Jacob S. Blaustein / ryu238 / ryu289 / 87Blue - Brony, furry, gets banned everywhere, defends pedophiles, transexuals, and pedophile transexuals, to his last breath and needs others to do the arguing for him

Speaking of Shane, he made an account here to debate the terrible kiwis. What was funny, is that he seemed to select a couple of people to reply to, what did those people have in common you may ask? He believed them to be women. I am wondering if Jacob here is doing something similar to that. Since he appears to really have it in for/interested in replying to @GenociderSyo and @Doppio Vinegar
As if being a woman, on kiwifarms, would stop them from straight up slaughtering pedos like him. It won't. They will still skin you alive given the chance.
Hmm... Now that you mention it, he didn't reply to me too much or give me too much credit until I informed him I was a woman. As soon as someone who has "never seen a vagina before" ended up owning one, some sort of fuse burst in his head. It's sad, really. Poor guy couldn't fathom the idea of a biological female being repulsed by neovaginas.

EDIT: wait doesn't even FA have standards on minors in TF scenarios? I remember specifically someone posting a photo manip of a literal child tfing into a dog and furries EVERYWHERE were fucking losing it
Screenshot_20211004-095119.png
There's nothing banning minors from being involved in transformation fetish art in the FurAffinity rules, just so long as their genitals aren't exposed. I would expect no less from FA. Also, take note of the "you can make pregnancy art of characters 13 and older, just don't fetishize it." When the fuck would someone make 13 year old pregnancy art without it being a fetish?
 
So you're admitting you sexually fantasize about kids in very clearly sexual scenarios, or adults transforming into children for the purpose of fulfilling your self-admitted transformation fetish.
Wrong.
And there you go, ignoring me telling you three times now that sexually assaulting children literally does indeed make you, by legal definition, a pedophile.
Before you were using scientific terms, but now you only care about what the law says?
"Dude i just look at naked children in bathtubs like its dog and cat videos"
Again
"I'm not a pedophile. I just want to fuck some pussy. Even if it's 9-year-old pussy. Checkmate, puritan!"
Tell me, why are are you all so focused on just one pic like it represents everything I look at ever?
Lol he is full on going for the loli-defense. I never thought I'd see anyone use it seriously.
Do you own one of those loli-sex dolls too @ryu289 ? After all, it is not a real child, and no real child gets hurt if you fuck it.
No I don't
"Mr. Blaustein, you stand accused of distribution of explicit images depicting children, lewd and lascivious behavior with a minor, and solicitation. What have you to say for yourself?"
One they wern't explict. Two they didn't involve real children.
As for your statement of that you didn't have a choice in the matter Jacob...
Which I edited long before you wrote this. Please drop the strawman,
Just a reminder one of his patreons he paid for I was unable to link the art because it actually WAS loli full frontal nudal transfomration porn with sex.
So if you can't link yo it, then you give no proof that it exists huh?
So if conceding the argument equals him being called a pedophile is this admission he IS a pedophile?
Conceding the argument means not even addressing my points.
Dude, it isn't normal to be getting off to watching little girls get aroused by transforming into a werewolf.
Um what? I am not even looking at that...does anyone even remember what the pic was at this point, because I feel like you all are making things up.
You have an above normal interest in anime series that have transformation as a part of the storyline where the characters seem to span from around 10-14, and you requested art of a 8-9 year old.
That last part was an adult turning into a 9 year old...
Cause children, in any age, are women to you. Even if they are originally boys/men cause, as long as there is that transformation thing happening you get aroused. Even if their final form is still a child. You know you do. You get sexually aroused, and you seek it out because you are attracted to it. Pay people to write stories for you, draw art for you, you bid on characters/art. You have a sexual attraction to child characters., and experience sexual arousal, even with them included. Stop being absurd in your claims that this is just some passing arousal and not a legit sexual attraction.
You seem to conflate arousal due to transformation with attraction to child characters. I have made bids for older characters as well as well as appreciated their art.
Likewise GenociderSyo took a alook at my patreon and can confirm that alot of the people I fund do adult art as well: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/jacob-s-blaustein-ryu238-ryu289.99675/post-10000303
Even if they are originally boys/men cause, as long as there is that transformation thing happening you get aroused. Even if their final form is still a child. You know you do.
So you finally agree with me on this? That it's isn't about attraction to children but arousal to tf?
After all you are not jacking off to your transforming, you are 'here for the mtf', and want were-women, jekyll/hyde women.
That's a big assumption. You think my arousal is connected to an attraction to the child form? That's a conflation right there
 
Last edited:
So if you can't link yo it, then you give no proof that it exists huh?
I won't link to illegal content:

But from my own post you linked here:
"Pegasus TGTF $2/$50 (This one involved mainly children anime characters)
"TG Transformation Sequences" AKA Transformation Porn with Naked Anime Children."

Their gumroad account linked where you could buy prints of their patreon art.
 
There aren't any sources or links in general until the very end of this post. Do you all think he's finally giving up? Are we a few posts away from a confession?

Before you were using scientific terms, but now you only care about what the law says?
Nah. I care about the science. You just repeatedly misquote the science again and again using non-trustworthy sources, so I'm valuing the legal definition more. You can't misquote the law, after all.

Tell me, why are are you all so focused on just one pic like it represents everything I look at ever?
Because it's not "just one pic." You repeatedly ask artists on DeviantArt to draw shit like this for you. Remember the My Little Pony stuff, Jacob? The werewolf Rarity transformation smut that you tried to get someone to write for you, but no one ever answered?

So if you can't link yo it, then you give no proof that it exists huh?
Unlike you, some people are disgusted and uncomfortable by uncensored loli porn. Considering one of the people you're a patron of (his Patreon is here for anyone wanting to do a deep dive) has a profile picture of Lysithea from Fire Emblem (who is underage!) on a profile full of fetish art, it's not too far of an assumption to say that there's more where that came from.

I have made bids for older characters as well as well as appreciated their art.
These are all writings. None of them are actually transformation fetish art. As such, since you're unable to provide any proof you've commissioned TG fetish art of legal adults, it's safe to assume you only jerk off to kids. After all, it's incredibly easy to pretend like the main character in a writing is whatever age you want them to be, regardless of your insistence otherwise.

That's a big assumption
The fetish writings you just linked were about men turning into women, by the way. I don't think you're helping that case at all.
 
NOW YOU WAIT A MINUTE RYU: A CURSORY SEARCH ON DEVIANTART BRINGS UP AN ENTIRE-ASS FIVE PAGE COMIC COMMISSION YOU GOT OF ASH KETCHUM, A TEN YEAR OLD CHILD, TURNING INTO SOME SORT OF "WERE-WOMAN" NO NORMAL PERSON COMMISSIONS THIS SHIT
Um what? I am not even looking at that...does anyone even remember what the pic was at this point, because I feel like you all are making things up.
oh, you wanna link that? You sure do love linking stuff, you should link this piece to help you get out of the clear in this one in your own words
You seem to conflate arousal due to transformation with attraction to child characters. I have made bids for older characters as well as well as appreciated their art.
In short it seems you are doing the spotlight fallacy.
Likewise GenociderSyo took a alook at my patreon and can confirm that alot of the people I fund do adult art as well: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/jacob-s-blaustein-ryu238-ryu289.99675/post-10000303
oh, you wanna link all the TF pieces that you got that involve characters that were 18+ before and after the transformation since you keep tabs on all of your commissions?
Conceding the argument means not even addressing my points.
Like redditor Coffey25 pointed out, you literally kept circling into "but I'm not a pedophile! Anyways here's evidence as to why you should seperate the terms Child Molester and Pedophile" and "sexual interest into children is NOT sexual attraction into children, and Desire is somehow different from either of those as well!"
 
Last edited:
But from my own post you linked here:
"Pegasus TGTF $2/$50 (This one involved mainly children anime characters)
"TG Transformation Sequences" AKA Transformation Porn with Naked Anime Children."
It's funny, because most of my patreon has adult characters, and you and others ignore that, acting like I am only there for pedophilic reasons
Nah. I care about the science. You just repeatedly misquote the science again and again using non-trustworthy sources, so I'm valuing the legal definition more. You can't misquote the law, after all.
You are playing a variation of the appeal to dictionary. And the law can be abused.
None of them are actually transformation fetish art.
You ignored this: https://www.deviantart.com/cluedog/art/Beware-the-Were-Woman-806034025
Nice try.
NOW YOU WAIT A MINUTE RYU: A CURSORY SEARCH ON DEVIANTART BRINGS UP A FOUR PAGE COMIC COMMISSION YOU GOT OF ASH KETCHUM, A TEN YEAR OLD CHILD, TURNING INTO SOME SORT OF "WERE-WOMAN" NO NORMAL PERSON COMMISSIONS THIS SHIT
Please don't conflate "normal" with "moral" sir.
Like redditor Coffey25 pointed out, you literally kept circling into "but I'm not a pedophile! Anyways here's evidence as to why you should seperate the terms Child Molester and Pedophile" and "sexual interest into children is NOT sexual attraction into children, and Desire is somehow different from either of those as well!"
Which is true. Becuase the logic used to accuse me of being a pedophile relies on false assumptions.
 
Which is true. Becuase the logic used to accuse me of being a pedophile relies on false assumptions.
these "false" assumptions are because you are so ardent about defending the definition of pedophilia, and how we should separate the terms "Pedophile" and "Child Molester"

also since I didn't see it prior:
>Please don't conflate "normal" with "moral" sir.
HOW IS IT NORMAL OR MORAL TO COMMISSION ART OF A TEN YEAR OLD CHARACTER TURNING INTO A BIMBO?
 
So you commissioned one adult fetish art, and it's a MtF transformation fetish. So your adult porn has a 100% rate of being tranny fetishism, your child porn... well, I don't have the time nor the desire to look through all of it. Not helping your case as much as you think you are, Jacob.

You are playing a variation of the appeal to dictionary. And the law can be abused.
So can children, but clearly you're into that sort of thing.
 
these "false" assumptions are because you are so ardent about defending the definition of pedophilia, and how we should separate the terms "Pedophile" and "Child Molester"
Which is the most retarded argument I've ever seen. No matter how much this pedophile cries and moans. The terms will never be separated because they're synonymous.
 
Um what? I am not even looking at that...does anyone even remember what the pic was at this point, because I feel like you all are making things up.
Then why is everyone talking about it if it clearly doesn't exists?
 
Then why is everyone talking about it if it clearly doesn't exists?
I'd like to point out that I asked Ryu to link this piece since clearly wrote his post thinking he remembers which piece we're talking about and he refused to even acknowledge that point. In fact, the only part of my posts he responded to was me posting a child character turning into a bimbo with "don't conflate normal with moral" as if that makes it any better lmao
 
Just arousal to child art, imo is worse than "attraction"
At least people who say they're "attracted" to children attempt to convince themselves they love the kids they wanna rape

Arousal just makes it seem like it makes pee pee hard so it good :c

Note: both deserve to get the rope
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Cilleystring
I'd like to point out that I asked Ryu to link this piece since clearly wrote his post thinking he remembers which piece we're talking about and he refused to even acknowledge that point. In fact, the only part of my posts he responded to was me posting a child character turning into a bimbo with "don't conflate normal with moral" as if that makes it any better lmao
Did not realize Ash is 10. Most of the stuff he had was that Winne girl from Ghoul School, Ash from Pokemon, Akune from Ranma 1/2 and the 14 year old kids (Shinji, etc.) from Evangelion. Don't watch anime myself so it is quite possible more of his shit was underage as well.
 
Did not realize Ash is 10. Most of the stuff he had was that Winne girl from Ghoul School, Ash from Pokemon, Akune from Ranma 1/2 and the 14 year old kids (Shinji, etc.) from Evangelion. Don't watch anime myself so it is quite possible more of his shit was underage as well.
I'm also sure that it's stated in the show multiple times in each season that Ash is ten in earlier seasons, with Ash only recently becoming eleven years old in the 7th or 8th gen seasons
 
Tell me, why are are you all so focused on just one pic like it represents everything I look at ever?
Because that commission is an evidence on itself that you're clearly not adequate person and that you probably would diddle little kids if any opportunity of such act will be given to you. No need to walk around and lie about that, jacob. I'm here for you, I'm autist myself (or so was that freak doctor said when I was less than a year (heard from my mother though...)), so I'll understand that you just don't want to admit a simple truth.

One they wern't explict. Two they didn't involve real children.
You blame us that we are not read your riddled dementia right. I might to agree on that, BUT, nobody would agree with you that fictional children by all means different than real ones. It's all the same field, son, the question is that one is drawn\modeled while another is a real flesh captured on photo\video. That's all the difference here, the meaning stays the same. Always.
Which I edited long before you wrote this. Please drop the strawman,
Childrenfucker, you openly admit you "had no choice". There's no strawman at all, dumbass.
And while we speak of that stuff, your "I didn't care about the age" makes your edited sentence even more disgusting. Now I want to chop your hands, for real. Good job mate, not even my haters from CV-11's server would want me to do anything like that with them. And there are actual, real degenerates, that do shit way, way worse than you.

That last part was an adult turning into a 9 year old...
Oh for fuck sake, stop the bullshit and droping the strawman, you.

So you finally agree with me on this?
No, but you just confirmed their words. Congratz, pedo.

You think my arousal is connected to an attraction to the child form?
WHY YOU HAVE COMMISSIONED TRANSFORMATION INTO A MINOR, OTHERWISE?

You can't misquote the law, after all.
My dear Doppio, I wouldn't be that sure about that...

The werewolf Rarity transformation smut that you tried to get someone to write for you, but no one ever answered?
I recall the answer was given but in a very shady manner, that would lead to the generic "fuck off you sick fuck" line.
Honestly, can't argue with that and I 146% agree with those denied jacob's "fanfic".

t's funny, because most of my patreon has adult characters, and you and others ignore that, acting like I am only there for pedophilic reasons
Because you are, just the mere fact these artists draw porn with adults doesn't mean they do this for you specifically. First.
Second, like I said, and others have said that too, you commissioned a shitton of transformations of minors. In graphic way, not symbolic (text) one. So please either shut your pedo mouth and finally admit that we are right about you or do like Jeffrey and Kurt Cobain yourself, preferably through your mouth.

Please don't conflate "normal" with "moral" sir.
He ain't in the wrong here you douche nonce.
No NORMAL, ADEQUATE PERSON, WOULD COMMISSION THIS. JUST AS WELL NO NORMAL PERSON WOULD DRAW THIS SHIT.
NOT EVEN ME (I kinda have some moral shifts but, all in the line of normalcy, I keep that in check...), AND I'M REAL THIRSTY FOR AN ADDITIONAL INCOME SOMETIMES.

Becuase the logic used to accuse me of being a pedophile relies on false assumptions.
Wrong. Those assumptions were proven valid in your case.
And I gotta tell, I've have gone through same claims just two years ago and keep be called like that by certain groups of braindead manchildren and actual minors that were fed up with that bullshit, but in my case I am indeed an innocent one. Because all the people use against me are shitposting screencaps that prove literally nothing. That's all they have, yet for these motherfuckers that's enough for them to lie all around the places and thus far, commit a slander.

But you, though, was proven to jerk off on morbid shit, done for your money, by so far moralles individuals (because nobody with actual morale would ever thought of doing these things). Not to mention you keep whiteknight pedos by messing up with links to "stydies" that say nothing particual and prove nothing but you wasted some important time of your life to read this bull and you can't get these back. Such as your posts all around Farms, Reddit, and everywhere you keep coming by.
 
Back