- A lot of individuals in your "past" whom you think disappeared are actually following all of this, and are willing to testify against you if any of this shit gets taken to court.
This one helps to keep her unemployed in the cyber field. Her answer was to draft up the idea if someone points out your past in public that is a "SAAPP".
VS accountability. Like Jackie says when she's asking employers to 'look into the actions' of an employee. Why does Jackie engage in SAAPPing others?
Anyone who she was insulting in the IRC days, the people who are buddies with Jason the Better who feel her depredation of him being the genetic father means Jason was done dirty, whomever she has tried to get fired with her social media "activism", co-workers from her accusations of some *ism all have a reason to do things from watch, watch with popcorn, to make sure old logs are published.
Edit:
Jackie has a new term to explain her past pubic display of stupidity.
The response to 'I think this fire detector is actually spying on me' is a new, exciting framework! The "surveillance panic".
Her work in tracking down the Swede was SO important along with the ties to diplomats and federal judges means why shouldn't she be in a panic?
What will be the name of the next 'framework' to attempt to explain why people are posting about her online? Adultry Mocking? GNAA posters posting on lightpoles? "Users Stating Internet Now Gotta Experience Removal Soon" or USINGER'S to keep the framework in the Patverse?
https://www.usinger.com/ for those not up on all the possible processed meats of Milwaukee. Patrick Cudahy would be another example.
