through this type of rhetoric, Republican politicians and pundits have managed to convince tens of millions of people to ignore all evidence against the notion that their ideas are benevolent when their rhetorical strategies betray the fact that their primary interest is to preserve social hierarchies conservatives have perpetuated for centuries. Considering a significant number of conservative ideologues studied at schools such as Harvard and Stanford in fields explicitly related to politics and history, you’ll have a hard time convincing me they don’t know exactly what they’re doing.
As such, it is unproductive to act as if the only difference between the American left and the American right is perspective when conservative rhetoric proves to be consistently inflammatory and violent. Trying to defeat them in the marketplace of ideas will only allow them more of a platform to spread this rhetoric, and trying to compromise with them is similar to trying to get a brick wall to move out of your way.

With all of that in mind, it’s maddening to see people on the left try to dumb down their own ideas or make them more moderate to appease the right when all that accomplishes is decreasing their effectiveness. Powerful conservatives don’t care how moderate the American left makes itself because they know they can get away with calling them socialists and radicals anyway, so there is absolutely no disadvantage to fighting back with policies that are actually effective.
This doesn’t mean liberals and leftists should cut all conservatives out of their lives (unless their presence is harmful or dangerous) because the Republican base being isolated from people who have different views is not a solution. What it does mean is that, when it comes to political engagement, it’s time for the American left to care much less about what conservatives think and to care more about victory in the realms of social and economic justice above all else. Organize, look into mutual aid and pay attention, because making a real change means winning where it really matters.

About the Contributor
cuck.jpg

Colin Houston, Opinion Columnist
My name is Colin Houston, and I’m an opinion columnist for the Trinitonian. I’m a sophomore from San Antonio most likely majoring in political science...
 
Specifically, liberals tend to be interested in reason
and the effectiveness of compromise
believing that their political opponents have good intentions,

This is probably the most egregious lie I'll ever read all week.

The worst part is that you know it's a lie because it upholds the concept of compromise as if it's necessarily a good or measured thing, when both liberals and conservatives can appreciate that compromise isn't inherently good.

It comes off as disingenuous, as if the author is specifically on a mission to talk up "his side" as all good and rational-- as opposed to actually believing it.
 
"We are so infallible that we must silence all opposition! They only criticize us because they're racist sexist fascist poopyhead meanies!"

circular_reasoning_works.jpg

When people raise genuine concerns about the wave of anti-trans legislation pushed by Republicans nationwide, Republicans such as Ron DeSantis have accused them of pedophilia and child grooming. When people raise concerns about an abortion ban’s effect on women’s rights, Republicans have accused them of supporting murder. When there was a push to improve public education about America’s racist past and its effect on the present, Republicans fought tooth and nail to demonize critical race theory and accuse the left of being racist against white people.
Where is the lie?
 
This is probably the most egregious lie I'll ever read all week.

The worst part is that you know it's a lie because it upholds the concept of compromise as if it's necessarily a good or measured thing, when both liberals and conservatives can appreciate that compromise isn't inherently good.

It comes off as disingenuous, as if the author is specifically on a mission to talk up "his side" as all good and rational-- as opposed to actually believing it.
There's that one famous study that asked libtards and conservatives to answer a survey about what they believe, and then answer the same questions about how they think vice versa would answer. The conservatives knew exactly how liberals would answer the survey for the most part, and libtards had 0 clue. They're utterly ignorant of everything, most especially their own ignorance.
 
As such, it is unproductive to act as if the only difference between the American left and the American right is perspective when conservative rhetoric proves to be consistently inflammatory and violent.
Yeah, people get hostile when you want them silenced and disenfranchised.
What kind of self aggrandizing, egotistical, smug cunt spends this much time rhetorically masturbating about how much better their team is compared to the other team?

View attachment 3747615

Oh. You can practically smell the condescension through this picture. Another victory for phrenology.
Or when they realize the kommissar who claims moral and legal authority over them looks like this.
Trying to defeat them in the marketplace of ideas will only allow them more of a platform to spread this rhetoric, and trying to compromise with them is similar to trying to get a brick wall to move out of your way.
In other words, liberal ideas get their shit pushed in upon the slightest iota of scrutiny. They'd rather invent new words ("bothsidesism") than acknowledge that opinions other than their own exist.
The ideology and rhetoric of the American right are based on one thing — maintaining a status quo that exists to exclude essentially anyone from power and security who falls outside the lines of white, cishet and male.
This form of ad hominem is one of Marxists' most common dismissals of their idiocy. "You're just an apologist for the oppressor class! Go to gulag!"
 
Specifically, liberals tend to be interested in reason and the effectiveness of compromise
Compromise...
396a5363f5b0928069996a3709333fb604a1738b38641429546cbc451bc03447_1.jpg

Also, most youngfags might not remember but Reagan "compromised" on immigration and legalized 2.7 million illegal aliens for the promise of border security.

Yet today, we have Democrats pushing to tear down border walls in urban areas. Funding for some sort of border barrier was a compromise for more immigrants until Trump wanted to do it.


The movement of a large set of Democrat voters is Progressivism meaning a constant move forward. That movement is antithetical to compromise as it's just a speed bump to their goals.
 
What kind of self aggrandizing, egotistical, smug cunt spends this much time rhetorically masturbating about how much better their team is compared to the other team?

View attachment 3747615

Oh. You can practically smell the condescension through this picture. Another victory for phrenology.
Okay, seriously.

What genes do you have to merge to get a human neck and head combination like that? It always looks strange to me.
 
When you look at the rhetoric and policies of the American left, a noticeable trend appears in the way liberals attempt to engage with the right. Specifically, liberals tend to be interested in reason and the effectiveness of compromise, believing that their political opponents have good intentions, but different ideas for their implementation.

LOL no, they lie cheat and steal any which way they can to browbeat the over person into submission, see below for an example:

Conservatives’ rhetoric shows that their ideas are not raised in good faith. For example, the House of Representatives passed the Respect for Marriage Act this year, the aim of which is to codify the protection of same-sex marriage into law. 77% of House Republicans voted no and justified it with unbelievable mental gymnastics, such as North Carolina representative Dan Bishop, who called it an attack on Americans who hold traditional views of marriage. This seems like an almost impossible conclusion for a Constitution-loving Republican to arrive at, considering freedom of religion is guaranteed by the First Amendment, but that apparently doesn’t matter.

Man(?) can't even keep it straight 2 paragraphs later...
 
There's that one famous study that asked libtards and conservatives to answer a survey about what they believe, and then answer the same questions about how they think vice versa would answer. The conservatives knew exactly how liberals would answer the survey for the most part, and libtards had 0 clue. They're utterly ignorant of everything, most especially their own ignorance.
Would love a link and archive.
 
Back