- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
Jacob S. Blaustein / ryu238 / ryu289 / 87Blue - Brony, furry, gets banned everywhere, defends pedophiles, transexuals, and pedophile transexuals, to his last breath and needs others to do the arguing for him
- Thread starter Syntaxion
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2020
That is some quality schizoposting, right there.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2016
Fix my account faggots then take delivery of classic redacted content from Jacob Blaustein before he was banned from international sceptics. I got his college to revoke his email because he was a child groomer years before this thread started you kiwifags.
Did you see the newspaper article about Jacob yet with my screenshots of the dox lifted by the OP
2014 video doxxing the faggot.
Calling up his dad
Did you see the newspaper article about Jacob yet with my screenshots of the dox lifted by the OP
2014 video doxxing the faggot.
Calling up his dad
NerdShamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
Remember when you bent to knee to Gary Burns with tears in your eyes, you insolent Edomite? Stay in yo' lane, cuh!
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2020
My disappointment when I think there's some new Jacob content and it's just people engaging with an off-topic schizophrenic.
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
To make it up to you, here's Jacob going "ERM, SOURCE!?!?" on Prostasia in response to an article(?) excerpt stating that kids shouldn't be reading books that contain "rape, pedophilia, sex toys, and incest."
(https://archive.fo/Sx6Sg)
It will never not be funny to me that troon groomers and so-called """"minor-attracted persons"""" alike are so incensed by an organization of moms trying to protect their children. You can't get much more on-the-nose than that!
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2016
I still want an answer on the feasibility study for kiwifarms operation whorepocalpyse powered by the Medibank data breach mentioned on the last page.
It will result in the mass doxxing of every Asian whore in Australia. This will be the greatest whore shaming in this history not since @Null 's Dutch girlfriends got their heads shaved in 1946 has their been an epic incident. I don't blame him really I tried some Danielle Kloosterman in Australia but buying a few rounds doesn't count.
Stop spamming the thread and report this to the mods who are either not gay Jew or pedophile. Remember this whole thread is my fucking prior art kiwifaggots and it's time time to paint in acid on Picasso's grave again (yes that actually happened?). Make those cunts fix my account so
1) I drop more decade old receipts on Jacob Blaustein furry faggot.
2) operation whorepocalypse downuner can kick off.
Yes I have the data to do it. Look at this ugly Aussie Cossack fuck hiding in Russian embassy liked to the ASIO cunts who got carried away in their false flag to release the data put his YouTube on the tor blog post that released the 10 gigs of bzipped text data.
Yes that's an old tweet. Kiwifaggots I know you want the data to start the whorepocalypse for the NSW Police protected legal enterprise. Let's dox them all since it's such a "legal and honorable" profession.
Um
You can't make this shit up. Fully sourced.
https://twitter.com/EndTheZB951Visa/status/1640062113719939072 on a thread all whilst attacking OTO.org "Rainbow new world order" child rape cult and kiwifarms member Rod Swift aka chimpburgers. You think you are getting word salad? Nope. These Aussie OTOAustralia.org.au pedophiles / kiwifarms users actually said a "Rainbow [kiddy fiddling] New world order". https://twitter.com/EndTheZB951Visa/status/1752205966249214313
He was allowed to use a fake name in court for 10 years to hide his criminal history because that's a perk afforded to Jewish pedophiles in Australia to the like of Garry Richard Burns.
The cunt made death threats to lawyers from his gaydaynews whatever Gmail account that he used to run his https://twitter.com/garyburnsblog and deleted that email account in a guilt ridden panic so when I outed his real name and he was forced to rebrand himself to https://twitter.com/garryburnsblog he has to make a whole new twitter account.
What kind of kiwifarms faggot comes on here to defend Jacob Blaustein's proven associate Garry "Boylover" Burns who Mark Latham destroyed in Parliament to the horror of cock-chopped trannies screaming high pitched whines at the top of their lungs in protest?
Here's Latham's speech into the boylover spending 6 million dollars into his pedophilia normalisation crusade.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8G0uhqAcbG38/ tell me if a speech in parliament was censored from bitch ute on GCHQ order and I'll give you a mirror if anyone curious. Fucking deepstate boylover.net fans infesting kiwifarms like this faggot I replied to. For those who don't know Garry Burns sued by dad for homosexually vilifying boylover.net members Mark J Newton and Peter Truong. See them here on most famous gay in Singapore Alex Au's website after their arrest using their baby rape victim's image as poster boy for gay pride.
It will result in the mass doxxing of every Asian whore in Australia. This will be the greatest whore shaming in this history not since @Null 's Dutch girlfriends got their heads shaved in 1946 has their been an epic incident. I don't blame him really I tried some Danielle Kloosterman in Australia but buying a few rounds doesn't count.
Stop spamming the thread and report this to the mods who are either not gay Jew or pedophile. Remember this whole thread is my fucking prior art kiwifaggots and it's time time to paint in acid on Picasso's grave again (yes that actually happened?). Make those cunts fix my account so
1) I drop more decade old receipts on Jacob Blaustein furry faggot.
2) operation whorepocalypse downuner can kick off.
Yes I have the data to do it. Look at this ugly Aussie Cossack fuck hiding in Russian embassy liked to the ASIO cunts who got carried away in their false flag to release the data put his YouTube on the tor blog post that released the 10 gigs of bzipped text data.
Yes that's an old tweet. Kiwifaggots I know you want the data to start the whorepocalypse for the NSW Police protected legal enterprise. Let's dox them all since it's such a "legal and honorable" profession.
Um
MAPS is an invention by an openly gay Jew pedophile James Cantor PhD who was on CNN official dirty jewtube channel with gaynigger Don Lemon as he was saying he feels sorry for Jerry Sandusky being arrested and having his Penn State boy raping activities interrupted. (Jeff Bezos' IMDB can talk about"Gayniggers from outer space" so, so can I)To make it up to you, here's Jacob going "ERM, SOURCE!?!?" on Prostasia in response to an article(?) excerpt stating that kids shouldn't be reading books that contain "rape, pedophilia, sex toys, and incest."
View attachment 5738824
(https://archive.fo/Sx6Sg)
It will never not be funny to me that troon groomers and so-called """"minor-attracted persons"""" alike are so incensed by an organization of moms trying to protect their children. You can't get much more on-the-nose than that!
You can't make this shit up. Fully sourced.
https://twitter.com/EndTheZB951Visa/status/1640062113719939072 on a thread all whilst attacking OTO.org "Rainbow new world order" child rape cult and kiwifarms member Rod Swift aka chimpburgers. You think you are getting word salad? Nope. These Aussie OTOAustralia.org.au pedophiles / kiwifarms users actually said a "Rainbow [kiddy fiddling] New world order". https://twitter.com/EndTheZB951Visa/status/1752205966249214313
You spelt his name wrong.
He was allowed to use a fake name in court for 10 years to hide his criminal history because that's a perk afforded to Jewish pedophiles in Australia to the like of Garry Richard Burns.
The cunt made death threats to lawyers from his gaydaynews whatever Gmail account that he used to run his https://twitter.com/garyburnsblog and deleted that email account in a guilt ridden panic so when I outed his real name and he was forced to rebrand himself to https://twitter.com/garryburnsblog he has to make a whole new twitter account.
What kind of kiwifarms faggot comes on here to defend Jacob Blaustein's proven associate Garry "Boylover" Burns who Mark Latham destroyed in Parliament to the horror of cock-chopped trannies screaming high pitched whines at the top of their lungs in protest?
Here's Latham's speech into the boylover spending 6 million dollars into his pedophilia normalisation crusade.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8G0uhqAcbG38/ tell me if a speech in parliament was censored from bitch ute on GCHQ order and I'll give you a mirror if anyone curious. Fucking deepstate boylover.net fans infesting kiwifarms like this faggot I replied to. For those who don't know Garry Burns sued by dad for homosexually vilifying boylover.net members Mark J Newton and Peter Truong. See them here on most famous gay in Singapore Alex Au's website after their arrest using their baby rape victim's image as poster boy for gay pride.
http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/2...hes-goh-chok-tong-with-demand-to-defend-377a/ child rape victim's photo used by most infamous gay marriage activist in Singapore as justification for gay marriage after paedophiles arrest widely known and ABC TV took down the original image. http://www.smh.com.au/national/boy-6-taken-from-gay-pair-20120208-1rf17.html and they tried to get more kids the old fashioned polygamy way http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/...a/news-story/cda211bd7d7edb622110a30f79c1741a https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2013/07/the-story-the-abc-doesn-t-want-you-to-see/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Au https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-nj/legacy/2013/11/29/De Sear, Edward Indictment.pdf boycuddle2 = peter truong.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2020
It was funny for like five seconds but can we threadban this guy or something? It's really shitting up the thread.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2016
Fuck you nigger. Jacob Blauestin is a package deal with infant sex normalisation activist Garry Burns. That's why doxxed him in 2016.
I wasn't joking about the Tranny raid on NSW parliament to defend Jacob Blaustein's wingman. Here it is in all its glory first shared on the internet by VIP pedophile Michael O'Brien on my pinned twitter thread who just had his @michaeljamesabc account deleted. His too big to jail status gave his Jewish partner immunity to child rape charges just before the gay marriage postal vote in Australia where the QLD police prosecutors blessed the holy union of gay marriage activist penis into 14 year old Catholic altar boy child ass by perverting the course of justice and withholding the use of date rape drugs from the jury in a child rape trial.
You kiwifarms faggots in 2016 watched me out ASIS.gov.au highest ranking anonymous officer Catherine Judith Burns sister of Garry 6 years before the mainstream media. And you poofter faggot pedos say shut up?
Then they upgraded it to street riots because twitter.com/realMarkLatham spoke in a church against faggot bumsex sodomy on his election campaign he won.
NerdShamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
Meds. Take them. Now.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2016
Drops
. Fuck you nigger. I don't see you outing top Australian spies half a decade before the MSM thanks to human intelligence sources who also have a beef with Burns who was on Sydney Beat Project website with her brother that petitioned NSW Parliament to legalise sex with children. Click the link on my twitter profile then google "Burns looses complaint Sydney star observer" about the time he sued the treasurer of South Australia for opposition to anal sex with children. Tiny url dot com slash stopgaypublicsex
MEDS NOW
Drops
Tiny url dot com slash stopgaypublicsex
MEDS NOW
MEDS NOW
MEDS NOW
@Otoya Yamaguchi please come and get your schizo mate because he's gibbering on about paedos again. We all hate paedos but we don't see them everywhere we look like old mate here.
NerdShamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
Please don't. We need an replacement schizo since Ryu is lying low.
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2016
Pedophilia is a mental illness that you are defending, much like homosexuality that never had the full general member vote required by the charter of the American psychiatric association to remove it from the DSM-II rev 8.
DSM-5 Typo: Pedophilia Described as 'Sexual Orientation'
Deborah BrauserNovember 01, 2013
The cure for your mental illness contains lead.
In case you can't guess the cure for your condition of doing pro-pedophilia advocacy just like Jacob Blaustein this very thread started with me doing the dox on him, pay attention to the images in the link above.
0 0
--- .... / --.. . .-. ---
Forum Staff
🐕🦺 Animal Control 🐕🦺
💬 Off-Topic Mod 💬
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2017
Sorry, but Kiwi Farms has already been subverted by the Asian mafia. As its current representative, I'm afraid you must be banned for one month due to sedition as per our code of conduct.
Fuck off, you worthless flog.
I despise paedophillia. If you'd read my recent postings you would see that I'm particularly concerned about groups like Prostasia using their 'MAPS are opressed vulnerable folx' as part of leftist discourse.
The fact you're feeding into this partisanship, even inadvertently, is helping these groups.
Throwing the accusation around like you are just creates a 'Boy who cried wolf' scenario. If everybody is a paedo, nobody is. It is your monomania. I wonder why....
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
Both were never considered mental illnesses and were always under sexual deviation. There also were not eight revisions.
From the DSM-II:
The movement to Paraphillic Disorder has occured so that it can be used in criminal cases. This is the criteria used to civilly commit someone with pedophilla who has offended.
Pedophilic Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria
A. Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a
prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger).
B. The individual has acted on these sexual urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty.
C. The individual is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A.
Note: Do not include an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 12- or 13-year-old.
Specify whether:
Exclusive type (attracted only to children)
Nonexclusive type
Specify if:
Sexually attracted to males
Sexually attracted to females
Sexually attracted to both
Specify if:
Limited to incest
Diagnostic Features
The diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder are intended to apply both to individuals who freely disclose this paraphilia and to individuals who deny any sexual attraction to prepubertal children (generally age 13 years or younger), despite substantial objective evidence to the
contrary. The age guideline of 13 or younger is approximate only, because the onset of puberty varies from person to person, and there is good evidence the average age at onset of puberty has been declining over time and differs across ethnicities and cultures. Examples of disclosing this paraphilia include candidly acknowledging an intense sexual interest in children and indicating that sexual interest in children is greater than or equal to sexual interest in physically mature persons. If individuals also complain that their sexual attractions or preferences for children are causing marked distress or psychosocial difficulties, they may be diagnosed with pedophilic disorder. However, if they report an absence of feelings of guilt, shame, or anxiety about these impulses and are not functionally limited by their paraphilic impulses (according to self-report, objective assessment, or both), and their self-reported and legally recorded histories indicate that they have never acted on their impulses, then these individuals have a pedophilic sexual interest but not pedophilic disorder. When trying to differentiate child offenders with pedophilic disorder from child offenders without pedophilic disorder, factors that suggest a diagnosis of pedophilic disorder in the offender include self-reported interest in children, use of child pornography, a history of multiple child victims, boy victims, and unrelated child victims.
Examples of individuals who deny attraction to children include individuals who are known to have sexually approached multiple children on separate occasions but who deny any urges or fantasies about sexual behavior involving children, and who may further claim that the known episodes of physical contact were all unintentional and nonsexual. Other individuals may acknowledge past episodes of sexual behavior involving children but deny any significant or sustained sexual interest in children. Because these individuals may deny experiences, impulses, or fantasies involving children, they may also deny feeling subjectively distressed. Such individuals may still be diagnosed with pedophilic disorder despite the absence of self-reported distress, provided that there is evidence of recurrent behaviors persisting for 6 months (Criterion A) and evidence that the individual has acted on sexual urges or experienced interpersonal difficulties as a consequence of the disorder (Criterion B). Behaviors include sexual interactions with children, whether or not they involve physical contact (e.g., some pedophilic individuals expose themselves to children). Although the use of sexually explicit content depicting prepubescent children is typical of individuals with pedophilic sexual interests and thus might contribute important information relevant to the evaluation of Criterion A, such behavior in the absence of the individual’s sexual interactions with children (i.e., acting on these sexual urges in person) is insufficient to conclude that Criterion B is met.
Presence of multiple victims, as discussed above, is sufficient but not necessary for diagnosis; that is, the individual can still meet Criterion A by merely acknowledging intense or preferential sexual interest in children.
Associated Features
Individuals with pedophilic disorder may experience an emotional and cognitive affinity with children, sometimes referred to as emotional congruence with children. Emotional congruence with children can manifest in different ways, including preferring social interactions with
children over adults, feeling like one has more in common with children than with adults, and choosing occupations or volunteer roles in order to be around children more often. Studies show that emotional congruence with children is related to both pedophilic sexual interest and the likelihood of sexually reoffending among individuals who have sexually offended.
Prevalence
The population prevalence of individuals whose presentations meet the full criteria for pedophilic disorder is unknown but is likely less than 3% among men in international studies. The population prevalence of pedophilic disorder in women is even more uncertain, but it is
likely a small fraction of the prevalence in men.
Development and Course
Adult men with pedophilic disorder may indicate that they became aware of strong or preferential sexual interest in children around the time of puberty—the same time frame in which men who later prefer physically mature partners became aware of their sexual interest in women or men. Attempting to diagnose pedophilic disorder at the age at which it first manifests is problematic because of the difficulty during adolescent development in differentiating it from age-appropriate sexual interest in peers or from sexual curiosity. Hence, Criterion C requires for diagnosis a minimum age of 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A.
Pedophilia per se appears to be a lifelong condition. Pedophilic disorder, however, necessarily includes other elements that may change over time with or without treatment: subjective distress (e.g., guilt, shame, intense sexual frustration, or feelings of isolation) or psychosocial impairment, or the propensity to act out sexually with children, or both. Therefore, the course of pedophilic disorder may fluctuate, or the intensity might increase or decrease with age.
Adults with pedophilic disorder may report an awareness of sexual interest in children that preceded engaging in sexual behavior involving children or self-identification as an individual with pedophilia. Advanced age is as likely to similarly diminish the frequency of sexual behavior involving children as it does other paraphilically motivated and nonparaphilic sexual behavior.
Risk and Prognostic Factors
Tempermental
There appears to be an interaction between pedophilia and antisocial personality traits such as callousness, impulsivity, and a willingness to take risks without adequate regard for the consequences. Men with pedophilic interest and antisocial personality traits are more likely to act out sexually with children and thus qualify for a diagnosis of pedophilic disorder. Thus, antisocial personality disorder may be considered a risk factor for pedophilic disorder in males with pedophilia.
Environmental
Adult men with pedophilia sometimes report that they were sexually abused as children. It is unclear, however, whether this correlation reflects a causal influence of childhood sexual abuse on adult pedophilia.
Genetic and physiological
Since pedophilia is a necessary condition for pedophilic disorder, any factor that increases the probability of pedophilia also increases the risk of pedophilic disorder. There is some evidence that neurodevelopmental perturbation in utero increases the probability of development of a pedophilic interest.
Sex- and Gender-Related Diagnostic Issues
Laboratory measures of sexual interest, in terms of psychophysiological responses to sexual stimuli depicting children, which are sometimes useful in diagnosing pedophilic disorder in men, are not necessarily useful in diagnosing this disorder in women because there has been very limited research on the assessment of pedophilic sexual interest in women.
Diagnostic Markers
Psychophysiological measures of sexual interest may sometimes be useful when an individual’s history suggests the possible presence of pedophilic disorder but the individual denies strong or preferential attraction to children. The most thoroughly researched and longest used of such measures is penile plethysmography, although the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis may vary across sites, which frequently use different stimuli, procedures, and scoring. Viewing time, using photographs of nude or minimally clothed persons as visual stimuli, is also used to diagnose pedophilic disorder, especially in combination with self-report measures. U.S. clinicians, however, should be aware that possession of visual sexual stimuli depicting children, even for diagnostic purposes, may violate American law regarding possession of child
pornography and leave the clinician susceptible to criminal prosecution. The option exists to use audio stimuli describing sexual interactions in penile plethysmography. Across psychophysiological methods, the diagnostic marker is relative sexual response to stimuli depicting children compared with stimuli depicting adults, rather than absolute response to child stimuli.
Differential Diagnosis
Pedophillia
Individuals with pedophilia experience recurrent, intense, sexually arousing fantasies or sexual urges involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children. Unless the individual has acted on these sexual urges with a prepubescent child or unless the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty, a diagnosis of pedophilic disorder is not warranted.
Other paraphilic disorders
Sometimes individuals present with a different paraphilic disorder but are referred for an evaluation regarding possible pedophilic disorder (e.g., when an individual with a diagnosis of exhibitionistic disorder exposes himself to children as well as adults). In some cases, both diagnoses may apply, whereas in others, it may be the case that one paraphilic disorder diagnosis is sufficient. For example, an individual who exposes himself exclusively to prepubescent children may have both exhibitionistic disorder and pedophilic disorder, whereas
another individual who exposes himself to victims, irrespective of the victims’ age, may be considered to have only exhibitionistic disorder.
Antisocial personality disorder.
Some individuals with antisocial personality disorder sexually abuse children, reflecting the fact that the presence of antisocial personality disorder increases the likelihood that an individual who is primarily attracted to mature persons will approach a child sexually, on the basis of relative access to the child. An additional diagnosis of pedophilic disorder should only be considered if there is evidence that over a period of at least 6 months, the individual has also had recurrent, intense, sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child.
Substance intoxication.
The disinhibiting effects of substance intoxication may also increase the likelihood that an individual who is primarily attracted to mature persons will sexually approach a child.
Obessive Compulsive Disorder
There are occasional individuals who complain about egodystonic thoughts and worries about possible attraction to children. Clinical interviewing usually reveals an absence of positive feelings about these thoughts, no connection between these thoughts and sexual behavior (e.g., masturbating to these thoughts), and sometimes additional ego-dystonic, intrusive sexual ideas (e.g., concerns about homosexuality).
Comorbidity
Psychiatric comorbidity of pedophilic disorder includes substance use disorders; depressive, bipolar, and anxiety disorders; antisocial personality disorder; and other paraphilic disorders. However, findings on comorbid disorders are largely among individuals convicted for sexual offenses involving children (almost all males) and may not be generalizable to other individuals with pedophilic disorder (e.g., individuals who have never approached a child sexually but who qualify for the diagnosis of pedophilic disorder on the basis of subjective distress).
Diagnostic Criteria
A. Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a
prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger).
B. The individual has acted on these sexual urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty.
C. The individual is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A.
Note: Do not include an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 12- or 13-year-old.
Specify whether:
Exclusive type (attracted only to children)
Nonexclusive type
Specify if:
Sexually attracted to males
Sexually attracted to females
Sexually attracted to both
Specify if:
Limited to incest
Diagnostic Features
The diagnostic criteria for pedophilic disorder are intended to apply both to individuals who freely disclose this paraphilia and to individuals who deny any sexual attraction to prepubertal children (generally age 13 years or younger), despite substantial objective evidence to the
contrary. The age guideline of 13 or younger is approximate only, because the onset of puberty varies from person to person, and there is good evidence the average age at onset of puberty has been declining over time and differs across ethnicities and cultures. Examples of disclosing this paraphilia include candidly acknowledging an intense sexual interest in children and indicating that sexual interest in children is greater than or equal to sexual interest in physically mature persons. If individuals also complain that their sexual attractions or preferences for children are causing marked distress or psychosocial difficulties, they may be diagnosed with pedophilic disorder. However, if they report an absence of feelings of guilt, shame, or anxiety about these impulses and are not functionally limited by their paraphilic impulses (according to self-report, objective assessment, or both), and their self-reported and legally recorded histories indicate that they have never acted on their impulses, then these individuals have a pedophilic sexual interest but not pedophilic disorder. When trying to differentiate child offenders with pedophilic disorder from child offenders without pedophilic disorder, factors that suggest a diagnosis of pedophilic disorder in the offender include self-reported interest in children, use of child pornography, a history of multiple child victims, boy victims, and unrelated child victims.
Examples of individuals who deny attraction to children include individuals who are known to have sexually approached multiple children on separate occasions but who deny any urges or fantasies about sexual behavior involving children, and who may further claim that the known episodes of physical contact were all unintentional and nonsexual. Other individuals may acknowledge past episodes of sexual behavior involving children but deny any significant or sustained sexual interest in children. Because these individuals may deny experiences, impulses, or fantasies involving children, they may also deny feeling subjectively distressed. Such individuals may still be diagnosed with pedophilic disorder despite the absence of self-reported distress, provided that there is evidence of recurrent behaviors persisting for 6 months (Criterion A) and evidence that the individual has acted on sexual urges or experienced interpersonal difficulties as a consequence of the disorder (Criterion B). Behaviors include sexual interactions with children, whether or not they involve physical contact (e.g., some pedophilic individuals expose themselves to children). Although the use of sexually explicit content depicting prepubescent children is typical of individuals with pedophilic sexual interests and thus might contribute important information relevant to the evaluation of Criterion A, such behavior in the absence of the individual’s sexual interactions with children (i.e., acting on these sexual urges in person) is insufficient to conclude that Criterion B is met.
Presence of multiple victims, as discussed above, is sufficient but not necessary for diagnosis; that is, the individual can still meet Criterion A by merely acknowledging intense or preferential sexual interest in children.
Associated Features
Individuals with pedophilic disorder may experience an emotional and cognitive affinity with children, sometimes referred to as emotional congruence with children. Emotional congruence with children can manifest in different ways, including preferring social interactions with
children over adults, feeling like one has more in common with children than with adults, and choosing occupations or volunteer roles in order to be around children more often. Studies show that emotional congruence with children is related to both pedophilic sexual interest and the likelihood of sexually reoffending among individuals who have sexually offended.
Prevalence
The population prevalence of individuals whose presentations meet the full criteria for pedophilic disorder is unknown but is likely less than 3% among men in international studies. The population prevalence of pedophilic disorder in women is even more uncertain, but it is
likely a small fraction of the prevalence in men.
Development and Course
Adult men with pedophilic disorder may indicate that they became aware of strong or preferential sexual interest in children around the time of puberty—the same time frame in which men who later prefer physically mature partners became aware of their sexual interest in women or men. Attempting to diagnose pedophilic disorder at the age at which it first manifests is problematic because of the difficulty during adolescent development in differentiating it from age-appropriate sexual interest in peers or from sexual curiosity. Hence, Criterion C requires for diagnosis a minimum age of 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A.
Pedophilia per se appears to be a lifelong condition. Pedophilic disorder, however, necessarily includes other elements that may change over time with or without treatment: subjective distress (e.g., guilt, shame, intense sexual frustration, or feelings of isolation) or psychosocial impairment, or the propensity to act out sexually with children, or both. Therefore, the course of pedophilic disorder may fluctuate, or the intensity might increase or decrease with age.
Adults with pedophilic disorder may report an awareness of sexual interest in children that preceded engaging in sexual behavior involving children or self-identification as an individual with pedophilia. Advanced age is as likely to similarly diminish the frequency of sexual behavior involving children as it does other paraphilically motivated and nonparaphilic sexual behavior.
Risk and Prognostic Factors
Tempermental
There appears to be an interaction between pedophilia and antisocial personality traits such as callousness, impulsivity, and a willingness to take risks without adequate regard for the consequences. Men with pedophilic interest and antisocial personality traits are more likely to act out sexually with children and thus qualify for a diagnosis of pedophilic disorder. Thus, antisocial personality disorder may be considered a risk factor for pedophilic disorder in males with pedophilia.
Environmental
Adult men with pedophilia sometimes report that they were sexually abused as children. It is unclear, however, whether this correlation reflects a causal influence of childhood sexual abuse on adult pedophilia.
Genetic and physiological
Since pedophilia is a necessary condition for pedophilic disorder, any factor that increases the probability of pedophilia also increases the risk of pedophilic disorder. There is some evidence that neurodevelopmental perturbation in utero increases the probability of development of a pedophilic interest.
Sex- and Gender-Related Diagnostic Issues
Laboratory measures of sexual interest, in terms of psychophysiological responses to sexual stimuli depicting children, which are sometimes useful in diagnosing pedophilic disorder in men, are not necessarily useful in diagnosing this disorder in women because there has been very limited research on the assessment of pedophilic sexual interest in women.
Diagnostic Markers
Psychophysiological measures of sexual interest may sometimes be useful when an individual’s history suggests the possible presence of pedophilic disorder but the individual denies strong or preferential attraction to children. The most thoroughly researched and longest used of such measures is penile plethysmography, although the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis may vary across sites, which frequently use different stimuli, procedures, and scoring. Viewing time, using photographs of nude or minimally clothed persons as visual stimuli, is also used to diagnose pedophilic disorder, especially in combination with self-report measures. U.S. clinicians, however, should be aware that possession of visual sexual stimuli depicting children, even for diagnostic purposes, may violate American law regarding possession of child
pornography and leave the clinician susceptible to criminal prosecution. The option exists to use audio stimuli describing sexual interactions in penile plethysmography. Across psychophysiological methods, the diagnostic marker is relative sexual response to stimuli depicting children compared with stimuli depicting adults, rather than absolute response to child stimuli.
Differential Diagnosis
Pedophillia
Individuals with pedophilia experience recurrent, intense, sexually arousing fantasies or sexual urges involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children. Unless the individual has acted on these sexual urges with a prepubescent child or unless the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty, a diagnosis of pedophilic disorder is not warranted.
Other paraphilic disorders
Sometimes individuals present with a different paraphilic disorder but are referred for an evaluation regarding possible pedophilic disorder (e.g., when an individual with a diagnosis of exhibitionistic disorder exposes himself to children as well as adults). In some cases, both diagnoses may apply, whereas in others, it may be the case that one paraphilic disorder diagnosis is sufficient. For example, an individual who exposes himself exclusively to prepubescent children may have both exhibitionistic disorder and pedophilic disorder, whereas
another individual who exposes himself to victims, irrespective of the victims’ age, may be considered to have only exhibitionistic disorder.
Antisocial personality disorder.
Some individuals with antisocial personality disorder sexually abuse children, reflecting the fact that the presence of antisocial personality disorder increases the likelihood that an individual who is primarily attracted to mature persons will approach a child sexually, on the basis of relative access to the child. An additional diagnosis of pedophilic disorder should only be considered if there is evidence that over a period of at least 6 months, the individual has also had recurrent, intense, sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child.
Substance intoxication.
The disinhibiting effects of substance intoxication may also increase the likelihood that an individual who is primarily attracted to mature persons will sexually approach a child.
Obessive Compulsive Disorder
There are occasional individuals who complain about egodystonic thoughts and worries about possible attraction to children. Clinical interviewing usually reveals an absence of positive feelings about these thoughts, no connection between these thoughts and sexual behavior (e.g., masturbating to these thoughts), and sometimes additional ego-dystonic, intrusive sexual ideas (e.g., concerns about homosexuality).
Comorbidity
Psychiatric comorbidity of pedophilic disorder includes substance use disorders; depressive, bipolar, and anxiety disorders; antisocial personality disorder; and other paraphilic disorders. However, findings on comorbid disorders are largely among individuals convicted for sexual offenses involving children (almost all males) and may not be generalizable to other individuals with pedophilic disorder (e.g., individuals who have never approached a child sexually but who qualify for the diagnosis of pedophilic disorder on the basis of subjective distress).
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
So what’s ok’ Blaustein up to these days, eh? Has he finally given up the ghost and logged off the internet? Is he still spamming links on all kinds of forums defending flashing his dick to kids? Defending child drag shows? I must know.