- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Everything about this street-shitter is unpleasant. She has to be one of the dumbest, most unlikeable people alive. What a stupid street-shitting whore. There is nothing likeable about this worthless cunt.
Jackie Singh / Jacqueline Singh / Jacqueline Anne Stokes / Jax / @find_evil / HackingButLegal / @HackingButLegal / piggytomlinson - Cybersecurity "expert," wannabe journoscum, former "hacker"; gunt guards Patrick Tomlinson, currently picking a fight with ONA Forums, GNAA Groupie
- Thread starter Sexy Senior Citizen
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2023
Bitch says “right???” more often than Kamala fucking Harris. Also her mouth is more lopsided than CWJ’s. Has she had a stroke?
Imagine being in that audience and listening to this dumb cow pretend to be a superhero for faildoxing. “Has anyone been wondering how I manage to do all this? Of course you have. Here’s why I’m so amazing!”
Fucking embarrassing.
It is good to know though that Null and Quasi are both funded by Russian oligarchs. That’s not a schizo theory at ALL.
Imagine being in that audience and listening to this dumb cow pretend to be a superhero for faildoxing. “Has anyone been wondering how I manage to do all this? Of course you have. Here’s why I’m so amazing!”
Fucking embarrassing.
It is good to know though that Null and Quasi are both funded by Russian oligarchs. That’s not a schizo theory at ALL.
"I laughed it off...and I totally didn't care...even though it's illegal...and I have kids...and I complained to have it removed...but ya, I totally, 100%, didn't care. I'm so cool, and I was totally in control, and I fer shure wanted them to dox me and post partial nudes of me...reverse psychology ya know...dang I'm L33t"
21:14 - 22:32
Just a reminder of "the partial state of undress" she is talking about.
Jackie's DOB | Mar 12, 1985
WebcamXP didn't even exist as a released version until 2002.
Meaning when this still beta (Red XP, not superscript) version was just starting to make the rounds on a very early Internet, Jackie was at least 16.
Oh and around that time she was posting stuff like this.
"I LOVE SATAN, 666, DEATH TO ALL KIDS, KILL & MAIM & DESTROY DIE"
21:14 - 22:32
Just a reminder of "the partial state of undress" she is talking about.
Jackie's DOB | Mar 12, 1985
WebcamXP didn't even exist as a released version until 2002.
Meaning when this still beta (Red XP, not superscript) version was just starting to make the rounds on a very early Internet, Jackie was at least 16.
Oh and around that time she was posting stuff like this.
"I LOVE SATAN, 666, DEATH TO ALL KIDS, KILL & MAIM & DESTROY DIE"
Vect
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2020
Stranger still, she looks like the Imperial Inquisitor from Jedi Fallen Order.
Well, if she'd been on a diet of Yuengling and Ben & Jerry's for the past two years.
On the subject of malevolence, I've kind of wondered if she's the reason Pat interacts so regularly but so perfunctorily with his trolls. Like she's told him that if he keeps loudly and publicly feeding the trolls and provoking an extended reaction from them with the same catchphrase (while attributing them with criminal behavior) and acting out on Xwitter, she can get them both some national attention as a cyberbullying case study and his benevolent security expert.
AutoClownMaker
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2020
Jackie's "right" speech pattern is also in her interviews with the Trump is bad group. It is like she bought access to a tiktok class on closing a sale and her interpretation of getting the client to become agreeable to the purchase was to say right at the end of a sentence.
Note that the view count of Jackie's presentation is 100 over the other presentation. it is at 256 views so an argument of over 1/3 of the views are watching just because of the special nature of Jackie.
Pat has been interacting with the trolls longer than Jackie started interacting with Patrick as far as I know. The idea of 'now please stop contacting me' as an element for a successful harassment lawsuit goes back farther than Pat attracting the attention of the pests.
Jackie is hoping for positive notoriety and public ass pats over herself being "SAAPPP"ed and by defending Patrick she's getting people calling her a not sexually desirable overweight person with poor bowl control. By getting name called on "illegal sites dedicated to harassment" she then gets to deflect the GNAA claims posted to these sites as just part of the harassment and therefore obviously made up. Foul people saying foul things should be rejected because they are foul people is valid logic for swaths of humanity. Yet, somehow, Ms Singh was not a person of interest of the foul people when Gene Spafford had the GNAA callout of Ms. Singh.
While Patrick has had the cops visit both him and had his name tied to a Patty LaBell concert he should have more sympathy, Patrick is not a generally sympathetic character. Tim Pool isn't a very sympathetic character and he's got many youtube videos from various people who have a shared audience where Tim will get a sympathetic reaction. ishowspeed swatting got covered by moist critical. Patrick's coverage? News reports and people talking about pay quazi are who covered Pat swats.
Jackie earned a thread in April 2023. Patrick in Jan 2020. Pattie LaBelle bomb threat on Dec 11, 2022. There is a logic of sorts in tying your fate to a concert bomb hoax event, even if the subject is unlikable enough to inspire what is called "Pat posting".
Note that the view count of Jackie's presentation is 100 over the other presentation. it is at 256 views so an argument of over 1/3 of the views are watching just because of the special nature of Jackie.
Pat has been interacting with the trolls longer than Jackie started interacting with Patrick as far as I know. The idea of 'now please stop contacting me' as an element for a successful harassment lawsuit goes back farther than Pat attracting the attention of the pests.
Jackie is hoping for positive notoriety and public ass pats over herself being "SAAPPP"ed and by defending Patrick she's getting people calling her a not sexually desirable overweight person with poor bowl control. By getting name called on "illegal sites dedicated to harassment" she then gets to deflect the GNAA claims posted to these sites as just part of the harassment and therefore obviously made up. Foul people saying foul things should be rejected because they are foul people is valid logic for swaths of humanity. Yet, somehow, Ms Singh was not a person of interest of the foul people when Gene Spafford had the GNAA callout of Ms. Singh.
While Patrick has had the cops visit both him and had his name tied to a Patty LaBell concert he should have more sympathy, Patrick is not a generally sympathetic character. Tim Pool isn't a very sympathetic character and he's got many youtube videos from various people who have a shared audience where Tim will get a sympathetic reaction. ishowspeed swatting got covered by moist critical. Patrick's coverage? News reports and people talking about pay quazi are who covered Pat swats.
Jackie earned a thread in April 2023. Patrick in Jan 2020. Pattie LaBelle bomb threat on Dec 11, 2022. There is a logic of sorts in tying your fate to a concert bomb hoax event, even if the subject is unlikable enough to inspire what is called "Pat posting".
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
11:35: You're not a famous author, you're just a regular guy.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2023
Grand Moff Snackin
Girth Vader
Johnny No Cash
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2021
I just cannot believe this image is unedited. I actually had to check the video for myself.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2023
She’s genuinely this fat and ugly.
If we take her statements as true (and I don't) Why is the Kremlin targeting her and Pat? Don't they have more important shit to be doing?
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
So, this must sound completely schizo to the people in the audience.
Even if they're all mutual asslickers at this dumbass "security" conference or whatever it is.
Like, she goes through and lists all the ways Fatrick is getting hassled by randos online. At first she plays it up as the work of various geographically dispersed internet assholes who cannot be punished because they're anonymous. But then she gets into the lawsuits and Fatrick's attempts to get restraining orders (including the ways he fucked it up), and then she touches on how some of the accused stalkers are actually doxed and known by their actual names. She makes accusations of serious crimes, with the swatting and whatnot, and then mentions how the local police and the feds don't care about any of it.
What can her audience possibly think? If their names are known, and they're committing serious crimes, and there's zero reason for Fatrick to be targeted... something's wrong about this story. She cannot be telling the truth.
Why did Fatrick lose the lawsuit? Why can't he press charges against the named people?
Kiwis all know it isn't that simple, but her audience is just going on based on what Jackie's telling them. This story must sound like complete rambling bullshit to the audience.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
I've never seen an Indian with Down Syndrome before. I knew they had to have existed, but this Jackie Singh is the first time I've seen one.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
Watching the video now. I was hoping it would be so bad that it's funny, instead it's mostly just boring. The psychoanalysis babble is kind of entertaining at least, but that's pretty far into the talk.
The delay in posting the video was probably just because Jackie used a couple minutes of copyrighted NBC news coverage around 15 minutes. They seem to have edited it to exclude the footage, probably to avoid a YouTube copyright strike. They switched it to the Jackie cam, where it awkwardly focuses on her drinking water while the audio plays.
The delay in posting the video was probably just because Jackie used a couple minutes of copyrighted NBC news coverage around 15 minutes. They seem to have edited it to exclude the footage, probably to avoid a YouTube copyright strike. They switched it to the Jackie cam, where it awkwardly focuses on her drinking water while the audio plays.
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2023
These people are so weird.
AutoClownMaker
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2020
The Kermlin will destabilize western civilization by allowing randos on the Internet taking shit about POWERLESS people who act in a unhinged way be archived and provide other POWERLESS people comment on a forum.
VS people with money use that money to run an Internet company and by not bothering to have staff to respond to complaints/only concerning themselves with complaints that are illegal in their nation leads to service selection based on the lower cost and the lack of service.
This is not 1994 when a T1 was $10,000 a month and plenty of mom/pop shops run an Internet company. The big boy routers that need a forklift to be put into service are 1/4 a million USD for a card that goes in it so Russia who's gonna be buying that BUT the oligarch class?
Jackie did start off mentioning how she approached this investigation thinking there was a political angle that just isn't there and yet kept the hurf durf Russian part in the speech.
Yes, Patrick is getting harassed. But this "but legal" ex-spurt (has been drip under pressure) misses how Wisconsin law allows citizens to directly file criminal complaints with judges - bypassing the useless cops and useless DAs. And in Wisconsin law pretending to be someone else to 'cause harm' is one level of felony, to attempt to obtain financial gain is a different section of the criminal code, and making up faked sexual photos/movies is a different section. There are actual crimes by the pests and Patrick has tools to deal with them....he's just to lazy to use these tools.
Ole Jackie could be helping the sci-fi author write these criminal complaints up but instead claims to have all this law breaking documented and just can't get anyone to care. One needs to build the case and present it as cops are lazy and won't take time to do this work.
The presentation would have been FAR more powerful to have listed the harassment AND crimes, cited WI statutes, and then told the audience how WI was not following their own damn laws. And the audience being reminded to actually take 1/2 a day to read their states code of criminal procedures would empower them to perhaps make their own presentments to their states Grand Juries as some states still allow this.
TLDR - Jackie and Patrick are lazy.
What was interesting was the spin on Weev. How things being said about her and Weev were "disinformation". What, exactly was 'disinfo' VS correct Jackie? Are you denying you never typed or said Sand Nigger? You never hung around Weev socially? You have no involvement with the GNAA crew? You never sent underage males pictures of female genitals? What was the disinfo Jackie.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 24, 2018
Who looks better?
A street shitter? Or a literal Potato?
A street shitter? Or a literal Potato?
Manul Otocolobus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2021
Interestingly, she used to be on the page. Someone has made a concerted effort to keep her off, even going as far as deleting history entries that show the reversion that removed her name. That means someone who is at least an Administrator is doing it. I know some of then historical revisions with her name on it are still in the history somewhere, they appear to have missed a few.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2021
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
