The Pathfinder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2023
Path Network, LLC is an Internet Service Provider providing 'network security' (DDoS protection). It is formed by ex-blackhats. In particular, they have on payroll Corey Barnhill, better known as the pedophile Zoom from IBS.
In 2021, Path was sued, as it frequently is. They were sued by one of their former investors, plaintiff Dorsett, who invested a million dollars into the company on promise of three things:
1) Certain rights in the company.
2) Access to financial records.
3) Dividends.
The financial benefits of this arrangement were meant to start a year after investing.
When Path could not provide adequate financial records or any money for the investor, they kept him on by adding a fourth promise:
4) 1,000,000 PATH TOKENS - literally, cryptocurrency tokens which could be used to redeem Path services at an equivalent value in American dollars. They promised their PATH TOKENS would be on cryptocurrency exchanges, like real tokens such as $DOGE.
Surprise, dealing with a collection of criminals and a pedophile did not pan out. Dorsett never received his money and they even stole his worthless PATH TOKENS!
There are seven cause of actions listed in the document. The most interesting are these.
#2 Promissory Estoppel.
Legal speak for "owed damages because you promised me something you did not deliver on".
In particular, by lying to Dorsett about the PATH TOKENS and never even deliving Path's financials to him, the bare minimum you'd expect as an investor, he did not exercise his right to sue Path when they failed to deliver a year after the deal was made.
#4 Conversion.
Conversion is another fun legal word. When you steal something and make money off it, you have committed the tort of "conversion" and the person who you stole from is entitled to the money you made.
Since he claims Path stole from him to start their company, he is owed money from the company that was made with his investment.
#7 Fraud.
Simply: They lied to him and, for the reasons they outline, they owe him money.
#9 California Penal Code § 496(c).
This one doesn't have a name - you might call it fencing. California has civil remedies and criminal punishments for knowingly buying/obtaining or selling/assisting in selling stolen goods.
Path told Dorsett that he had a million dollars in PATH TOKENS that they stole from him. In doing so, they both stole from him and obtained the stolen goods.
California outlines that not only does Path owe him 3x the value of the goods ($3m), but so do the people who assisted in stealing the goods - this means each co-defendant, Webb and King, were on the hook for another $3m.
This lawsuit was settled out of court in 2022. It is unknown what they actually paid. This is one of many legal blows that Path has suffered in recent times. The company is disintegrating.
Full document attached.
In 2021, Path was sued, as it frequently is. They were sued by one of their former investors, plaintiff Dorsett, who invested a million dollars into the company on promise of three things:
1) Certain rights in the company.
2) Access to financial records.
3) Dividends.
The financial benefits of this arrangement were meant to start a year after investing.
When Path could not provide adequate financial records or any money for the investor, they kept him on by adding a fourth promise:
4) 1,000,000 PATH TOKENS - literally, cryptocurrency tokens which could be used to redeem Path services at an equivalent value in American dollars. They promised their PATH TOKENS would be on cryptocurrency exchanges, like real tokens such as $DOGE.
Surprise, dealing with a collection of criminals and a pedophile did not pan out. Dorsett never received his money and they even stole his worthless PATH TOKENS!
There are seven cause of actions listed in the document. The most interesting are these.
#2 Promissory Estoppel.
Legal speak for "owed damages because you promised me something you did not deliver on".
In particular, by lying to Dorsett about the PATH TOKENS and never even deliving Path's financials to him, the bare minimum you'd expect as an investor, he did not exercise his right to sue Path when they failed to deliver a year after the deal was made.
#4 Conversion.
Conversion is another fun legal word. When you steal something and make money off it, you have committed the tort of "conversion" and the person who you stole from is entitled to the money you made.
Since he claims Path stole from him to start their company, he is owed money from the company that was made with his investment.
#7 Fraud.
Simply: They lied to him and, for the reasons they outline, they owe him money.
#9 California Penal Code § 496(c).
This one doesn't have a name - you might call it fencing. California has civil remedies and criminal punishments for knowingly buying/obtaining or selling/assisting in selling stolen goods.
Path told Dorsett that he had a million dollars in PATH TOKENS that they stole from him. In doing so, they both stole from him and obtained the stolen goods.
California outlines that not only does Path owe him 3x the value of the goods ($3m), but so do the people who assisted in stealing the goods - this means each co-defendant, Webb and King, were on the hook for another $3m.
This lawsuit was settled out of court in 2022. It is unknown what they actually paid. This is one of many legal blows that Path has suffered in recent times. The company is disintegrating.
Full document attached.
A literal crypto faggot! And just in case hubby's info is relevant:
