Jacob S. Blaustein / ryu238 / ryu289 / 87Blue - Brony, furry, gets banned everywhere, defends pedophiles, transexuals, and pedophile transexuals, to his last breath and needs others to do the arguing for him

Syntaxion

Leave the gun, take the cannoli
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 8, 2020
header2.png

Jacob S. Blaustein / ryu238 / ryu289
Brony, furry, gets banned everywhere, defends pedophiles, transexuals, and pedophile transexuals, to his last breath and needs others to do the arguing for him.
Who is Jacob Blaustein?
As said above, he’s a brony, a furry, and above all, he’s a sperg who wants to debate you and tell you why you’re homophobic, transphobic, sexist, or just generally hateful.
His form of debate, however, is more akin to spam because he’ll spam 50 links and if push comes to shove, asks reddit for help. He came to my attention, due to the fact that he started doing that here aswel;

gsghsfgh.png
sdgfh.png
1.png


And this wasn’t the first time either, he’s been doing this for quite a while
3.png
If you notice that he asks reddit for help, well, that’s part of his M.O. He seems to be a fan of asking reddit for help when he can’t actually argue any of his standpoints

4.png
This one is a direct link to the farms, where he immediately ran to Reddit for help and backup


And this behaviour of sperging and arguing everywhere gets him often banned.
5.png
6.png
another ban.PNG
tfw the chuds got fed up.png
1631711464832.png
1631887598532.png
1631908368205.png
1633678240728.png





His love for politics, sperging and crazy claims has led him to get a thread on a niche forum. Despite this forum being niche, he still managed 34 entire pages in under 6 months
fdsgsdg.png

As you notice, he spergs so much, they gave him an entire 2nd thread for his LGBT debating, which ended up with 16 pages
hfrdhdfrh.png

After these threads were closed, he got yet ANOTHER thread
fdhjdf.png
Which ended up with 22 more pages

The only reason this site hasn’t banned him, seems to be because it goes against their goal as a forum to discuss various topics such as politics and LGBT. No doubt these containment threads were made because he cannot stop spamming and sperging in normal threads.

Even in real life or with his real name attached, he doesn’t seem to stop
irl.png
irl2.png


Pedophilia
When defending mainstream LGBT is not enough for him, he likes to take the time to defend the more extreme aspects of sexual minorities aswel – namely pedophilia
1.png
2.png
3.png
4.png
5.png
6.png
1631908453124.png

.....and he's maybe even one himself
1632385897675.png



Furfag, sonic fan AND brony
Now you’re thinking; “but Syntax, isn’t Jacob an upstanding citizen!?”

WRONG

Even worse than all this, he’s a furfag, a sonic fan, a brony AND potentially a tranny himself.

11.png
22.png
33.png
1631888672051.png


And the MLP, among some other claims, can easily be verified by looking at his facebook:
facebook likes, confirms NJ as homestate and clearly heavily into politics, also MLP2.png


Sadly I wasn’t the first who doxed him, his real identity was known for a while

https://archive.md/wI7uZ

Although I missed that and most images cannot be downloaded/viewed anymore, so I’m happy that that atleast confirmed what I found
abc.png


lol.png


This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
















New reddit (used for 2 years)

Old reddit (used for ~4 years, until 2 years ago)



















Shout out to

@Coach Kreeton Of All That
@Smug Freiza
@A Gay Retard
@Much Ado About Nothing

For updates on the dox

And thanks to

@Wereknight
@Doppio Vinegar
@kittyfucker
@A Gay Retard
@Sprate Header
@Kiryu DIO
@Pickle Suited Vicar
@Niggernerd
@Fentanyl Floyd

For their contributions for the header image

edit: also this is my first OP/thread so I hope it's good enough, feedback would be much appreciated
 
Last edited:
When defending mainstream LGBT is not enough for him, he likes to take the time to defend the more extreme aspects of sexual minorities aswel – namely pedophilia
Great work spending over posts made 5-6 years ago without considering if I feel the same now. Then moving on to me showing kids in bathing suits or shorts, i.e. clothed: https://www.google.com/search?q=kid...hWwFlkFHZqlC7AQ_AUoAXoECAIQAQ&biw=962&bih=601

In the links were any of those kids nude, like the people I argued with claimed?


None of you prove that its inherently sexual.
I admit I used to say I was okay with consensual relationships between kids and adults...6 years ago. The idea I could change my views on this only shows your lack of intelligence, as is the fact you insist is still true despite finding no current evidence.

5 Brothers: Jordan (40yo), Chad(34yo), Branden(29yo), ?, ?,
Unsure: Mordecai Bleustein (99yo)

Yeah I have no brothers. Are you so pathetic you have to invent stuff for your dox?

Also I love that you use another lolcow as evidence: https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/7-png.2518093/

Don't believe me? https://kiwifarms.net/threads/luke-...topboylover-his-dad-geoff-mckee.18836/page-80

Yeah, he seems like a sane source 🙄. I guess you guys no longer trust your own standards?

His form of debate, however, is more akin to spam because he’ll spam 50 links and if push comes to shove, asks reddit for help. He came to my attention, due to the fact that he started doing that here aswel

And no one has proven a singke one wrong. All you do is cry cry cry.
 
@ryu289
I admit I used to say I was okay with consensual relationships between kids and adults...6 years ago. The idea I could change my views on this only shows your lack of intelligence, as is the fact you insist is still true despite finding no current evidence.
You were 24 when you said that pedophilia was okay. The fact you said that shit ever in adulthood is horrifying enough, it doesn't fucking matter if it was six years ago.
 
@ryu289

You were 24 when you said that pedophilia was okay. The fact you said that shit ever in adulthood is horrifying enough, it doesn't fucking matter if it was six years ago.
So as long as I said it once I am forever guilty despise realizing soon after it was stupid? Nice to see you persecute thoughtcrimes sperg.
 
This explains very thoroughly why he debated me for three pages about why he wants to stick his dick inside a neovagina, and then disappeared off the face of the Earth when he got banned from r/TransgenderSurgeries and couldn't get Reddit to make points for him anymore. He went to college and still had no idea that "bowel fluids" means poop juice. Absolutely dazzling.

I've changed my mind from our debate, Jacob. Fuck all the amholes you want. If it keeps you away from children, I'm all for it. Fucking creep. :cringe:

ETA:
His form of debate, however, is more akin to spam because he’ll spam 50 links and if push comes to shove, asks reddit for help. He came to my attention, due to the fact that he started doing that here aswel

And no one has proven a singke one wrong. All you do is cry cry cry.
Did our debate mean nothing, Jacob? The one where I disproved every single source you linked? I'm hurt. :c

Second ETA to avoid doubleposting:
1631059890181.png

1631059895176.png
 
Last edited:
So as long as I said it once I am forever guilty despise realizing soon after it was stupid? Nice to see you persecute thoughtcrimes sperg.
If someone says "I think killing and fucking the family dog is a-okay" but when the comment is brought up later they say "oh I've changed you guise," does that mean you just can't bring up the fact they thought necrozoophilia was okay in the past? The fact you ever thought something that degenerate was at all acceptable is indicative of more than just "thought crimes."

Edit: @ryu289 dude, check your Discord, holy shit, did your mom die or something?
Screenshot_20210907-191445_Brave.jpg
Screenshot_20210907-191700_Photos.jpg
 
Last edited:
Did our debate mean nothing, Jacob? The one where I disproved every single source you linked? I'm hurt.
Doppio, I know for a fact you ignored this: https://web.archive.org/web/20031125030637/http://www.gendercare.com/library/italiano_paper1.html

Recent attempts at vaginoplasty for transsexuals have utilized a variety of techniques, including split-thickness and full-thickness skin grafts, penile inversion procedures, and sigmoid-colon methods.

Although the advantages and disadvantages of each continue to be debated, many stated advantages are are clearly exaggerated or are erroneous. For instance, Masters and Johnson's (1966) pioneering work on the artificially-constructed vagina clearly demonstrates that "the method of creating an artificial vaginal barrel is incidental, since the functional reaction patterns of artificial vaginas are identical regardless of how they are constituted" (p.101) This statement includes behavior during arousal and orgasm as well as lubrication, a subject steeped in controversy.

Some surgeons opt for the use of sigmoid-colon methods in the belief that this provides an advantage of lubrication secreted by colon mucosa. Other surgeons employ mucosal flaps from the urethra to supplement penile inversion for the purpose of providing lubrication. They believe lubrication can't be achieved by the use of skin grafts or penile inversion. This is untrue.

There is much to be learned from nontranssexual women who have had surgery for "inadequate" vaginas. From months to sometimes years after skin grafting, the graft loses all of its skin properties and adapts to its environment, becoming a mucosa which takes on "the exact cytology, gross and microscopic, of a normal vagina" (Sherfey, 1973). Masters and Johnson state, "Suffice it to say that on the basis of pure cytologic evaluation, it is impossible to differentiate the epithelial cells taken from the artificial vaginas of Subject 'A' (when under the influence of adequate hormonal replacement) or Subject 'B' from those of a normal vaginal mucosal smear" (Masters & Johnson, 1961, p. 203).

Some surgeons disagree, stating that the tissue is not mucosa, but only resembles mucosa. They are only partially correct, since the normal female vaginal tissue is not truly mucosa either. It is called mucosa only because it lines a body passageway. It contains no mucous-secreting glands (Fawcett, et. al., 1995). That is why lubrication is a transudate phenomenon, the source being dilation of the capillaries that surround the barrel and the subsequent squeezing out of fluid through the vaginal walls, which in normal and artificially constructed vaginas have been shown to be a functioning two-way membrane. (Masters & Johnson, 1966). Although Masters & Johnson note that production of lubrication usually takes longer in the artificial vagina, they also showed that some artificial vaginas are capable of lubricating as well and as rapidly as any normally constituted vaginal barrel and that two of their patients had "lubricated, in fact, more effectively than many women with normally constituted vaginas" (Masters & Johnson, 1966).

Pierce et. al. (1956) demonstrated the conversion of skin to vaginal epithelium, which after twenty years, included normal vaginal PH levels, complete loss of hair, complete loss of pigment, complete loss of sweat glands, and normal vaginal epithelial glycogen levels. They proposed, "the process is not one of metaplasia, for no new cell types are produced. Rather, there is alteration of existing cell layers and the loss of the skin organs." (p.6)

Those post-operative male-to-female transsexuals who amuse themselves with the peculiar statement that they still have a penis, but that it's just turned inside-out should note that not only do they not have a penis, but they don't even have skin of the penis any more. The histology of the tissue has changed. It also responds to hormones in an identical way as does a normal vagina, with "cyclic cornification and mucification" (Sherfey, 1973). The presence of ovaries is not a necessity. For instance, "The estrogenic and early luteal effects demonstrated by Subject 'A' are obvious, and serve as a clinical indication of adequate steroid replacement in this surgically castrated female" (Masters & Johnson, 1966, p. 203).

More impressive is a recent report by Alessandrescu et. al. (1996), who did biopsies on twelve artificially constructed vaginas and found an epithelial structure identical to that of oa normal vagina. Two examples are shown in the form of pictures using electron microscopy.

I caught you on that here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/general-transgender-discussion-thread.63637/post-9907032

And you didn't respond to it at all here: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/general-transgender-discussion-thread.63637/post-9907361

In fact you just kept repeating this ad nauesum:
dilation wouldn't be used to prevent a vagina from sealing up on itself due to being an unnatural axe wound.
Thats not an argument, thats asserting it is a wound by default. So women receiving grafts like you said here, those aren't open wounds...but it is for transwomen despite the structures being homozygous and made from grafts that show no signs of rejection? Dilation is needed to prevent the muscle from sealing it shut since the original configuration didn't develop in that shape and had to be rearranged into it (whereas it did in a natal vagina). That's all.

Oh and you also said
Uhh, umm, uhh, 1.7% of the 7,890,502,556 people who are currently alive on Earth have a chromosomal abnormality that is the result of a birth defect
Doppio...I am sorry I missed this because your ignorance is astounding. You think it's all about chromosomes?
For some properties like brain volume and connectivity, trans people possessed values in between those typical of cisgender males and females, both before and after transitioning. Another study found that for certain brain regions, trans individuals appeared similar to cis-individuals with the same gender identity. In that same study, researchers found specific areas of the brain where trans people seemed closer to those with the same assigned sex at birth. Other researchers discovered that trans people have unique structural differences from cis-individuals.

And these are all independent of Chromosomes.

If someone says "I think killing and fucking the family dog is a-okay" but when the comment is brought up later they say "oh I've changed you guise," does that mean you just can't bring up the fact they thought necrozoophilia was okay in the past?
The problem is you think it is somehow relevant now and presented it like I still held those beliefs. You really can't find anything horrible to smear me now, so you reach back for something like it must still be true now.

No sane adult would ever argue a position like that at 24 years old. You are not right in the head, mister Accountant of Autism.

I had suffered a nervous breakdown some months before that yes, that made me question my beliefs...you saw the result. The fact that you think I didn't get my head straight is very sad. You have nothing else to cry about in the now, so you much dig for something no matter how irrelevant it matters in the present.

I think you guys are the sickos.
 
Last edited:
Back